VERY discouraged

Options
12346

Comments

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited July 2012

    Notself, thanks! I followed the links and it leads to a company selling "special" water.

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited July 2012

    Mini, what is leftbisnthe special health water that "Dr" Noreen sells.

  • ananda8
    ananda8 Member Posts: 2,755
    edited July 2012

    Sorry, Momine,

     I should have checked the information more carefully.  I was just trying to find water filters that will filter out contaminents.  I guess I messed up.  Embarassed

  • exbrnxgrl
    exbrnxgrl Member Posts: 12,424
    edited July 2012

    Dr. Noreen is also a chiropractor according to her bio. It seems her are posts are teetering on the edge of rules violation if she is trying to sell something.
    ETA- Read through her site. Don't know if she gets anything from the sale of Kangen water, but it is heavily promoted. It does not appear as if she has a stake in the company but it could be possible.

  • AMP47
    AMP47 Member Posts: 200
    edited July 2012

    I am not sure what happened in Dr Noreen's post - but I assume it was related to water? Why was her post deleted? 

  • exbrnxgrl
    exbrnxgrl Member Posts: 12,424
    edited July 2012

    I think people reported the posts as rule violations. It seemed she was selling or at least promoting the sale of some special water filtration system. I was quite close to reporting it myself if you read my earlier post. Caryn

  • ananda8
    ananda8 Member Posts: 2,755
    edited July 2012

    The link to the water system didn't bother me.  She had suggested that people Google "water quality report city state" and check to see if there was a warning about cancer that appeared in the report.  I did so and saw the warning but it didn't apply to my city's water and it was interesting. It's nice to know how clean my local water supply is.

    People with poor quality municipal water should do research on getting appropriate filters.  Most bottled water is municipal water that has had some contaminant removed but not all.  For this reason, her link to a water filtration system didn't concern me.

    What did concern me was her statement that people should try to adjust the pH of their urine to make it alkaline.  Serious kidney, liver, and heart damage can result by mucking about with pH. My local Walgreen's wont sell pH test strips without a prescription because there is all sorts of false information about pH floating about.  Although I didn't report her post, I was watching to see if she posted again.  I assumed that she was posting sincerely thinking it was good information.  She may have asked to have her posts removed after I made my comments.

  • AMP47
    AMP47 Member Posts: 200
    edited July 2012

    Mini1 -

    Thanks for the info.  

    I assume it had to do with city water, bottled water, reverosmosiswater or distilled water?  I have some experience with the previous water options and I personally would not drink any of the options.  

    I am lucky enough to live on a large ranch with a very pure water source.  For people who live in the city they have little choice of their water source.  Plastic bottles has very dangerous chemicals that permeate into the water during the process of putting water in the bottle.  I was sick to my stomach after watching the docu and felt sorry for the people are chuging down many of these bottle water drinks daily.  

    A very large documentary was just placed on the large new organizations.  It was shocking for both my husband and myself.  After watching the documentary I got rind of all drinks: water, juice/ organic drinks, etc and now only buy glass drinks or organic paper containers.  

     One time in chemistry class - my experiment was placing meat and a can of coke - next day at the lab - the meat was completely disintegrated.  No more pop for me.  

     City water, I could tell you very scary stories about the water and how it is turn clear when coming out of the tap.  

      

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited July 2012

    @. The water she is flogging is supposedly extremely alkaline.

  • ananda8
    ananda8 Member Posts: 2,755
    edited July 2012

    Momine,

    I thought you did mean me and I was confused.  Thanks for the correction.

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited July 2012

    Yes, sorry about that, notself. I looked up the actual machine that Dr. Noreen is trying to sell. It attaches to your faucet and turns your water alkaline. It costs, areyou ready? 4000 US dollars. I am truly disgusted by the way people will try to take advantage of cancer patients.



    By the way, that dire warning about city water and cancer is probably pretty simple. In some places there may be problems with the cleanliness of the water supply. For most people this poses no problem, but could be a problem for those with compromised immune systems, like chemo patients.

  • AlaskaAngel
    AlaskaAngel Member Posts: 1,836
    edited July 2012

    Hi Momine,

    I've lived with acidic and basic water supplies. Either of them may have advantages or disadvantages, but having something that would filter out the results of pesticides, fertilizers and hormonal influences would be much more likely to get my attention.

    A.A.

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited July 2012

    Yes, agreed, Angel.

  • AMP47
    AMP47 Member Posts: 200
    edited August 2012

    Moderators.

    There is something very wrong when a computer is left to make the decision what information is important on which form.  

    Every form on this site should see the new research on chemo therapy you decided to remove from this post.   And now, I am being told that a computer is spoon feeding women what information it thinks a woman should view. Plus, going as far as threathing me from access to other members and possibly the site?   

     

     

    Shame on Breast Cancer.Org for removing the right of women to make their own decisions  and choice of treatment with this lethal disease.

    Sounds like Breast Cancer.Org is violation of their mission statement : supply women with the latest information on breast cancer research.

     

     Hopefully, the moderator that removed my post, on the new breast cancer research, will repost the article about the study so every woman can read about the study and be able to make her own decision about her treatment.  

     

    I will continue to post new research to the breast cancer.org site.  If you, moderator, decide or the allow a computer to decide , to prevent me from posting new cancer research, then your organization fails to live up to its own mission statement.  Shame on you.   

    AMP47 

  • purple32
    purple32 Member Posts: 3,188
    edited August 2012

    I disagree moderators.

    I support the removal.

    As the OP , some salesperson came on and steered everyone off topic. Perhaps they should have made their own thread  entitled

    " water for sale". Dont tag off me.

  • AMP47
    AMP47 Member Posts: 200
    edited August 2012

    The study that was removed is new cancer research on chemo therapy and what it does to the DNA of normal cells.  How could you object to women knowing the new risk of this treatment. 

     I would want to make a decision based on the latest study. No salesperson is involved in this issue?  How did you come up with that opinion? 

    Not one of my doctors told me about this risk.  Now that it is in the news, it should be known by all women who have breast cancer and chemo is in their treatment plan. 

    Breast Cancer.Org is about bring to new breast cancer research to the "for-front."  Not removing it from this site.  Anyone can go to the site and see that it was a study not a advertisement.   

    Not sure how you come up with approving removal of vital information for women who are facing chemotherapy? No sales pitch-just real life facts. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2012
    Purple and AMP, I don't believe you are talking about the same post that was removed. Purple, one of AMP's post was removed on another thread and she has no way of reaching the moderators other than posting somewhere and she thought because you are like-minded sisters, she could post on your thread.  AMP, I'm most grateful for the info you posted and I hope you continue doing so. Peace Sisters Smile
  • purple32
    purple32 Member Posts: 3,188
    edited August 2012

    My error AMP. I apologize. We were indeed talking about TWO entirely different threads!

    Emotions have been running high today.

    PEACE

  • AMP47
    AMP47 Member Posts: 200
    edited August 2012

    Ruby your very welcome.  Purple32 thanks for the PI.  

    I appreciate both your perceptions on new breast cancer research.  As said by some famous person,  the whole is the sum of its parts, this study is one of the very vital parts.  

    :) 

  • AMP47
    AMP47 Member Posts: 200
    edited August 2012

     Tought you ladies would find this site posted by Marie Kelly interesting. 

    jco.ascopubs.org/content/22/9/... 

    Ten-Year Outcomes in a Population-Based Cohort of Node-Negative,Lymphatic, and Vascular Invasion–Negative Early Breast Cancers Without Adjjuvant Systemic Therapies.   

  • Rosetapper
    Rosetapper Member Posts: 7
    edited August 2012

    This is my first post after reading a number of the threads on alternative and holistic approaches....and I have to admit that I'm a bit confused.  Nowhere does anyone mention anything about Artemisinin or Bindweed as possible treatments.  Are these supplements unknown to this site?  Or did I miss information on them in another forum?

    Purple32, I'm in Stage IV with Invasive Micropapillary Ductal Carcinoma that metastasized to my lymphatic system, and three months ago I began taking Artemix (a blend of Artemisinin, Artesunate, and Artemether), which has been studied recently all over the world.  Most recently, the University of Washington completed its clinical trials, though they have not yet published their findings.  The researchers have indicated, though, that the results were astonishingly positive.  I'm currently working with one of the lead researchers at the University of Washington and am following the protocol that was used in clinical studies in India.  Nine days after taking Artemix, all of my symptoms went away.  It is able to cross the blood-brain barrier to kill cancer cells in the brain, and it also treats all cancers, including lung cancer.  The way it works is that it seeks out cells that have an abnormally high amount of iron, and cancer cells accumulate iron, and then (through a peroxide action) causes those cells to explode.  Many people have gone into remission, but even though I don't believe I will be one of them due to malabsorption problems (I have celiac disease), I think that it will help prolong my life....with a good quality of life.

    As for Bindweed, it is the natural equivalent of Faslodex, which prevents the formation of abnormal blood vessels.  When tumors can't establish a blood vessel network to nourish them, they die.  I use AngioBlock twice a day, and I believe that it's doing "something" because I had abnormal blood vessel networks in my right calf, called matting, from failed schlerotherapy that I had done 20 years ago.  The matting was unsightly, but now I can finally wear shorts again--thanks to the AngioBlock, which faded it almost completely after only three days.

    Regarding osteoporosis, has no one on this site heard of T-Tapp?  It's an exercise program that works the core and is was originally designed for people trying to recover from chemo.  It boosts bone strength by using the muscles to squeeze the bones--there are testimonials on the T-Tapp site that you can read, and I have met several of the people with osteoporosis who have benefited from this exercise program.  As a person with celiac and who was born with Rickets, I've found this exercise program to be invaluable.  It has truly helped me preserve my bone strength over the years.  Information can be found at www.t-tapp.com.

    DianaNM, I am a faithful follower of the primal/paleo diet, too!  Unfortunately, though, because I'm currently taking Artemix, which requires a low-protein diet (to lower my iron levels), I have to follow a diet high in fruits and vegetables and low in meats.  I miss my preferred diet, though!

    I know I'm a newcomer here....and I hope I haven't brought up topics that have been covered and discarded, but I'm just curious about why the above information does not seem to appear anywhere on this very knowledgeable site.  Have I missed something? 

  • Mini1
    Mini1 Member Posts: 1,836
    edited August 2012

    I am fairly new here too and haven't heard of any of the things that you mentioned, so if they were already covered in past posts, I appreciate them being brought back up. I'm still learning so bring on the info for us newbies. :-)

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited August 2012

     Thanks for bringing this up Rosetapper.  I did a search for Artemisinin and this hasn't been mentioned much in the last few years.  Researchers generally refer to it as having "potent anticancer activity", however it can be toxic and there are differing views about how to take it and in which combination with other supplements or conventional treatments.  The general view seems to be that it may be helped or hindered by different combinations and it's a matter of researchers finding the right combination.  Most research has been at the in vitro and in vivo level though there is one phase 1 trial ongoing since 2008.

    Here is a recent open access review article from universities in Colombia and Australia.

    Review Article
    Antitumor Activity of Artemisinin and Its Derivatives: From a Well-Known Antimalarial Agent to a Potential Anticancer Drug
    Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology Volume 2012

    Here's an explanation of how it works from Wikipedia.

    Cancer treatment

    Artemisinin is undergoing early research and testing for the treatment of cancer.[23][24] Chinese scientists have shown artemisinin has significant anticancer effects against human hepatoma cells.[25] Artemisinin has a peroxide lactone group in its structure, and it is thought that when the peroxide comes into contact with high iron concentrations (common in cancerous cells), the molecule becomes unstable and releases reactive oxygen species. It has been shown to reduce angiogenesis and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in some tissue cultures. Recent pharmacological evidence demonstrates the artemisinin-derivative dihydroartemisinin targets human metastatic melanoma cells with induction of NOXA (phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate-induced protein 1)-dependent mitochondrial apoptosis that occurs downstream of iron-dependent generation of cytotoxic oxidative stress.[26]

    Here's the phase 1 study.   Thanks to Jenrio from the research section of BCO.

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited August 2012

    Here's a more readable explanation from the University of Washinton.

    Ancient Chinese remedy shows potential in preventing breast cancer 

    A derivative of the sweet wormwood plant used since ancient times to fight malaria and shown to precisely target and kill cancer cells may someday aid in stopping breast cancer before it gets a toehold.

    In a new study, two University of Washington bioengineers found that the substance, artemisinin, appeared to prevent the onset of breast cancer in rats that had been given a cancer-causing agent. The study appears in the latest issue of the journal Cancer Letters.

    "Based on earlier studies, artemisinin is selectively toxic to cancer cells and is effective orally," according to Henry Lai, research professor in the Department of Bioengineering, who conducted the study with fellow UW bioengineer Narendra P. Singh, a research associate professor in the department. "With the results of this study, it's an attractive candidate for cancer prevention."

    The properties that make artemisinin an effective antimalarial agent also appear responsible for its anti-cancer clout. When artemisinin comes into contact with iron, a chemical reaction ensues that spawns free radicals -- highly reactive chemicals that, when formed inside a cell, attack the cell membrane and other structures, killing the cell.

    The malaria parasite can't eliminate iron in the blood cells it eats, and stores it. Artemisinin makes that stored iron toxic to the parasite.

    The same appears to be true for cancer. Because they multiply so rapidly, most cancer cells have a high rate of iron uptake. Their surfaces have large numbers of receptors, which transport iron into the cells. That appears to allow the artemisinin to selectively target and kill the cancer cells, based on their higher iron content.

  • Rosetapper
    Rosetapper Member Posts: 7
    edited August 2012

    Joy, you did a nice job of producing some factual information--thank you!  Because it is so new on the scene, how much and in which way to take it is really something that takes a bit of guesswork.  I'm working with Dr. Narendra Singh, and he promotes the protocol that was followed in a clinical trial in India; namely, that Artemix be taken (the combination of all three derivatives) and that the amount should be based on Artemether and the patient's weight.  This is because Artemether is fat-soluble and is the more toxic derivative.  Its toxicity, however, occurs at much, much higher amounts than is used in the clinical trials.  I would have to take a 1,000 times what I'm taking to make it toxic; however, my oncologist, who is knowledgeable about Artemisinin and its other derivatives, tests me for liver damage and anemia on a regular basis.  If I were to take intramuscular injections, I would have to worry eventually about neurological damage.

    Until recently, the Indian protocol seemed to be working for me, but then my cancer marker began to rise.  One of the problems with Artemisinin and its derivatives is that absorption can go down the longer a patient stays on it.  Actually, the absorption can be diminished tremendously after only three days.  Because I have celiac disease and, therefore, have absorption problems already, I believed that I was beginning to experience an absorption problem on the Indian protocol.  At that point, I switched to Dr. Lai's preferred protocol of taking it four days a week and then stopping for three days.  During those three days, I take iron because I've become terribly anemic.  I'm hoping that this protocol will reestablish absorption, and Dr. Singh agrees that it's necessary for me to switch to this protocol.  At this point, it's all guesswork, but the studies thus far have been so positive, I believe that this may be my only hope to prolong my life.

    BTW, Joy, my daughter lives in Sydney, and I visit her every year.  You're so lucky to live there!  Australians really understand the needs of people with celiac, and I literally eat my way through Australia every time I'm there. 

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited August 2012

    Rosetapper, I'd love to see this in a thread of it's own as it's a really promising treatment that does seem to get results, even if they may not last.  No cure that I can see, but for stage IV it's about gaining time.  You're so lucky to be working with a researcher.  Also I suggest you add this information to "An Alternative approach to Stage IV Health and choices" (in forum Alternative Medicine)"

    I see that it's sometimes used with Low Dose Naltrexone (LDN) and that might be an option for you later on.  I haven't even looked into Bindweed yet.

    This article seems to cover every aspect of Artemisinin including the different types and protocols.  I know testimonials aren't scientific but they offer hope, and there are a few in this article by Christina L White though it's signed at the bottom by your Professor Narendra Singh, Ph.D., M.D. 

    Cancer Smart Bomb, Part I: An Idea from Ancient Chinese Medicine

    Follow the links at the bottom for part 2 and then the Update link.

  • purple32
    purple32 Member Posts: 3,188
    edited August 2012

    Rosetapper

    I have never ever heard of any of that!  THX so very much for all the info- I will bring it up to my naturopath.

    Good Luck to you!

  • Rosetapper
    Rosetapper Member Posts: 7
    edited August 2012

    Joy,

    Where have you read that the effects of Artemisinin don't last?  When I've asked Dr. Singh how much longer the Artemix would work for me, he has said that he knows of many patients who continue to take it well beyond the two-year trial.  Even if the information is negative, I'd like to read it.  I understand that quite a few people have gone into remission with Artemix.  Dr. Singh seemed to assume that I would, in fact, go into remission. 

    I'm very impressed with your research techniques--you must have had lots of practice!

    Purple32, if you decide to take Artemix, please let me know, and I'll send you the protocol that I've been following.  It also lists where to buy the Artemix from a reputable company. 

  • purple32
    purple32 Member Posts: 3,188
    edited August 2012

    Thanks, Joy.

    Right now, I am still sorting things ouit and the more I do, the more confused I become!

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited August 2012

    Thanks Rosetapper, but there's no secret, I just put key words in Google search and then click on the most promising looking links.  I always try several sources and often look at skeptic sites too to get a balanced view, while taking into account any bias and the quality of the information given.

    I can't remember where I read about it not lasting, maybe I meant that generally cancer has a habit of overcoming whatever is thrown at it after a while, but I've also seen examples of it working for years in the links I posted.

    It's certainly something I'd try if I needed to due to its promising results and established safety profile from malaria treatments. 

Categories