I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange

19899909929949951828

Comments

  • lewing
    lewing Member Posts: 1,288
    edited October 2012

    Ah, Bill, you devil you!

    Linda

  • lewing
    lewing Member Posts: 1,288
    edited October 2012

    Seriously, what gets me about Romney's response to the question about equity for women is that it didn't touch at all on what he would do as president.  He may very well have been a great boss for the women who worked directly for him when he was governor.  I'm totally ready to believe that.  (Though I understand that he didn't actually approach women's groups in an effort to find qualified job candidates . . . it was the other way around, they approached him.)  But being a flexible, sympathetic boss for the handful of (privileged) women who work for you doesn't speak to the broader issues.  What *is* his position on Ledbetter?  What about the insurance industry practice of charging women more for health insurance?  What about improvements in the Family and Medical Leave Act?  What about access to paid sick leave, including for family illnesses?  Not a word.

    Linda

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited October 2012

    And yes, of course, the binder "story" was in fact a lie:

    http://blog.thephoenix.com/BLOGS/talkingpolitics/archive/2012/10/16/mind-the-binder.aspx

    Mind The Binder

    Hey, I know about that binder! And guess what -- Mitt Romney was lying about it.

    From the rush transcript:

    CROWLEY: Governor Romney, pay equity for women?

    ROMNEY: Thank you. An important topic, and one which I learned a great  deal about, particularly as I was serving as governor of my state,  because I had the chance to pull together a cabinet and all the  applicants seemed to be men.

    And I -- and I went to my staff, and I said, "How come all the people  for these jobs are -- are all men." They said, "Well, these are the  people that have the qualifications." And I said, "Well, gosh, can't we  -- can't we find some -- some women that are also qualified?"

    And -- and so we -- we took a concerted effort to go out and  find women who had backgrounds that could be qualified to become members of our cabinet.

    I went to a number of women's groups and said, "Can you help us find folks," and they brought us whole binders full of women.

    I was proud of the fact that after I staffed my Cabinet and my senior  staff, that the University of New York in Albany did a survey of all 50  states, and concluded that mine had more women in senior leadership  positions than any other state in America.

    Now one of the reasons I was able to get so many good women to be part of that team was because of our recruiting effort.

    Not a true story.

    What actually happened was that in 2002 -- prior to the election, not even knowing yet whether it would be a Republican or Democratic administration -- a bipartisan group of women in Massachusetts formed MassGAP to address the problem of few women in senior leadership positions in state government. There were more than 40 organizations involved with the Massachusetts Women's Political Caucus (also bipartisan) as the lead sponsor.

    They did the research and put together the binder full of women qualified for all the different cabinet positions, agency heads, and authorities and commissions. They presented this binder to Governor Romney when he was elected.

    I have written about this before, in various contexts; tonight I've checked with several people directly involved in the MassGAP effort who confirm that this history as I've just presented it is correct -- and that Romney's claim tonight, that he asked for such a study, is false. 

    I will write more about this later, but for tonight let me just make a few quick additional points. First of all, according to MassGAP and MWPC, Romney did appoint 14 women out of his first 33 senior-level appointments, which is a reasonably impressive 42 percent. However, as I have reported before, those were almost all to head departments and agencies that he didn't care about -- and in some cases, that he quite specifically wanted to not really do anything. None of the senior positions Romney cared about -- budget, business development, etc. -- went to women.

    Secondly, a UMass-Boston study found that the percentage of senior-level appointed positions held by women actually declined throughout the Romney administration, from 30.0% prior to his taking office, to 29.7% in July 2004, to 27.6% near the end of his term in November 2006. (It then began rapidly rising when Deval Patrick took office.)

    Third, note that in Romney's story as he tells it, this man who had led and consulted for businesses for 25 years didn't know any qualified women, or know where to find any qualified women. So what does that say?

    Indeed.  What does it say that he spent 25 years in the private sector -- a fact that he is inordinately proud of -- and doesn't know any qualified women.  What does that say about the kind of organization he runs?  What does that say about him as a CEO or a supervisor?  I would hard-pressed to find any man I know who would say he didn't know any qualified women in his field. 

    L

  • gardengumby
    gardengumby Member Posts: 7,305
    edited October 2012

    Very much enjoyed watching the debate last night - and then reading everyone's posts about it this morning.  Glad I missed the one the moderators removed - I get awfully sick of hate speech in any form!! 

    Obama did good.  There were a few things he could have done better (IMO), but overall he was very good.  Romney showed he was pressured, made some really stupid statements. 

    HL beat me to it......  :)

  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited October 2012

    Once again....I am so glad that I am here where I can count on facts to show up and not some slanted view.  It is so refreshing to come to a place that doesn't take some favorable sounding part and put it up as though that is all there is.  To everything that I have seen, even from the Repugs side --- Romney did not deliver last night.  I'm still a bit appalled that he was going to strong-arm Candy  like he did Leher ( which I think I'm spelling wrong ) but that fell apart and that he showed at one time such dis-respect for the office he is running for by talking down so to the Pres. Also I did not feel that he managed to connect much with women.  I think there may be big repairs in order.  We have some work to do on our side too.  Its growing late.   

    Jackie 

  • Wabbit
    Wabbit Member Posts: 1,592
    edited October 2012

    I thought it was bizarre when Romney answered the question about assault rifles by basically saying it was 'single mothers' that were the real problem.  So I went checking this morning.

    Columbine ... Eric Harris ... parents Wayne & Kathy Harris - Dylan Klebold ... parents Tom and Susan Klebold

    Aurora theater ... James Holmes ... parents Robert and Arlene Holmes

    Gabby Giffords shooting ... Jared Loughner ... parents Randy and Amy Loughner

    Not a single parent family in the bunch.

    So nice that he thinks women should have flexibility in the workplace so they can get home in time to fix dinner.  Wonder if he would allow us to come in late so we could clean the bathroom and kitchen in the mornings too?  Not equal pay though.  Lucky us ... we could maybe work 3/4 as many hours as men for 1/2 as much pay as men in his idea of a perfect world.  WTF Yell

    Was happy to see his arrogance get slapped down some and some of the lies called out.  All in all a good job by Obama I thought.

  • Enjoyful
    Enjoyful Member Posts: 3,591
    edited October 2012

    You left out Timothy McVeigh - parents divorced at 10 and raised by his father. So much for single mothers being the problem.

  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited October 2012
    Before I leave for work....just saw this and feel it says a good deal.  In fact, I think she’s right.

     
     

    If You Don’t Know Me By Now…How Can You Possibly Still Be An ‘Undecided’ Voter?

    by Lorraine Devon Wilke

    “You will never, ever, ever know me.”

    Sing along, gents; this is between you and all your confused, reluctant, fence-sitting voters who still can't figure out which of you to vote for. Whoever they are. Those people who make very… slow… decisions. The Undecideds. Sounds like an Irish folk band.

    This has been the most expensive, and certainly longest, campaign in the history of America and, at this point, unless there’s a skeleton in the closet, an elephant in the living room, or a horse’s ass in the family tree, we know all we need to know about these two men: likely more than we even know about our own spouses (I’m still trying to figure my husband’s stance on lapel pins). But despite the cost and longevity, we continue...for them: The Undecideds.

    // //

    At least it was a refreshing debate at the Hofstra Town Hall. Candy Crowley did a good strong-arm job, the questions from the audience were excellent, and after weeks of chortling by the GOP (and how often do you get to use the word “chortling”?) and hand-wringing by the Democrats (Dear Dems: Can We NOT Throw Obama Under The Bus This Time?), it was nice to see the President come out with fire in his eyes and silver on his tongue. Mitt…well, he did what Mitt does: finesse, steamroll, revise, flip-flop and condescend (at one point he shoved Candy Crowley aside like a bad waitress!) but he was well groomed, looked like he’d gotten a haircut, so...that was new. Otherwise, he was Mitt, maybe Mitt-Lite, like he’d been toned down a bit. I'm guessing they thought the couch jumping wasn't presidential enough.

    But the point is: what more do you need to know about these guys? This question is directed to The Undecideds. What more, really? President Obama has been, well, the President of the United States, so we’re pretty up-to-speed on him. Mr. Romney has been campaigning for the last eighteen years, some while in office, so he’s been pretty front-and-center himself. Beyond that, lots of talking has gone on between these two, about these two, and by these two and, frankly, I think it’s been covered; barring the menagerie mentioned above, it's all been covered. Make a decision already!

    Because, like a wedding engagement that’s gone on too long, this campaign has gotten ripe: slightly curdled, certainly tedious, and, for many of us, really, really redundant to the point where I’m wondering when we start polling the polls used to poll the polling demographic (Why Presidential Campaigns Don’t Work).

    While it’s grand that our country goes to such lengths to make sure we really know the people we vote for, at some point the election process is held hostage by The Undecideds. They're plied and pandered to like that attention-sucking cute chick who won't say yes and, really, it's excessive, particularly when the rest of us make it our business to actually decide. Without them, we could do this like grown-ups: have a few debates, listen to a few speeches, do our own research, and get the hell on with it. Without them, we could wrap this up in six months, tops. Without them, we could literally right the economy by using the copious amounts of money being wasted. Without them, "The Undecideds" really would be the name of a band somewhere.

    Time to get off the fence, people. Well, past time. Not to be rude or anything, but we're tired of hearing about you and, frankly, if you don’t know them by now, you will never, ever, ever know them.

  • Wabbit
    Wabbit Member Posts: 1,592
    edited October 2012

    Glad to see you popped in Glenna!  Hope treatment is going well for you.

    Wishing you a very good time on the cruise Chickadee.  Hope the internet access is there so you can still visit with us.

    The binder story just makes me wonder how they think they can get away with some of their 'stories'.  Ryan supposedly washing dishes at the soup kitchen too.  Are they so used to only having people around them who are scared to challenge them maybe?  Because this stuff is so easily proven to be phony ... why even say it? Foot in Mouth

      

  • River_Rat
    River_Rat Member Posts: 1,724
    edited October 2012

    Glenna it's nice to hear from you, hope you're doing well.

    Pictures of the chocolate buffet, Chickadee, we need pictures...and of anything else you care to post. Have a wonderful time!

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited October 2012

    Dh and I enjoyed the debate last night.  Both had their strong moments.  However, Obama came out strong and confident, which was so reassuring after his last time out.  Romney started out confident but was rambling and repeating himself before too long. He seemed to think that the person who said the most words was the winner.

    Watching him sitting there with that wierd smirk and the obssesive blinking made me wonder what other heads of states would think while conversing with him if that is what they saw.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited October 2012

    Somebody's getting nervous next door.  Geez, relax!  I think I've seen the same post 3 times.

    And I don't think Crowly made a mistake on "Act of Terror" either.

    I see nail biting.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited October 2012

    Pip. Ray was watching the debate with me and at one point just turned to me and said "Is that Romney for real?"  Called him a clown and went to bed.  He's not a political junkie. 

  • Enjoyful
    Enjoyful Member Posts: 3,591
    edited October 2012

    I kept listening for details on his plan to cut tax rates and add 12 million jobs (although Romney also said that government doesn't create jobs) but heard nothing. Except...whoopeeeee!...all of us middle classers with incomes below 250k won't have to pay taxes on our interest and dividend income. Because we all have investments and huge savings accounts.



    *eye roll*

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited October 2012

    Blue, I watched that Rose Garden presser = and it was ALL ABOUT the seriousness with which the President of the United States, Barack Obama ( in case any lurker has forgotten) takes ACTS OF TERROR.  HRC had been brilliant ( HRC, 2016)

    BLUE:  Stay away from the places which upset you...I figured out how to watch the WHOLE DEBATE, fabulous,  used the MUTE button so I only heard PRESIDENT OBAMA ...passed that idea around during debate by email - and wow, amazed at how many dear friends hadn't thought of that option...

    BINDERS - took them 90 seconds to buy the website.  Tee, hee...gotta be THE MEME of the Month, and probably the Halloween Costume of the Year too...

    Wanna bet Tina Fey uses it at the Golden Globes - she & Amy will be hysterical, not as funny as Etch-A-Sketch whatzizname, but good...

    Yorkie - Mormon Playboy - a classic.  Also neat pic of WJC ;-)))

  • River_Rat
    River_Rat Member Posts: 1,724
    edited October 2012

    Enjoyful, his plan is "I know how to do that." You must have missed that. *eye roll*

  • Wabbit
    Wabbit Member Posts: 1,592
    edited October 2012

    So why was MA 47th in job creation during his reign as Governor?  He just didn't want to then or what?

    What was the real deal with you East Coast folks and your earthquake?  Shake, rattle and roll or just a little jiggle?

  • AnneW
    AnneW Member Posts: 4,050
    edited October 2012

    I've had so much fun catching up here today! Except for the Begazi transcript. That brought tears to my eyes. And to think that the repugs are twisting it for their own agenda purposes--treasonits, to me. And that's not a word I throw around.

    Gotta find that Clinto meme for FB. It's priceless, and I nearly spewed my coffee.

    Good news department: I don't have a torn labrum in my hip, though it is wearing out (the labrum, not the bone.) SO, no surgery unless pain and dysfunction get worse. And the BEST news of all--I'm graduating to once a year visits with the oncologist! I've been with him for ten years, at least twice a year. I promised him no "do-overs" this time, and hope to see him socially only till next October. Such a freeing feeling, but tempered by the sadness I feel for all the people I know who are not as fortunate on this cancer journey as I am today. Today. I know how fleeting this all can be.

    I will pledge to enjoy this gorgeous fall day, cool and breezy, yellow leaves whirling everywhere. I wish you all the same sense of peace. (I'll be intropsective for all of us, if anyone's riled or agitated, okay?)

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited October 2012

    Ann, I'm going to share the meme on my page.

    Here is another important chart:

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited October 2012

    Aaaaand back to funny:

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited October 2012

    Question:

    In debates where there are alloted times to speak, why don't they just have the mikes automatically go dead when the time is up?  I hate the way that they all take advantage of the 'time'.

  • QuinnCat
    QuinnCat Member Posts: 3,456
    edited October 2012

    I find above hilarious, I also must laugh when I am told as a feminist that women shouldn't worry about a woman's right to choose or the fact that an insurance company would decide not to offer contraception service because that employer, offering that insurance, would not agree with said contraception BECAUSE we have much bigger things to worry about, like the jobs and the economy.

    That's "YOUR" problem that you can't seem to handle two issues at once and beyond belief that you would advocate women giving up hard fought rights, period. Besides, we all know it's not about juggling, but you can't come up with anything logical to say to those undecided women voters and the R's desire to take us back to the 1950's as far as women's rights.

  • ananda8
    ananda8 Member Posts: 2,755
    edited October 2012

    I like the idea of timing by dead mikes.  The one who is speaking has a live mike until time is up.  The one who is not speaking has a dead mike until it is his or her turn.  I would also like to see each candidate talk for five minutes on the issue and have a two minute rebuttal.  Regardless of the forum every question should come from the American People.  Each party can take turns choosing the question to be asked with the incumbent allowed to choose first.  The candidate who does not use all of his or her time, can add it to the closing statement. 

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited October 2012
  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited October 2012

    Passed out, and have only just come to. Damned meds - when they don't kill you, they nearly kill you. Unable to go to work today.

    Chickadee - yey - we'll hear how your cruise is going - watch it with the chocolate pictures - some of us are trying to watch what we eat, ya know.Tongue Out

    Glenna - my only complaint is that you don't post enough. It's so wonderful that we are all here saying such interesting things, not letting our health status define us, serious though it is in too many cases. Really glad to see Sandy here.

    HL - very interesting graph.

    Possum lovers are here again....I didn't see the post. The punctuation and bigotry always give her away, thought. The more ignorant, the more the hate.

    Interesting to read the real story about how women got hired to top positions in the MASS government.

    Next Romney will say we should be happy because we don't have to pay employment taxes on the underbutler - only on the butler. Ooooh, the oodles that will save me!!

    Athena, the Plains Dweller (we do our own food serving. Tongue Out )

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited October 2012

    Athena, passed out?? That is not good girl! Have you called the doctor?

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited October 2012

    Lassie, some people see out of their blind eye.  The only way they can handle the truth is to keeep posting the same gibberish over and over again, hoping that some idjut latches on.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited October 2012

    Well, not exactly, Yorkie. Went to sleep - but very, very tired the next morning.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited October 2012

    Question....why are most of the red states not coastal states?  I know the answer, but just interested in other opinions about this sutuuashun.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited October 2012

    Blue, I will bite: because coastal states are more likely to come in contact with the outside world. This means they are more economically developed, attract the most talent, are more industrialized and benefit from intermingling.

    The blue states never complain about how they have to subsidize the less developed, less talent-laden red states because they learn to live in community. The red states are more likely to be isolated, economically laggard, depend on the port states for commerce, and more likely to resent the political and economic dominance of the coastal states. This has been true throughout American history and served as part of the impetus for the Civil War.

    All of this while telling themselves the lie that they could go it alone. The Tea Partiers have no idea how dependent they really are on federal largesse. It's ironic to hear that really think they can make it alone.

    Red States vs. Blue States

    Source:http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/economic-intelligence/2012/09/18/obama-supporters-subsidize-romney-supporters-with-their-taxes-

Categories