How effective is screening?

Options
farmerlucy
farmerlucy Member Posts: 3,985

I would be very interested to know the effectiveness of screening, backed by professional opinion, research, and so forth. I attach a paper written by Dr Alan Hollingsworth in response to: "US Preventive Services Task Force Mammography Starting at age 50” (November 16, 2009) In it he says mammos can be between 40 - 70% effective, and MRIs in the range of 90% effective in detecting cancer. This is vital information not only for us, but for our daughters. I would also be very interested in knowing how effectiveness is addressed in relation to breast density.

http://www.breastmrioklahoma.com/download/Bridge-half-built-final-draft.pdf

Comments

  • Eliz52
    Eliz52 Member Posts: 4
    edited August 2013

    There is an excellent summary of the risks and actual benefit of breast screening at the website of the Nordic Cochrane Institute, an independent and highly regarded medical research group. I found official sources of information to be pro-screening, basically a sales pitch for testing.

    I've declined testing, an informed decision.

    The evidence is concerning: about 50% of screen detected breast cancers are over-diagnosed, the fall in the death rate is mostly about better treatments, not screening. Also, Professor Michael Baum, UK breast cancer surgeon, has a piece in the BMJ (2013): he says any benefit of screening is wiped out by those who die from heart attacks and lung cancer after treatments. Prof Baum also, has an informative lecture on You Tube, "Breast Cancer Screening: the inconvenient truth". Peter Gotzsche from the NCI has also, written some great articles and a book.

  • MelissaDallas
    MelissaDallas Member Posts: 7,268
    edited August 2013

    So Eliz52, why are you here if you decline testing/screening?

  • Eliz52
    Eliz52 Member Posts: 4
    edited August 2013

    Of course, if you're high risk, I'd get a couple of opinions from breast cancer specialists.

    When I declined mammograms, i also, looked at clinical breast exams, but found no proven benefit and they cause excess biopsies. Breast self-exams have not been recommended for some time.

    So I practice breast awareness devised by the late Dr Joan Austoker from Oxford University, just taking note of the look of my breasts in the mirror every morning. I'll report any changes to my doctor.

    I'd also, perhaps, send an email to the NCI...have they considered what a high risk woman should do? Are there any studies on MRI etc?

  • Eliz52
    Eliz52 Member Posts: 4
    edited August 2013

    Hi Melissa, I thought this was a discussion forum on breast screening, I didn't see the reference to high risk women on the thread, which of course, changes things. I've deleted my posts.

  • QuoVademus
    QuoVademus Member Posts: 1
    edited August 2013

    Screening with mammography is utterly ineffective because the theories of cancer progression are highly unscientific. Contrary to popular beliefs and the claims of the medical profession, a greater effectiveness in early detection of breast cancer does not translate into a lower mortality rate (read "The Mammogram Myth: The Independent Investigation Of Mammography The Medical Profession Doesn't Want You To Know About" by Rolf Hefti; see Mammograms: Dangerous! Mammography Risks, Myths & Breast Cancer Facts). If women knew the true facts many would stop having mammograms but politics and big profits for the medical industry assure that the truth remains obfuscated.

Categories