Critical Breast Cancer Research Gaps and Priorities

Options

From the UK:

Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer

Results

The 10 major gaps identified were:

(1) understanding the functions and contextual interactions of genetic and epigenetic changes in normal breast development and during malignant transformation;

(2) how to implement sustainable lifestyle changes (diet, exercise and weight) and chemopreventive strategies;

(3) the need for tailored screening approaches including clinically actionable tests;

(4) enhancing knowledge of molecular drivers behind breast cancer subtypes, progression and metastasis;

(5) understanding the molecular mechanisms of tumour heterogeneity, dormancy, de novo or acquired resistance and how to target key nodes in these dynamic processes;

(6) developing validated markers for chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity;

(7) understanding the optimal duration, sequencing and rational combinations of treatment for improved personalised therapy;

(8) validating multimodality imaging biomarkers for minimally invasive diagnosis and monitoring of responses in primary and metastatic disease;

(9) developing interventions and support to improve the survivorship experience;

(10) a continuing need for clinical material for translational research derived from normal breast, blood, primary, relapsed, metastatic and drug-resistant cancers with expert bioinformatics support to maximise its utility. The proposed infrastructural enablers include enhanced resources to support clinically relevant in vitro and in vivo tumour models; improved access to appropriate, fully annotated clinical samples; extended biomarker discovery, validation and standardisation; and facilitated cross-discipline working.

Conclusions

With resources to conduct further high-quality targeted research focusing on the gaps identified, increased knowledge translating into improved clinical care should be achievable within five years.

Comments

  • SelenaWolf
    SelenaWolf Member Posts: 1,724
    edited October 2013

    Hallelujah!  Finally, a plan!

  • cp418
    cp418 Member Posts: 7,079
    edited October 2013

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/09/130930211653.htm

    Critical gaps have been identified in breast cancer research. In an article in BioMed Central's open access journal Breast Cancer Research, leading scientists in the field report on a gap analysis that critically assessed issues and new challenges emerging from recent breast cancer research, and propose strategies for translating solutions into practice.

  • jenrio
    jenrio Member Posts: 558
    edited October 2013

    all well and good.   But I see a huge gap in the gap analysis.

    Where is the research for the cure for metastatic breast cancer/drug resistant breast cancer/metastasis in the brain/triple negative breast cancer?   "cure" gets no mention (in the abstract, but mentioned in the text as "elusive", not-even-dreamed-of), "triple negative" (no mention in the abstract, only mentioned in the full text as a tribute to "heterogeneity"...), "brain" gets no mention (in the abstract, get a few mentions as a preferred site for metastasis).  The word "metastasis" is drowned out by a whole bunch of rosy cheeked breastly conditions and gets no particular attention.   Hmmmm

    Given this gap, I suspect that these same researchers have been beating around the bushes for 3+ decades, and probably will continue to beat around the bushes for the next 3+ decades.    They do good and necessary work of course, but I'll not look for breakthroughs from this crowd.   And despite their headline grabbing "critical gaps", they miss the real "critical gaps".

    http://abcnews.go.com/Health/BreastCancerCenter/big-breast-cancer-breakthroughs-2013/story?id=20436617#9

    By the way, out of the 10 so called "big breast cancer breakthroughs" by ABC, only 9th improves metastatic breast cancer survival by more than 1 year.   Pathetic,  but matches the data of less than 10% BC research dollars go to metastatic research.   What it doesn't match is that 90% of breast cancer patients die from metastasis.   Go figure.

Categories