I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange

1104910501052105410551828

Comments

  • QuinnCat
    QuinnCat Member Posts: 3,456
    edited November 2012

    HL

    I'm not sure if you posted this other Atlantic story:

    http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/11/ohios-provisional-ballot-order-the-biggest-legal-story-of-the-weekend/264498/

    I've seen the math and if you look state by state,  it's a pretty good bet to think this election will come down to Ohio.  If it comes down to counting these provisional ballots, by this Secretary of State Husted of Ohio (a Republican who has been directly involved with limiting voting hours or trying to get rid of early voting all together), I fear for a fair counting in this state.  We would not have results, either, for weeks again.

    Edited to add this info on the subject too:

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/in-ohio-vote-a-form-checking-nightmare

  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited November 2012

    Will all have to hope for our 87% foothold and that the universe willing we won't have to rely solely on Ohio to win.

    Jackie

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited November 2012

    HL - I am not optimistic about the investigating part either. I really think some republican election officials should be charged with obstruction. Waiting 7 hours to vote is obstruction, as is cutting the early voting days.

    But I do think that from a political standpoint, it will become evident that you can't lie your way through a presidential campaign and still win.

    I really wish the GOP would just run Bachman or Rand Paul fort president. They may as well get it out of their system. Run extremists, let tham tell the country the truth about what they want, THEN we will see how America votes. A lot of extremists think they are the silent majority - conservatives leaders like Rush Limbaugh have convinced them of it. This would prove them wrong.

  • cp418
    cp418 Member Posts: 7,079
    edited November 2012

    HappyLibby --- EXACTLY!!! Voter suppression and racism for sure.  How many people are able to wait in lines for so many hours???  (yikes -- I always have pee - what would I do?)

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited November 2012

    I wonder if some of these states create long ballots on purpose. I think it's Florida (or counties in S Fla.) which have ballots as long as 12 pages. That's absurd. They should at least hand out voter guides to people while they wait in line.

    So what are everyone's voting plans? I plan to go tomorrow after work. Lucky me, I expect very little wait. My precinct is navy blue but very well heeled, so we don't get suppressed.

  • QuinnCat
    QuinnCat Member Posts: 3,456
    edited November 2012

    I plan to vote after my pre-colonoscopy office visit (it must be the season of colonscopies!).  Around noon.  Live in a blue state, so no problem with voting.  Hardcopy ballot that is optically scanned - best kind!  Never have to show ID, just sign my name and signature compared against the one in their book.  Lots of propositions in California, including raising state income taxes on the rich and making it mandatory to label GMO foods.  Senator Feinstein was hardly challenged this year.

  • Wabbit
    Wabbit Member Posts: 1,592
    edited November 2012

    Libby ... another thanks for the Smerconish link.  I'd never heard of him before but he said exactly what needed to be said.  Sharing that is the only overtly political post I've made on my FB wall ... but it needs to be said. 

    Indianapolis also had long lines for early voting.  And again we have a Republican governor who got rid of the satellite early voting locations that were so very popular and forced everybody back to one downtown location.  People were willing to wait and were doing so in an orderly fashion ... good for them!

    It needs to be pointed out who the suppression of early voting is aimed at hurting.  The people who want and need to vote early are the hourly wage employed people who will lose wages they cannot afford to lose if they are in long lines voting on a Tuesday.  It pains me to think that some people must actually like giving a good kick in the gut to people who already are working hard and trying to do the right thing and exercise their civic responsibilities.  Can I say 'scumbags' here?

         

  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited November 2012

    I, ( per HL and Athena's entries ) feel that it is truly time to quit having to handle suppresions, major major lies and other things that are allowed to stand in these campaigns.  Of course, that may be total wistful thinking and a near fairy tale, but infringing  ( by either side ) on the basic rights of the people to cast their balot and vote is completly non-acceptable.  So, just off the top...true the vote would have to step down. 

    I have always thought in my heart, mind, and soul that lies are not something to build on, and I see this election as no exception period.  Yes, there was some of that on both sides.  The Repugs and Romney though  ( when intimating strongly that people would lose their jobs in Ohio and would do nothing to take it back---going so far as to build on it ) I think got into a real unforgivable area.  When Romney loses, this will have so very much to do with it.  Something about an en-empathetic liar that tends to come across about like fingernails on a chalk board.  Hits nerve bundles very quickly.

    Jackie

    eta -- I will probably be voting my straight Democratic ticket tomorrow after work at 4 p.m. with Dh who will also vote straight Dem. ticket this year.  In this small town....we will not have inteference of any kind and no lines either. 

  • QuinnCat
    QuinnCat Member Posts: 3,456
    edited November 2012

    It's not just the lines....that is one hurdle for the voters WR, but I truely believe there are going to be huge "vote counting" issues going on behind the scenes.  One of those fights is in the Ohio courts today.

    Funny how this topic of long lines never seems to come up with the mirror people.  In fact, "fair" is a dirty word over there and then they have the nerve to mention communist in reference to those of us who want fairness (not sure if they're thinking of cooperative farms or the voting booth?). I guess voting doesn't have to be fair in their book, by extension and exhibit.  Don't have the type of job that would allow you to vote on a Tuesday because you just don't have right stuff - I guess that's your fault, so you dont get to vote.   Ironic, isn't it?

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited November 2012

    I early voted last Friday. I'm worried about Ohio SoS stealing it again, as in 2004. Dimwit cheated his way to the presidency TWO times, second time thanks to Ohio. Rethugs couldn't pull it off in 2008 because the election wasn't that close. This time they have a shot. 

  • QuinnCat
    QuinnCat Member Posts: 3,456
    edited November 2012

    Their last best hope in Ohio is to throw out provisional ballots and/or keeping people from voting (they're working on that now).  The exit polls will show too wide a gap between R and O, as do current polls, to pull off out and out stealing.  Gotta watch that Hamilton county where Tagg Romney owns the voting machines, though. Exit polling will be extremely important there, though it's one of those things that is so difficult to challenge.

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited November 2012

    Here is another article from Mother Jones about the end of truth in political campaigns, courtesy of the Robme campaign. They lie like they breathe -- baldfaced, bold, barefaced lies constantly refuted by people who know the truth, and still they lie.



    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/11/mitt-romney-barack-obama-end-political-truth



    Pull quote: "Romney's false assertions have been the building blocks of his campaign. And he has tethered his truth-trampling to a disregard for transparency. He succeeded in keeping most of his tax returns hidden from public scrutiny—one of the major tactical successes of his campaign. He never fully explained his offshore accounts or magical IRA, valued between $20 million and $100 million. Unlike Obama and past candidates, he refused to disclose his major campaign fundraisers (a.k.a. "bundlers"). Romney has not yielded to the calls to identify the tax deductions he would end to compensate for lowering tax rates for well-to-do Americans and other taxpayers."



    It is stunning that *some* people think this is OK as long as it is their candidate who does it. It is stunning that *some* people are quite open in their disdain for minorities, the poor, the elderly and the working class who can't take off work to vote. It is stunning that *some* people look in their mirror and preen and admire themselves for being good Christians while violating many of the fundamental tenets of Christianity. It is beyond stunning that *some* people think that some people's voting rights are less important than others, and that some people's votes are less worthy than others. Listening hard for that Karma bus revving its engine!



    I, too, am worried about vote tabulation irregularities, especially in Ohio. I really hope the FBI and the USAttorney are on their game.



    DH and I voted in-person absentee the week of Columbus Day. Unlike many regressive states with thugs in charge of voting, my swing state has in-person absentee balloting and my county has very generous times and multiple places to vote.



    L



  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited November 2012

    Well said HL and with anyone's religion, no matter what it is, if this is the highest portrayal of it in Mr. Romney, then God help us all. 

    Jackie

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited November 2012

    Here's an interesting article on the development of Wisconsin's Government Accountability Board -- a good effort to take the partisanship out of both federal and state elections:

    http://prospect.org/article/what-theres-nonpartisan-way-run-elections

  • lassie11
    lassie11 Member Posts: 1,500
    edited November 2012

    I continue to be astonished that the federal election in the US does not have federally controlled elections procedures which would include the type of ballot and/or voting machine, hours of voting, systems for identifying eligible voters, monitoring rules, polling protocol, etc etc. To allow the states to control the federal election is a most peculiar system, particularly when it is clear that partisan state politicians have the capacity to effect changes favouring their party. It boggles the mind that a so called democratic country cannot produce an election system that is unambiguous, consistent and (dare I say it?!)transparently fair.

    State elections and the various referendum questions could be a separate entity run by states in a manner that does not create the outrageous waiting lines with the potential for voter intimidation.  Again, state systems should be required to be non partisan and at least consistent within the state.

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited November 2012

    How sad that American citizens now have to worry about banana republic type election theft. Before 2000 that never seriously entered my mind. I had heard about a few incidents throughout our history, but never as an organized, permanent aspect of U.S. elections, at least on the Rethuglican side.

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited November 2012

    As a Canadian, I just don't understand the long lines to vote.  I have never waited longer than 3-5 minutes to vote.  We have many polling stations in each area.  They try to put stations in or near retirement homes to make sure the elderly are included.  Hours for voting are the same throughout the country.  One area cannot shorten the available voting time.  Or change the rules.

    It all seems very odd and easy to manipulate without federal rules that apply to the entire country.

  • QuinnCat
    QuinnCat Member Posts: 3,456
    edited November 2012

    Lassie - this country is built on the concept of State rule loosely tied together by a federal government when it comes to voting.  

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited November 2012
  • Wabbit
    Wabbit Member Posts: 1,592
    edited November 2012

    Polling update ...

    Obama ... who has been accused by some of being a Muslin to the core of his fabric ... holds a commanding lead among his brotherhood of Cottons and Linens.  Polyester is as expected trending Republican and Velvet is still undecided.  Stay tuned for more information as it becomes available. 

    I'm in white bread suburbia ... we have lots of polling places and don't have long lines either.  It's not that it can't be done better ... it's that in some places some of the powers that be don't want to do better.  Sad but true. 

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited November 2012

    It is very chilling, PiP. One of the governing principles of the U.S. is local control over as much as possible (the much-ballyhooed "states' rights"). That includes things as diverse as education (no national standards for us, by gum), building codes, and election administration. The fact that a fundamental right such as voting is given to the states to administer does, indeed, render it vulnerable to partisan chicanery. We have a long, sad history of that, as a matter of fact. Poll taxes, literacy tests and outright murder were tools used to suppress the black vote after the Civil War. While the Voting Rights Act put some Federal protections into place, partisan hacks (usually regressives) are finding more and more ways to skirt the law, suppress the vote and do it without being prosecuted. However, as they say in economics, nothing fails like success - they have gotten away with it so often that they seem to be getting sloppy and greedy with voter suppression. It takes many forms, including closing polling places because of "budget issues" and forcing people to travel longer distances and wait in longer lines to vote, restricting or eliminating hours of and places for early voting, and -- as you have seen exponentially this election season -- imposing other impediments to voting such as restrictive, difficult-to-meet identification requirements, confusing ballots, and unreasonable requirements for absentee or early voting (like Husted now mandating that in-person absentee voters vouch for their own ID). These are all simply thinly-veiled (or brazen) attempts to keep minorities, the poor, the elderly and other traditionally Democratic voters from exercising their rights. You can be sure that there are many more voting machines than needed in Republican precincts, and many fewer in Democratic precincts. And they can get away with it because they are in charge. The social compact has been broken, and the demonization of the nation's first black president has given new impetus to those who would deny others the right to vote... And this demonization has given "permission" to people who previously would have objected to this voter suppression. There needs to be a new Voting Rights Act and yes, you are right -- there must be Federal standards for ballots, vote tabulation, numbers and types of voting machines, numbers of polling places by population, forms of ID required, hours of voting, etc. Otherwise, people will continue to be victimized, disenfranchised and marginalized in a society that is increasingly hostile to them.



    L

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited November 2012

    Canada and the US really are more different than we used to believe.  Isn't it confusing when travelling from one state to another if laws can change so much?  Some states are pretty small so I would think it would be an issue.

  • YramAL
    YramAL Member Posts: 1,651
    edited November 2012

    Washington State is entirely mail in ballots. I sent mine in last week. There are issues with this process-if the race is close, as our governor's race is shaping up to be-all the votes will not be counted by election night. People have until 7(I think) to get their ballots in to ballot box locations, then those votes are transported to the counting facility. 

    Fortunately, we're a blue state and there won't be any issue with our electoral votes.

    Mary

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited November 2012

    Arizona GOP Senate Candidate Robocalls Democrats And Tells Them To Vote In The Wrong Place






    Source: Think Progress

    Arizona GOP Senate Candidate Robocalls Democrats And Tells Them To Vote In The Wrong Place 
    By Ian Millhiser on Nov 5, 2012 at 9:00 am 

    Rep. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) 

    According to a report by Phoenix, Arizona’s NBC affiliate, Rep. Jeff Flake’s (R-AZ) U.S. Senate campaign called Democratic voters telling them to vote in the wrong precinct — in some cases as much as 11 miles away from their actual polling place. After telling the Democratic voters to vote in the wrong place, the calls also encourage the voter to “vote Flake for U.S. Senate.” Watch the report:




    Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/11/05/1137841/arizona-gop-senate-candidate-robocalls-democrats-and-tells-them-to-vote-in-the-wrong-place/ 
  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited November 2012

    PiP, it can be confusing. When you move, you have to learn the laws of your new state -- not only with regard to the minutae of voting (the big things are the same - age 18, U.S. citizen, but the small things like felony status are different state to state), but with voting hours, early voting or not ... Even traffic laws. Some states don't allow right turn on red, some do. Speed limits are different state-to-state. Even highway exit numbers on interstate highways are different. Some states number them sequentially, some states number them according to the number of miles away from the border. It is indeed a mishmash. It works ok most of the time, but we are seeing the dramatic consquences when civility breaks down and there is no overriding Federal law governing the election process. If there were, it would be overriding, because Federal law always trumps state law. Federal law is the minimum standard that must be followed, in the cases where there is a governing Federal statute.



    L

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited November 2012

    I am concerned about how fraud could affect house races. The GOP apparatchiks probably know they won't be able to change the outcome for presidentials, but they will try to get as many gadfly Tea Partiers in Congress as they can so that the can bring things to a near halt until Obama leaves office.

    The GOP just has no shame anymore - none. They don't seem to care that the UN has to be sent here to observe elections, or that their last president garnered critical reports from Amnesty International because of the Bush/CheneyRumsfeld human right violations around the world.

    The GOP has become ideologically synonymous with fascism. There is no discernible ideology other than that which creates a plutocracy and suppresses the poor - and revises both science and history to suit the needs of backward corporations.

    I suppose even in the US heartland you can't sell such an agenda. But it's the one the GOP represents more than any other, and the only option of candidates is to lie and contradict themselves, them whisper the truth, so that voters in the end DO know what the fascist agenda is all about.

  • River_Rat
    River_Rat Member Posts: 1,724
    edited November 2012

    1. Occupy Sandy now has a registry on Amazon.com.

    For those who want to know exactly what your money was spent on (and that none of it was used for executive salaries or bonuses).

    http://www.amazon.com/registry/wedding/32TAA123PJR42

    Reposted from: http://interoccupy.net/...

    2. You can ship items directly to Occupy Sandy’s main distribution hub, (for those who prefer not to use Amazon, for whatever reason.)  They are cooking meals there, serving meals there  AND using volunteers to personally deliver hot meals and supplies to those in need who can’t come out to pick up things for themselves.

    St Jacobi Lutheran Church
    5406 4th Avenue
    Brooklyn, NY, 11220

    Occupy Sandy Contact No. at St. Jacobi
    (347) 470-4192

    If you choose option No. 2 let them (and others) know what you are sending by posting to the social media feed at http://interoccupy.net/...

  • lewing
    lewing Member Posts: 1,288
    edited November 2012

    Thanks, River_Rat!  My sweetie is right now cooking two big trays of rosemary-garlic breaded chicken to take directly to Red Hook.  It smells amazing. 

    (His office in lower Manhattan closed last Monday and is STILL closed -- they finally have power, but still no heat.  Since I work from home, it's been a lot of enforced togetherness.)

    Linda

  • Wabbit
    Wabbit Member Posts: 1,592
    edited November 2012

    RR ... what a good idea to use Amazon that way!   

  • rosemary-b
    rosemary-b Member Posts: 2,006
    edited November 2012

    I have some random observations...

    Where is the outrage on the right at Romney using teleprompters? They were all over Obama for that.

    it is really amzing to go to the sites that say Romney has the race sewed up. They are back to pushing the "polls are biased" line. The contortionism is amazing.

    Life isn't fair but laws are supposed to be.

Categories