GE Medical Equipment

Options
mary625
mary625 Member Posts: 1,056
edited March 2015 in Stage III Breast Cancer

I'm at a business conference this week and found myself listening to Tom Gentile of GE who decided to devote his entire 1/2 hour to what GE was doing for breast cancer detection. You can imagine my reaction when he started extolling the virtues of mammography. He then stated that many cancers are missed and the reasons for that. He showed some new technologies, such as a contrast assisted mammogram, a new type of ultrasound where something the size of an iPad is laid over the breast (didn't look too comfortable to me), and a new mammography suite where the woman chooses music, pictures and even aromatherapy. That one was my personal favorite (sarcastically). There was also some thing about how GE is going to decrease the time between first detection and biopsy results, but I'm not sure how that's supposed to work.



So then the had questions and answers. I walked up to the microphone, in front of a 1000 people, and said I was a BC survivor for whom mammography had failed, leaving me with a 7 cm tumor and 10 lymph nodes when it was found, I wanted to put a face with the problem so that it wasn't just a bunch of nameless women who are a statistic. I then asked him what he and GE intended to do to get this equipment available to women as part of standard of care. I of course got a BS answer. He thinks the answer is to educate patients and caregivers about what to ask for. Does he not realize that we can ask for a lot of things, but it doesn't mean we get them or that insurance will pay for them. I would like scans and tumor markers, and I'm not going to get them. I told him that after invasive cancer of that magnitude, I could not qualify for MRI for future detection!



Anyway, I wanted to let you guys know and I hope I represented us all well.

Comments

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited May 2013

    Good for you and thanks for speaking up.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2013

    I'm still waiting for the hand held 'star trek' scanners where I don't have to get undressed or be smashed flat as a pancake. When GE comes up with that...we'll talk. ;)

  • jennyboog
    jennyboog Member Posts: 1,322
    edited May 2013

    Thanks for representing us.  One thing they're missing, it's not only the equipment it's who reads the mammos and ultrasounds.  That is where I was failed, I was told all good when it wasn't.  So, they can use all the high tech stuff and aromatherapy they want, if the dr reading it doesn't get it right, it doesn't matter.  How about educating them, not us.

  • kar123
    kar123 Member Posts: 273
    edited May 2013

    Are you serious?  Aromatherapy and music?!?!?  It's not like we're going to the spa.  Maybe a massage after would be nice though Wink

    Thanks for representing the ILC girls!  All three technologies failed me.  Mammo/US/MRI

    PET Scan saw it, but only after I was biopsied, so they knew what they were looking for.  Not sure what my report would have said if they didn't know I was already diagnosed.

  • melmcbee
    melmcbee Member Posts: 1,119
    edited May 2013

    Thanks Mary for putting a face with the problem.

    Kar, if you dont mind me asking, I just want to clarify. Are you saying that a mri did not pick up a 6cm tumor? Do you mind me asking where the tumor was and did you have iv contrast with your scan? My tumors were not picked up on mammo and the u/s wasnt real definitive but it showed up on mri as a 5cm tumor. When I had the bmx it turned out to be 3 tumors with the biggest at about 2.5cm I think. Basically all 3 totalled about 5cm. I am asking this because I work in radiology and I knew that some tumors especially small were missed on mammo but it is a shock to hear that mri missed it. I actually do xrays, cat scans and some mri. I have seen mri of the breast and it amazes me what is picked up on mri that I cant see on the mammo. I share this knowledge with my coworkers so they will know about it. Thanks for any info you can give.

  • Rdrunner
    Rdrunner Member Posts: 309
    edited May 2013

    Mammo and ultrasound missed mine also and Mri estimated 4cm for big tumor but after surgery was found to be 6cm and mri missed 3 smaller tumors although they were very small being just under 1cm for each one.

  • Gitane
    Gitane Member Posts: 1,885
    edited May 2013

    I really hope Tom Gentile of GE (and the powers that be in his company) heard you Mary.  You really are speaking for all of us and we appreciate it.  Those of us with ILC who had humungous tumors that were not "seen" on our mammos and ultrasounds are pretty sensitive about this.  Yes, the best machines in the world do us no good if they aren't available to us and/or if the technicians and doctors don't use them well.  How in the world would he expect the patients themselves to force this to happen?  If a giant like GE can't do it.......    Thanks for getting in there and giving our pitch for us!  

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited May 2013

    Mel, my tumor showed on MRI with contrast, but the affected nodes did not. There were two nodes that were enlarged enough that we could all palpate them. One of those and 6 others turned out to have cancer after neo-adjuvant chemo. This was found on the post-surgical path report, none of them showed on any of the imaging, including MRI and CT with contrast.

    I also had extensive LCIS on the other side, and that did not show in any of the imaging, which for that breast included a mammo, 3 ultrasounds (one 3D/color), MRI and CT (both with contrast). Suffice to say that I have no regrets about choosing BMX.

  • kar123
    kar123 Member Posts: 273
    edited May 2013

    Hi mel,

    Yes, an MRI did not show my 6cm tumor.  I had IV contrast.  The tumor was unifocal in the upper left quadrant of my breast.  It was a shock to all of us.  When the BS called to say the MRI was all clear, I asked then what the heck is going on in this breast.  It was chalked up to dense tissue.  Since I was still concerned they offered to check again in 3 months instead of the recommended 6 months (written in the MRI report).  BS said it was very rare for tumors not to show up on MRI, but ILC is very good at hiding.  She was pretty shaken up as well because she felt bad for not trusting her instincts and relying on the MRI report.  I have since talked to one other woman online at MyBCteam.org who had the same thing happen to her.  Needless to say, I don't have a lot of confidence in screening technology.

  • melmcbee
    melmcbee Member Posts: 1,119
    edited May 2013

    Kar thats awful. how did they find the 6cm tumor?



    Momine, mine was the same way. My tumor showed up on the mri but the 8 positive lymph nodes did not show up on the mri, petscan or ct. I talked to a radiologist about it and he said that the cancer has to be a certain size for a petscan to pick it up.. I cant remember what he said maybe it was .8cm.

    healing hugs to all

  • kar123
    kar123 Member Posts: 273
    edited May 2013

    They found it when I came back after waiting the 3 months via a biopsy and then it finally appeared in the PetScan along with a few nodes..  I had chemo first and then a mastectomy (luckily clean margins). 

  • KSil
    KSil Member Posts: 56
    edited March 2015


    Just to add my 2-cents, the Radiologist that initially did my ultrasound could not see anything that looked abnormal, but my BS did the ultrasound and took a biopsy of the spot where I felt a small lump (confirmed ILC). Follow-up MRI showed 2cm ILC tumor and 1-possible node. Surgery revealed a 6 cm tumor and 4 positive nodes with extracapsular extension. Ugh! This was 8-years after a double mastectomy for DCIS/LCIS with immediate tram flap reconstruction. Scary stuff, but two-years out from diagnosis, and doing well. :)

Categories