An Alternative approach to Stage IV Health and choices

Options
1171820222335

Comments

  • cheery
    cheery Member Posts: 311
    edited February 2012

    PipersMom

    I've been using akaline water filtration system costing thousands since 2004. I was subsequently diagnosed with Stage IV BC in 2008. 

    Having said that, I think any simple filtration system would still help as it can filter off the rust from old water pipes etc.. 

    Edit to add: I came across this thread re Gerson Therapy:-

    http://her2support.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=53153

    Paula O (Stage 3) shared how she did it even though she had progression. I didn't post this to say that it doesn't work (just like the alkaline water) but just to let you know the details. Paula mentioned that it did work for some BC ladies but I suspect HER2+ is fairly aggressive and Gerson Therapy alone may not be sufficient. This is only my personal opinionSmile 

    The other point to note is, Paula said she did not have surgery before she did Gerson, as advised by Charlotte Gerson. I'm not sure if the end result would have been different if she surgery prior to Gerson. 

    Hope this helps. 

  • sweetbean
    sweetbean Member Posts: 1,931
    edited February 2012

    Pipersmom,

    I just bought Aquasana filters for both my kitchen faucet and my shower.   They are not too expensive - about $100 per system and then about $50 for replacement filters.  It filters out a lot of pollutants.  The big alkaline system is Kangan, but cheery is right -it is super expensive.  

  • Heidihill
    Heidihill Member Posts: 5,476
    edited February 2012

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLjgBLwH3Wc&feature=player_embedded

    Dr. Terry Wahls gives a talk on her dietary cure for her MS. I think her story is really inspiring and is very relevant to us. Her diet looks a lot like mine, maybe just a cup or two less of the fruits and veggies. Organ meats also much less, but would have no problem upping. I like that she calls this a strategy of minding mitochondria in the brain. As cancer patients we need to mind mitochondria everywhere, particularly where our tumors are. I wonder if infusing antioxidants locally would do the trick. If only it were that easy. Anyway exercise is another way to repair damaged mitochondria. Exercise affects every tissue in the body, at least in mice. Weightlifting can improve mitochondrial health as well as moderate endurance exercise.

    http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/02/can-exercise-keep-you-young/

  • 3littlegirls
    3littlegirls Member Posts: 853
    edited February 2012

    Do mice weightlift??  :P  Sorry couldn't resist.  I just logged on to say I didn't get a chance to pick his brain too much.  He had another patient he had to step out for and ended up being gone the whole time.  :(  I see him again on Fri and will make him give me copies of his notes. :)  

    He said it was amazing and he has a few treatment options he wants to try on me for my liver.  One of them is DCA IV.  That is the only one I could remember.  there were loads of talks on Marijuana but he didn't go into detail.  I am guessing they were good or he would of told me to stop.  

    I just bought the Santevia water filtration system.  I really like it. It costs about $170 here in Canada so it will probably be about $20 in the States.  :)  Here is the link.  I like that it adds minerals back into the water after it is filtered.  

     http://www.santevia.com/

  • Kaara
    Kaara Member Posts: 3,647
    edited February 2012

    Heidihill:  Thanks for posting that video..it was interesting and inspiring.  My boyfriend has MS that is now progressing so we are fighting hard to keep it stable.  When I was dx with bc this past year, we both dramatically changed our diets to the hunter gatherer variety and began a supplement program.  In addition we get weekly vitamin infusions, and he get chelation therapy to remove metals from his body.  We've both lost a lot of weight and we feel better than we have in a long time.  Initially we thought it would be a real challenge to stay on the diet, but it is actually very easy.  It helps that we both have a common goal...to improve our health and rid ourselves of our respective diseases. 

  • Heidihill
    Heidihill Member Posts: 5,476
    edited February 2012

    DCA has been on my mind too. It supposedly improves mitochondrial function of cancer cells so they no longer depend on glucose for energy and and can die off like normal cells.



    Kaara, glad to hear you and bf are feeling better!

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited March 2012

    Hi Ladies, I've just caught up with this thread though I had to skim through a lot as my brain is struggling atm.  I mostly come on BCO to read the research pages.  For the first time in my life I went into some sort of depression at the end of last year and lost the desire to be reading and typing.  My word finding and reasoning abilities are letting me down so I find it depressing to read and not understand things like I used to.  I intend to take coconut oil each day to see if it helps, but I could never stomach the taste or smell of coconut in any form so I need a way to disguise it. Any suggestions?

    That's Life, I see you mentioned me in regard to Metformin and funnily enough I mentioned it to my MO on Monday and she is also following the research.  She said she'd managed to get some patients onto it as they had borderline blood sugar levels or were very overweight and would recommend a good endochrinologist if I need one and asked me to get a blood work up with my GP.  Unfortunately she needs some clinical reason to approve it but I appreciate her open mind and that she doesn't get irritated with my independant research like many doctors do. I'm undecided on whether to take it or not.

    Here are some Metformin links:

    Metformin Prevents Tumors From Growing In Human Cultures

    Diabetes Drug Shows Promise in Reducing Risk of Cancer, Study Suggests

    With Metformin- regulate blood sugar levels and lower cholesterol  - To import without a prescription.  I don't know how reliable this is.

    Researchers identify cancer cell mitochondria as 'Achilles' heel' of tumor growth

    Diabetes Drug Shows Promise in Reducing Risk of Cancer, Study Suggests 

    Metformin Selectively Targets Cancer Stem Cells, and Acts Together with Chemotherapy to Block Tumor Growth and Prolong Remission

  • Heidihill
    Heidihill Member Posts: 5,476
    edited March 2012

    JLW, great to see you back! Sorry to hear you've been in the doldrums. I have a bottle of body oil that has coconut and vanilla in it. I can't smell the coconut, just the vanilla. I like to disguise the coconut smell too so i won't be hungry all the time. Maybe if you add some vanilla extract to plain coconut oil? Cinnamon might work as well. Anyway, your linking skills are still the best.

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited March 2012

    Thanks Heidi, I'll try those.

  • thats-life-
    thats-life- Member Posts: 1,075
    edited March 2012

    Joy! its lovely to hear from you. Smile Thanks for the links..... I went through nearly every post on this thread yesterday looking for the one link that one of us uploaded re the caloric restriction diet being as good as, if not better than metformin in the study result. I cant find it!...so if you remember the study, or have a copy of it, let me know. I wanted to add the link on the METFORMIN thread, mainly for circles, who was discussing the link to diet. I know what you mean about losing the ability to think!..I did too. I felt we were really getting somewhere, when we touched on the restriction diet, then the pancreas information, i thought we may get our heads around what needs to be done!, then I had overload! and became a dunce for a few months, very frustrating!, i wonder if its the drug im on?

    Essa quoted an explanation of cancer cells and their fuel use on the same METFORMIN thread. It was a very clear and simple explanation of what we spent so much time trying to working out! I want to upload it here, I will ask her if I can copy the info part of her post. It explains how we can use diet to starve cancer cells, in easy to understand terms :) The one question that hasnt been answered, and which I keep forgetting to ask my Oncologist, is in regard to ER+ PR+ cancer cells. Do they 'feed' on E and P? more than glucose? or all of the above? in which case, the Hormone fuel would be thwarted by our hormonal treatments, and the glucose fuel could be hampered by our diet etc...I will send Essa a pm now.

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited March 2012

    I'd suggest you do a BCO search for posts by me that contain the words- metformin calorie restriction.  That should do the trick.

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited March 2012

    Fuel Lines of Tumors Are New Target 

    Quote from the above link,

    ["When a patient with cancer is calorically restricted, the amount of glucose in the blood until they are almost dead is close to normal," said Dr. Michael Pollak, professor of medicine and oncology at McGill University in Montreal. Also, Dr. Pollak said, tumors are adept at extracting glucose from the blood. So even if glucose is scarce, he said, "the last surviving cell in the body would be the tumor cell."
    So efforts are focusing not on reducing the body's overall glucose level but on interfering specifically with how tumors use glucose.]  ...
    End quote, my bold.

    I can't find the link comparing calorie restriction with metformin, but here's what I'm considering at the moment.

    A person who is fasting or on a low calorie or low carb diet is affecting insulin and other bodily functions, such as the fluid loss that happens at the start of a diet and the ketosis effect of an extreme low carb diet.  As tumours grow quite fast, it may be that upsetting the body chemistry can be very disrupting and therefore frequently changing treatments can slow down growth.  So I'm thinking of changing regularly, say monthly, from low calorie, to low carb, to intermittent fasting. From one supplement intensively for a month to another one next month so any cancer doesn't get a chance to adapt. I wouldn't want to use metformin while fasting or restricting calories so maybe I could rotate that too. It's all speculation but it's better than sitting back doing nothing.

    This article talks about this tactic for active cancer, which I hopefully don't have.

    Quote from a mathematical oncologist!...   [Your whole goal is to keep the tumor stable. You continuously alter the drug, the dose, the timing of the dose, with that goal in mind.]

    To Survive Cancer, Live With It

  • Heidihill
    Heidihill Member Posts: 5,476
    edited March 2012

    That Gatenby interview is fascinating, JLW. I've read that cancer can use ketones and glutamine for energy as well, so I do think changing strategies is important. My intermittent fast last year was actually interrupted every two months for about two weeks due to school / summer holidays.

    I have been trying to decide as well whether to take a 3-month Femara break along the lines of the SOLE (Study of Letrozole Extension) trial. The rationale is that the surge of estrogen during this period actually kills cells long deprived of it. Under this and Gatenby's theory it may well be good for us to have a food orgy every once in a while. Hey, I could have my cake and my estrogen, too! Thats-life, maybe estrogen and progestorone is like the air we breathe for some cancer.

    Of course, the big question underlined by Gatenby for me is whether stable is better than NED even in earlier stages. He seems to be saying the former. It probably is an individual thing, depending on how adaptable one's particular cancer is. With an adaptable cancer there are too many variables not even a mathematical oncologist could quantify.  Maybe earlier stages are less adaptable or local control is easier to achieve given the much higher survival rates there.

  • thats-life-
    thats-life- Member Posts: 1,075
    edited March 2012

    I suppose the body will always try to maintain glucose levels joy, but I am wondering why the low starch diet verses a low fat diet study I linked to a couple of pages ago showed a reduction in recurrence with the low starch diet. Is it that we can at least not offer cancer extra glucose to fuel itself? Essa's quote discussed the body's ability to resort to fat for fuel if glucose intake is low, whereas cancer cells cant use fat for fuel. That explained, IMO, why the low fat diet didnt alter numbers much, and why the low starch diet did.

    I totally agree with the mathematical oncologist you linked to joy. I totally believe that we are treating cancer the wrong way. I take my daily tamoxifen knowing even that,(let alone chemo)  is teaching my cancer to grow stronger, more resilient...It frustrates me, that at this point in time, chemo and hormonals are our only options. My goal is stable disease.

    Heidi: It is an interesting study, and i know you are considering trying it, though you are stage IV. It has some sense to it. The other recent study I cant find Undecided Which showed that high glucose levels reprogrammed cancer cells to apoptosis, follows the same principal you are both discussing I think, i.e:changing tactics to make things hard for the cancer to adapt...its very interesting.

  • Kaara
    Kaara Member Posts: 3,647
    edited March 2012

    There is that one alternative cancer treatement called IPT (Insulin Potentated Therapy) whereby the patient is given a large amount of glucose just before the administering of a low dose of chemo.  The theory is that the cancer cells open up to receive the glucose and then the chemo comes in and kills them off...something like that.  It's done at the Oasis of Hope in Arizona and I think the Dr.'s name is Lodi.  It sounded like something I would be willing to try if I needed chemo treatment because the dose of chemo is not as toxic, so you don't get the debilitating SE's that you get from conventional chemo.

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited March 2012

    That's Life, you said;

    Is it that we can at least not offer cancer extra glucose to fuel itself?

    I'm no expert, but the way I understand it is- we only have more glucose in our blood if our blood sugar levels are high, as in diabetes.  But we all have lower readings in the morning after overnight fasting. If we stop eating then we turn fat into glucose to stop ourselves from going into fatal hypoglycemia.  Also the more carbs we eat, the more insulin is required to keep our blood sugar levels under control.  With diabetics they have spikes of high insulin or high blood sugar depending on when they have taken medications or how many carbs they've just consumed.  One hypothesis mentioned in many of the papers on Metformin and cancer is that it's the insulin that promotes cancer. This may explain why low starch diets reduce cancer rates.

    I'm sure any knowledgeable diabetic will correct any misunderstandings I have about that.  My mother had a poor understanding of her diabetes and was getting Alzheimers so I had to refresh my knowledge then and have read quite a bit about it but don't understand the complexities. In any medical condition there's the 'public', easy to understand version and the more technical details for professionals.  Trying to find information that's not too simplified yet not too technical to understand is a constant challenge and frustration for us all as we all have differing levels of knowledge on any subject. 

    On a more personal note, one of my dear sisters who is intelligent and well informed on most subjects, thought I was a misinformed know-it-all because I said her friend could not have stage V (five) BC. She is insistent I don't know everything and I've got it wrong. After all, her friend knows what stage she is!  My MO confirmed that no specialists in the world go higher than stage IV and many patients get confused or mistaken about such details.  Family fights are part of the reason I had the recent lapse in self confidence which threw me into the doldrums, as someone here called it, and I found that expression uplifting as it put it into perspective while acknowledging how I feel.  I've felt SO much better since coming back to BCO.  Sure there are disagreements and upsets but my lovely friends, even those I don't know, help me feel good again just by sharing their knowledge, enthusiasm and support.  It's like my lifeblood somehow and I think I'll have to stick to a few threads so it doesn't swallow up so much time and effort but still gives good feedback.

    Thank you ladies (and any gents) for being here!

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited March 2012

    Kaara, Last time I checked, years ago, we didn't have IPT here in Australia.  It's not accepted by medical science but I can't see why not.  If I had progression I'd investigate further and consider selling the house if I had to, to get it, but I'd need to know the long term statistics and why it's not an approved treatment. Also I'd be thinking of the mathematical oncologist's beliefs that such sweeping treatments could result in the cancer becoming resistant and spreading faster later on.  I wish it were more straight forward.

  • thats-life-
    thats-life- Member Posts: 1,075
    edited March 2012

    Well, its lovely to have you back joy, its my comfort place too. 

    if a high sugar diet can cause blood sugar levels to rise in the body, then are you saying that it is the resulting insulin levels, and not the glucose levels, that fuel cancer? and if our bodies when low in blood sugars turn fat cells into fuel (or glucose?) to survive, would that not be better than high (available) sugar levels? Sorry if i sound ignorant, but i would really like to get my head around this issue! If i have 'norma'l blood sugar levels, and 'normal' insulin levels, wouldnt lowering  blood sugar levels be beneficial, as my body would revert to using fat cells? which the cancer cells cant do? the cancer cells would have to use the glucose produced, but there would not be an abundance? slow growing, underfed cancer is fine by me! or maybe ive got this whole thing wrong? If caloric restriction results were as good as if not better than Metformin, then does caloric restriction work on insulin levels or glucose levels? Those studies that i am refering to were not of diabetics.......? (thats not all aimed at you joy, its an open ended question!:)

  • Kaara
    Kaara Member Posts: 3,647
    edited March 2012

    If going on the "no starch" diet is any indication of the body using fat cells to get their energy, then it is working on us, because we've been on the diet since October, and I've lost close to 20 pounds.  Keep in mind that I wasn't heavy to begin with...weighed between 138 and 142 and I'm 5' 4" tall.

     Most of the weight I lost was around my middle where all my fat cells were stored.  Really... we eat like rabbits..salads, veggies, fruits, nuts, and lean protein like fish or chicken.  We cheat occasionally but not often.  Our diet is also 99% gluten free.  We keep our bodies in a constant alkaline state, as I've read that cancer thrives in an acidic environment.  I'm hoping this is going to work for me.  I rolled the dice and passed on radiation, which everyone said I was foolish to do.

     I am trying tamoxifen, but I have my doubts that I will stay on it very long.  I did it as a compromise for my conventional doctors who were freaking out that I wasn't doing anything.  I also see a naturopath and get weekly IV infusions of Meyer's cocktail and some cancer additives, plus a boost of glutathione and alpha lipoic acid at the end.  All that and enough supplements to open a vitamin store...I pray it is successful.

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited March 2012

    Oops, it looks like I'm wrong about insulin and fat. Try reading Wikipedia, Insulin to see how insulin acts in the body. But I do know the body uses fat stores when calories are restricted, hence weight loss. But it's not due to insulin!

    From Wikipedia again - Lipid;

    "In animals, when there is an oversupply of dietary carbohydrate, the excess carbohydrate is converted to triglycerides."
    "... the Krebs Cycle can start at acetyl-CoA when fat is being broken down for energy if there is little or no glucose available."

    So we can't lower our blood sugar levels as our bodies use stored glycogen in the liver and muscles to make up any shortfall. Our blood contains the glucose and it's up to the cells to take what they need, and cancer sucks up the glucose as I'll explain at the end of this post.

    Many of the links I posted on my earlier post say that the role of insulin in cancer is not known but may be linked. Here are some examples:
    "...the insulin-lowering effects of metformin may be integral to its anticancer properties."


    "The ability of metformin to lower circulating insulin may be particularly important for the treatment of cancers known to be associated with hyperinsulinemia, such as those of the breast and colon."


    "It is still not clear if high blood glucose is the reason diabetics have a higher cancer risk. A more likely explanation is that people with Type 2 diabetes have high levels of insulin, a hormone that is known to promote growth of certain tumors, according to the consensus statement.
    Similarly, metformin might fight cancer by lowering insulin levels, not blood sugar levels. But there is some evidence that the drug works in part by inhibiting glucose metabolism in cancer cells.
    Even if blood sugar levels fuel tumor growth, however, experts say that trying to lower the body's overall level of blood sugar - like by starving oneself - would probably not be effective. That is because, at least for people without diabetes, the body is very good at maintaining a certain blood glucose level despite fluctuations in diet.
    "


    So the studies still need to be done in this area since research in the past has been on chemo that stops cells from dividing rather than cutting off fuel that feeds cancer, as first studied by Otto Warburg so long ago.


    In following up Kaara's IPT post I found this fascinating information in regards to insulin, IGF and glucose uptake. Thanks Kaara!
    Wikipedia - Insulin potentiation therapy

    "Breast cancer cells, for example, have six times more insulin receptors and ten times more IGF receptors per cell than normal cells. As an added boost, insulin is able to react with its own receptors and is also able to cross-react with and activate the IGF receptors on cancer cells.
    Something else to take into consideration is that ligand effect is a function of receptor concentration. In a particular tissue, the more receptors there are for a certain ligand - such as insulin - the greater the effect of that ligand on that tissue.
    "

    Oh yes, one more thing That's Life.  Metformin is a calorie restriction (CR) mimetic, which means it mimics CR so we can get the benefits of CR without starving.  I put links up on the "stop SUGAR" thread ages ago which may be the ones you're looking for. I won't be on here again till late tomorrow so I'll try to find more on this then.

  • Heidihill
    Heidihill Member Posts: 5,476
    edited March 2012

    Intermittent fasting lowers glucose and insulin levels

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc156352/

    Abstract: Dietary restriction has been shown to have several health benefits including increased insulin sensitivity, stress resistance, reduced morbidity, and increased life span. The mechanism remains unknown, but the need for a long-term reduction in caloric intake to achieve these benefits has been assumed. We report that when C57BL/6 mice are maintained on an intermittent fasting (alternate-day fasting) dietary-restriction regimen their overall food intake is not decreased and their body weight is maintained. Nevertheless, intermittent fasting resulted in beneficial effects that met or exceeded those of caloric restriction including reduced serum glucose and insulin levels and increased resistance of neurons in the brain to excitotoxic stress. Intermittent fasting therefore has beneficial effects on glucose regulation and neuronal resistance to injury in these mice that are independent of caloric intake.

    Elevated insulin increases breast cancer risk

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090709170819.htm (quote below)

    Notably, the link between elevated insulin level and breast cancer was strongest among lean women and weakest among obese women (who, in general, have higher insulin levels compared with lean women). "This finding is potentially important because it indicates that, in postmenopausal women, insulin may be a risk factor for breast cancer that is independent of obesity," says Dr. Kabat.  However, because the number of lean women was small, this finding is preliminary.

    Estrogen and insulin work together - Tamoxifen acts to reduce serum IGF levels (insulin-like growth factors)

    http://erc.endocrinology-journals.org/content/13/2/279.full

    Exercise lowers insulin in breast cancer survivors

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/06/070604090259.htm

    "Our findings suggest that the effects of exercise on breast cancer prognosis may be mediated, at least in part, through changes in insulin levels and/or changes in fat mass or deposition," said Ligibel. "Exercise has benefits all through treatment and afterwards. It's an investment in a woman's health and hopefully will prove to lower her risk of dying from breast cancer."

  • Kaara
    Kaara Member Posts: 3,647
    edited March 2012

    Heidihill:  Well that's good, because I'm eating like a rabbit and exercising quite a bit.  I was average weight, but now am a little below average for my age.  I lost about 15 pounds on this new starch and sugar free diet.  It was recommended for prevention of bc recurrence, so it has become my first line of defense along with enough supplements to open a vitamin shop:)

  • thats-life-
    thats-life- Member Posts: 1,075
    edited March 2012

    Kaara, im going pretty well on the limiting starch thing, but im still having sugar in my tea and coffee, and still having a biscuit with it on occasion. I still drink cordial!...what is wrong with me!...lol I must say the tummy weight is dropping off...I think its due to watching starch intake...:)

    Heidi, i bet i would be one of those lean women with high insulin levels..I was such a sugar freak, i have dropped my intake alot, (apart from the aboveEmbarassed) I have never put on weight, until just recently (first time in my life over 56kg). I should get my levels checked, maybe that would help me make this Metformin decision.

  • AlaskaAngel
    AlaskaAngel Member Posts: 1,836
    edited March 2012

    I admit I know not what to think about it!

    To some degree I know that exercise certainly benefits us all so I wouldn't argue that.

    But I am also a tad suspicious of what is actually "going on" metabolically at the cell level for each of us.

    Those of us whose metabolism has slowed down seem to be at higher risk for recurrence because of weight gain that is unbelievably difficult and next to impossible to avoid on a steady basis.

    But at the same time, I think there is also risk for those whose metabolism is faster/normal, because cancer likes the energy it creates. So I think that those who tend to slim easily are also at higher risk.
  • Kaara
    Kaara Member Posts: 3,647
    edited March 2012

    A.A.:  I think if you tend to be on the slender side and eat anything you want, including sugars, starches, etc.  you could be at risk, but if you watch what you eat and as a result lose fat deposits in places where estrogen is stored, I don't see how that could be harmful.  IMO it would benefit you, since most of the information out there suggests that estrogen is stored wherever the body has fat deposits.  My goal is to get rid of mine as much as I can.  The carb restricted diet has helped me to do that when no other diet ever could, so naturally I'm a believer that it works.

  • LiwoG
    LiwoG Member Posts: 12
    edited March 2012

    I have so enjoyed reading thru all the posts and input from all of you wonderful ladies.  For me personally, I believe alternative/integrative therapies certainly have their place and embrace various supplements and homeopathic remedies to support my body. 

    I found the following that I hope will contribute to this site, however read with caution and scrutinize for yourselves. 

    http://www.euro-med.us/homeopathy.pdf

    http://www.moshefrenkelmd.com/index.asp?page=2058&lang=eng

    http://www.virtualtrials.com/pdf/ruta6.pdf

    The last link, regarding ruta 6 someone else mentioned in an earlier post but if they used it for various brain cancers in the article perhaps there is something for breast cancer.  It is a stretch I realise. 

    I have yet to post my biography, I seem to breeze in and out of these forums rather quickly but love all the interaction from all of you.

    My diagnosis is stage lV, grade 3 and labeled Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer.  In December 2011 I was diagnosed with Peritoneal Carcinomas of unknown primary and they had no desire to look for the primary but insisted I start on chemotherapy which I declined.  Then in January I was told the primary was believed to be ovarian and in February I am now told the primary is Lobular Breast and they now want me on Femera.  I have also been trying since December to get an appointment with MD Anderson for a second opinion (which my insurance will pay for) and last week I resubmitted my entry on their website for a second time.  Meanwhile, I met with an Integrative Oncologist and did the blood work for the chemo sensitivity test that I realise is very controversial and did various IV's for four days to build me up (I must say they helped tremendously) and returned home. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2012

    Joy - you mentioned tricking the cancer by alternating between therapies and times.  That is what I have done since I found the mass, I call it transitioning. I go from one hard therapy to the next, and continue to use the ones I just used but not as strong.  Then return to them again.  Your references to food, interesting to me, the changeableness of that strategy.  I never do anything with food just perfect as planned and always feel rather guilty, but maybe I could be grateful for my inconsistency.

    Last week I had a bioenergetic test that validated suspicions of what my cancer is all about, besides the driven estrogen that is. 

    I was 'resonant' with several antibacterial protocols that I am now using, six fold of what I would have ever done for myself.  But the antibacterial supplements that ended up on my list all pieced together into a protocol that I was able to realize because of all the research I have done and in reading so many experiences.  I may have done one at a time and now am on all 6 at once and full force for awhile. 

    This happened after I had a tooth extracted where the oral surgeon found a cyst at the end of root and bacteria in the root and pulp of tooth and the crown had been put on loose, very WRONG!  Very interesting.  So am now on MSM-Collodial Silver protocol 3x a day w 1 T each time of the Mesosilver, and MSM-LIPH water protocol, and highdose antibiotic (wouldnot let oral surgeon touch me without this started), Vitamin C infusions for 3 1/2 hours each week, and Bacteria Fold homeopathic drops, and Olive Leaf Complex by Barlean's 3 T a day which is a lot and quite awful tasting... I follow the MSM-Silver protocol with the T of Olive Leaf Complex for more punch.

    Anyway, there is a possibility a root canal was there but the last dentist who set the porcelain crown pulled the root canal 'wires' out to save the tooth from being extracted, and thus could have cost me my life when I was attempting to regain my health.  In a trial there were 150 women checked and all had breast cancer, and 147 of them had root canals, 3 had bone cavitations, that's 100%.  In thermographies, a line can be seen connecting the root canals to the breast tumors and lymph nodes affected.

    Undoubtedly a link and for me, a reason to have these removed to be safe. But one seems to have been left, and I am grateful it is out now.  Still could not believe the bioenergetic test showing these powerful natural antibiotics on the day after the extraction.

    That's Life - I hope I was right in my take on the Metformin info.  I studied IPT therapy a bit, actually found my Integrative MD listed on the IPT Therapy site too, so knew I was on right track with him.  In using Met for cancer, it is another way for me.

    The bone scan was clear, the ctc and such fine.  Still with the pain, I am not certain all is well, but must imagine it is for today.  Perhaps the new DIM I started today will make the difference in pain because the shooting and burning pain in right breast sure feels like something is hitting something or else cancer cells are clearing themselves out.  I opt for the latter.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited March 2012

    Just wanted to say, the quotes in the post are from the IPT therapy site, so I didn't write all this, in case there is confusion.  But I do believe in it.  If the cancer cells are being fueled by sugar, are inhabited by morphing microbes and / or are ER+ PR+ or HER2+ or gene oriented, there are so many ways to deal with them and this is yet another.

    Metformin acts somewhat like the IPT chemotherapy, (edited to insert that metformin does not necessarily mean taking chemo therapy too) the IPT uses insulin so the chemo will be taken up by the cells more easily, thus less chemo needed and only targeting the greedy cancer cells that ar not getting the glucose they want.

    http://www.iptforcancer.com/index.php?md=8

    In part:::

    A Closer Look at How it Works

    "IPT exploits the fact that cancer cells, unlike healthy cells, are not able to metabolize fat for energy. They rely completely on glucose (sugar/carbohydrates) for their energy supply. This is a weakness of cancer cells, and we can use this weakness to control them. We use the hormone insulin to do this.

    When insulin is injected into a patient, it has the effect of causing the patient's blood glucose to drop. As the blood glucose drops, the patient's healthy cells simply shift over to fat metabolism. But the patient's cancer cells become seriously compromised.

    Shutting down the amount of glucose that a cancer cell can have has the same effect as depriving it of oxygen. You know what it's like to hold your breath. You know you can do it for 1-2 minutes, but much longer than that and you will quickly die. Depriving cancer cells of glucose has the same effect. If it were possible to completely deprive them of glucose, they would die within a matter of minutes. Unfortunately we can't do that, but IPT can decrease the amount of glucose by at least 60-75%. And this is just enough of a decrease to cause them to go into an emergency mode. It is when they are in this emergency state that they are very vulnerable to chemotherapy drugs."

    I will do Metformin forever, gladly, but this is also 'up my sleeve' because the amount of chemo is so much less, as it is with Poly MVA and chemo combined.

    COCONUT OIL comment - I have to find a brand that does not taste like coconut oil, ugh, last bottle is too much for me and Hubby to stand, so we will make 75%>  cocoa, coconut oil and agave nectaur into a candy to eat instead, perhaps w almonds like an Almond Joy hahaha.

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited March 2012

    Essa, you brought up a subject which is very painful for me.  After my treatments I had to work on dehoarding my mother's house and getting her moved several times as she had early Alzheimer's but didn't realise it and thought she was taking all her medications, even though her insulin sat almost untouched in the fridge.  She threw emotional fits every time we tried to pack her belongings.  When she ended up in a hostel with staff to administer medications it was a relief for us but she was beside herself so I was staying at my sister's a lot so I could visit more often.  I was hardly home during this time.

    I remember just after the last move, I was worrying about a dark mark on my front tooth at the top.  I'd been to the dentist before starting treatment so didn't think it could be much so soon. I feel bad that I didn't see the dentist straight away.  My mother could have gone without a visitor for a day!  Well I needed a filling and a year later I got a toothache and the root was infected.  I had a root canal done a few weeks ago but it's obvious that there's a lump at the top of the root just under my nose.  I have an appointment for a checkup in a couple of weeks and will probably have the tooth pulled, but what happens to the infection?  And then I'll need a denture, one I'll need to wear each day.  Oh dear, I feel like an old lady now.  It feels worse than when I knew I'd need a BLMX.  

    I read all about Weston A Price and his theories at least a decade ago but have no idea if he's right.  He says BC appears the same side as a root canal and that's not the case with me.  They say mercury fillings cause chronic fatigue yet my close relative who had it for years has never had a single filling.   So I don't form any opinions on such claims.

    My new dentist is the best I've found as a person and she lectures at a major university so she knows her stuff, albeit conventional treatments.  The previous one who did the filling may have left something behind as, when it went bad, there was no visible decay and it must have gone bad from inside where she filled.

    Thank goodness I said no to bisphosphonates when I found I had osteoporosis.  I could have been at risk for jaw necrosis.  No matter how careful we are with our teeth, they can go bad.

  • Heidihill
    Heidihill Member Posts: 5,476
    edited March 2012

     I posted this a while back on LIsanti's work on cancer mitochondria.

    http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-12/tju-nh112911.php

    He seems to think that metformin works by inhibiting mitochondrial activity and forcing cancer cells to rely on glycolysis instead, which is an inefficient way of producing energy. Cancer cells then starve to death. I don't know how this theory squares with IPT, if it does at all. There are studies showing increased risk of breast cancer with higher insulin levels.

    Essa, have you seen your doctor about the pain? I sure hope it's cancer clearing out. But double check.

    LiwoG, hope you get in at MDA. It would be good to get a second opinion on the primary of lobular breast cancer given that it seemed so difficult for your team to decide.

Categories