I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange

1114811491151115311541828

Comments

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited December 2012

    Until next time, Yorkie - hope you got a solution for the bobcat problem!

  • kad2kar
    kad2kar Member Posts: 336
    edited December 2012

      If I can throw in my 2cents---Stop reporting on these tragedies minutexminute,hourxhour,dayxday. These monsters WANT their 15 minutes of fame and to go down in infamy and WE allow it.

     Does anyone remember the Victims of OK city, Boston,etc..etc. No we dont we only remember the KILLERS names.  We dont remember the names of the Amish kids killed, or the ZODIACS victims,etc..etc.

      I really believe if we stop the over  reporting AND PUT INTO LAWS gun laws that make sense, will we be able to take some control of these situations.  I grew up with guns in the house, my Dad was a cop. I have a sibling that was a drug addict and total criminal.  My Dad never believed everyone should be able to get guns and that there is NO NEED to issue permits for uzis and the like for hunting

                     sorry for rant---kad2kar

              PRAYERS FOR PEACE FOR THE FAMILIES OF THIS TRAGEDY

                                                                         

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited December 2012

    If I lived in the US and I had a gun, I would go outside, round up the neighbourhood and encourage everyone to throw their guns in a pile as a protest and mark of respect for the poor wee children. If everyone in the US did this, you might have a hope of living in a civilsed country.

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited December 2012

    Huckabee should just do what most of the other gun supporters are doing.  Keep quiet.  They really have nothing to say that we haven't already heard.  (It isn't the gun, it is the person with the gun.....he could have done the same thing with a knife....geez)

    I have to wonder if the horse is already out of the barn.  Too many guns in too many hands.  And you can just imagine the wheels that are turning at the NRA right now.  The lobbyists are on their way to Washington too.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited December 2012

    Peirs Morgan is having a conniption fit with his guests who want more guns out there.  Good for him!

  • riley702
    riley702 Member Posts: 1,600
    edited December 2012

    I hesitate to write this, but I've decided I have to. You can all whale away on me if you wish. *deep breath*

    I know you're all very upset, but I'd urge you to reconsider some of your words. Frankly, to demonize, or inhumanize those who disagree with you on gun control is just as bad as the tactics of the conservatives you also deplore. And this is why I'm an independent. Both Rs and Ds are just as bad about whipping up emotions and using ad hominem attacks on those issues they feel strongly about. And you're both wrong to do it. I catch crap from both sides for refusing to toe their party line. I have just about every conservative I know mad at me for my support of Obama and some liberal views. And now I'm going to have my liberal friends mad at me, too. But I have to call it like I see it.

    I have a gun, and I've never gone amok or even thought about it. I certainly don't consider myself subhuman or less than human or however y'all put it. I feel hurt and attacked by gals I thought were my friends. I gladly pay the government to run my fingerprints and do a criminal background check on me in exchange for the right to carry. I don't have a problem with that, and I didn't have a problem with a background check before I could purchase a gun, so those of you who say there are no checks are dead wrong. Also wrong are those who have stated that mentally ill people can freely buy and carry guns. That's not true here in Indiana and we're a pretty conservative state, so I'd bet it's not common if it's even allowed in other states. I personally think that's a liberal straw man to rail against while chanting the liberal boogie man mantra of, "NRA, NRA!"

    I didn't laugh or feel indifferent to the deaths of the people killed today. Children OR adults; all the deaths were just as wrong, just as devastating. I cried. But I don't think any law on the books would have stopped this man today. We have a shitload of gun-control laws. We need to start enforcing them instead of adding to them more laws that aren't enforced. He walked through an unlocked door, for God's sake. Maybe stricter controls on entries and exits might help. I know many schools do require ID to enter. There is more to this problem than just a knee-jerk reaction would indicate.

    Just please, think about what you're saying. If you're trying to convince others of the rightness of your cause, I don't think you're going about it the right way by attacking anyone who doesn't believe as you do. If you're just talking to each other in an echo chamber, have at it. I didn't think we always had to agree to post here, but I'm feeling very uncomfortable with the tone, and attacked.

  • River_Rat
    River_Rat Member Posts: 1,724
    edited December 2012

    Riley, we have guns too and I understand some of what you're saying.  But I do think there need to be changes.  There is no need for regular citizens to have assault weapons and magazines that hold many rounds.  Limits on those things would at least make it less likely that one person could cause so much harm and destruction.

    Neither DH or I have a permit to carry.  Gun safety is of utmost importance.  I was very against guns when we married.  DH had grown up with guns - hunting and target shooting.  We came to a compromise.  I tried target shooting and found that I was pretty good at it.  He agreed with my requirements for keeping guns locked up and ammunition in a separate place.  Neither of us supports the NRA.

  • Ang7
    Ang7 Member Posts: 1,261
    edited December 2012

    Our schools have locked doors and the office has to buzz you in.

    I can't help but think that if they knew the guy they would have buzzed him in anyway...

    I am sorry you feel attacked Riley.  We should be able to come together on this site.

    I feel that there are many things wrong with our country and emotions are high right now.

    Our neighbor had to walk out of a house the other day as the kids were "playing" a video game that he said "transported him back to Iraq" as it was so real and he could not stand it.

    There is something very wrong with that.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited December 2012

    riley I appreciate your views and would never hold them against you, however, you don't have a semi-atomatic.  Does one really need those?  My Dad has always had hunting rifles.  The most he could do is pull 2 shots when he goes hunting before having to reload.  This guy had semi automatic weapons, and fired 100 shots in the span of minutes.  That's plain wrong!

  • lewing
    lewing Member Posts: 1,288
    edited December 2012

    Carolyn, thanks for posting. I think we probably disagree on gun control (thought I'm not even sure we do, as you mention a number of protections you do agree with), but it's good to be reminded not to demonize all gun owners. (My ex-husband was one - until his hunting rifle was stolen In a burglary. So much for security from having a gun in the house!)



    My own strong reactions are to what I consider an irresponsible and extremist gun lobby. I personally dislike guns and would never buy one, but I do know a lot of folks who are responsible gun owners. I'm very sorry if you felt attacked.



    Peace,

    Linda

  • riley702
    riley702 Member Posts: 1,600
    edited December 2012

    I DO have a semi-automatic. The most I could fire is my 8 round magazine. Hundreds? Sounds like a fully automatic to me and I can agree on those being banned except for military and law enforcement.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited December 2012

    What do you use it for?

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited December 2012

    My son also has hunting rifles but he went through stringent checks and the rifles are locked up.  I'm going to his house in case of a zombie apocalypse!

  • riley702
    riley702 Member Posts: 1,600
    edited December 2012

    Primarily target practice, but I bought it when I lived in a bad part of town (couldn't afford hundreds more a month to get out). I also grew up with guns and also have my grandfather's shotgun, although I don't have any ammo for it and wouldn't shoot it for fear of damaging it anyway.

    Target practice is very relaxing. I call is stress management. Cheaper than retail therapy!

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited December 2012

    I used to go skeet shooting when my aim was steady, but again, only with a rifle.

  • Chickadee
    Chickadee Member Posts: 4,467
    edited December 2012

    I'll quibble with one thing, those of diminished capacity or the mentally ill as some would say, do have access......access.....because of the proliferation of horrifically damaging weaponry and the continued need of one segment of our society to insist that no weapon of any kind should be Inaccessible to the masses.



    They don't have to buy them, because families have them lying about. For protection you know. But Yes they can buy these weapons and do. They can be significantly impaired and subject to rages but they don't have a big M branded on their forehead. Their drivers license gives no clue. Never been arrested for anything perhaps. Maybe they only seem peculiar. Perhaps they have learned to live isolated lives and are nice to the casual passerby who knows nothing of their demons. Families do their damnedest to find therapeutic help only to find none they can afford or that for the most part the psychiatric community is completely impotent to help.



    These mass killings and the damaged humans among us who perpetrate them go hand in glove as two issues that no one seems able to comprehend or have a solution to.



    I know I don't.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited December 2012

    Apparantly, the guns used today were registered to the killer's mother.  Why would she need such weapons?  Ironically, he shot her with one of those guns. 

  • Alyson
    Alyson Member Posts: 4,308
    edited December 2012

    I feel so sad at another shooting. Yes there have been some horrific shooting here but we cannot have guns except for hunting then under extremely strict conditions. Our police do not in normal circumstances carry guns or even tazars so something like this is so strange.

    Those poor teachers and those babies it is terrible.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited December 2012

    And apparantly the assault rifle is illegal in CT.  How did that happen?

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited December 2012

    Riley -- Those of us who have no use for guns of any kind do understand why certain people -- farmers, ranchers, hunters, skeet shooters etc. -- own rifles or pistols.  Like Blue, I'm wondering why the killer's mother needed 3 guns.  And why her son who, by some accounts, was mentally challenged, would have access to them.

  • Chickadee
    Chickadee Member Posts: 4,467
    edited December 2012

    I suppose all we can do is wait for the forensic analysis of this families dysfunctional existence and the clues will be there...........but it never results in any action going forward, just wringing of hands.

  • alexandria58
    alexandria58 Member Posts: 1,588
    edited December 2012

    There is a difference between reasonable gun control and banning guns.  I see no reason for expanded magazines and fully automatic weapons.  I don't understand why it's harder to get a motorcycle license than to get a gun - at least if you screw up on a motorcycle you likely to only kill yourself.  I don't understand why background checks and waiting periods aren't mandated for anybody buying a gun, since it's so easy to legally buy guns at gun shows, why it is so easy for people who are known to have mental illness with violent tendencies to get guns.  I don't understand why people who do have guns aren't required to keep them locked in a safe. I don't understand why gun safety classes aren't mandated for anyone buying a gun.

    For the record, I also have a gun, but it is in a forty pound safe that has both a key and a combo lock.  (A long story, not for tonight.)   

  • Belinda44
    Belinda44 Member Posts: 718
    edited December 2012

    From NYT:

    "...But when a gunman takes out kindergartners in a bucolic Connecticut suburb, three days after a gunman shot up a mall in Oregon, in the same year as fatal mass shootings in Minneapolis, in Tulsa, in a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, in a theater in Colorado, a coffee bar in Seattle and a college in California — then we’re doing this to ourselves.

    We know the story. The shooter is a man, usually a young man, often with a history of mental illness. Sometimes in a rage over a lost job, sometimes just completely unhinged. In the wake of the Newtown shootings, the air was full of experts discussing the importance of psychological counseling. “We need to look at what drives a crazy person to do these kind of actions,” said Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington, one of the highest-ranking Republicans in the House.

    Every country has a sizable contingent of mentally ill citizens. We’re the one that gives them the technological power to play god.

    This is all about guns — access to guns and the ever-increasing firepower of guns. Over the past few years we’ve seen one shooting after another in which the killer was wielding weapons holding 30, 50, 100 bullets. I’m tired of hearing fellow citizens argue that you need that kind of firepower because it’s a pain to reload when you’re shooting clay pigeons. Or that the founding fathers specifically wanted to make sure Americans retained their right to carry rifles capable of mowing down dozens of people in a couple of minutes....

    ....We will undoubtedly have arguments about whether tougher regulation on gun sales or extra bullet capacity would have made a difference in Connecticut. In a way it doesn’t matter. America needs to tackle gun violence because we need to redefine who we are. We have come to regard ourselves — and the world has come to regard us — as a country that’s so gun happy that the right to traffic freely in the most obscene quantities of weapons is regarded as far more precious than an American’s right to health care or a good education.

    We have to make ourselves better. Otherwise, the story from Connecticut is too unspeakable to bear....."

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/15/opinion/collins-looking-for-america.html

  • QuinnCat
    QuinnCat Member Posts: 3,456
    edited December 2012

    Riley - When I get mad, it isn't about gun ownership (though in my ideal, but impractical, world, most guns would be banned), it's about these large magazines and automatic weapons. It's about this idea that one should walk around schools, etc., with concealed weapons, or those with mental illnesses can so easily purchase or obtain these weapons...mostly it's the insanity that the NRA espouses that if you ban assault weapons or the large magazines, or have waiting periods, or backgroun checks, next it will be your hunting rifle.

    I own a shotgun, 20 guage.  It's in my house because I use to bird hunt, not because I want to shoot some intruder.  It might be fun to trap shoot; never tried it.  I have it so well hidden that no one would find it.  It doesn't define me, never did and I'd happily give it up, but I understand this type of gun ownership.

    I have to ask why your need to have guns is more important than these children's lives, even if it were possible to ban all guns?  I respect your opinion, but there are shades of gray here....and most of us are not arguing you cannot own your guns, but why is that always the first assumption by gun owners?

  • alexandria58
    alexandria58 Member Posts: 1,588
    edited December 2012

    I think most Americans agree with reasonable controls.  We are all being held hostage by the NRA, its lobbyists, and the small minority of highly vocal, highly actively NRA supporters. 

  • QuinnCat
    QuinnCat Member Posts: 3,456
    edited December 2012

    Here is a perfect example of why guns need to be under lock and key, and I'm referencing back to Belinda's article.. "The shooter is a man, usually a young man, often with a history of mental illness."


    My gf's son was off to college. While there he had his for psychotic event (sorry, I may not use the proper words).  His ultimate diagnosis was severe bipolar.  He got on his bicyle and rode 65 miles in the dark of night. He ended up at a hunting lodge where he found an unlocked pickup with a hunting rifle on the racks, keys in the ignition. He then drove this pickup to the closest International Airport and tried to hijack a plane, using the rifle.  Luckily, he didn't shoot the gun, but he could have.  He doesn't remember any of it.

    I knew/know this young men.  A straight A student, Zen, normal normal normal, wonderful gentle human being.  I think if this had happenned after 9/11 he would have been in jail for life, but the whole town rallied around him and the judge let him out after 6 months.  He's out and about, and has had episodes, but nothing that resulted in this type of event.

    When I hear of these types of events, like today, I think mental illness.  Especially when it is man of this age 19ish.  Usually it turns out to be the case.  They say it's not the guns, it's the people.  I hate that saying.  It's both!!

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited December 2012

    Enough tears for today.  Gonna go hug my grandson tomorrow.  Night.

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited December 2012

    "This is all about guns — access to guns and the ever-increasing firepower of guns. Over the past few years we’ve seen one shooting after another in which the killer was wielding weapons holding 30, 50, 100 bullets. I’m tired of hearing fellow citizens argue that you need that kind of firepower because it’s a pain to reload when you’re shooting clay pigeons. Or that the founding fathers specifically wanted to make sure Americans retained their right to carry rifles capable of mowing down dozens of people in a couple of minutes...."

    That is where I am with it, more or less. I have no problem with guns or gun ownership. My grandpa in Denmark had a cupboard full of rifles, they were locked up and nobody ever came to any harm from them. But if the kid only had access to an old six-shooter, we would have had far fewer dead.

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited December 2012

    One child is one too many

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited December 2012

    Sure, but the other piece of this is better psychiatric care. It is always difficult to reach people when needed and to reach them adequately, but psychiatric care is notoriously sketchy in the US.

Categories