Anyone who has been NED while doing alternative only?

Options
Deblc
Deblc Member Posts: 479
edited October 2014 in Alternative Medicine

I would love to hear uplifting stories from those whose cancer has not recurred, while on alternative treatments ONLY. Can you include your diagnosis and length of time that you have been cancer-free, and your treatment plan? Personal experiences only, please. Thanks so much!

«13

Comments

  • Deblc
    Deblc Member Posts: 479
    edited September 2014

    So disappointed that no one has replied to this post. Especially since there are threads on the traditional forums of long term survivors. Was really hoping I could get the same from the alternative forum.

    From this am I to assume :

    A) No one on the alternative forum has done alternative treatments only? 

    Or

    B) No one who has done alternative treatments only, achieved NED status?

    I am really searching for answers, so any response to any of these questions would be greatly appreciated. (I of course want to hear from those doing alternative treatments, but I welcome input from all members of the forum)

  • leggo
    leggo Member Posts: 3,293
    edited September 2014

    Deb, I wanted to respond, but I am not NED. I do however, think the point must be made that anyone who states they are NED, with bone mets, is making an untrue statement. I have been to several oncologists (different countries as well) and ALL say that it is impossible to tell due to the nature and structure of boney disease. Other mets, not an issue. Also, I do practice alternatives, such as supplements but I have no concrete way of knowing if my condition improved because of this or the use of off-label drugs. I think most people who contribute to the alternative forum would have the same quandry based on the unpredictability of cancer itself. Could you stay cancer-free after conventional treatment? Sure. Could the same be said with alternative? Sure, depending on diagnosis, though I am a proponent of surgery to give you the best shot, regardless of other treatment choices.

    The whole NED thing might be stopping some from posting simply because of the fact that if you're at an earlier stage, you're not followed regularly after conventional treatment ends until symptoms of metastisis present themselves and for later stage, you either see improvement or you don't. Nobody has all the answers....not even the oncologists.

    Hope that makes sense.

  • Deblc
    Deblc Member Posts: 479
    edited September 2014

    Thanks Leggo. I understand your point. I guess I am equating it to those who post on other boards who have gone 5+ years etc without a recurrence, and therefore, from my understanding, they consider themselves NED. They all seem to have done conventional treatment. From that standpoint, I was wondering if there were any persons who did alternative treatments from early stage (not stage IV) , who did not recur. 

    You mentioned "could you stay cancer-free after...alternative treatment? Sure".  That's what I meant about NED, maybe I am using the wrong terminology, and should change the word NED to cancer-free in my title.  I want to hear from those who have stayed cancer-free while on alternatives only.

    In case anybody is wondering why I am asking this, I have had "conventional" treatment for Stage 3 and God forbid that it recurs in the other breast, I really don't think I could go through the whole chemo thing again. Which is why I am really interested in hearing about long term survivors who have gone the alternative route from early stage BC.

    Edited to say, I did change the title from NED to "those whose cancer has not recurred". Hope that makes it clearer.

  • Deblc
    Deblc Member Posts: 479
    edited September 2014

    Leggo, I see you are also HER2+. Did you not do herceptin at all?

  • leggo
    leggo Member Posts: 3,293
    edited September 2014

    In that case, yes, me. I had conventional treatment for Stage 3 in 1996, whilst using alternatives. Stayed cancer free until 2006 at which time I again had conventional. When those mets spread to my brain in 2009, that's when I went another way. Could be luck, could be prior treatment, could be alternatives. I'll never know, and more importantly, neither will my onc....and he's the first to admit it.

    I totally get why you're asking and my best advice would be to go with what feels right. You've already been through the conventional treatment to rid your body of what you could. Adding some alternatives you feel worthy sure couldn't hurt to keep it that way. Like my onc said way back in '96...."you've done and are doing everything possible. Let's both just hope like hell it doesn't come back". No guarantees offered then, none now.....on anything....conventional or alternative. 

  • leggo
    leggo Member Posts: 3,293
    edited September 2014

    Sorry, I was typing while you were asking. Yes, I had Herceptin in 2007 for two years, after which my heart just couldn't handle anymore and I had progressed.

    Edited to change the year because I remember it was not offered until a year in from my mets diagnosis.

  • Lily55
    Lily55 Member Posts: 3,534
    edited September 2014

    Deblc - I was stage III on diagnosis two years ago and I refused chemo, did surgery, rads and complementary treatments........am I someone you might be looking for?

  • Deblc
    Deblc Member Posts: 479
    edited September 2014

    Leggo,The problem I have with alternatives is that there is so much out there being touted, I wouldn't know where to start, I find it so confusing.  Can you PM me with what you personally have been doing just to get an idea? I think five years without conventional treatment at Stage IV is amazing, wishing you many many many more.

  • Deblc
    Deblc Member Posts: 479
    edited September 2014

    Hi Lily, yes I am interested in hearing from everybody who might have not gone the traditional route, even if only partially, in your case chemo (I see you are on hormone therapy) ...especially as your diagnosis is so close to mine.

    I see now that I may have worded my topic too narrowly to exclude people such as yourself.

    I am so glad to see that you are doing well two years after diagnosis. Would love to hear about complementary treatments you are doing now.

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited September 2014

    Deb, I get where you are coming from. Like you, I had locally advanced ILC, and also like you I did all the suggested, conventional treatment. The thought of ever having to do chemo again is not appealing, to say the least.

    Somebody here, I think, posted a lecture by Servan-Schreiber, the doc who kept himself alive much longer than expected after a stage 4 cancer DX. I thought the lecture was interesting.

    What I am doing to push a recurrence further into the future, hopefully, is 1) Get 10 hours minimum of exercise a week and keep my weight below 21 BMI. This is based on research, although I do not have the studies bookmarked. My exercise is mostly walking, but I also go to the gym 2-3X a week. 2) Eat a low-glycemic diet with loads of fibre and veggies, but very little dairy fat. The research is still only beginning on this, but apparently many breast cancers have IGF-1 receptors, so keeping blood sugar stable may be helpful. 3) Take pro-biotics.

    The way I see it, even if the above turn out not to be helpful against the cancer, they are all things that will make me healthier overall at least. So it seems to me that I have little to lose.

  • Heidihill
    Heidihill Member Posts: 5,476
    edited September 2014

    Leggo, all my scan reports for the past 6.5 years say NED (ok, in German, but word for word translated as NED). I have had them done at the University Hospital and at private hospitals and they all say the same thing despite bone mets initially. Maybe it depends on the type of bone mets? Maybe I have been able to build enough new bone on my spine? Maybe Zometa has an influence? I hope, whether we are NED or not, we stave off progression for many more years!

    Deblc, I have been on hormonal therapy but also employ additional complementary strategies like Momine. I am an exercise nut, at least 10 hours weekly, including strength training. I eat tons of fruits and vegetables. I do, however, have dairy, including yogurt, for the calcium, protein and healthy bacteria. I think calcium and protein also increase IGF-1, which you need for bone growth. I'm hoping my bones, muscles and other organs are getting "priority access" to growth factors and not cancer. I get Vitamin D at my onc's office. I try to keep my weight down, because any additional pounds seem to go straight to my belly. Other strategies I've tried but have stopped are metformin, aspirin, intermittent fasting. My onc was on board with these. The last helped me lose weight for a while.  I am currently taking melatonin as prescribed by my onc. It helps me to sleep (and maybe create more melatonin!) It is supposed to be antiestrogenic and an antioxidant. I think it's also helping with my vision problems.

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited September 2014

    Also, I think this whole division between "alternative" and "conventional," is somewhat pointless.

    A more constructive division might be "science-based" and "faith-based." 

    Some people seem to think of "alternative" as "stuff there is some evidence for, but which is not mainstream yet." Other people seem to define "alternative" as "not conventional/big pharma/not science-based." I fall in the former category.

  • juneping
    juneping Member Posts: 1,594
    edited September 2014

    my integrative doc told me exercise everyday for 30 min. It's doesn't have to be hard core exercise but we need to sweat a little and heart beats faster. The key is exercise everyday like a meal.

  • lightandwind
    lightandwind Member Posts: 754
    edited September 2014

    Momine, agree with you for the most part, but it requires faith to trust what we decide to refer to as science as well. So in this way, it would be more constructive just to accept and respect others preferences and beliefs,rather than to "have it out" over these things. 

  • ruthbru
    ruthbru Member Posts: 57,235
    edited September 2014

    I did all the conventional treatments when diagnosed, but what I did then and continue to do now is:

    * keep the weight down into the normal range

    * try to eat more fruit/veggies/fish etc. and less processed, fatty food (this part will always be a struggle for me)

    * take a daily low dose aspirin (check with your doctor first if you decide to do this one)

    * exercise (which I do faithfully every day)......this is the most important non-medical thing we can do to lower our risk of recurrence/stay NED. Studies show a strong link between breast cancer risk and exercise. I was just looking through the research news on BCO and here is a little quote from one of them:

    " One thing comes through loud and clear in all these studies: regular exercise can lower breast cancer risk by about 25% to 30%. The benefits of exercise were not the same for all women -- the type and amount of exercise affected the amount of risk reduction (my note: the harder you work and the more days during the week you work out, the more benefit you get). Women who had a healthy weight to height ratio -- body mass index (BMI) -- got more benefits from exercise than women with a higher BMI. This could be because the protective effects of exercise were offset by the increase in risk associated with being overweight."


     

  • AlaskaAngel
    AlaskaAngel Member Posts: 1,836
    edited September 2014


    I'm not sure where I fit in here but count me in. I'm so glad to see more people, reluctantly or not, buying into doing the difficult parts instead of protection through to the use of chosen substances alone.

    I did the conventional chemo available at the time (2002), whiich is a less common combo now (CAFx6), and also did not include following with trastuzumab, and by the time trastuzumab was available to me my onc advised against it and I took his advice. I did rads. Tamoxifen was the only follow up available for adjuvant use at the time, and I did it for 1 year at full dose and 3/4 year at half dose and stopped it.

    Heidihill, you used many of the same strategies as I use and I wondered if you could indicate why you stopped each one?

    "Other strategies I've tried but have stopped are metformin, aspirin, intermittent fasting."

    The metformin I am taking not only to help with weight management but because, as I understand it, it affects stem cells whereas chemotherapy does not, so I am especially curious to know why you would d/c it -- perhaps due to adverse personal glucose levels?

    Also, thanks for reiterating the importance of vitamin D.

    I am not by nature an exercise nut and force myself to do it. My living space is small, I live where precipitation is 144 inches a year, and I won't spend the hour it takes to drive to and from a gym or a school pool (plus the money for it) plus the half-hour shower after that. I used to jump rope or roller skate for aerobic exercise but had to stop because with age my ankles and knees were too painful most of the day and night (even though I have never done an AI). So exercise is a constant challenge, but it is a must -- not negotiable to me.

    P.S. I think it is especially unfortunate when someone emphasizes that the likelihood of significant benefit by using healthy practices is "small". It is probably true if one doesn't use multiple healthy practice strategies consistently. My take on it is that they can and do add up, especially when combined with not using treatments that damage the immune system.

  • abigail48
    abigail48 Member Posts: 1,699
    edited September 2014

    I do only alternative but I've not been diagnosed.  by the way I stopped using colloidal silver some time ago, it worked well tp controll bacteria, worked the best perhaps, but I stopped for cosmetic reasons.  the it is so ugly & the silver makes it uglier, * I still have a blue streak nearby from when I used it for the first time a year ago

  • Heidihill
    Heidihill Member Posts: 5,476
    edited September 2014

    AA, I chucked metformin because it was causing constipation, weight gain and muscle weakness. Also hemorrhoids from being constipated. The muscle weakness was scary as it was a radiating weakness in my leg. Aspirin causes mouth sores for me. I also figured I get enough salicylates from all the fruit and vegetables I eat. I did the intermittent fast for a whole year but stopped when it seemed to have outlived its purpose, i.e., I was re-gaining some of the weight I had lost. Speaking of cancer stem cells, for a whole summer a while back, I ate broccoli sprouts everyday. I stopped this when my scans showed a benign nodule in my thyroid. If it killed cancer stem cells as some studies say sulforaphane does, it was worth it for one summer. I had Hashimoto's thyroiditis before I had one lobe removed pre-cancer dx, so it made sense to moderate my broccoli consumption. I forgot to mention I also periodically have to take antihistamines for allergies and rashes. My onc told me to take up to 4 times the regular dose, if necessary. Apparently histamine can play a role in promoting tumor growth in animal models. http://www.science20.com/news_articles/antihistamines_may_become_cancer_therapy-132096 

  • leggo
    leggo Member Posts: 3,293
    edited September 2014

    I did visit an oncologist in Germany (Dortmund, where my family is from). Same story....healing of boney disease. When questioned "does that mean it's gone?" Pretty much the same answer as everywhere else, "can't say...scan only shows new boney growth and any additional areas of concern, if there were any".  The verbage changed amongst countries, but same jist...impossible to tell. Not worth me arguing about really, and kind of irrelevant,  but thought I'd mention it just so peopke know treatments, scan interpretation, etc., are much the same wherever you go. Good thing to know, I think for those who think one place is better than another. And yes, the important thing is no progression and that it stays that way for a very long time. That is my wish for you Heidihill, and me, and everybody else. 

  • AlaskaAngel
    AlaskaAngel Member Posts: 1,836
    edited September 2014

    Heidihill,

    My husband is on full-dose metformin to prevent diabetes and got used to it. I am doing very low-dose, so problems with diarrhea have been almost nill.

    Two years ago I had onset of skin problems, with severe itching that started under the sagging breasts due to more bra friction from sagging, and then spread gradually all over me. I saw a derm doc, who was staggered by how bad it was. She Rx'd lotion steroid for me for 1 1/2 months, alternating high-dose with low dose to minimize the thinning of the skin that happens with steroid use. That calmed it down some but it was gradually spreading. I saw a second derm doc who said it was due to dry skin. I haven't used steroids but must use nightly applications of Cetaphil and about every 2 weeks it still gets bad enough that I have to take a Zyrtec to calm it down again. It is miserable. Another SE of tx.

    The dry skin is IMHO due to lack of estrogen, so is bc-tx- plus premature aging-related. Thanks for posting the link.

    A.A.

      

  • chef127
    chef127 Member Posts: 891
    edited September 2014

    From the very start of this wild ride with BC, I was led to believe by all my docs that the ONLY way I can survive BC was to do all of the standard tx's. First cut off my breast..I found a doc willing to try a lumpectomy and he did successfully, but there was skin involvement so I felt radiation was a must for me. Chemo was, of course, recommended by all the drs (oncoDX 28) but I couldn't poison my entire body with the poison, so I try to boost my immune sys with Mushrooms and LDN,and then the next thing they wanted me to get rid of all my estrogen. There was no proof that in my case ER caused my cancer. I believe it was a perfect storm of perimeno unbalanced hormones, a bad diet and lifestyle, and being unaware about BC so I ignored the obvious signs. 

    I cleaned up my diet, 500 calories 2 days a week and very little refined sugar, started taking supps for a healthy body??, I take DIM and try to avoid envior estro.  I take metformin but for diabetes so it may be irrelevant to BC.IDK. I'm thin (BMI of 20-21) I get very little  exercise due to multiple sclerosis, No excuses.

    I ain't dead yet as I was told I would be, and who knows if I did the chemo would it have killed me??? No one knows. 

    For me alternative has worked so far and I'll try to stay as healthy as I can. If I recur or get mets thats the price, and it's cheaper than intentionally destroying my health with the conventional tx.IMHO. No regrets.

    I do respect all who have faith in science and struggled to rid yourself of BC?? Are you more cancer free than I am????

    I hope for good health for us all.

    Maureen

  • Deblc
    Deblc Member Posts: 479
    edited September 2014

    Thanks so much for all the input. Lots to think about. 

  • ruthbru
    ruthbru Member Posts: 57,235
    edited September 2014

    This is an old post I wrote in 2011, but it has some interesting information about vitamins etc. that I believe is still useful.:

    " I went to a very interesting speaker the other day. She is a doctor, nutrition specialist, and an eleven year breast cancer survivor ( a note from me today, if I remember correctly, she had a very rare type of BC that required a bone marrow transplant). Here are some of her tips for staying healthy:

    1. We all know we should eat more fruits & veggies, whole grains, less red meat, processed food etc. so I am not going to go into any of that.

    2. EVERYONE should be taking a multi-vitamin. Make sure it says ‘Complete' on the label. Make sure it contains iodine, Vitamin K, selenium and folic acid along with all the other good stuff. Interesting facts about why multi-vitamins are important:

    * older women with the lowest levels of vitamin B-12 were at the greatest risk for breast cancer

    * taking acid-blocking medications make you less able to absorb B-12

    * she recommends 400 mcg of folic acid a day. It works with the B-12 (studies have found that folates may help to make chemo more effective and decrease side effects)

    * B 6 is important in lowering the risk of breast and colon cancer

    * she recommends 90 mg of vitamin C

    * 30 iu of E

    3. Omega 3.....either eat oily fish twice a week or use fish-oil supplements (make sure it says EPA and DHA approved) 1000 mg a day. It's associated with decreased risk of cancer, heart disease, inflammatory disease, depression and more.

    4. Vitamin D....a big deal.....she recommends getting it tested (should be between 40-50 ng/dL). She recommends 2000 iu a day to maintain a good level. Many, many conditions are associated with low vitamin D; heart attack, cancers, rheumatoid arthritis, muscle weakness, asthma, diabetics, multiple sclerosis etc. etc. etc. There are over 200 different body tissues that have been identified so far that have receptors for the vitamin D hormone and they need it to work properly.

    * adequate Vitamin D levels has been shown to reduce the side effects of taxol based chemotherapy

    * Adequate Vitamin D has shown to reduce the side effects of aromatase inhibitors

    * start with a multi-vitamin, drink milk, eat yogurt (check and make sure it has vitamin D added), and most people will also need a supplement to keep that high of levels

    5. Vitamin K, should get 100 mcg a day. Check your multi-vitamin, not all of them have it added.  Inadequacy leads to an increased risk of various cancers, heart disease, osteoporosis and kidney problems."


     

  • juneping
    juneping Member Posts: 1,594
    edited September 2014

    there's an article about we should not take vit E supplement....

  • ruthbru
    ruthbru Member Posts: 57,235
    edited September 2014

    This is a couple years old, so recommendations certainly could have changed by now.....seems like as soon as a study comes out that says 'do this', the next one will say, 'nope' Scared

  • MelissaDallas
    MelissaDallas Member Posts: 7,268
    edited September 2014

    The 30 iu dose in a multi isn't the same as the huge doses a lot of people were/are taking of Vitamin E.

  • leggo
    leggo Member Posts: 3,293
    edited September 2014

    I agree with juneping. It's already known that taking supplemental vitamin e increases risk of certain cancers. I realize you're quoting an older article, but a lot of that information is outdated. Any antioxidants that don't come from food aren't likely to be absorbed anyway (or very little) and the jury's still out whether or not they may actually feed cancer cells. Same with a multi-vitamin. If your diet stinks, then yes, it's better than nothing, but I think it's important to note that very little is absorbed that way. There was a study showing a multi-vitamin, Centrum, I believe, of what it looked like during the digestion process. I don't have it anymore, but it was quite the eye-opener.....around the same time it was announced in the media that multi-vitamins are quite useless. Always best to get what you need through food. 

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited September 2014

    Chef, you say there was skin involvement. Does that mean they actually found cancer cells in the skin when they did the pathology? 

  • BrooksideVT
    BrooksideVT Member Posts: 2,211
    edited September 2014

    Chef, just a minor clarification---Estrogen does not cause our cancer; it is a "food" source for cancer cells with estrogen receptors.   An antihormonal drug can have a dramatic effect on removing nourishment from those nasties.  In my case, arimidex cut my chance of recurrence in half.

  • chef127
    chef127 Member Posts: 891
    edited September 2014

    Momine,

    Yes there was Ca found on the skin margins on the path. However, it did not develop  in the skin, the tumor was close to the skin and spread to the skin. That makes it less of a factor from what I have read and revised to a stage 1 11 or 111a. It started as  hormonal lump, there since 1975 and at dx was the same size but became invasive. (or the ca developed in the same area) IDK. the area dimpled 2 years before I was dx'ed. I was in shock when they told me it was IDC. I was never scared til I met wiith the surgeon and onco who were too aggressive. and fired them both. No i'm not in denial but don't care to damage myself any further.

    BrooksideVT,

    Not a minor clarification, thanx. I never thought about it like that.....but manipulating hormones is not IMHO the way to fix what may be hiding in my system. Balancing hormones makes more sense for me and staying away from most bad estro. My head is not in the sand.

    xoxMaureen

Categories