Would a KETONE Diet Kill Cancer?

Options
Anonymous
Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
edited June 2014 in Alternative Medicine
nn

I was reading a post a while ago and the reference to cancer cells operating anaerobically, therefore needing more glucose for fuel than normal cells and it suddenly hit me like a ton of bricks, a ketone diet to kill cancer. Ketones can only be used for fuel aerobically. When you fast you go into ketosis but you don't have to fast to go into ketosis. You can eat lots but have to virtually eliminate carbohydrate including starch. Trouble is cells have to be fairly malignant before becoming anaerobic enough for this to work, although that must include all metastasis. As cancer cells become more and more malignant they use less oxygen, the so called Warburg effect and increasingly use glucose for fuel and less fat. A fully anaerobic cell uses 16 times more glucose than a fully aerobic cell, and excretes lactic acid instead of carbon dioxide and water. The liver and heart can use lactic acid for fuel.
Then I thought if one went on a ketone diet there is very little glucose in the bloodstream at all and as ketones require aerobic metabolism which is fine for all non tumour cells in the body except, from memory, the adrenal or kidney cortex, then TUMOUR CELLS MUST STARVE. To get into ketosis you have to cut back your carb intake to around 10 grammes average or nothing if you just eat meat, eggs, cheese and fish, though this is much too nutritionally deficient and constipating. Better to eat more carb as starch in anti cancer veges and do a lot of exercise to compensate by burning off the excess carb. It takes about 3 days for your body's cells to adapt to ketones and what's called gluconeogenesis where the body makes glucose from the body's own tissues when fasting or protein and glycerol when on ketone diet. You know you are in ketosis when they appear in your urine using Ames Ketostix to detect them and you smell acetone on your breath.
Ketones are made in your liver from fatty acids from the diet or fat cells. You cannot lay down fat in ketosis as fat cells need glucose to make glycerol to estrify the dietary fatty acids to triglycerides. The is the sneak mechanism of ketosis. Theoretically you can eat as much fat as you like as you pee it out as ketones, lose weight and don't get hungry. Actually you shouldn't as you'd go into ketoacidosis and put a strain on your kidneys. The Ketostix tell you how much ketone you are expelling.
I reckon this must work and is a DIY, so costs nothing. Your diet would have to be very nutritious and you'd have to do a lot of exercise, lots of vege but no fruit to start off with. I've done a ketone diet myself, lost all the excess weight but have put it and more back on again. Just being slack as you DO NOT get hungry on a ketone diet. Animals in the wild are in and out of ketosis all the time as they can't eat continuously like we can.

«1345

Comments

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2012
    PREPARING FOR THE KETONE DIET PART 1 

    I have just been online to check to see if anyone else has thought of a ketone diet to kill cancer and find to my dismay that it's an old idea. So I read all the papers on it and to my delight find the concept riddled with misconceptions. Now none of the papers on the ketone diet hypothesis went far enough in lowering blood sugar, almost all were trying to achieve it in a sedentary clinical setting and some used ketosis as an adjunct to chemotherapy. NONE talked about restoring liver and kidney function as the tumour gradually broke down and NONE understood the complete biochemistry of ketosis. However each one provided clues.

    Probably the biggest problem in getting patient compliance in these studies seems to be a sugar craving, thus jumping straight from a diet full of refined sugar to almost NO sugar and natural sugar at that might seem a near impossible task. So the logical thing to do is cut out all refined sugar as the first stage. So much pathology is associated with consuming refined sugar, especially when associated with liver malfunction, which is, to a large part, caused by consuming refined sugar. Migraines, moodswing, depression, panic attacks, epilepsy, non allergenic asthma, diabetes, arteriosclerosis, hypertension, cramps, tremors etc. etc. Then there are all the meds that are taken to treat these problems, ALL making the underlying pathologies worse and creating new pathologies of their own plus cross reactivity problems.

    Thus giving up refined sugar TOTALLY will mean that all of those meds can go into an incinerator. Some drugs, those that cause an increase in cell receptor numbers such as antipsychotics, SSRI's, will need to be tapered off gradually. By giving up refined sugar and cutting back on meat a lot of the gunk in blood vessels will begin to dissolve and, as anxiety disappears as well, your blood pressure will come down so you can taper off those meds, eg beta blockers and ACE inhibitors. Eating a lot of polyunsaturated fats, plus taking EPA and DHA oils will help here. Buy a blood pressure gauge and a blood glucose monitor while you are at it as they are pretty cheap these days. Why not also get a good book of basic physiology?

    EXERCISE, HOW?

    Someone has been diagnosed with cancer. By this time they will be anxious or depressed or both, tired or even exhausted through lack of sleep, relationships with other people are terrible, there is a heap of debt, things around the house don't work, mess. They have gone down into a black hole so deep that it seems impossible to ever find one's way out. How does someone get exercise when it might be extremely dangerous out there, especially for a woman going for a walk at night, something most men don't ever even have to think about. But he or she HAS TO GET EXERCISE to prevent or get rid of existing cancer without 'cut, poison, burn' or to just simply be healthy full stop. Well, there is one way that will kill two birds with one stone IF one has a backyard, ie start a comprehensive VEGE GARDEN and plant some FRUIT TREES including some on the nature strip. That way you get FRESH veges and fruit, free of spays and you can control the composition of your soil. Start a compost heap. Soil iodine deficient? Then get to a nearby beach if there is one and pick up kelp washed up onto the beach and add that to the compost.

    Then there are community activities that might be able to get started, e.g. building bush tracks IF there's bush nearby. Out in the forest, sweating like a pig, taking photos, great stuff. Then get a community action group together to pressure the local water authority to get rid of the water chlorination treatment plant and replace it with an ozone plant. These are just a few ideas to get the ball rolling. One thing is for certain. YOU HAVE TO TAKE YOUR OWN LIFE INTO YOUR OWN HANDS and wave goodbye to to the doc and the psychiatrist, but keep on good terms in case you break a leg.

    NOW HOW TO BREAK THE SUGAR ADDICTION.

    MIGRAINE Breaking the Sugar Addiction. I wrote this for migraine but is perfectly applicable for everything else.

    Now it's all very well to say cut out the sugar but if the migraineur is addicted, which he or she is almost certain to be. Saturday morning migraines are common for the obvious reason that many people lay in on Saturday so their blood sugar has had longer to fall. If you get out of bed a bit shaky and sweaty your are more likely to be in ketosis, a certain indicator of reactive hypoglycaemia, and depending when and what you snacked on before going to bed So its a very good idea to get some Ames Ketostix to test your urine, better still Diastix which also test for glucose although they can't coincide. If you ARE in ketosis this is a sure indicator of poor liver storage of glucose (as glycogen.).

    The addictive cycle goes like this. Gets out of bed hanging out for a cuppa with a fair bit of sugar in it, more likely coffee than tea. Blood sugar shoots up, feeling great for a little while then craving starts again as it plunges back down. Another cuppa and so on all day. So first off you've got to cut down the rest period and have a late snack of wholemeal toast with say avocado on it. Now get out of bed early and toast once again, For a sweetener in cuppa cyclemates I suppose although I hate the taste of those things. You could try glycerine as it is very sweet but doesn't trigger an insulin release. Now your blood sugar will rise much more slowly and fall slowly with a much longer cycle. YOU SHOULD HAVE BROKEN THE CYCLE AND NOW BE TOTALLY MIGRAINE FREE (as long as you don't backslide)

    OKAY NOW SUGARS. Fruit is okay but if you are very sensitive cut out very sweet fruit like pineapple for a coupla weeks. Fruit juices are out as there is no fibre with them and it's just too much sugar. As much as it's very good for you honey is out for a coupla months as the sucrose in it has been split by the bees digestive system to fructose glucose and there is no fibre in it. Now for the processed food. Chocolate and cola drinks are deadly as they contain sugar, caffeine and threobromine. Now add a cigarete and you have the very worst combination of all. Especially if you are very sensitive you've got to weed out sugars in all other processed food root and branch, Look for SUCROSE (TABLE SUGAR glucose, fructose), GLUCOSE, DEXTROSE (another name for glucose), FRUCTOSE, (although it's supposed not elicit an insulin response), just be on the safe side, CORN SYRUP and MALTOSE (glucose, glucose). As to the lactose in milk bear in mind that humans are the only animal that drinks milk after being weaned. Just see how you go. Once your liver bounces back you could put things back on the diet like milk but not the refined sugars. Anyway, once you've broken the addiction you'll hate the taste of it.

    WHOLEMEAL BREAD, PASTA, SPAGETTI, BISCUITS, BROWN RICE.

    BOOZE. Unfortunately ALL out. Meaning no parties, no pub. However, once your mood stabilises and your stress level drops as your liver comes good you won't feel like a drink.

    EXERCISE. A lot of migraineurs do nothing one day then go at it like a bull at a gate the next and get a migraine. Obviously exercise is great and NECESSARY but it also gobbles up blood sugar, so just go easy to start off with and increase it a bit at a time.

    TYRAMINE. A substance in a lot of foods which triggers the release of NORADRENALIN. I'll deal with that later in a separate post.

    {PS When I say blood sugar I meant blood glucose, same thing).

  • camillegal
    camillegal Member Posts: 16,882
    edited April 2012

    I've been reading u'r posts--it's 5AM here so my mind is not awake, well that's my excuse right now-I think I get a little of this but I'm sure the rest of the ladies/gentlemen would understand thus so much better than I can. I have to ask R U a researcher or just an avid reader about cancer because it has touch (or) screwed up u'r life or that of a loved one. It is quite detailed with extreme explanations, I just wondered what u'r diagnosis was and if u are following all or any of what u have stated?

  • apple
    apple Member Posts: 7,799
    edited April 2012

    post removed to support forum guidelines

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited April 2012

    There was a study done on this recently. High-risk women were put on a 600-calorie, low-carb diet two days a week, but ate a normal diet the rest of the time. The study concluded that doing this type of diet reduced BC incidence (I don't remember by how much, but obviously enough to be measurable).

    Here is a short article about the study: http://articles.latimes.com/2011/dec/08/news/la-heb-low-carb-diet-20111208

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited April 2012

    Paul, I've read through your bio and skimmed your lengthy posts and I must say your contributions are a breath of fresh air on these forums. I'm afraid my knowledge of biochemistry is almost nil and it's too late to start learning now so I'll have to skip those parts and just look at the meat of your posts.   We have another member, Timothy, who studied biochemistry and is well respected here, and I'm hoping he'll be able to verify what you're saying isn't complete bunkum.  No doubt there are other members who know enough about biochemistry to ask appropriate questions, though I suspect you'll mostly get the "currently accepted" viewpoint since it seems to be human nature to stick to the status quo and not want to look at new ideas.

    We have had some complete crackpots come here at times trying to pass on their crazy ideas so some will be wary of you, but so many of your themes are similar to my far less educated ideas that I'm looking forward to reading more of your ideas.

    I'm in the process of putting together my theory about diet and it includes many of your ideas, though not about Ketones which are too much biochemistry for me. Oh yes, Warburg features in my diet story. All this time has passed and only now are they looking at starving cancer rather than poisoning it.  I do know that in many of the protocols and diets which people claim to have worked against metastatic cancer, many of them included low calorie or low carb diets.  I read through the Ian Gawler method book of testimonials regularly and wonder why no one is studying all the success stories.  Surely gathering together all these people from around the world, validating their medical histories and getting a detailed account of their diets and methods should be top priority for researchers.  Why do we study the sick rather than the recovered?  Oh yes, if they've prayed to a potential saint then the doctors will submit information to get the sainthood recognised.  So they can do it!  So my strategy is to look at what works for people, bearing in mind that many like Gawler used multiple methods so it's a matter of finding the common factors.

    I'll get off my soapbox now

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2012

    To apple.  The reason kids with epilepsy stop having fits when going into ketosis is because they have stopped eating REFINED sugar.  Researchers just DON'T understand blood sugar regulation at all.  It's a black hole.  You wouln"t have to go on a ketone diet just yet. just TOTALLY eliminate refined sugar, maybe for a couple of months first.  I had a few fits myself but a long time ago and my blood sugar was through the floor before each one.  I didn't class myself as epileptic and go on meds because I had a few fits,  I'm 71 and take NO drugs.  If you went off refined sugar you might even put on some weight and be ready for the ketone diet but gently does it using Ketostix to monitor your urine.  You could go in and out of ketosis just as an animal in the wild does.  It has to work if there is next to zero glucose in your bloodstream because even moderately malignant cancer cells must die if they can't get glucose. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2012

    Paul - the lady aat our nearby organic farm with an all natural raw milk dairy herd thatwe bought into, she is on a ketone diet and has encouraged me to do same.  I am on the macrobiotics moreso now, less caarbs than I used to do and working my way to even less.  But the main resource being protein throws me bcz I WAS leaning to vegetarian who does products like eggs and dairy, but only from clean, well-treated, free-range, pastured animals.  The chicken and seafood and fish work into my plan I suppose, if I went this way, as I still do eat these now, though I just feel stresssed when I do.   But that is me.

    Yesterday I was given a nutrition assessment from Chinese medicine, to reestablish kidney function, it was basically macrobiotics, no raw or cold foods.  Just cook all veggies and fruits a little bit, focus on highly alkaline foods.

    Paul - your info here gives so much more detail than found online, and the five books I ordered on either macrobiotics and ketogenics are here in a nutshell with a wealth of ideas and inginuity.  Thank yoou for taking time to share this profile with us.

    I am seriously attempting to decide how to pull the two together.

    Edited to add - I have always believed that in the end food is our medicine and greatly leads to the downfall of health, though not always the end all, in my situation part of the fall was the pollution and carcinogens from the neighbor's outside wood boiler.  But I was already teetering.

    Also adding, naturally, since bc people almost always have low body temps even prior to treatments, the other important thing to do immediately is raise the body temperature, using a Biomat or one of the means on the threads here in alternatives on raising body temperature. 

    Question - does keto diet also raise body temperature?

  • elimar86861
    elimar86861 Member Posts: 7,416
    edited April 2012

    Re:  Trouble is cells have to be fairly malignant before becoming anaerobic enough for this to work, although that must include all metastasis.

    I don't know that you have substantiated that all metastasis is anaerobic, and I have never come across that as fact.  As I understand it, a single tumor can be comprised of both aerobic and anaerobic cells.  What are you proposing for the aerobic cells?

    Re:  So much pathology is associated with consuming refined sugar, especially when associated with liver malfunction, which is, to a large part, caused by consuming refined sugar. Migraines, moodswing, depression, panic attacks, epilepsy, non allergenic asthma, diabetes, arteriosclerosis, hypertension, cramps, tremors etc. etc. Then there are all the meds that are taken to treat these problems, ALL making the underlying pathologies worse and creating new pathologies of their own plus cross reactivity problems.

    Thus giving up refined sugar TOTALLY will mean that all of those meds can go into an incinerator. 

    Having a theory is the beginning of most novel discoveries (tho' some are purely accidental,) and there is nothing wrong in having an idea.  However, here you suggest a do-it-yourself method, with a claim that eliminating refined sugar will put people in the position of being able to throw away meds for other life threatening diseases (i.e. hypertension, diabetes, epilepsy.)  Nowhere do you suggest medical  or even naturopathic supervision to this diet, or medical supervision of reducing these medications.  You imply that it can all be done with Ketostix, Diastix, a blood pressure guage and  glucose monitor.  This could be a potentially fatal decision, even if you have a complete haemetologic lab. at your disposal.

    You have piqued the interest of some here without providing any sort of safety net.  One difference I have noticed between "standard" medicine and "alternative" medicine is that alternative is much more frequently practiced over the internet, under the cloak of anonymity.

    "Natural" has always been an equivocal term, and it's definition does not rule out "harmful."

  • plumblossom
    plumblossom Member Posts: 68
    edited April 2012

    Thanks Paul to give us so much knowledge. Although I don't understand all of those, I am very interested in this topic.

    In Chinese traditional medical theory, the medicine and food comes from the same source. I believe proper diet and excercise could kill cancer.

    A question to Paul:

    Since cancer cells operating anaerobically, is this means if we breath more oxygen, then will kill more cancer cells?

    I am doing an excercise, called Anti-cancer QiGoing. The main point is using a special breathing method to take more oxygen then normal breathing. 

  • Blessings2011
    Blessings2011 Member Posts: 4,276
    edited April 2012

    Paul - while there may be some merit in what you post, please read my experiences in this area.

    Many years ago, when I was young and stupid (1980's), I signed up to do a MediFast program, supposedly "physician-supervised"...although it was in an older part of town and I was not particularly impressed with the cleanliness of the place. We were given packets of MediFast, and very few instructions. Our only "medical supervision" came once a week when we weighed in, and our urine was tested with Ketostix.

    I did fine for five days. On the sixth day, I got out of bed, saw stars, and promptly passed out. I called the doctor's office throughout the day, and no one ever returned my call. By mid-morning, I was having muscle tremors, and by late afternoon they had turned into seizures. I ended up in the ER with ketoacidosis, and was told I could have died. For weeks after that, was severely ataxic, weak, and disoriented.

    In September 2011, I was diagnosed with breast cancer, and underwent a bilateral mastectomy in December. In the process of going through reconstruction, I realized that I needed to lose weight in order to insure the proper sizing of my permanent implants. I also knew that I was ER+, and that body fat produces estrogen. My MO was thrilled when I told her I was planning to lose the weight.

    I learned that Kaiser had an Optifast Program, and I went to their Orientation. What a difference from my experience years before! No one gets into the program without extensive medical testing, bloodwork, and exams by physicians. I was approved and I started three weeks ago.

    My daily intake is 960 calories, with a requirement that we drink a gallon of water per day to flush out toxins. Each day's worth of products has the complete total of daily needed nutrition and supplements.

    Each week we weigh in, see the nurse for vitals, and turn in a medical questionnaire listing any side effects. Every two weeks, we have extensive lab work done, and meet with the physician to discuss the results. Staff members are available at any time if issues come up.

    This program of meal replacements (Fasting Phase) will last for four months. Then the Transition phase back to food starts. Results are usually amazing, with some participants losing incredible amounts of weight, and others being able to go off many of their medications, especially diabetes and blood pressure meds.

    My point in this long tale is to say that while there may be merit in the theories you disuss, I am horrified to read about your "DIY Ketone Diet."

    Elimar is absolutely right in saying "This could be a potentially fatal decision..."

    It is one thing to eliminate white sugar from your diet, or reduce carbs, or whatever.

    But to deliberately alter the diet to put your body into ketosis could be like Russian Roulette for many women here with other medical issues to consider.

    PLEASE - whether you agree with Western Medicine or not, this is not something to be taken lightly, nor even attempted without some type of regular, ongoing medical supervision.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2012

    To blessing 20.

    Sounds like you ovedid the ketosis too soon to fast.  If you have kiver pathology going into ketosis, you have three possible problems, poor storage of glucose as glycogen, poor ketogenesis and poor gluconeogenesis (the making of glucose from the body's own tissues).  Your liver seemed to be able to make ketones ok hence the ketoacidosis,  However your body cells didn't have time to adapt to ketones, upregulate the associated genes and down regulate those associated with glucose metabolism.  Your brain was still dependant on glucose as the seizures resulted from cerebral hypoglycaemia, in part because of poor gluconeogenesis by the liver.  If the forum covered all disorders I'd post one on epilepsy.  I could put it in here. 

    This sort of problem is why I urge a couple of months preparation to restore liver and kidney function first, get off the refined sugar, and take it easy when going into ketosis with the Ketostix just showing colour.  The Atkins diet and the earlier Lealord Kordell diets are ketone diets and plenty of people have gone onto them without a problem.  For an animal in the wild going in and out of ketosis is the norm and actually essential to their health.

    Another thing, not everyone can afford the cost and the time to do the treatment that you are undergoing and without lowering your blood glucose to near zero you are not going to KILL the cancer cells 

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited April 2012

    We should not be giving medical advice - especially potentially fatal advice.

    There is one way to cure cancer - it's a 100 percent, fail safe mechanism:

    Die of something else.

    Some of the advice here may actually effect such a "cure" - well intended though it could be.....

    Please let's remember that these are primarily support boards, and we can certainly share experiences and readings. But advice like this crosses the line. Also, the goal should be to act in the interests of good health overall. What may be an excellent idea for one person may kill another one.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2012

    To plumblossom.

    No it won't. Experiments have shown that when cancer cells are perfused with oxygen they don't take it up as they have adapted to become increasingly anaerobic as they become more and more malignant.  However, doing aerobic exercises can't do you any harm and is headed in the right direction. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2012

    To Elimar 

    I'm taking it that only cells of the primary tumour CAN metastasise, therefore assuming that the metastasis themselves are fully anaerobic, although I couldn't rule out the possibility of many of their cell redifferentiating to become more aerobic.  As to the primary tumour, sure a variety of anearobic and aerobic, DEPENDING ON THEIR DISTANCE FROM THE NEAREST BLOOD VESSELS.  I'll put my post on metastisis soon.  I obviously don't have any clinical experience and am open to any criticism, welcome it in fact.

    As to all of the pathologies associated with consumption of refined sugar they are on another forum and I could get this post withdrawn if I make a link to same.  However in response to a comment on seizures I'll put that here now and message you the link.

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited April 2012

    If a healthy sugar free diet is the way to go, why do so many women who do live a healthy life get breast cancer? The answer - we really don't know.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2012

    This theory is based on the assumption that the symptom, in the case of epilepsy, convulsions, have a cause.  It is about a grand mal seizure as an alternative to a panic attack but also includes mechanisms of schizophrenia.

    This is the theory of what is taking place in the body and brain leading up to and during a panic attack. I will go into blood sugar regulation in detail in later posts. Assume that the blood sugar has gone into the bloodstream too quickly and shoots up to be followed by a big fall to a very low level because too much insulin has been released. Because the liver is not storing much glucose as glycogen most of it has gone into the muscles instead, so muscles have to take over the role of the disordered liver. But muscles were not designed for this role.

    If there is ONE mechanism central to understanding schizophrenia, migraine, epilepsy etc. it is THIS. Muscle cells cannot release glucose back into the bloodstream as they do not express the enzyme Glucose-6-phosphatase, whereas the liver does. The muscles have to take over the role of glucose storage but because they cannot release it as glucose have to ferment it to lactic acid. Adrenalin is required to increase the metabolic rate of the muscles and dilate the blood vessels to wash the lactic acid out, but the dilated blood vessels supply oxygen which stops fermentation. Alternatively noradrenalin does constrict the blood vessel, but has no metabolic effect on muscle cells and of course restricts blood flow. Enter muscle spasm, hot and cold flushes as the two hormones alternate. It seems to be hot first followed by cold

    NORADRENALIN is associated with extreme fear, but here it's not fear in response to an external perceived threat. The threat is internal and NOT understood by the person experiencing it The crisis is life threatening cerebral hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar in the brain) which can only be alleviated by increased lactic acid synthesis by the muscles. Liver pathology means not just impaired glycogen storage but also impaired gluconeogenesis (the liver making glucose from lactic acid) thereby necessitating even more secretion (release) of adrenalin and noradrenalin by the adrenal glands and in the brain 'Panic attack' exacerbated (made worse) by the individual not understanding what on Earth is going on. 'I must be going mad (and all that entails).

    THE RUNAWAY CASCADE OF FEAR.

    The brain metabolises 40% of the bodies glucose. The more neural activity, the more glucose consumption. The more glucose consumption, the worse the cerebral hypoglycaemia and with it the greater the secretion of adrenalin and noradrenalin. 'Jesus, I'm going to die'

    Enter HYPERSUGGESTABILITY plus religion, almost universal in schizophrenia. 'I'm going to burn in Hell. I AM IN HELL. TERROR. I might lose my mind and go berserk!!! Now frozen stiff in a catatonia trance. Noradrenalin now predominates to constrict the blood supply to skeletal muscles persistently, along with immobility of the body to conserve energy. Catatonia is the worst case scenario and can go for DAYS ON END.

    So how does the the individual pull out of the attack? Part of the process of gluconeogenesis is ketosis where fatty acids from fat cells are broken down in the liver to ketones, three different kinds. Two of these come out in the urine and can be tested for using Ames Ketostix, a good idea straight after a panic attack. One, acetone comes out in the breath as the "smell of rotting apples". Most body cell adapt to using ketones but like ketosis itself this takes time especially with liver pathology..

    EPILEPSY.

    Now add black out and convulsions as an alternative to the above runaway cascade. The blackout shuts off the panic cascade thereby conserving glucose and the convulsions PUMP lactic acid out of the skeletal muscles. Veins have non return valves along them so that by the convulsions stretching and contracting them they act as a series of pumps to speed up the delivery of lactic acid back to the liver.

    Brain tumours don't directly trigger seizures. They use a lot of glucose the more malignant they become (what's called the Warburg effect)and so exacerbate (make worse) the cerebral hypoglycaemia.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2012

    1 Athena 1

    I can't see how changing one's diet constitutes offering medical advice. I do suggest throwing one's meds into the incinerator because flushing then down the loo is so destucrive to the environment, bad enough just peeing them down the loo. Big pharma loves your sort of talk. Anyway I'm only putting forward this idea for debate and, after all, people have minds of their own and shouldn't need to be nannied. I would like to see a mouse experiment set up first and I know a disillusioned female cancer researcher who might be interested. But she would be up against formidable odds and would need a helluva lot of public support from women just so she didn't lose her job for just suggesting it. The funding would have to come from government and IT would need to be subject to HUGE pressure as it's in bed with so many research institutions, eg the NH and MRC in Australia.

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited April 2012
    Rules of Conduct

    You agree to abide by the following rules, and all administrative and moderator decisions, in your online communications with or through Breastcancer.org, and you acknowledge that we may suspend or terminate your access to online communications in our sole discretion:

    1. You represent that you are a breast cancer survivor or support person.

  • NattyOnFrostyLake
    NattyOnFrostyLake Member Posts: 377
    edited April 2012

    I've been looking at a ketogenic cancer approach on a Facebook Group. "Elaine's Alternative Health Tips for Cancer"

    She started it after shrinking her tumor.

    Is this the same thing?

  • Kadia
    Kadia Member Posts: 314
    edited April 2012

    So this supposedly cures schizophrenia, too? And migraines? And...hmm....

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2012

    Paul - if you are not breast cancer person, a survivor or a support person, you really cannot be on the forums.  I have read back, you are giving advice on how to heal, another rule not followed.  

    Edited to add: Perhaps you could begin your own website with all the information.  True, people do make their own decisions, but also true is that bc people can be quite frightened and grasp at what is not good for them, in a way that does not serve them, I for one was very confused and forgetful for well over a year.  Be careful in what and how you teach.  These are ideas to take to a naturopath and be closely supervised.

  • organa
    organa Member Posts: 66
    edited April 2012

    Paul,  I am just wondering what your credentials are to give such advice to the women on these boards? You state that blood glucose levels should be almost at zero to kill cancer cells.  This is very poor and very dangerous advice.  I am wondering if you follow your own advice and walk around in a hypoglycemic stupor day in and day out. You have a lot of theories and I am wondering what your motivation is... Are you bored in your retirement?    Maybe you should take up a hobby, and I mean one besides giving such ill un-founded opinions on how to cure disease online. 

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited April 2012

    Nodules - you suggest elsewhere that the enemy is not the cancer but the treatment and that it is counterproductive to wage a war on bc like we have waged the war on drugs. Let's just say that such statements go beyond the scope of these forums. And that they appear to be self-serving rather than intended to communicate with others. I personally am not uncomfortable with a non-bc person joining these talks. But I am if the intent is to conpose a treatise of medical advice on our backs.
    FYI I don't really care what Big Pharma thinks. I speak for myself. Excuse the typos.

  • vespersparrow
    vespersparrow Member Posts: 62
    edited April 2012

    quote:  Paul - if you are not breast cancer person, a survivor or a support person, you really cannot be on the forums. I have read back, you are giving advice on how to heal, another rule not followed.

    I would suggest he is a "support person", as so far I personally am finding his posts to be more supportive and useful than most other things I read around here.  Let him be...

  • motheroffoursons
    motheroffoursons Member Posts: 333
    edited April 2012

    I don't know where to post this, but it is somewhat related to the subject of ketones.

    Studies show tumors grow well in a lactic acid mileu.  However, from the article referenced below, there appears to be a confounding factor.  There is lactic acid inside the tumor cell, and lactic acid outside of the tumor cell.  The lactic acid inside the tumor cell appears to harm the tumor cells, while the lactic acid outside of the tumor cells gives the  tumor cells a selective advantage over normal cells.

    I am not sure how the bicarbonate treatments or alkalinization of blood would affect these two areas of lactic acid.  It could be good, and it could be bad.   I am at the upper limit of my biochemistry in studying the relationship between the lactic acid dehydrogenases and the interior and exterior of the cell.  If anyone knows more about this, please post. 

     http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2740455/

    Inhibition of CA9 activity in CO2-excreting tumors may thus provide a strategy for suppressing their development, by acidifying pHi (to attenuate growth (2, 21)) and alkalinizing pHe (to eliminate the selective advantage of neoplastic cells (8, 22)).

  • elimar86861
    elimar86861 Member Posts: 7,416
    edited April 2012

    How are we using the word "support" these days?  Please tell me it means not only offering Dx's based on what a woman writes in a post and offering a diet idea on how to kill cancer (and perform other amazing feats) but also the support of covering the cost should the woman wind up in the hospital. That's the kind of support I would want from someone advising me to try this diet.

    Anyway, women reading this can try it or not.  Free will, free country, and so on, etc., etc. It is not something I would attempt, myself.

  • NattyOnFrostyLake
    NattyOnFrostyLake Member Posts: 377
    edited April 2012

    Please keep the keto info coming.

    I see even Lance Armstrong's site is reporting good results with brain cancer if people could stick to the diet. I wonder if all the Metformin studies are linked to the same principle.

  • vespersparrow
    vespersparrow Member Posts: 62
    edited April 2012

    I've been using keto diets off and on for many years and they are not dangerous, just maybe a little uncomfortable if your body is accustomed to sugars and you go too fast.  Dietary ketosis and diabetic ketoacidosis are two completely different things, btw.  Eating sugar when you have cancer is what's dangerous, IMHO...

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited April 2012

    I have no problem with people proposing new diets or theories but suggesting one can throw out life saving meds is irresponsible.  Also the language used is suggesting this is a certainty, rather than using more precautionary phrases, such as... there is some evidence... there's a possibility... .  No mention of other causes for migraine, epilepsy etc.  Information about high starch foods such as white flour in breads, cakes, cookies, pasta or rice etc is missing.  Lots of capitalised words, dramatic references to mental illnesses, epileptic fits and other over dramatised hype.  I don't think anyone here will become catatonic unless they have another serious condition and probably wouldn't be on these forums to read this.  Why the obsession with mental illness?  Some women here are dealing with a new diagnosis or mets so we don't need to be scared any more thanks.

    In another thread about War on BC, Paul talks of BC turning from positive to negative after the shock of the diagnosis.  This is where a lack of basic BC knowledge shows and why I'd feel more comfortable with a genuine BC supporter.  It's only the biopsy and surgery which looks at the ER status.  It's hardly likely to change status in days or weeks between these two events. Often there are many cell types in one tumour so hormonal therapy may kill the ER+ and allow ER- to proliferate but that can take years. Paul also states the initial shock causes Tamoxifen to stop working which turns it ER- causing more fear.  But anyone with BC would know that Tamox isn't started till after the initial treatments end, then there's no way to find out if any future mets will be ER- so again, two more basic errors due to lack of BC knowledge.

    Anyone coming on here claiming to be some sort of expert at least needs to know the basics of BC or their credibility will soon be destroyed.  So unless someone has had a BC diagnosis, supports someone who has a diagnosis, or has expert, knowledgeable help, then we are quite capable of looking at the possibilities of a ketone diet on our own thanks.

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited April 2012

    Joy, Paul said that he had two trips to the bin. So, I am assuming his DX is schizophrenia, and that is probably why he is focused on that disease.

Categories