Lumpectomy WITH NO RADIATION- Need to hear from others!

Options
2»

Comments

  • gumshoe
    gumshoe Member Posts: 248
    edited March 2012

    Just a quick update: the two oncologists I spoke with agreed that I should explore my reconstruction options first.

    They both said that although, as doctors, they like to get all treatment underway as quickly as possible, that they didn't see a problem delaying rads for my particular case of DCIS until I have all the information I need. (Indeed, although they recommended rads, they also made it clear that it was my choice and if I chose not to go that route, then I would be very closely monitored.)

    They also agreed to ask for an amendment to my pathology report to include the actual surgical margins.

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited March 2012

    gumshoe, it sounds as though your discussions went really well. Reasonable doctors who are willing to consider the needs of the patient... how about that!

    It's good news for you too that although the oncologists are recommending rads, they don't see a rush to get it started and they agree that it's an optional treatment.  To me this means that they think you have an acceptable risk level (or at least, not excessively high) even without rads.  That's great!  

  • gumshoe
    gumshoe Member Posts: 248
    edited March 2012

    Thanks Beesie.

    Trust me, I was wishing I had a Pocket Beesie to bring with me and sit on the consultation table. Maybe you could market something like that? Laughing

    I do feel lucky to have had these two oncologists: getting a good doctor or surgeon in the Canadian health care system really is hit or miss, and it's almost impossible to get rid of one you don't like. I also feel that, whenever possible, if you go into an appointment with as much information as possible, it does help them to know you've done your homework. 

  • mrkffr11
    mrkffr11 Member Posts: 74
    edited March 2012

    Thank you for following up with results of your visit.

    My surgeon had my talk with Radiogist who is involved in study of partial breast locally.  I liked this Dr. much better than the first radiologist I spoke with.

    He really put me at ease in the sense that if I do require radiation follow up that I would in fact feel more comfortable with whole breast radiation.  Also I would qualify for his study which is randomized so if radiation is required I could participate in his study and have 50% chance at getting the partial breast.

    Currently im scheduled for my lumpectomy on tue 20th and still holding out hope that the DCIS area is small enough that the benefit of additional rad treat will be minimal enough that I can forego radiation.

    Good luck Gumshoe, M  

  • gumshoe
    gumshoe Member Posts: 248
    edited March 2012

    Hi mrkffr11 -

    That sounds promising and it's really important to like your doctors, in my opinion. Sounds like you are getting lots of information early as well, which is great.

    Good luck with the lumpectomy tomorrow!

  • scrappylady
    scrappylady Member Posts: 43
    edited March 2012

    Hi All...I had lumpectomy for DCIS on 2/6, then met w/medical & radiation oncologists, had 1 month post op mammogram and it was decided since my cancer was so small, caught so early, fully excised, that I could forgoe radiation but med onc. still thought tamoxifen for 5 years was in order. I have my appt. w/her again tomorrow and am seriously considering stopping the tamoxifen. It has thrown me for quite the loop! So many intense side effects I was not expecting...insomnia, hot flashes way more intense than I have ever experienced, heart palpitations and having to change my depression med from what has been working for 5+ years. So not myself anymore. I thought I had dodged a bullet by not having to do radiation, but this tamoxifen is almost worse! But if I go off it, will I always worry, wonder about my chances for recurrence, etc. Ugh. So many decisions go with this whole process.

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited March 2012

    scrappylady, 

    What was the size of your DCIS, the grade of your DCIS and the size of the margins?  If you had a very small low grade DCIS and if your surgical margins are good, then your risk of recurrence might already be very low, even without taking Tamoxifen.  In fact, since radiation wasn't recommended for you, my guess is that your recurrence risk is probably in the single digits, possibly only 5% or 6%. What you have to remember is that the average woman walking around out there has a breast cancer risk that is greater than that - and yet the average women doesn't worry all the time about breast cancer.  Before you were diagnosed, your risk was greater than that; did you worry all the time?

    The bigger benefit for you from Tamoxifen might be the reduction in risk of a new BC.  Once any of us have been diagnosed one time, our risk to be diagnosed again - not a recurrence but a new primary - is higher than average.  Tamoxifen can cut this risk by about 45%.  But.... and this is a really huge BUT..... our risk to be diagnosed again is spread out over the rest of our lives.  What I've generally heard is that the risk is about 0.5% per year (unless you have other significant risk factors).  Taking Tamox. for 5 years will reduce your BC risk for at least 10 years, and maybe as long as 15 years, but if you are in your 40s or 50s and expect to have another 40 or 50 years ahead of you, taking Tamox for 5 years now won't protect you in the years when you are older and you face the greatest risk (annual risk increases as we age).  In my case, I had a single MX at 49.  My risk to be diagnosed against, in my remaining breast, was estimated by my oncologist to be about 22% - spread out over 51 years (till I was 90).  Doing the math, I figured that taking Tamox for the next 5 years would have reduced my risk by at most 4% - taking it from 22% to 18%.  So I decided to not take Tamox - and that in fact was exactly what my oncologist recommended.  He said that I might want to consider taking Tamox when I'm older, if I'm concerned and wanted to lower my risk at that time.

    I'm not suggesting that you stop Tamox, however certainly you should consider Tamox to be optional - a choice that you get to make - and not something that is necessary.  Only you can know if the right decision for you is to stick with it or stop it.  But I wanted to provide a bit of information that might help you with your questions for your doctor, and help you put your risk - and the benefit from Tamox - in perspective.

  • akmom
    akmom Member Posts: 272
    edited March 2012

    I was very interested to read these last couple of posts, because I am seeing an oncologist for the first time tomorrow to know whether she will recommend radiation. I didn't realize that Tamoxifen might be suggested so will have to do some research. My DCIS was only 3mm, however margins were a minimal 2mm, so am not sure what to expect from the onc. According to what I could find out about the Van Nuys Prognostic Index, I think I would land at about a 6...

    Beesie, as always, you are a gold mine of useful information. Thanks for your response, and thank you to scrappylady for your post.

    I love this site :)

  • MaryF2
    MaryF2 Member Posts: 51
    edited March 2012

    I had partial breast radiation four years ago outside of a protocol and it was covered by my insurance. The only good thing about DCIS is that you can take the time you need for a second opinion about radiation. Go to someplace near you where they do partial breast radiation and get evaluated by one of those particular radiation oncologists who do it.I did it and have no regrets.My radiation was done at "the second opinion" facility by the second opinion physician.

    My first radiation onc eval was at one world-class university medical center who offered me full breast radiation because they didn't offer it. That was unacceptable to me as I only had 4 mm of DCIS and wanted to preserve my breast. I also had five of six different doctors I respected telling me radiation was a good idea for me. 

    I didn't want to have any regrets down the line that I didn't do everything possible to make sure this cancer doesn't come back. It's been four years for me and I'm doing well. No cancer!

    Good luck!

    Mary

  • mrkffr11
    mrkffr11 Member Posts: 74
    edited March 2012

    Quick update post lumpectomy.



    I had lx on 3/20 and physically doing quite well 3 days out.



    I have been super anxiety ridden waiting on path and almost took my leftover xanax to ease condiderable anxeity.



    Anyway my surgeon just called with news. Good news. The path showed no sign of any disease. I stupidly remarked "so good clean margin" to which he responded "all margin".



    I am over the moon and looks like i wont have to debate the rads question any longer.



    However feeling so many mixed emotions. Definately fallen prey to the feelings of unnatural "love" for my dr. I think he hung the moon he is also handsome at that and my dh is a bit jealous but it will pass i and i light heartedly joke.



    All kidding aside i also feel a powerful survivors guilt. Ive been crying and shaking since hearing from the dr. Youu see ive been following the posts on the march lx thread and another woman who i guess to b about my age with children same age as mine got path results yesterday on opposite end of spectrum and she was quite clearly and understandable devestated. I worry because ive not seen from her since and my heart is breaking...

  • akmom
    akmom Member Posts: 272
    edited March 2012

    mrkffr, so glad to hear your good news. I understand about the "survivor's guilt" - I kind of feel like that too. Will be having radiation to treat my tiny 2mm DCIS, but feeling bad for those who started out like me (calcifications on mammogram) and are dealing with a much worse outcome. It's a matter of degree and you could say luck. So don't feel guilty, just feel grateful and take care of yourself going forward.

    Hope your friend on the other thread will be okay.

    xoxoxo

  • CancerStinks
    CancerStinks Member Posts: 84
    edited April 2012

    On April 10, I finished 30 radiation treatments to my right breast (25 full breast and 5 boost to tumor bed) after 2 lumpectomies for DCIS stage 3.  I chose to do the radiation since my DCIS was grade 3 and lumpectomy with clear margins (which I got the 2d time) has the same odds of recurrence as if I had a mastectomy. (and a mastectomy is much harder to recover from than a lumpectomy) Now that these 2 parts of triumvirate "standard of care" are over (tamoxifen being the third) I can tell you both the surgeries and the radiation were very easy for me.  But I made taking care of myself my job and I know not everyone can do that.  I don't know why you don't want to do the radiation, but it was so easy for me that now I am in a strange place cause it is almost as if I just had a 4 month cold and can go back to my life.  

  • Auntieoftwo
    Auntieoftwo Member Posts: 1
    edited April 2012

    My initial diagnosis was DCIS, Low Grade, ER/PR + and the surgeon told me I would probably NOT need radiation therapy. Since my sister died of breast cancer at age 40, I went to the best breast cancer treatment center in my area (UCSF).

    They reviewed my original pathology and upped my grade to intermediate. I had a lumpectomy on 3/21 and had way clear margins. All over 1 cm. The UCSF tumor board (after reviewing my case) recommended radiation and tamoxifin. Like you, I didn't want to over treat my condition.

    I had an appointment with a Radiation Oncologist at UC Davis cancer center yesterday. Thinking I was going to get an opinion on whether radiation was needed or not. In a nutshell this is what was explained to me...

    Standard of Care (where radiation therapy is concerned) if you have DCIS that measures 1 cm or less and are LOW grade, radiation therapy is NOT recommended. The current clinical trials that are out there for partial breast irradiation are ONLY allowed in a clinical trial setting. Like you mentioned earlier, in a clinical trial setting you have a 50% chance of having the expermential partial breast irradiation or the "standard of care" treatment.

    The radiation oncologist determines your status based on the FINAL pathology from your lumpectomy. In my case my final pathology was intermediate grade and my area of DCIS was 1.5 cm. Based on my pathology, my standard of care is 5 weeks of whole breast irradiation (to prevent reoccurance in any area of my left breast) and 1 1/2 weeks of partial breast irradiation to my lumpectomy site.

    Both radiologists I spoke with explained their recommendation because of my age (apparantly at 51 I'm considered young) and the clinical study outcomes that indicate women in my situation have about a 5% or less chance of any breast cancer reoccurance in the treated breast versus a 32% chance without treatment. Based on this information (which basically confirms all the research I had done on my own) I've decided to go with the "standard of care" radiation treatment. 95% chance of no reoccurance versus 68% of no reoccurance makes me very comfortable with this decision.

    I'm going to be meeting with a medical oncologist in the next few months to hear about the risks and benefits of tamoxifin. My gut reaction is I don't want to do this. The benefit to me would be to knock of 2-3% more in my favor. 97-98% chance of no reoccurance versus 95% of no reoccurance. I'm comfortable taking that risk.

    I hope this helps while you try to decide which treatment option is best for you.

  • akmom
    akmom Member Posts: 272
    edited April 2012

    Thanks for your post, Auntie, very useful information.

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited April 2012

    Great information Auntie.  Thanks for sharing it!

  • zuzana
    zuzana Member Posts: 1
    edited April 2012

    Glad to hear that other women opted to forgo radiation. I had a lumpectomy on Feb. 3rd, 2012 , invasive ductal CA, tumor 1.4 cm (14 mm), ER/PR positive, clear margin, clear nodes, specimen 4x4x2.8 cm, left breast (B cup), age 76. When my BS called with the results I was told that women over 70 with that type of diagnosis don't have to have radiation, however it will be presented to the tumor board and wait for their recommendation. Of course the recommendation was 3 weeks of radiation (total 40 Gy) . Did a lot of online searches ,talked to 2 radiologist, BS, oncoligist and even went for the simulation,  was scheduled to start radiation on 3/24 and cancelled my app. I'm taking estrogen inhibitor and wonder what the future brings. Are there any women my age  ( over70) with a similar diagnosis?

  • Shayne
    Shayne Member Posts: 1,500
    edited April 2012

    Thx Auntie for posting your info.  Im waiting to meet with RO - and scared about rads.  Mine is also v v small - but also dont want to take chances of recurrence.

  • KimJay
    KimJay Member Posts: 2
    edited May 2012

    In case this helps anyone...I know reading about others in the same situation i am in has helped me...

    I just made the decision today with my RO not to do radiation treatment based on her recommendation. My core biopsy pathology report said DCIS grade 2 at under 3mm (they didn't classify my calcification area as a tumor). Surgical pathology indicated no new cancer cells were excised (the biopsy actually got the entire area of concern!) with only LCIS removed with "extreme" margins. Thankfully University Hospitals in the Cleveland OH area are very big on analyzing everything and considering alternatives when your case falls outside the scope of what is considered "normal requiring the standard course of treatment".  My RO did give me my Van Nuys Index score.  I was put at a 4 with my reoccurrence rate sitting at 6-8% with tamoxifen.

    It's still very early for me, so I'm still feeling uncertain that I made the right decision. Intellectually I know I have, but those pesky emotions get in the way and the "what if" games start to take over.  Hearing from others in the same boat I am in definitely helps.

  • Shayne
    Shayne Member Posts: 1,500
    edited May 2012

    Thank you!!  So basically you have to wAIT till after surgery to know for sure??

    I also had calcifications.....that were few, and removed at biopsy - the tissue around it showed NO cancer.  I have one small lesion i the same area that is contained and 12mm...... So i might might might fall in to that catorgory as well.  Just wondering if you have to wait for pathology for them to make that decision......or prior to that.  Im assuming after......bc of course, more waiting........

  • Infobabe
    Infobabe Member Posts: 1,083
    edited May 2012

    I too am 76 and fair skinned.  Stage 0, grade 1.

    Home again.  Had the test to see if the baloon was properly seated for the seeding and it is not.  It is too close to the surface so Mammosite is a no go.

    New choices: Partial breast radiation, like a mammosite from the outside taking three weeks.

    Whole breast radiation for 5 weeks, both of these once a day, 5 days a seek.

    Mastectomy

    And I am thinking, not the doctors suggestion, doing nothing based on the pathology report says  on Friday.  After all, it is DCIS stage 0, grade 1.

     Had the spacer balloon and catheter for MammoSite taken out today which is a relief in itself.  I had my first sponge bath today, doable but cold.  Don't have to do that anymore.

    Got to do more research.  Wonder what no further treatment would mean.  My poor left breast has been radiated all to hell starting with a needle biopsy 8 years ago to this seies maybe making more mutations.

     I am leaning toward no more treatment or Mastectomy.

    Grrrrrr.

  • tvacrat
    tvacrat Member Posts: 60
    edited May 2012

    I'm 10 years younger than you with DCIS (stage 0), intermediate grade. I opted for the MammoSite radiation (the clinical trial being conducted at my hospital was filled for my age group) and had the spacer and catheter inserted during the lumpectomy. Like you, the site ended up too close to the surface and I couldn't go ahead with PBI. Boy, did I cry!! I did not want to go through the whole breast radiation, but the statistics for my case were similar to what Auntieoftwo described. So I bit the bullet and moved forward. I did not have an easy time with radiation and I still wonder if I could have skipped it, but I'll never know. I just hope to be cancer-free forever!

  • BLinthedesert
    BLinthedesert Member Posts: 678
    edited May 2012

    Interesting read ladies.  My 2nd biopsy - I had two because I had a very large area of "concern" - one mass and two areas of microcalcifications about 2cm from the mass - was pretty extensive and found 2 focal areas of grade 2 DCIS measuring a little over a cm together.  The lumpectomy was about 5cm with clear margins and very messy (highly proliferative ADH and other benign stuff) - but no more cancer. 

    I was really hoping to avoid radiation, but was actually advised not to skip it.  I think it was both because of my age (49), not low-grade, ER-/PR- status, and fact that I had a palpable mass.  I had convinced myself that I would be able to not do radiation - and was even ready to live with a higher risk, but my RO really did not want me to skip treatment.  At the end of the day, I decided to trust her experience and advise.  It was a hard decision - until I learned that I really did not have a decision Smile

    Good luck ladies!  

Categories