Alternative Treatment

Options
1181921232462

Comments

  • dunesleeper
    dunesleeper Member Posts: 2,060
    edited April 2012

    You betcha Momine!

  • essiactea
    essiactea Member Posts: 1
    edited April 2012

    I agreed with allison M as I has used alternative treatment like Essiac to support my immune system which is helpful instead of expensive medicines.

  • sweetbean
    sweetbean Member Posts: 1,931
    edited April 2012

    Essiactea,

    Are you being (or have you been) treated for BC or are you just using Essaic tea for prevention?  There's a huge difference and you should definitely clarify on a breast cancer site.  

  • Kadia
    Kadia Member Posts: 314
    edited April 2012

    Isn't essiac tea estrogenic? If so, not good for those of us who are ER+.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2012
  • abigail48
    abigail48 Member Posts: 1,699
    edited April 2012

    tripple ouch.  was it intravenous?  have to look again, but I don't do that either after 7 years of heroin, no thanks.  opiates by the way, the way most allopathy kill their patients, are regurgetants, that;s oksy, opens the bile ducts (& decalcifies the teeth), but it also constapates, & that as well as the lungs shutting down kills fast.

  • abigail48
    abigail48 Member Posts: 1,699
    edited April 2012

    my advice get the realname if you can or the substances you take.  dca & waht does that mean also?

  • dunesleeper
    dunesleeper Member Posts: 2,060
    edited April 2012

    Essiac tea is estrogenic. I returned what I had bought (unopened). The guy refunded my money but also enclosed a note saying "Whoever gave you this information was not correct. Women have been using Essiac for over 90 years with no side effecs as it is safe - natural - with no side effects and has been approved in writing by the FDA for over 11 years."  Printed on the paper is something from July 2001, saying "Phytoestrogens are estrogen-like chemicals found in plant foods such as beans, seeds, and grains. Foods made from soybeans have some of the highest levels of phytoestrogens and have been studied the most. In spite of initial optimism, it is not clear whether eating foods rich in phytoesgrogens decreases breast cancer risk."

    Clearly, this man does not have ER+ breast cancer. LOL. I don't know if phytoestrogens are dangerous or not. However, my sense of the matter has me leaning AWAY from them for safety.

    I think Essiac may be good for some cancers, but NOT breast cancer, particularly ER+.

  • abigail48
    abigail48 Member Posts: 1,699
    edited April 2012

    & I'm wondering whether the men on that thread drink beer or use pot:  great estrogen both.  I had a lot of pain when I cooked up some red beans a few months ago, no beans or soy since

  • abigail48
    abigail48 Member Posts: 1,699
    edited May 2012

    wow.  you pulled survivors who have used only alternatives????????wow wow wow.  are you trying to make it difficult to post here except on conventional threads where we'll be subject to real horror stories.

    joy:  in a very recent time magazine report it's been discovered that people who get dintal exrays have a much greater incidence of USUALLY, unquote non -cancerous brain tumors.

  • sweetbean
    sweetbean Member Posts: 1,931
    edited May 2012

    Phytoestrogens are beneficial for ER+ cancer.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2012

    Sweetbean, I have repeatedly asked that you provide back up to your statement and you have repeatedly failed to do so - phytoestrogens are NOT beneficial for ER+

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2012

    Abigail, I think you've hit it on the nail 

  • abigail48
    abigail48 Member Posts: 1,699
    edited May 2012

    green tea is a phytoestogen:  there ar hundereds contained in fruits & vegetables, nearly all are benifical for health.  there's a linus pau;ing institude at the u of oregon I think, I researched this subject fairly recently

  • abigail48
    abigail48 Member Posts: 1,699
    edited May 2012

    phyto chemical, my error

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2012

    Abi, phytoestrogens as in food have both estrogen agonist and estrogen antagonist activity in different tissues. They don't work the same way as regular estrogen hormone.  However, phytoestrogenic herbs and supplements are a whole different issue and they are not recommended for ER pos breast cancer.  I have seen enough warnings out there to convince me.

    Green tea is a miracle worker

    Epidemiological data have suggested that EGCG may provide protective effects against hormone related cancers, namely breast or prostate cancer.

    Researchers at the University of Murcia in Spain and the John Innes Center in Norwich, England have shown that EGCG prevents cancer cells from growing by binding to a specific enzyme. They showed for the first time that it inhibits the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase, which is a recognized, established target for anti-cancer drugs. Green tea has about five times as much EGCG as regular tea. Green tea has been suspected to decrease rates of certain cancers but scientists were not sure what compounds were involved or how they worked. Nor had they determined how much green tea a person would have to drink to have a beneficial effect. EGCG is probably just one of a number of anti-cancer mechanisms in green tea. EGCG targets multiple MMP-mediated cellular events in cancer cells and provides a new mechanism for the anticancer properties of that molecule. Understanding the basic principles by which EGCG inhibits tumour invasion and angiogenesis may lead to the development of new therapeutic strategies, in addition to supporting the role of green tea as a cancer chemopreventive agent.

    Green tea helps protect against breast cancer by enhancing glucuronization of estrogens in the liver, a process through which estrogens are rendered inactive by being conjugated with glucuronic acid, a form in which they are excreted from the body. 

    Also, a study done at the University of Shizuoka in Japan found that epigallocatechin gallate (in green tea) does in fact inhibit the secretion of collagenases by tumor cells (in this study, highly metastatic lung cancer cells), thus arresting their ability to invade normal tissue.

    Now, I would stay that benefits outweigh the risks if green tea is estrogenic which I have not read so far 

  • abigail48
    abigail48 Member Posts: 1,699
    edited May 2012

    no it's definitely not, my error, my error, I read phytochemicals.  now gonna make my 2nd mega green tea for today, & a few T of olive leaf decoction.  great post, maud.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2012
    Enjoy that cuppa Abi Wink
  • abigail48
    abigail48 Member Posts: 1,699
    edited May 2012

    it vv bitter but I've never minded bitter.  it does contain a bit of white rice, I guess to prevent caking

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2012
    I'm sure you know not to pour boiling water on green tea which makes it less bitter Cool
  • Kaara
    Kaara Member Posts: 3,647
    edited May 2012

    I've never been in the chat rooms and I don't think, from what Charlene says, that I have any interest in going there.  It sounds like a group of women who are set in their ways and aren't interested in hearing another's point of view.  When I post on the conventional sites, I don't mention my alternative choices unless I'm asked.  There is lots to discuss without going there.  

    There are a lot of nice women on all the different threads, but if someone doesn't understand an alternative approach, it is completely confusing and scary to them.

    I'm getting close to the end of my IV infusions...3 more to go and I'm done.  Then I just watch my diet and take my supplements and hope for the best I guess.  I have a digital diagnostic mammo scheduled for the end of the month which is the alternate to the thermography I just did.  I will then have a baseline after the surgery for both for future reference.

    Almost time to head to NC for the summer. 

  • abigail48
    abigail48 Member Posts: 1,699
    edited May 2012

    you know I think it's red tea.  decaff, how does that compare?  the red part.  & bee propolis, how does it work for our trouble?  acidix? not? estrogenic? not?  I use bee pollen every day, pollen being a male substance

  • sweetbean
    sweetbean Member Posts: 1,931
    edited May 2012

    Maud, seriously?  I know I've quoted  articles from the Block Center for starters.  Provided the links and everything.  Honestly, I went through it with my CAM-friendly ob-gyn as well  - she showed me how the phytoestrogens work similar to Tamox and also help process your body's estradiol down non-carcinogenic pathways.  she is big on diet as a prevention tool and she has found soy/flaxseed etc to be good.

    Phytoestrogens are really weak forms of estrogen - they fool the cancer cells into thinking it is food.  The phytoestrogen fills up the cancer cell's receptors (like Tamox), but there isn't actually enough estrogen to feed the cancer.  So it works synergystically with Tamoxifen. 

    Here's the thing - if you don't want to eat any form of phytoestrogen, then don't.  But it isn't harmful.  Xenoestrogens, on the other hand, are very bad.  

    And what's up with the rude tone?  Seems uncalled for. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2012
    Rude no, frustrated yes.  You push your soy eating habits here when it is proven time and time again that soy is strongly discouraged for ER +.
     

    I'm glad to see that most ladies are very prudent about this issue and that you are a lone voice out there.

    For those who have not followed the most recent discussions on soy, here are the links:

    http://community.breastcancer.org/forum/79/topic/732781?page=1 

    http://community.breastcancer.org/forum/121/topic/774063?page=1#post_2977921 

    http://community.breastcancer.org/forum/86/topic/779094?page=1 

  • sweetbean
    sweetbean Member Posts: 1,931
    edited May 2012

    Yikes, you are really being unpleasant.  Fine, don't eat soy.  Sheesh. I'm out.  See you all later.

  • Ang7
    Ang7 Member Posts: 1,261
    edited May 2012

    Gosh Maud~

    "you push your soy eating habits here."  Come on.  Sweetbean never pushed anything on anybody.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2012

    In this study (2011), we show that genistein can induce estrogen-dependent MCF-7 tumor cell growth and increase breast cancer-associated aromatase expression and activity in vitro

    http://www.mendeley.com/research/genistein-induces-breast-cancerassociated-aromatase-stimulates-estrogendependent-tumor-cell-growth-vitro-breast-cancer-model/ 

    Dietary genistein negated/overwhelmed the inhibitory effect of TAM on MCF-7 tumor growth, lowered E2 level in plasma, and increased expression of E-responsive genes (e.g., pS2, PR, and cyclin D1)

    http://www.mendeley.com/research/dietary-genistein-negates-the-inhibitory-effect-of-tamoxifen-on-growth-of-estrogendependent-human-breast-cancer-mcf7-cells-implanted-in-athymic-mice/

    Tons more studies like those above

    Unpleasant, no.  You are stirring the pot

  • Ang7
    Ang7 Member Posts: 1,261
    edited May 2012

    Thank you Nancynow.  Good article.  I believe that Sweetbean also gave credible information with her findings...

  • sweetbean
    sweetbean Member Posts: 1,931
    edited May 2012

    Thank you, ladies!  *warm fuzzies*

    Maud, I really don't think that voicing another opinion is stirring the pot.  Stirring the pot is when someone comes on the board, says something like, "Chemo will kill you" or "Alt medicine is for idiots" and then leaves.  Simply voicing another opinion about what is admittedly a controversial topic is not stirring the pot.  It's having a debate  - there's a difference.  Especially since there are studies to back up my beliefs and I have posted links, although maybe not every time this topic has come up, because it has been discussed ad nauseum.  I also have to say, I always think of the Alt boards as the place where we can have a free discussion.  Or at least, we are supposed to be able to do that.  Seems like it is just a place for women to get into fights.  Sad.

      I would never eat processed soy, like soybean oil or soy protein isolate.  But yes, I do feel comfortable eating organic tofu, tempeh, etc and believe that eating those foods is beneficial.  And honestly, I feel bad when I see women going nuts trying to cut out everything that is estrogenic - it's so much work! I think everyone is better off focusing on the xenoestrogens and the processed phytoestrogens.  However, far be it from me to push my soy-eating habits like some sort of drug dealer.   (Seriously, that was a really weird way to put it.)  If you don't want to eat any soy or flaxseed, definitely don't do it.  

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2012

    Nancynow, no doubt Monsanto is financing studies to promote soy, they own over 90% of its production worldwide

    Stirring the pot, hum.... Do you mean like the Colonics thread on which you posted ? 

    Sad indeed when calling someone rude and unpleasant to get one's point across 

Categories