How long from DCIS to invasive?

Options
njmae
njmae Member Posts: 48

I have just had a biopsy result for DCIS, 3.5 cm, comedo.  I had a mainly tubular cancer in the other breast three years ago.  I recall too vividly that period of time prior to the surgery, wondering if  the cancer cells were trekking to my lymph nodes.  Agonizing wait.  Now  I am concerned about this one turning invasive and again trekking to my lymph nodes, if it hasn't already happened.   I see the surgeon on Tuesday and plan on a BMX.  Cannot tolerate the thought of radiation on the left, as my heart is my best feature and the organ I have the most confidence in.  I just would like to know what a safe wait to surgery is, if there is any such thing.  Fretting and mad as my health behaviors have been stellar.  Of course I know that fairness doesn't enter into this, but all that deprivation of my nightly glass of wine.  For nothing, apparently.  So excuse my rant, but how long did you have to wait between biopsy and surgery, particularly if you had a mastectomy?

Comments

  • AZ85048
    AZ85048 Member Posts: 2,613
    edited January 2014

    njmae - So sorry for your recent diagnosis.  I have no idea what the definition of a safe wait would be.  I went from my biopsy and diagnosis to a lumpectomy three weeks later (on my BSs recommendation) during which they also found LCIS.  That was the game changer for me.  DCIS and LCIS, so I had my BMX three weeks after the lumpectomy.  But only because I wanted it all out of me as soon as humanly possible.  I knew what was right for me and have no regrets.  But don't feel pressured or rushed - this is a huge decision and you need to be at peace with whatever you decide to do.   There is no fair in BC.  Unfortunately, BC just doesn't play fair!  Sending you a hug and a prayer....

  • clarrn
    clarrn Member Posts: 557
    edited January 2014

    njmae

    Sorry I don't think anyone knows the answer to that.   I have been searching the research diligently and can't find anything, and I think it would be extremely varied between people.  I too have high grade with extensive comedo necrosis and am somewhat worried about wait times as well.  But for our DCIS to become invasive it has to have a molecular change.  They dont yet know what causes it to change or when.  I am telling myself that even if it did become invasive while we wait they would get it during surgery and it likely wouldn't have had time to travel to our nodes.   Hope that gives you a little peace while you wait.

    As far as how long my wait is, I knew I had BIRADS 5 on Dec 4.  15 core biopsies taken on Dec 13.  DCIS diagnosed Dec 30. Another 4 biopsy cores taken Jan 21 (to rule out microinvasion that was discounted in the last sample?) I am seeing a PS for consult Jan 29 and they say it is about a 6 week wait after that because I want immediate DIEP recon.  And OR time is hard to find. I will let you know when I get an official date.  Good luck and hope you get in soon!

  • clarrn
    clarrn Member Posts: 557
    edited January 2014

    njmae

    Sorry I don't think anyone knows the answer to that.   I have been searching the research diligently and can't find anything, and I think it would be extremely varied between people.  I too have high grade with extensive comedo necrosis and am somewhat worried about wait times as well.  But for our DCIS to become invasive it has to have a molecular change.  They dont yet know what causes it to change or when.  I am telling myself that even if it did become invasive while we wait they would get it during surgery and it likely wouldn't have had time to travel to our nodes.   Hope that gives you a little peace while you wait.

    As far as how long my wait is, I knew I had BIRADS 5 on Dec 4.  15 core biopsies taken on Dec 13.  DCIS diagnosed Dec 30. Another 4 biopsy cores taken Jan 21 (to rule out microinvasion that was discounted in the last sample?) I am seeing a PS for consult Jan 29 and they say it is about a 6 week wait after that because I want immediate DIEP recon.  And OR time is hard to find. I will let you know when I get an official date.  Good luck and hope you get in soon!

  • LeeA
    LeeA Member Posts: 1,660
    edited January 2014

    njmae, my biopsy was October 4, 2012 and the BMX was November 7, 2012.  I had invasive ductal carcinoma along with some DCIS.  I also had a .5 micromet in one sentinel node and yes, I've alway wondered if that was the result of having the biopsy and then waiting a little over a month for the surgery.  I would have liked to have had the surgery (BMX) earlier but my BS seemed to be in no particular hurry and didn't want to operate on Halloween for some reason. 

  • njmae
    njmae Member Posts: 48
    edited January 2014

    Thanks to all for replies.  Since the doctor did not mention unclear margins, can I assume the margins were apparently clear?  I say apparently because I know the final path report is the only truly reliable one.  But I believe on my previous cancer biopsy report it did report that the margins were clear and it seems reasonable that unclear margins would have been reported to me.  I researched so much for my last cancer.  Can't believe I didn't ask the doctor, but frankly I was stunned.  For those waiting for surgery, I was diagnosed December 22, 2010, and the surgery was January 24.  Long month and Christmas did indeed suck.  

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited January 2014

    njmae,  I'm confused.  Did you have a needle biopsy or an excisional (surgical) biopsy?  

    Margins wouldn't be a factor with a needle biopsy because it's generally assumed that the needle would not have picked up all of the cancer so more surgery will be necessary.  Even if it's believed that all the cancer was pulled up by the needle, surgery is still required to deliver adequate margins.

    On an excisional (surgical) biopsy pathology report, margins should be noted.  But if you had an excisional biopsy and have clear margins, then you don't need to be worrying about how quickly you go into surgery. Clear margins mean that it's believed that all the cancer has been removed from the breast.  So if all the DCIS has been removed from your breast (and the pathology shows that it's all DCIS), then you don't have to worry about the DCIS evolving into invasive cancer and possibly moving into your nodes.  If you've had surgery that's resulted in clear margins, your planned mastectomy is in effect prophylactic and you have all the time in the world.

  • njmae
    njmae Member Posts: 48
    edited January 2014

    Beesie, 

    Sorry my post was confusing.  I had a Stage One cancer three years ago.  Other side, it looks fine.  I had a vacuum-assisted biopsy this week for the calcifications seen on my mammogram.  I have no idea how many samples were taken, but I heard a lot.  I know this isn't definitive, but I still think they would have told me if the last sample on either end (it was a single line) had DCIS, because I'd they had DCIS they would have said something like "at least 3.5 cm".   The doctor just said the size was borderline for a lumpectomy.

    Added:  this was done in prone position.  They took mammograms of the cores at the time and the doctor who did the biopsy said many of the calcifications were removed, although I know the calcifications are not the cancer itself.

  • percy4
    percy4 Member Posts: 477
    edited January 2014


    I had low-grade DCIS, no necrosis, with 1-2 microinvasions (was told that 2 separate micros are not more "invasive" than one).  The micros had wide margins; the DCIS around them had clean margins, but narrow.  I have also wondered whether if I had had my mammo sooner, or my surgery closer to biopsy, the micros may not yet have appeared.  Was told there is no way to know; could have been there a year, could have been there hours.  I investigated sentinal node biopsy thoroughly.  Just want to to reassure you about the very tiny chance of nodal involvement with microinvasions.  It is standard procedure to do an SNB on any invasion, even micro.  I've read here there is about a 10% chance of nodal involvemnt with microinvasion, my HMO put MY chance at 5%, Dr. Lagios put my chance at one third of a percent.  Though my current MO recommends SNB, as it is standard, she has to admit that in her 10 or so years practicing, she has never seen anyone with only micro(s) have nodal involvement.  And, of course, the micros she's seen obviously probably had been there awhile before being found, at least lots of them had.  So, if you have a micro, please don't worry too much that a micro would have gone to your nodes in any amount of time.

  • bluewillowskys
    bluewillowskys Member Posts: 365
    edited January 2014

    MY path report from my DCIS lumpectomy in 2011 said " grade 2, minimal necrosis"...could someone explain to me ...does necrosis mean anything particularly bad? Is it bad to have necrosis? should i take that into consideration when deciding to have a PBMX or not?

Categories