Suzanne Somers statement on the Rosie Show

Options
124

Comments

  • CoolBreeze
    CoolBreeze Member Posts: 4,668
    edited March 2012

    This is the first thread ever that has made me extremely hungry.

    I confess that I have dismissed Suz's life for the most part.  Has she ever stated what kind/stage her breast cancer was at?  I thought she said she had a lumpectomy and now hrf says she had some kind of stem cell recon?  

    Not that I believe anything that comes out of that woman's mouth and I don't think she's above lying when it comes to self-promotion but I'm just curious if she has said anything consistant about it?

  • cp418
    cp418 Member Posts: 7,079
    edited March 2012
    PLEASE stop posting those Paczki and donut pictures!!!  You are wearing down my resistance and when I go off the wagon -- I do so in a big way!!!!  Embarassed
  • hrf
    hrf Member Posts: 3,225
    edited March 2012

    She alleges that her lumpectomy took about 2/3 of her breast. Although you'd never know it from the way she always wore (and wears) the most revealing tops.  

  • BouncingBetties
    BouncingBetties Member Posts: 379
    edited March 2012

    I have no problem if she wants to talk about her experience but for her to provide dangerous advice is irresponsible. She's not an oncologist and has no business writing about or promoting treatments that could kill some of us. My cancer is ER+ and I have no intention of "feeding" it estrogen. I take my Tamoxifen every night and have my Zoladex implanted monthly to keep my ovaries shut down. Sure, I hate going through menopause at 40 but if I want any hope of seeing 45 I will do what I must. I wish Suzanne Somers would stop spreading misinformation and dangerous theories. I think we need to stick together and try and help one another.

  • CoolBreeze
    CoolBreeze Member Posts: 4,668
    edited March 2012

    I found an interesting piece that answered my questions.  I thought somebody else might like it too:

    http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/suzanne-somers-knockout-spreading-dangerous-misinformation-about-cancer-part-1/ 

  • camillegal
    camillegal Member Posts: 16,882
    edited March 2012

    What a topic--LOL--I used to watch her all the time on HSN and I liked her jewelry--it was fun stuff, then she started all that u could find in a dept. store---then she went healthy when she got cancer, ren she seemed to be crazy--And off HSN and onto another one SNBC--no jewelry just beauty/health and occasional clothing for 18 yr olds. She was fun at first and looked pretty good, now she talks about her own remedies and people call in and praise her idiotic thinking. She looks awful but has all this energy and she beat cancer mostly on her own.  How can she tell  the public that story? She's a mess now, why doesn't someone tell her.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2012

    She's a total whack job and has no idea what she's talking about!

    Anne 

  • Chickadee
    Chickadee Member Posts: 4,467
    edited March 2012

    Coolbreeze can you edit out that "v" at the beginning of the URL? iPads are a pain in the butt for copy and paste. The article was fantastic.

  • exbrnxgrl
    exbrnxgrl Member Posts: 12,424
    edited March 2012

    Thank you, Leah. Good NY Jew of the late 50's, early 60's that I am, I had never heard of sufgania until I was an adult. Latkes were our fried food of choice for Hanukah. Still, these treats are all filled with the same sweet but unsubstantial jelly.

    Caryn

  • Stormynyte
    Stormynyte Member Posts: 650
    edited March 2012

    Good article CoolBreeze. It really made me think shes nuts. Full body cancer? What the heck is that?? And how on earth would you be misdiagnosed by 6 doctors with full body cancer?

  • CoolBreeze
    CoolBreeze Member Posts: 4,668
    edited March 2012

    Done, chickadee, sorry about that.  I made it clickable too.

    Yes, she clearly does not understand anything that has happened to her.  And, she is sharing her ignorance freely.  Most women are not like the women you will find here, and they are not seeking information.  They might very well misunderstand what a doctor says and hear her and believe her.  While we all have to be responsible for learning about our illness the best we can, it is sad that she isn't being challenged much by the mass market media.  (They, after all, make money on her too.)  It's bloggers and scientists proving her wrong and that message doesn't get out as well. 

  • dancetrancer
    dancetrancer Member Posts: 4,039
    edited March 2012

    Coolbreeze, thanks for that link!  Great article.  

  • Fearless_One
    Fearless_One Member Posts: 3,300
    edited March 2012

    She's a nut.   Unfortunately, there is no law that prevents people from buying into medical claims and opinions offered by has-been actresses.

  • BouncingBetties
    BouncingBetties Member Posts: 379
    edited March 2012

    I don't believe her "doctor" is actually an oncologist. I fail to see how twice daily coffee enemas are going to "cure" cancer. I have tried to find information on Suzanne Somers' breast cancer such as stage but nothing. I can say that most cancer survivors will mention their stage, whether it is metastatic, etc. I am starting to think she had sarcoidosis not cancer.

  • dutchgirl6
    dutchgirl6 Member Posts: 673
    edited March 2012

    Of course her doctor is an oncologist, he did go to an "oncology school". 

    I think that Ms. Somers is on a life time cruise on de-nile.  She is unable to accept the fact that aging is a normal life stage, she has her head in the sand regarding her cancer and she thinks that she is qualified to give medical advice.  I worry about the people who take her word as verbatim and end up not seeking the proper diagnostics and treatment.

    I didn't realize that Paczki were a pre-Ash Wednesday treat, but it does make sense.  I have always seen them in the grocery store around Easter, right next to the hot cross buns.  Now I might have to actually try some....

  • voraciousreader
    voraciousreader Member Posts: 7,496
    edited March 2012

    What surprises me is that her 15 minutes of fame is perpetuated by irresponsible people in the media. Furthermore, I did a little reading yesterday and there are companies that specialize in matching celebrities to diseases, so they can become paid spokesmen. Every which way you turn, it's about money and ratings and more money. Good riddence to Rosie and her guests and especially her bookers!

  • GG27
    GG27 Member Posts: 2,128
    edited March 2012

    This article says she had stage 1 BC, for treatment a lumpectomy & rads.

    http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20567432,00.html

  • CoolBreeze
    CoolBreeze Member Posts: 4,668
    edited March 2012

    That article I linked to as well said she had Stage 1 ER+ cancer.  Not only that, they explained why she could easily "turn down" chemo and tamoxifen and not have her lifespan threatened.  She had an extremely good outlook even without any adjuvent treatment.

  • pickle
    pickle Member Posts: 1,409
    edited March 2012

    Excellent article. Thanks for posting it

    Cheers

    Beth

  • DocBabs
    DocBabs Member Posts: 775
    edited March 2012

    That woman is a nut job.I saw only a small portion of her interview only because I couldn't stand to listen to her spew her nonsensical thoughts on her magical treatment. She said that she had a tram flap yet she went on and on about how her own fat was taken out , spun down to get the stem cells and then had them injected into her chest. "Poof" her breasts appeared. The woman is certifiable.

  • Outfield
    Outfield Member Posts: 1,109
    edited March 2012

    Coolbreeze, great link.  I read the first chapter of "Knockout" standing in a bookstore and noted many of the same things.  At the very least, I cannot imagine physicians actually talking to her in the language she reports and urging chemotherapy without a tissue diagnosis.  That just doesn't happen in oncology.   

    Voracious Reader, that is simply disheartening.  

    I simply do not understand our culture's worship of actors, singers and athletes, and our willingness to accept them as experts in fields far beyond those which made them famous. Would any of us care anything about Dr. Weiss's thoughts about basketball or rush out to buy a book by Dr. Weiner about choosing a new car?  I'm choosing them randomly, because they have been prominent names on this site, but you get the picture. 

    My local newspaper has a weekly feature I have come to really appreciate.  In the business section, they print an in-depth interview with a successful business person in our small city.  I'm not in business, but I have found that I really enjoy reading successful people answer questions about their early life and how things that happened or choices they made then may have contributed to what they're doing today.  It's so refreshing to read this type of interview and have the focus NOT be on a celebrity.  

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited March 2012

    Leah, thanks for the info and correction on the name. Like Caryn, I grew up with (and continue with) the 'latkes for Chanukah' tradition. I would however happily add sufganiot to the menu. Even if it means a trip to Israel to find them.

    Coolbreeze, great article!  The more that I hear about what comes out of Suzanne Somer's mouth, the more amazed I am that she has any credibility.

    p.s.  The paczki was yummy.  

  • dlb823
    dlb823 Member Posts: 9,430
    edited March 2012

    Great article, CoolBreeze!  That doctor did a great job of dissecting what's so troublesome about SS's narrative of her bc story on which she bases her opinions and advice.  It's clear when it comes to bc she doesn't know what she's talking about, and it's ridiculous that the various media outlets allow her comments to go unchallenged when it doesn't seem like challenging them would be very difficult to do.    Deanna

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited March 2012
    Deanna -- I've noticed that, over the last 5 or 6 years, TV interviewers treat celebrities and politicians in virtually the same way.  They provide the venue, they don't do their homework, and the interviewees get to spout off on anything they wish, unchallenged.  There isn't any hard news or news magazines on American TV anymore.  Treat the interviewee with some skepticism and he/she will boycott the programme or network from then on.  Seeking the truth has become passe.  The networks and cable stations are only interested in ratings.  It seems Suzanne Sommers still secures good ratings (although I just can't understand whyFrown).
  • exbrnxgrl
    exbrnxgrl Member Posts: 12,424
    edited March 2012

    Not too many things get me riled up but the cult of fame and celebrity worship makes me crazy. The cult of worshipping those who are famous for no discernible reason makes me even crazier but I try not to waste too much time even thinking about those people.

    Caryn

  • pickle
    pickle Member Posts: 1,409
    edited March 2012

    The celebrity worship is ridiculous. I always have my morning coffee while watching the Today Show and occasionally GMA but they are so celebrity, entertainment driven now too. I often wonder if the interviewers like Matt Lauer etc just roll their eyes behind the scenes regarding some of the interviews they have to do. Matt Lauer interviewed Snooki and those damn Kardashians. SS was on GMA yacking about her reconstruction. Even Clint Eastwood's family is going to do a reality show...he'll make some appearances...Jeesh! And don't even get me started on Oprah..lol

    Cheers

    Beth

  • voraciousreader
    voraciousreader Member Posts: 7,496
    edited March 2012

    Matt Lauer ISN'T rolling his eyes back because he's interviewing these guests.  Instead, he's laughing all the way to the bank....He just signed his renewal contract for $5 or $10 million dollars.  For that kind of money, he will roll his eyes, suck it up and interview ANYONE!  What's alarming is that he doesn't put his foot down and demand better guests.  I guess he sold out his integrity.....

  • pickle
    pickle Member Posts: 1,409
    edited March 2012

    VR, I agree. I think they've all sold out. Unfortunately it's all about the ratings and I just don't understand how these so called celebrities draw a lot of viewers.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2012

    A while back in 2011 she was hyping her book on cancer too, in which she stated she had "whole body cancer" and overcame it by doing herbal stuff.  Yes, she really IS a nut job and I wouldn't take anything she says as gospel.  Then on the Rosie show, she says her tumor was "huge" - 2.4 cm.  WTF??  I would trade tumor sizes with hers anyday.   No one has ever been labeled as having "whole body cancer" and even the herbal stuff she takes for good health can build toxins in the body. Plus did anyone think it was weird when she wanted Rosie to feel her new boobs?  Give me a break

  • Booboo2
    Booboo2 Member Posts: 59
    edited March 2012

    That has got to be one of the nuttiest books I've ever read, and one of the most irresponsible.  She could really endanger people's health by writing a book like that.  What really got me was the "whole body chemotherapy."  What sort of chemotherapy is not whole body?  Also, I think that some of the doctors that she interviewed in that book are downright quacks, though I wouldn't want to slander all of them with that word.  I really disliked the one who tries to treat cancer with coffee enemas.  WTF!

    I think that Somers may have had a bad experience with her own doctors.  If her description near the beginning of the book about her own experience is true, what kind of crazy hospital was she in? Running off to quack doctors isn't the answer.  Finding a proper hospital with good doctors is.

Categories