The Other Shoe is Dropping...After 13+/8+ Years

Options
124»

Comments

  • bluepearl
    bluepearl Member Posts: 961
    edited December 2014

    No it is not a death sentence to have skin affected. I was just reading an article about that but can't remember where it was, but skin doesn't mean a poor prognosis. Radiation would be standard of care. Toe-tagging is not allowed. No one can be sure they have tomorrow. I just lost a friend who fell off a ladder and died. The treatment plan you are on and have had, is spot on and you should do well. Having cancer 3 times doesn't mean a whole lot, especially when they appear to be new lesions, and prognosis is usually based on the "worst" of them. Her+ is aggressive but perception is a wonderful drug. Live today!!!!!!!

  • funthing42
    funthing42 Member Posts: 418
    edited January 2015

    Thank you so much!!!!!

    Everyone here is so wonderful and courageous. You touched my heart.

    I have been doing exactly what was protocol and standard of care. I've been with the best of the best.

    Thank you for giving me back my courage Icon slightly weird. I think it's happy really do not care for the teeth lol.


    I now want to share my courage. I am sorry for your bad news. Try to hang in there. Linda

  • LindaLou53
    LindaLou53 Member Posts: 929
    edited January 2015

    I decided it was time for another update. I am currently in Cycle 11 of the Paloma 3 clinical trial taking Faslodex + Palbociclib/Placebo. My original MBC dx was March 2014. I started on the trial April 2014 as my first line MBC Tx.
    I had a Stage 3C Lobular BC in 2005 and had remained NED until last March when routine CT scans detected multiple sites of enlarged lymph nodes. The Lobular pathology was again confirmed from the removal of a cervical neck node.

    The trial is tracking my 3 largest abdominal nodes after each 2 month CT scan. As of my last scan in Jan this year, my 3 targeted nodes have reduced in size a total of 67% compared to my pre-trial baseline. My largest node which originally measured 3.1cm x 1.9cm is now 1.2cm x 0.5cm!

    No new suspicious sites or areas of progression are noted on the scans. My CTs continue to detect multiple small "sclerotic lesions" in my spine and pelvis bones which have remained unchanged at every scan. My pre-trial bone scan indicated degenerative arthritis but did not detect any "active" bone lesions, so we are continuing to monitor and hopeful there is no active bone disease there. My mild hydronephrosis has remained stable or slightly improved.

    While most my results are overwhelmingly positive, there are still some areas of concern and uncertainty. I have blood work drawn monthly and only my tumor markers are consistently outside normal limits. My CA 27:29 has been on a slow rise with occasional drops and then new increases, the last result was up to 70. My CEA has consistently been on the rise since the first blood draw. It started out last May at 185 which is already in the high zone and this past Monday it is now up to 535. TM's are subjects of great controversy regarding their reliability and I would not make a treatment change based on TM's alone, but would feel better if they would start dropping after 11 months in tx.

    I do experience the standard fatigue and periodic drop in WBC/ANC/PLATELETS as a result of the treatment protocol. My only significant clinical issues are GI related. They are of enough concern that myself and my onc feel it is likely I have metastatic spread of Lobular BC to my peritoneum/GI tract area. Lobular BC is known to have an atypical metastatic spread pattern when compared to Ductal BC. Lobular BC is much more difficult to detect by Mammogram, US or even CT scans. This is because Lobular does not make rounded tumors, but rather spreads out in thin sheets, attaching itself to multiple sites, the stomach and abdominal area being most common for metastatic spread.

    So as a result of my GI involvement, I have early satiety (stomach feels full too soon), stomach cramps/spasms, diarrhea and significant weight loss. I think it is highly likely that my elevated TM's may be reflecting the GI inflammation and cancer presence there. In fact my most recent CT scan did indicate small amounts of ascites in the abdomen and free fluid in the pelvis.

    My onc and the trial will continue to monitor these issues. As long as I have no new progressions and continue to have reduction in the target nodes, we believe the treatment is effective. We will monitor for any increases in ascites or pelvic fluid by clinical presentation and scans. I have learned to adjust to the GI symptoms with multiple small meals a day and am supplementing my diet with high calorie/protein replacements to maintain weight. Having to buy new clothes to fit my "slimmer" body is not a bad thing, I just don't want to end up looking like Twiggy! (lol...for those old enough to know who Twiggy was)

    So the treatment plan continues and I continue to be so grateful for the positive results to this point. I am keeping faith that the reduction in the lymph nodes will translate to ultimate improvement in GI symptoms and TM levels!

    For those who are interested in following news on Palbociclib, it looks like it is getting closer to FDA approval and possible release to the open market. Pfizer has suggested it's brand name be IBRANCE. Here is a recent in-depth article about Palbociclib's clinical trial data and impressive results: (may require a Medscape account to view)

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/838484?src=wnl_edit_tpal&uac=126254SV#vp_1

    Linda

  • Binney4
    Binney4 Member Posts: 8,609
    edited January 2015

    LindaLou, I'm really encouraged by the good news! So glad you were able to enter the trial, and thanks so much for updating here. You're amazing!

    Just wondering, though, about the ascites. Any chance it's related to the LE rather than to cancer? I've known lymphers to deal with this.

    Continued prayers for wonderful results, especially those rotten tumor markers!

    Hugs,
    Binney

  • LindaLou53
    LindaLou53 Member Posts: 929
    edited January 2015

    Hi Binney, it's good to hear from you! Your comment about Lymphedema being a possible cause of my ascites has me intrigued. At first glance it does not seem likely to me, but I will definitely do some research. I did find an interesting article of a patient who experienced lymphatic ascites 20 years after having surgical and radiation treatment for cervical cancer. The article notes that while rare, it can happen.

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211338X12000403

    In my case, fortunately the amount of fluid seen on CT is very small and not symptomatic. My limb LE has somewhat improved with my weight loss, to the point I need to order new garments actually. My therapist, however, has noted what appears to be increased truncal LE so your theory is worth considering!

    Hopefully it is a fleeting problem that will resolve on its own. CT scans again in March will give us more info if there are no worrisome symptoms before then.

    Binney, thanks so much for the prayers and hugs! Those are always greatly appreciated!

    P.S. when I can find the time to do it properly, I would like to make a post for the LE forum recounting my experience a few months ago of having Extravasation of IV CT Contrast media into my right arm. It was a real example of how awareness of LE and getting immediate proper LE management may have prevented permanent serious damage. I hope to share some very important things I learned that LE patients should be discussing with their radiology/scan technicians prior to getting contrast media.

    Linda


  • Binney4
    Binney4 Member Posts: 8,609
    edited January 2015

    LindaLou, yikes! Sounds like a LE nightmare, for sure--I'll look forward to your post!

    Ascites related to LE is not as rare as the literature would make it sound, but fortunately it isn't entirely common either. Still, with any truncal involvement it's a consideration.

    Did I mention I hate LE?


    Binney

  • Erica3681
    Erica3681 Member Posts: 1,916
    edited January 2015

    Hi Linda,

    I just saw your update and am very glad that your news so far is mostly positive. And now Binney4 has added the very intriguing possibility that lymphedema might be contributing to your GI issues.

    I had no idea that metastatic lobular tumors might be as confounding a those found in the breast itself. Since they're so hard to detect, even with CT scans, I imagine that can be very frustrating. I hope you figure out soon exactly what's going on. And I hope you continue to do well on the trial.

    Warm hugs,

    Barbara

  • LindaLou53
    LindaLou53 Member Posts: 929
    edited January 2015

    Thank You Barbara for the well wishes! Yes Lobular BC maintains it's reputation for being the "stealthy" or "sneaky" BC even when in metastatic mode. My hope is to stay on my current trial for as long as possible. SE's are tolerable and quality of life is certainly better than the traditional IV chemo regimen.

    Hope you are doing well. Thanks for checking in!

    Linda

  • cookiegal
    cookiegal Member Posts: 3,296
    edited January 2015

    thank you for the excellent reporting

Categories