I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange

1113111321134113611371828

Comments

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited December 2012

    There seem to be a fair number of people who cannot tell the difference between news and entertainment.  Fox NewsCorp has an entertainment licence, not a news licence.  Beck and Limbaugh use their media pulpits for entertainment, and yet millions take them seriously.  Sort of like the folk who believe Stephen Colbert speaks on their (conservative) behalf, while he is actually satirizing them.

    And yes, the ultimate insult was paid to Bob Dole by his supposed GOP colleagues, which tells us all how much the party has winged its way......way, way off.

    Chick -- sorry I'm late in telling you how delighted I am that you are so boringKiss!

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited December 2012

    To all the Glen Becks and Rush Limbaughs and GOPers.  In case you missed it.  Listen and pay attention. 

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jp3OhC3NoMk

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2012

    Bob Dole was the Majority Leader of the Republican Party in the US Senate for YEARS.  He is responsibile for more GOOD legislation to help the diabled, his experience in WWII left him with a severe disablility.  HE IS A GOOD MAN.  I too diagree on some of his policies, but when THIS MAN, now 89, confined to a wheelchair, comes back to the Senate, almost directly from his hospital bed, to APPEAL to his colleagues, and they DENY him, the OBVIOUS - to welcome the WORLD to agree ( as most nations have) to the same standards available to the disabled in the USA ( ADA: Americans with Disabilites Act) because of this made up hooey about "problems with home schooling?"

    ETA: Building on Nature: The Life of Antoni Gaudi ooooooohhh...looks delicious Wink

    Can't even imagine what kind of a world this will turn into - without the leadership I've known growing up.  Moderate Republicans have fought for such good things - and worked so effectively "across the aisle" for everything.

    ART - Athena, inspiring, and I don't know Gaudi - but thanks to Belinda's pics - I am now fascinated, esp. the mosaics, going to look up more about his work.

    YOU ARE THE BEST GROUP OF WOMEN TO HANG OUT WITH....(ending a phrase with a preposition, in case there are grammarians amoung us) - remember when Winston Churchill was "corrected" by a secretary, and his reponse was "Impudence is something up with which I will not put."

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited December 2012

    Ugh.  I went to the gym yesterday (I have been going regularlyl, honest!) and did 3 sets of 10 lat pulldowns at 55 lbs.  I was pleasantly sore until this morning, when I stretched my arms up before I got out of bed.  I twisted a little and -- POP! -- I have a monster muscle spasm in my left lat.  UGH!  I am grunting every time I move wrong ... and ibuprofen didn't help much.  Fortunately I'm working from home, so I'm going to go stand in a hot shower in a little bit.  I do believe I will have a date with a Flexiril tonight!

    Sorry to be a whiney-boots, but just thought I'd interject it here. 

    And is anyone making Christmas cookies?  (Somehow I feel a minutia interlude coming on  ....)

    L

  • rosemary-b
    rosemary-b Member Posts: 2,006
    edited December 2012

    I am home today. A day off to stencil a tee shirt for my grandson(done) make a jumper for my ganddaugher (the last of 4 and I am procrastinating). The first one was  a lot of fun the next two were fun and well this one will be done soon. I am making a pillow for my granddaughter whose room is being redone for Christmas. It is a simple 9 patch. For my daughters I have embroidered and needlepointed gifts underway.

    No Christmas decorations up yet but I will start this afternoon.Whew.

    Oh and my daughter will be brining her 2 year old out for a little while this afternoon.

    And...there is still housework and laundry to do.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited December 2012

    And to think we thought the republicans were heartless cynics in Dole's days...

    What pisses me off is how the mainstream media keep repeating the tea party misinformation rant about this UN convention without correcting the facts. They are worse than Beck and Rush, who we know are fascists. 

    The NYT, for example, should know better than to quote one side, then the other, and leave it at that as though there was an equivalency between a lie and the truth. THAT is what hands the extremists their victories. When the media show a total lack of testosterone in its reporting.

    NYT, Hall of Shame, "reports" this in the following way:

    A majority of Republicans who voted against the treaty, which was modeled on the Americans With Disabilities Act, said they feared that it would infringe on American sovereignty.

    Among their fears about the disabilities convention were that it would codify standards enumerated in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child — and therefore United Nations bureaucrats would be empowered to make decisions about the needs of disabled children — and that it could trump state laws concerning people with disabilities. Proponents of the bill said these concerns were unfounded.'

    The part in bold explains one side. The part in non bold mentions (without explaining) the other. Yeah, way to go NYT, really "fair and balanced." Why don't you tell us WHY the other side say the concerns were ubnfounded. And why does the author use the word "bureaucrats" without quotation marks. The NYT style for public officials is to call them "officials." So if they are borrowing a phrase from someone else, they need to put it in quotation marks - and attribute it.

    Of course, I am speaking as though true journalism were still alive. I rarely read the NYT now. It has become a haven for spineless liberals who feel compelled to give the conservative misinformation machine more time just to show how flexible they are, right wing hacks, and people who generally apologize for everything expect for an intelligent idea.

    That kind of reporting - that subtle bias and misinformation, does 50 times more harm that any Glen Beck, IMO.

  • alexandria58
    alexandria58 Member Posts: 1,588
    edited December 2012

    What Sun and Athena said!!

  • Wabbit
    Wabbit Member Posts: 1,592
    edited December 2012

    I feel bad for Bob Dole.  He did not deserve to be kicked like that.  But I suspect he made the effort to show up because he saw what is going on and knew it might happen.  Nice of him to try.   

    Ouch Libby!  And they tell you exercise is good for you ... hmmmp.

    Yeah for your boring news Chickadee!

    Poor puppy dog!  Jake had one of those cones a few months ago.  It was pitiful ... he kept crashing into walls and getting stuck in doorways.  I found him a more comfortable cone than the one we got from the vet and thus had two cones.  Wanted to put one on both dogs and send them out to play bumper dogs.  But I haven't ... yet.

    Been trying to get Christmas stuff done.  Found little gifts for hubby and the annual 'goofy' gift for daughter.  Cards next. 

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited December 2012

    "bumper dogs" .... I am loving that visual!  Hurts to laugh, but laughing anyway!

    L

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited December 2012

    "hat tip to the Lizardking"??????????

    Methinks someone better change her "supplier"!  Bad weed = delusions!   hahahahhaahahhahhahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited December 2012

    WR if you do that, I want to see it on youtube....might go viral!  bumber dogs!  hehehehhe!

    HL OUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2012

    Don't think there are copyright laws on prss releases once the embargo is lifted, if I'm wrong, somebody PM me & I'll delete it:  http://www.sabcs.org/PressReleases/index.asp

    Embargoed for Release:
    7:30 a.m. CT, Dec. 5, 2012
    Media Contact:
    Jeremy Moore (215) 446-7109 Jeremy.Moore@aacr.org In San Antonio, Dec. 4-8: (210) 582-7035
    Extending Duration of Adjuvant Tamoxifen Treatment to 10 Years Reduced Risk for Late Breast Cancer Recurrence, Improved Survival
      
    Greatest additional benefit was seen in the second decade after diagnosis. Findings are directly relevant to women taking tamoxifen. Women on other ER-positive breast cancer endocrine treatments may benefit.
    SAN ANTONIO — Ten years of adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen provided women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer greater protection against late recurrence and death from breast cancer compared with the current standard of five years of tamoxifen, according to the international ATLAS (Adjuvant Tamoxifen — Longer Against Shorter) study.
    “Five years of adjuvant tamoxifen is already an excellent treatment that substantially reduces the 15-year risk for recurrence and death from estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, but ATLAS now shows that 10 years of tamoxifen is even more effective,” said Christina Davies, M.D., a coordinator in the Clinical Trial Service Unit at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom.
    She presented the results at the 2012 CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, held here Dec. 4-8. The results were simultaneously published in the Lancet.
    “The main additional benefit from continuing tamoxifen treatment is to reduce breast cancer mortality during the second decade after diagnosis,” Davies said. “We already knew that five years of tamoxifen reduces breast cancer mortality in this late period by almost a third in comparison with no tamoxifen. We now know that 10 years of tamoxifen is even better, approximately halving breast cancer mortality during the second decade after diagnosis.”
    Researchers enrolled 6,846 women with ER-positive breast cancer between 1996 and 2005. Half had node-positive disease. All the women had been using tamoxifen for five
    -more-
    Extending Duration of Adjuvant Tamoxifen to 10 Years Reduced Risk for Late Breast Cancer Recurrence, Improved Survival Page 2 of 4
    years, and the researchers randomly assigned them to continue treatment for another five years or to stop immediately.
    After about eight years of follow-up, the researchers observed 1,328 breast cancer recurrences and 728 deaths after recurrence. The treatment allocation had little effect on either recurrence rates or death rates during the period five to nine years after diagnosis. However, during the second decade following diagnosis, the women who continued tamoxifen treatment had a 25 percent lower recurrence rate and a 29 percent lower breast cancer mortality rate compared with women who stopped after five years.
    Risk for death from breast cancer five to 14 years after diagnosis was 12.2 percent among those who continued use versus 15 percent among those who stopped — an absolute gain of 2.8 percent. The researchers observed the greatest benefit during 10 to 14 years after diagnosis.
    Davies noted that continuing tamoxifen use can increase side effects, with endometrial cancer being the most life-threatening. Because endometrial cancer is generally curable, the cumulative risk for death between five and 14 years after diagnosis was 0.4 percent versus 0.2 percent. Because this risk is heavily outweighed by the reduction in breast cancer deaths, overall mortality was significantly reduced by longer treatment. In premenopausal women, for whom tamoxifen is often the endocrine treatment of choice, there was no apparent excess of endometrial cancer.
    “Many women with ER-positive breast cancer take tamoxifen, or some other adjuvant endocrine treatment, but the current recommendation is to stop after five years,” said Davies. “ATLAS showed that protection against breast cancer recurrence and death is greater with 10 years than with five years of tamoxifen use. Women and their doctors should be aware of this evidence when deciding how long to continue tamoxifen, or any other endocrine treatment.”
    The study was funded by Cancer Research U.K., the U.K. Medical Research Council, AstraZeneca, the United States Army and the European Union.
    ## #
    The mission of the 2012 CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium is to produce a unique and comprehensive scientific meeting that encompasses the full spectrum of breast cancer research, facilitating the rapid translation of new knowledge into better care for patients with breast cancer. The Cancer Therapy & Research Center (CTRC) at The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) and Baylor College of Medicine are joint sponsors of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. This collaboration utilizes the clinical strengths of the CTRC and Baylor and the AACR’s scientific prestige in basic, translational and clinical cancer research to expedite the delivery of the latest scientific
    Extending Duration of Adjuvant Tamoxifen to 10 Years Reduced Risk for Late Breast Cancer Recurrence, Improved Survival Page 3 of 4
    advances to the clinic. For more information about the symposium, please visit www.sabcs.org.
    Publication Number: S1-2 Title: ATLAS. 10 v 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) in ER+ disease: Effects on
    outcome in the first and in the second decade after diagnosis
    Christina Davies1, Hongchao Pan1, Jon Godwin2, Richard Gray1, Richard Peto1 and on Behalf of ATLAS Collaborators Worldwide1. 1Clinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom and 2Institutes for Applied Health and Society & Social Justice Research, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
    Body: Background: In ER+ early breast cancer, 5 years of tamoxifen greatly reduces recurrence throughout the first decade (years 0-9) with little further gain later, and reduces breast cancer mortality (BCM) substantially throughout years 0-14 (EBCTCG, Lancet 2011; 378: 771-84 – see Table). It is not known how 10 years TAM compares with the current standard of just 5 years TAM.
    Methods: In 1996-2005 the international ATLAS trial randomized 6846 women with ER+ disease who had had 5 years of adjuvant TAM to continue another 5 years (to year 10) or stop at year 5 (control). Annual follow-ups recorded compliance, hospital admissions, breast cancer recurrence (including new contralateral), any other new primary cancer and cause of death.
    Results: Compliance was 80%, as after 2 years 84% of those allocated continue and 4% of those allocated stop were still taking endocrine treatment (>99% TAM). With mean 7.1 woman-years follow-up (30,000 w-y in years 5-9, 16,000 in years 10-14, 2000 later), 1328 recurrences were reported (900 in years 5-9, 379 in years 10-14). Recurrence was significantly lower with10 than 5 years TAM (Table: logrank 2p=0.002, rate ratio (RR)=0.90 se 0.06 in years 5-9 and 0.75 se 0.08 in years 10+). So were both
    BCM (2p=0.01, RR=0.97 se 0.10 in years 5-9 and 0.71 se 0.09 in years 10+) and all- cause mortality (2p=0.01, with no increase in non-BCM). Proportional risk reductions were homogeneous by country, age and stage. Kaplan-Meier risks in years 5-14 (K- M)were: recurrence 21.4 vs 25.1%, BCM 12.2 vs 15.0%. Uterine cancer K-Ms in those randomized at age 50+ were: incidence 2.6 vs 1.6% (2p=0.08), mortality 0.2 vs 0.2%. In pre-menopausal women (where AIs are not an alternative to TAM) there was no apparent excess of uterine cancer.
    Extending Duration of Adjuvant Tamoxifen to 10 Years Reduced Risk for Late Breast Cancer Recurrence, Improved Survival Page 4 of 4
    Discussion: Compared with just 5 years TAM, continuing TAM to year 10 safely protects further against recurrence and, particularly during the second decade, BCM. Combining results from ATLAS and the EBCTCG meta-analyses of 5 years TAM vs none (both had 80% compliance), in a hypothetical trial of 10 vs 0 years TAM with 80% compliance, 15-year BCM would be reduced by at least one-third. Hence, full compliance with 10 years TAM would yield even greater benefit (Table). Further follow-up of ATLAS will assess more reliably the apparently substantial mortality reduction in the second decade after diagnosis.

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited December 2012

    No, Sunny -- don't worry.  It was already in the NYT.

    L

  • QuinnCat
    QuinnCat Member Posts: 3,456
    edited December 2012

    "Of course, I am speaking as though true journalism were still alive. I rarely read the NYT now. It has become a haven for spineless liberals who feel compelled to give the conservative misinformation machine more time just to show how flexible they are, right wing hacks, and people who generally apologize for everything expect for an intelligent idea."

    Oh? I wasn't aware CNN had bought the NY Times. Wink

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited December 2012

    http://www.politicususa.com/Glenn-Beck-The-View.html

    "Glenn Beck was on The View today, where after being called out on a story he used on his radio show involving meeting Whoopi Goldberg and Barbara Walters on a train, he admitted that he doesn’t check facts. Beck said that he is not a journalist. He is a commentator on life."

    Why don't they get it?  They believe everything he says, except when he clearly tells them that he is there to entertain.  He has said this many times over the years.  It must be quite amusing to him.  They have given him so much power.

    (Edited to add:  Belinda...one of my all time favourite movies)

  • QuinnCat
    QuinnCat Member Posts: 3,456
    edited December 2012

    I have to admit, that's a pretty cute commentary on Athena's post "over there."

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited December 2012

    Just for today.....got lots of gas!   hahahaahhaahaaaaaaa!

  • lewing
    lewing Member Posts: 1,288
    edited December 2012

    Yikes, Sunflowers, on the tamoxifen release (which I haven't yet read closely . . . will go back and look at it later). On the one hand, anything that reduces recurrence and increases survival is great; but on the other, I just really, really want to get off this shit sooner rather than later.  Dang, I was pissed when my new onc told me she wanted me to do a full five years of arimidex (instead of a combined total of five for arimidex plus the earlier tamoxifen).  So now new results are rolling in that may start pushing us to do 10 years, or more?  Dang again.  And I'm someone who's had minimal problems with anti-hormonals, which I guess gives me precious little to whine about, but whine I will. 

    On other topics, no Christmas decorations for me this year!  I figure getting married to a Jew on December 28 gives me a pass.  (I tried to weasel out of it last year, but my daughter insisted.  This year, however, she'll be going straight from school to her grandparents' house and not coming back here til New Year's . . . so she has no say.)

    I will, however, do some baking this weekend, as there'll be hell to pay if I show up back home without almond crescents and ginger cookies.  And I have the dreidel collection out on the coffee table.  To my amazement, the cats are leaving them alone for once: guess they're too busy trying to eat Eric's houseplants, LOL.

    Linda

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited December 2012

    Does anyone remember this?

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited December 2012
  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited December 2012

    Tamoxifen - Over my dead body, as almost did happen, actually. Have a better chance or surviving on arsenic, thank you very much!

    HL - Ouch! If it's any comfort, I have been lifting for years and that still happens.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2012

    Blue - and your new name is a tribute to??????  tee, hee..

    never saw that video clip you posted - when, where was it from?????  YIKeS...

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited December 2012

    This explains a lot!  From today's Globe and Mail:

    Law enforcement experts and con artists have long known the elderly are particularly vulnerable to financial swindles, from bogus charities to investment scams. Now Taylor, a distinguished professor of psychology at the University of California, Los Angeles, and her fellow researchers have made an important discovery that could explain why.

    In a new study, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, they found that an area of the brain called the anterior insula, which helps alert us to dishonesty, is less active in older adults than in younger people. In the first part of their study, the researchers asked participants in two separate age groups – one between the ages of 55 and 84, and the other averaging 23 years of age – to judge the trustworthiness of a series of faces shown in photographs.

    While both groups reacted the same way to photos of faces that were intentionally selected for their trustworthy and neutral expressions, the older adults were more inclined to rate untrustworthy faces, characterized by insincere smiles and averted eyes, as reliable and approachable.

    “Most of the older adults showed this effect,” Taylor said in a press release. “They missed facial cues that are pretty easily distinguished.”

    The researchers then monitored participants’ brain activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging, while they rated similar photographs. The anterior insula, which is involved in forming instincts or gut reactions, was found to be active in younger adults as they made their judgments, but not in the older participants.

    “The older adults do not have as strong an anterior insula early-warning signal; their brains are not saying ‘be wary,’ as the brains of the younger adults are,” Taylor said. “It’s not that younger adults are better at finance or judging whether an investment is good; they’re better at discerning whether a person is potentially trustworthy when cues are communicated visually.”

    The old and the young would be wise to heed her advice for avoiding scams: Hang up on telephone solicitors and avoid pushy salespeople and free lunch seminars offering investment pitches. “I’m not saying that all of these are fraudulent,” she said, “but the best thing that you can do if your brain isn’t helping you to make these discriminations is not to have to make them.”

  • QuinnCat
    QuinnCat Member Posts: 3,456
    edited December 2012

    My MO suggested I switch to Tamoxifen and I said "Are you kidding? You think I want to worry about uterine cancer now (I'm brca and have enough cancer to worry about).  Then she says to me "Why didn't you get your uterus out?"  Like where was she before and after my ooph (uh, giving me chemo and these hormonals) - she never mentioned it to me.  Am I suppose to recommend my own hysterectomy to my surgeon?

    Ten years? Seriously?  I'm counting the days now and I'm on month 4.

    I have a friend who has zero SEs on hormonals...save one, she is missing some hair on her crown.  But seriously, who are these women who feel nothing?

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited December 2012

    That's what annoys me about cancer doctors. Who needs a body part, right?

    It makes me think of a nursery rhyme:

    Lord Nelson lost one arm

    Lord Nelson lost the other arm

    Lord Nelson lost one leg

    Lord Nelson lost the other leg

    Oh, but gooody!!! He doesn't have cancer!!!! (Sarcasm oozing rivers)

    You know what I mean if you have been hospitalized on the brink of death and your doctors STILL pause to take you off the treatment. It's ok to die as long as it is of something else, it seems.

    For those who can live with it, fine. For some of us, treatment kills. And if it doesn't it makes you wish you were dead - or that someone else was. Not really what one woul.d call medicine.

    So studies are just that. Individuals are a different kettle of fish.

  • riley702
    riley702 Member Posts: 1,600
    edited December 2012

    Sunflowers, I have mixed feelings about that article - quite frankly, I don't want to take Arimidex past the 5 yr mark. I'm achy and creaky (watching me try to get up off the floor is laughable to everyone not me), I have tendinopathy in my right wrist/thumb for which I sleep in a splint, and have now developed trigger thumb on the left - all of which are associated with AIs. As a result, my hand strength and grasp are impaired, I can't use that right hand to push my self up out of a chair or bed because that much pressure on it hurts like hell, and I'll only be 52 in January! I never thought I'd feel like shit this young and was looking forward to the end of my AI days. Undecided

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited December 2012

    Kam - love your CNN quip!

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited December 2012

    Sunny, I can't remember.  Had it in my photobucket and was wondering.  LOL!

    Name change - when will people realize my skin is very thick.  NOTHING as petty as a name caller will bug me.  But I DO have gas today!  hahahahahahahaah!

  • QuinnCat
    QuinnCat Member Posts: 3,456
    edited December 2012

    Thanks Athena - the lioness who doesn't hang her clothes on the line. 

    I was actually home the day that Jon Stewart single-handedly put Crossfire to bed...even though I loved the idiocy of that show.  Have you noticed, we don't have shows with that format anymore.  We do have people saying the world is flat, when someone says it is round, but they are all on a tight leash (MTP, This Week, all of CNN) while pretending they are talking about real things.  Alan Coombs didn't last long on Hannity.  Honestly, could they find someone that could stand up to RM or CM?

Categories