Cancer Cure On The Horizon?

Options

For anyone not familiar with Jon Barron, he's an extremely thorough health news researcher and writer.  This sort of article from him is very exciting, as he does not disseminate rumors or trash science.

http://jonbarron.org/cancer-alternative-cancer-the...

Comments

  • Srh242
    Srh242 Member Posts: 328
    edited July 2014

    I think Immunotherapy is the answer , thanks,

    S

  • mike3121
    mike3121 Member Posts: 410
    edited July 2014

    My wife has Stage 4 BC, dx'd Dec 2012 (ER+ PR+ HER2-). After one session of Taxol and 3 of A-C she's in remission. She's taking estrogen blockers Aromasin for now. My wife doesn't want to even talk about her BC to anyone. I like to come to this site to check out advances in BC cure/treatment - it gives me hope.

    I would like to believe in this pill; a pill with no name. Maybe if the article came from some major cancer research center and co-written by several scientists I might take in more seriously. Many many top scientists have said their is no one cure to end cancer. Maybe they are wrong?

  • cp418
    cp418 Member Posts: 7,079
    edited July 2014

    It sounds too good to be true.  I wonder if the big pharma giants will respond or allow this drug to become available to patients.  They are all about making HUGE profits off the sale of oncology treatments.  IMO they are not about ethics or compassion, and no FDA, Approval agency, Oncology society, or country has forced them to make that their priority - saving lives.....

  • dlb823
    dlb823 Member Posts: 9,430
    edited July 2014

    Thankfully, this research is coming out of the UK, and hopefully, if it is a breakthrough, it can be fast-tracked, as mentioned in the article.  

    Mike, I didn't search for the original research docs, but I'm sure you can find them if you're interested.  Jon's sources sound very legit to me (albeit international), so I wouldn't discount this just b'cuz it's not a top US hospital commenting at this point in the game, as they might if it was their own researchers who had made the discovery.

    And cp, I know it's difficult not to be cynical about drug companies; I certainly am.  But quite a few very recent research findings seem to be opening doors to new tx options -- not necessarily to wiping out cancer, which I think would be pretty far-fetched anyway.  So I personally remain very hopeful that some of these latest discoveries will translate into better tx's to help Mike's wife and everyone else dealing with a Stage IV dx.

  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited July 2014

    I think we must train our immune systems to target our cancers.


     

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited August 2014
  • MusicLover
    MusicLover Member Posts: 4,225
    edited August 2014

    Deanna, Do you have a way to contact Jon Barron to ask him if this new drug is anti-cd47? The Stanford report that I posted stated that the UK was going to run it's own trials on this drug.  In any case, there is so much positive information coming out lately and I do hope that it is available very soon! 

    PS - I am repeating myself a lot lately but please do a google search on "people for CD47 a cure for cancer" to find a facebook page on this topic.  Please select "like" on the page to support this effort. 

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited August 2014

    Music Lover, here's another report from University College London (UCL) who did the research along with other institutes.  They only name it as "p110δ inhibitors". (p110 Delta.)

    "The p110δ enzyme is a member of the PI3-kinase family, and is sometimes
    called PI3Kδ.  p110δ and the other PI3Ks are hot drug targets for the
    pharmaceutical industry as they are implicated in many cancers and are readily
    druggable."

    And here's the best quote, from the end of the piece:

    Professor Nic Jones, Cancer Research UK’s chief scientist and director of
    the Manchester Cancer Research Centre, said: “Treatments that train the immune
    system to recognise and kill cancer cells are showing huge promise in several
    types of cancer. This new finding, although only at an early stage, offers the
    potential to develop more treatments that can do this in many more cancers,
    including ones that have real need for more effective treatments such as
    pancreatic cancer.

    “If the findings hold true in cancer patients this could make a big
    difference to many of them. The good news is that because the drugs used in
    this study are already being used in the clinic, we could see rapid translation
    of this research into patient benefit.”

    Leukaemia drug found to stimulate immunity against many cancer types

    Both the above drugs and anti-cd47 therapy aim to help our immune system to recognise cancer as a target to be attacked but appear to use different pathways to do it.  The more different pathways studied, the better, as one may work better than others or they may work better on different cancers.

    There are Wikipedia pages and many other web pages about both anti-cd47 and p110δ inhibitors but none are easy to understand.This Wikipedia page on PI3-Kinase Inhibitors makes no mention of cd47 in a page search so I assume they are different.

    Edited to say I am now following the People for cd47 Facebook page, thanks for that information.

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited August 2014

    For those on Facebook, here's the link: People for CD47 Cancer Cure

    To be honest, I find the Summary section to be lengthy and totally vague. What exactly is CD47?  Who's the target audience for this drug? Where's the supporting research links and/or clinical trials? Is there an official post about the subject on this forum? It's all just confusing and needs to be re-written.

  • MusicLover
    MusicLover Member Posts: 4,225
    edited August 2014

    Hi JohnS,

    I just saw your post here and I agree that the facebook page does not clarify things.  Here is another thread that I started in which I included several posts to explain anti-CD47.  I just emailed Stanford's communications officer for the latest info about this new drug and he said,

    "The phase I safety trial will start with just one patient in order to lower the risk of testing this very new therapy, but more patients will be added slowly in the following weeks and months as safety is demonstrated. Ultimately the trial will include about the typical number of patients involved in FDA phase I safety trials. 

    From what I have heard, the trial will probably start sometime in the next month. Because the trial is starting slowly, the initial patients will be from among the pool of current Stanford cancer patients. "

    I believe they may be starting with children, I forgot to ask him about that.  This drug is a long shot for me but it has gotten some very good press and I don't have many other baskets to put my eggs in. 

     Honestly, I hated this disease before I was diagnosed (who likes it?), I saw too many women die of it no matter when they were diagnosed.  If this anti-CD47 works the way the researchers would like it to, so many people will be saved (dx with various cancers). Say prayers for all of them, I do.

    I hope I helped...

  • dlb823
    dlb823 Member Posts: 9,430
    edited August 2014

    MusicLover, I just sent a note to Jon Barron about your question above.  I'd be quite surprised if I get a response, since they're a pretty huge organization, and I don't have a personal email for him.  But I think I have gotten responses from him in the past, so we'll see...

  • MusicLover
    MusicLover Member Posts: 4,225
    edited August 2014

    I do think that it may be two separate things because I did some of my own research and Joy has too (thanks Joy).  It will be interesting to see what Mr. Barron says about anti-CD47 if he responds.  Thank you again Deanna.

  • letmywifelive
    letmywifelive Member Posts: 360
    edited June 2015

    Is anyone getting treated at Stanford know whether they will consider CD47 with mets at this stage as part of the clinical trial ?

  • MusicLover
    MusicLover Member Posts: 4,225
    edited June 2015

    I think that they have recruited everyone for the phase I part of the clinical trial and you needed to be a Stanford patient and I believe a patient who is out of options.  They should be finishing this phase by Jan 2016. If all goes well they will have a phase II,  I continue to pray for this one to work.  If you get any other info on it please post it here. Thank you!

  • letmywifelive
    letmywifelive Member Posts: 360
    edited June 2015

    I will surely if and when I come to know anything. I pray to god that this becomes successful and brings end to a misery haunting humanity since the very beginning.

Categories