DIM and PR+ breast cancer?

Options

I am a long-time survivor who'd like to stay that way.  I had been taking DIM but stopped because I read things about the owner of the particular company that gave me great pause.  When I started to look around for DIM put out by other companies I noticed in the research something that escaped me earlier - DIM increases PR levels.  Well my BC was ER+/PR+/HER+.  I'm now wondering if I should be using it at all due to the fact that I am PR+?

Anybody?

«13

Comments

  • hopefour
    hopefour Member Posts: 459
    edited December 2012

    I had hoped someone with this knowledge would have replied...I don't have the knowledge myself, sorry! I am ER+ 95% and PR+95% and would love to gain a better understanding of the PR+ side of my BC!

  • dogsandjogs
    dogsandjogs Member Posts: 1,907
    edited December 2012

    go to the alternative sectiom where they are discussing dim. i can't take it because i'm on a blood thinner. haven't heard about other side effects--sorry

  • HappyTrisha
    HappyTrisha Member Posts: 614
    edited December 2012

    hopefour, I am extremely vigilant about making sure that no supplement I take has any estrogenic effect, but the progesterone connection never hit me until I was researching DIM and read about it raising progesterone levels!  Now I realize that I have to go back and check everything for a possible effect on progesterone.  Interesting that we are so well-schooled about staying away from soy and other things that can affect estrogen but nobody bothers warning us (those of us who are PR+) about the potential affect of things on our progesterone levels!  Talk about having to be your own doctor!!!

    Grrr!

  • mclark55
    mclark55 Member Posts: 168
    edited December 2012

    HappyTrisha - I'm glad you posted this question and I am researching it for you.  I write a blog to help others through the BC journey and I have today asked my naturopath about this.  I take DIM myself and I was also PR+, and I also promote DIM on my website, so your question was very interesting to me.  My naturopath is not only a naturopathic doctor, but also:

    Fellow American Board of Naturopathic Oncology

    President Oncology Association of Naturopathic Oncology, www.OncANP.org

    Chair, Speaker Selection Committee, American Association of Naturopathic Physicians  www.Naturopathic.org

    Associate Editor, The Natural Medicine Journal www.NaturalMedicineJournal.com

     

    So he's a very cluey guy and has recently written an article about this subject, the contents of which he just emailed to me.  I have had to ask him a couple of questions to clarify his article, so when he answers me, I'll post something here for you.

     

    Hope that helps, and I'll get back to you asap.
  • HappyTrisha
    HappyTrisha Member Posts: 614
    edited December 2012

    Marnie - thank you SO much for doing this!  I feel helpless at this point because I feel like I am spending all my time researching ingredients!  In the past, no matter what I considered taking, I would do the following Google searches with the ingredient list, with "X" being the specific ingredient:  X and estrogen; X and breast cancer; X and estrogen-positive breast cancer.  The minute I hit something that had any negative implication, I would automatically disgard the product.  (As an aside, one of my saddest moments was when I discovered that raspberry ketones had a potential estrogenic effect.  I had been taking them for about three weeks and my clothes were starting to hang on me, no word of lie.  And I really need to lose weight.  When I saw that about the estrogen - for some reason I hadn't thought to Google raspberrry ketones - I stopped taking it and my clothes have gone back to their "natural" tight stage.  :(   )

    If I hadn't read some very negative things about the owner of Young Again supplements, the place where I had been buying my DIM, I never would have started researching again and would not have run across the information about raising progesterone levels.  When I read that, a light went off that probably should have gone off a long time ago, but didn't.  I've been so busy making sure that I don't go near anything estrogen related that it had never occurred to me to consider the progesterone angle.  Better late than never though I guess.

    Thanks again.  I look forward to hearing anything you find out.  I know for sure curcumin is good for us!  So there's one thing we can feel good about and safe with!

    Smile 

  • cp418
    cp418 Member Posts: 7,079
    edited December 2012

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r527cuyW5fk&feature=youtu.be&t=45m8s

    Dr. Mina J. Bissell from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory at UC Berkeley

    Listen to the very end of her discussion where she discusses estrogen vs progesterone.

  • cp418
    cp418 Member Posts: 7,079
    edited December 2012
  • madpeacock
    madpeacock Member Posts: 369
    edited December 2012

    Well, this is disturbing. I had fired tamoxifen and have been taking DIM for months. I was highly ER/PR+ at 88 and 81, respectively.

    Marnie - will be eagerly awaiting your research! I "liked" you on Facebook a few weeks ago and really enjoy your no fluff approach to BC education. Thank you! Smile

    Happytrisha - I buy my DIM from Young Again also, but had not heard anything negative, other than the guy has a real attitude. I had not paid any attention to the raspberry ketone issue. I think it is because I hate raspberries! Yell

    The more we read, the more we learn...and the more confusing it gets.

  • mclark55
    mclark55 Member Posts: 168
    edited December 2012

    Okay ladies - I'm not sure this will answer your question effectively but here's my article today on what I found out on DIM:

    http://marnieclark.com/dim-is-not-the-wonder-supplement-weve-been-led-to-believe/

    The title says it all.  Like you, madpeacock, I found it very disturbing that something we'd relied on turned out to be a dud.  But hey, at least we know.  I'll certainly keep you informed once I discover any more info like this.

    Sorry for the disappointing news!

    xox

    Marnie

  • HLB
    HLB Member Posts: 1,760
    edited December 2012

    I hope there are more details when the article comes out. It doesn't really explain why he has come to that conclusion. About the video above where the lady mentions progesterone at the end...I wish she had the time to elaborate on that as well. I've been searching her name trying to find out. It seems there is new and conflicting info out there about progesterone but I'm having trouble finding it. Up until now I've always heard that progesterone is protective.

  • cp418
    cp418 Member Posts: 7,079
    edited December 2012

    HLB - I had the same understanding regarding the protection mechanism against estrogen dominance.  Now wondering if DIM has negative affects?

  • HappyTrisha
    HappyTrisha Member Posts: 614
    edited December 2012

    It may very well be that progesterone is protective.  (Of course I don't know the answer to that for sure.)  But I have to assume that in my case, where I am progesterone positive, progesterone is as dangerous to me as estrogen is.  That's what caused me initial concern with DIM.  I know soy is supposed to be protective too, but not for those of us who are estrogen positive.  So it might be the same kind of thing with progesterone?

    I wrote a post to cp418, madpeacock, and Marnie and now I don't see it.  I wonder if I put it in another forum?  I'm going to check around to see.  Otherwise I guess I'll just have to recreate it!  There was nothing controversial in it where it would have gotten removed.

  • HappyTrisha
    HappyTrisha Member Posts: 614
    edited December 2012

    Maybe I forgot to hit the "submit" button?

    Anyway, cp418, thank you for the links.  I am now on information overload and don't know what the heck to think!

    madpeacock, Laughing to your comment about raspberries!  And I agree about the confusion.  Instead of more clarity, it seems we just end up with more questions.  Frown

    Marnie, thank you so much for your article.  After reading it, I know for sure that my staying away from DIM is the right thing to do.    I really appreciate all you're doing to help others in this fight.  I was treated at Dana Farber and actually just released as a patient this past October (yay!!!).  I started there in early 2004 and had every treatment imaginable (well, it seemed that way, anyway!) because my cancer was considered aggressive, even though it was early stage.  I had written my onc to ask her a question about taking raspberry ketones and she referred me to the doctor there who is in charge of integrative therapies.  His name is Dr. David Rosenthal and he teaches at Harvard.  This was his response to me when I asked him about his role there, raspberry ketones, and whether I should make an appointment to see him:

    Yes, that is my role at the Zakim Center for Integrative Therapies - to consult on nutritional and botanical and herbal supplements as well as healthy behaviors such as physical activity and stress and symptom management. Consults can be arranged thru the receptionists and at Yawkey 6.

    IN THE MEANTIME: 

    Re: raspberry ketones - it is similar in structure to other stimulants but also (in animal models) acts as an androgen receptor antagonist; thus perhaps some remote estrogenic effect...although the evidence is not clear regarding raspberry ketones, my recommendation for now would be why take the risk.

    Curcumin is safe and can be very helpful.

    ****************

    He also told me to take in all of my supplements if I made an appointment to see him.  As soon as I finish this post, I am going to call and make an appointment for after the holidays. (Perish the thought that I can't eat my way through to the New Year!) 

    If anyone has any questions they want me to ask him, please let me know betwee now and then.  I will go prepared with a list.  I'm praying that he has good and trustworthy information on progesterone!

     

  • hopefour
    hopefour Member Posts: 459
    edited December 2012

    Thank you Happy Trisha and Mclark55 for all the info. I am looking forward to the article coming out and am grateful for finding Mclark55"s blog. Happy Trisha,  I would be interested to know what your Integrative Doctor thinks about the supplements Indole-3-Carbinol and Calcium-D-Glucarate, if you don't mind asking. I went to the Block Center and Dr. Block recommended them, but I always try to check and recheck everything I am taking. Thank you again for posting your very thought provoking question and all the replies!!

  • HappyTrisha
    HappyTrisha Member Posts: 614
    edited December 2012

    hopefour, will absolutely ask him!  And thank you for taking an interest in this.  When it comes to bc, I don't believe in leaving anything to chance.  If you think of anything else you want me to ask him, just let me know!

    Smile

  • gentianviolet
    gentianviolet Member Posts: 316
    edited December 2012

    Perhaps someone else has asked and answered this question.  I believe I have read many times that if PR+ is in the diagnosis, it has a better survival rate associated with it.  So why then would it be bad to take something natural that contributes to progesterone?  Is not true that the broccoli sprouts touted by John's Hopkins has some of the chemical action as DIM?  All of this is very confusing to me and if someone can clear this up, I would appreciate it.  Good thoughts to all.

  • HLB
    HLB Member Posts: 1,760
    edited December 2012

    The way it was explained to me is that estrogen tells the cells to grow, the progesterone comes along and tells them when to stop, and that if you are pr+ that's a good thing because the progesterone will do what its supposed to...stop the cells from growing. Now it seems there is new opposite info but I can't find the details either.

  • gentianviolet
    gentianviolet Member Posts: 316
    edited December 2012

    HLB -

    It is good to know that I am not the only one that is confused.

  • hopefour
    hopefour Member Posts: 459
    edited December 2012

    Happy Trisha, thanks for asking. I am looking forward to what you find out...have a wonderful Christmas!!

  • Summer_Girl
    Summer_Girl Member Posts: 69
    edited January 2013

    I am curious to see the ariticle on DIM.  I've read so many positive things, and article noted above does not seem to be based on a scientifice study, it reads "my naturopath feels".  

    I am confused about DIM.  Most women seem to be taking 100mg twice a day.  I tried 100 mg once a day and it seems to strong (made me very very tired).  I am very sensitive to medicine, so I may try 50mg every other day to start

  • mclark55
    mclark55 Member Posts: 168
    edited January 2013

    Laurie_ - I have reposted the article for you here.  Let me explain about my naturopath - he's an oncological naturopath and has many long years as this role, he's a very deep thinking guy and has spent untold hours looking at the scientific evidence so yes, his paper (to be published in Feb) is based on scientific evidence.

    I can tell you that after my discussion with him, I felt like the wind had totally been knocked out of my sails because I'd been relying on DIM pretty heavily.  I don't think DIM will hurt us, just that it isn't the Tamoxifen replacer that some websites say it is.  Here's the link to my article: 

    http://marnieclark.com/dim-is-not-the-wonder-supplement-weve-been-led-to-believe/

    When my doctor's article is released in February, I will post a link to it.  As he says, "sorry to be the party pooper"!  I had hoped to interview him for some answers to all our questions (yes we are ALL confused now) but right at the moment he's swamped - perhaps later in the year I can persuade him.

    I'll be staying on this and looking for answers.

    Hugs!

  • Carola32
    Carola32 Member Posts: 206
    edited January 2013

    Interesting discussion. I was wondering though; if DIM keeps ER down, wouldn't it be quite normal that PR levels increase? These two hormones should be in balance for optimal health. Isn't there real danger when there is an imbalance of the two? In any case, from what I've understood is that higher PR levels are preferable to high ER levels, like HLB suggests.

    Why should one rely on one sole pill or even consider DIM being a Tamoxifen remplacement? DIM is what it is, not a SERM, but a substance with anti-cancerous properties; but it is no miracle pill. It's a help on the way to avoid recurrence or in the best case scenario avoid cancer. Tamoxifen is toxic & synthetic, while DIM is not. All actions do have consequences though; you cannot eat 5 pounds of broccoli (containing DIM & IC3) a day or have it in pill form expecting your thyroidlevels for example to be untouched, one has to compensate in order to keep the balance.

    The diabolization of estrogenic foods like plants, organic soy etc is to me very mysterious. Where does the idea come from that we must to all costs supress our own estrogen? Like mClark wrote, one should be wary of the XENOestrogens in the world around us, we can find it in pesticides, non organic meat & dairy etc. Why is it that cancer is so common nowadays when women ALWAYS have had estrogen. It appears very simple to me.

  • HappyTrisha
    HappyTrisha Member Posts: 614
    edited January 2013

    Carola, I wish it were that simple!  When I was much younger I was great at being my own doctor.  I'd read about things and automatically jump into them.  Well years ago I read in Prevention Magazine about a doctor who decided to fashion something for his own mother either in order to prevent her from "getting" breast cancer, or it could have been to prevent it from coming back, don't remember which.  So he came up with these delicious soy bars.  I immediately ordered a ton of them and ate them once or twice a day.  Don't think I haven't questioned whether those soy bars had a deleterious effect!  Looking back it's easy for me to see that I was the poster child for estrogen dominance, but in those days nobody called it that or knew enough about it to focus on the overabundance of estrogen.  They treated the symptoms but nobody seemed to care about the underlying cause.  Actually that's still not so unusual I guess. 

    Being estrogen positive (and estrogen dominant) means, to me anyway, that I do not want any kind of excess of estrogen in my body.  Being progesterone positive signals the same thing to me, so when I read that DIM stimulates progesterone, or whatever it does to progesterone, a red flag immediately went up.   

    The fact that soy is considered a preventative for breast cancer for some, yet toxic for others, tells me that the only simplicity comes in knowing that if you are estrogen positive, soy, and anything else with an estrogenic effect, is your enemy.  If you are not estrogen positive, it isn't.  I live by that rule now.  The next step for me is to figure out the progesterone angle.  Next week I have an appointment with the doctor in charge of integrative and complimentary therapies at Dana Farber.  (That's where I had my treatment.)  I hope to come out of that meeting with a much greater understanding of these things than I currently have!

    Smile

  • Carola32
    Carola32 Member Posts: 206
    edited January 2013

    Hey Trisha,

    I see your point of course, although I'm utterly convinced there is a huge difference between phytoestrogens and xenoestrogens. Soy for example, has been, is and will always be wildly discussed. Non-organic produce (especially in the US it seems) contains these environmental estrogens which do wreak havoc with our systems, as it were. I believe it is there the real danger lies. Everything in moderation of course, even organic soy; I would never ever take soy supplements for instance.

    "They treated the symptoms but nobody seemed to care about the underlying cause." Which symptoms do you mean? Anyway, this phrase describes exactly what I think about doctors though, hehe. The Western ones atleast.. "When I was much younger I was great at being my own doctor." Have you stopped being your own doctor? And if so, why? Would be a shame if it was because of that soybar inventor/doctor ;-) Anyone who claims anything and at the same time tries to sell something makes my personal alarm go off.

    Personally I was 95%ER+ and 90% PR+ so I do understand these concerns and think it's important to discuss them, and so would love to read about your meeting at Dana Farber, if you have the energy to share!

    Have a good Thursday!

  • HappyTrisha
    HappyTrisha Member Posts: 614
    edited January 2013

    Carola, what I mean by treating the symptoms is that I apparently had a multitude of symptoms that were caused by estrogen dominance.  I had uterine fibroids, wicked PMS, fluid retention, etc.  You can go down the list and I had almost every one.  Now if someone had put it together and called it estrogen dominance, there would have been certain things I could have done to help the situation. 

    When I talk about being my own doctor, I mean that I would read things and then decide how to medicate myself, if you will.  I'd take the newest supplement, I'd take megadoses of things despite any kinds of warnings from the FDA, I was pretty much into everything natural and not much medical.  These days I am paying more attention to what I hear from the medical experts.  I'm certainly not blindly handing my life over.  I still do a ton of research and ask a ton of questions and if I have any discomfort whatsoever in what I'm hearing, I research more.  But there is no question that my treatment center is responsible for my good health.  I was Stage 2b, Grade 3, had lymph node involvement, multiple tumors, and was HER+.  My BC was aggressive, and so was my treatment.

    I will give you the entire rundown on my meeting next week!  I am bringing bottles of every supplement in my house (believe me, there are many!) and I want the doctor to tell me what gets a thumbs up and what gets a thumbs down.  Hopefully I'll have some interesting stuff to report.

    Have a great weekend!  Bon soir!    Smile

  • NattyOnFrostyLake
    NattyOnFrostyLake Member Posts: 377
    edited January 2013

    Having high progesterone receptor positivity is a GOOD predictive factor.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2013

    I'm quite interested in this discussion, but wonder if Natty could explain the PR+ goodness thing...I'm highly ER/PR+, and was estrogen dominant all my life (early menses, was still ovulating at chemo time and I'm 53, two surgeries to remove fibroids, etc. etc.)

    I nearly signed up for a clinical trial at U of A double-blind placebo vs. DIM...now I think I'm glad I didn't.

    A good predictive factor for what, exactly? I'm confused.

    Claire in AZ

  • HappyTrisha
    HappyTrisha Member Posts: 614
    edited January 2013

    Claire, interesting.  I had 3 surgeries to remove fibroids, including uterine fibroid embolization (HORRIBLE experience).  The doctors said I had 2 fibroids the sizes of grapeferuit.  Well a few years ago I had "unexplained bleeding" and had to have a D and C.  The doctor tried to get tissue specimens in her office and I thought I was going to pass out.  She looked at me like I was crazy.  After the D and C (or whatever it was) she told me she understood why I was in such pain in her office.  I still have large fibroids!!!  GRRR!!!!  And I am well past menopause now since I went into menopause with chemo.  Talk about estrogen dominance!  I'd like to have someone do a circulating hormone test for me just to see what my hormone levels are right now.

    I definitely will be asking the questions about progesterone next week and will let you know what I find out.

    I think that Natty meant that high PR was a good predictive factor for a better outcome for BC.  There are more treatments for hormone-positive BC than there are for non-hormone-positive BC.  Natty of course will correct that if I am misinterpreting her meaning.

    Smile

    trisha

  • NattyOnFrostyLake
    NattyOnFrostyLake Member Posts: 377
    edited January 2013

    High PR+ is better for outcome regardless of intervention. In the medical literature patients with high PR+ with postive lymph nodes lived as long as PR- with negative nodes. Progesterone was used as a breast cancer treatment in the form of Megace years ago. Megace is still used to some extent but more for other cancer related complications.

    I haven't watched the video but have read the progesterone literature. There are a couple of seriously misleading studies about progesterone which were developed in order to capitalize on an anti progesterone drug.

  • HappyTrisha
    HappyTrisha Member Posts: 614
    edited January 2013

    Natty, where I am feeling confusion, and I know the confusion will be erased after my meeting with the doctor, is regarding the interplay of estrogen and progesterone.  My thinking is that if I am ER+, I should stay away from things that will stimulate estrogen.  That one isn't really up for grabs, I know enough about it to know that's factual.  Well the same thing should obtain regarding progesterone, which is the genesis of this entire discussion.  I am PR+, so in my mind I also need to stay away from things that will stimulate my progesterone.  It appears that DIM is one of them.

Categories