Suggestions Please

Options
2»

Comments

  • luve2runn
    luve2runn Member Posts: 15
    edited January 2012

    Oh no---I did not think that you meant that at all. I was just making a statement. I really do appreciate every ones feedback and their sharing their personal journeys and fight against this dragon. I had nothing to go by to help me in this decision making process until this site.

  • momof3boys
    momof3boys Member Posts: 896
    edited January 2012

    Good! I would never want to think I stressed anyone out! Have a peaceful night...

  • Faye33
    Faye33 Member Posts: 180
    edited April 2012

    I haven't read all the responses you have gotten, but it boils down to you need to do what YOU are comfortable with.  It's easy for someone else to tell you what you should do, but nobody knows all the variables better then you.

    I tell you why I didn't think twice about doing chemo when it was recommended, and you can take it for what it's worth.  I knew that when this was all said and done, I needed to know that I had used every ammunition I could against this cancer, so that IF this beast ever comes back I will know I did EVERYTHING in my power to prevent it.  If I hadn't done everything I could of and it comes back, I know myself well enough to know I'd have a hard time letting that go and not feeling like I messed up the first time.  Now I know that if the beast comes back, it is totally out of my control.

  • Racy
    Racy Member Posts: 2,651
    edited January 2012

    luve2runn, just to be clear in regard to your earlier comment about being able to do chemo later if you have a recurrence, the truth is that if cancer cells have already moved to another part of your body and you don't do chemo and later the latent cancer cells grow, the unfortunate truth at this point in time is that your life span will likely be shortened and you will likely die as a result of BC.



    Yes, you can have chemo later but the tumour load in your body will be stronger such that chemo will be unlikely to eliminate the tumours permanently. Also, in this situation you could be on chemo for a very long time.



    I don't want to scare you but just want to be sure you understand what having a distant recurrence actually means.



    Of course, that may never happen and I hope it doesn't, but we just don't know.



    I know it's a really hard decision and many of us have had to make it. That second opinion and discussion with another doc may help you to see things more clearly.

  • Racy
    Racy Member Posts: 2,651
    edited January 2012

    You might also want to ask whether the PR- affects your chances with Tamox and likelihood of recurrence.

  • dlb823
    dlb823 Member Posts: 9,430
    edited January 2012

    luve2runn, following up on Racy's question ... another one to ask yourself is, what if, for some reason, you can't tolerate Tamoxifen?  It rarely happens, but it could.

    I've been thinking about your situation all afternoon, and I really believe the best thing you can do right now is talk to an onc who specializes in bc.   The point Racy made about your PR- does put you in a not-quite-as-common group, and input from an oncologist whose majority of patients are bc patients seems like the best idea to me.  He or she just may be able to add something to your thought process, so that your decision either way won't be quite so difficult as it seems now.   (((Hugs)))   Deanna

  • KorynH
    KorynH Member Posts: 301
    edited January 2012

    I was 44 when diagnosed. I was heavily amplified Her2neu+++ so chemo was a "given" for my case, no getting out of it and no Oncotype testing was not even done since I already had a high incidence rate of recurrence hanging over my head.



    After I finished chemo I began Tamoxifen and endured a miserable 6 months. I could no longer take the side effects, the leg and foot cramps where my feet would contorted and I could not walk or sleep. I determined that I absolutely could not live like that for 5 years. I only say this to say that Tamoxifen is not always tolerable for every woman and you must keep that in mind.  I would give it a try but realize it too has side effects, and there is no way to predict if they can be tolerated for the full 5 years. Lupron injections or ovary removal is another option. 



    Chemo,  for me, introduced life threatening MRsA infections that required hospitalization and surgery (which left horrible scars) and I never would have done it (chemo) had it not been absolutely required for me. These infections occurred 6 months AFTeR chemo...my immune system was ruined by chemo. Some theorize that it is the immune system that plays into developing a breast cancer diagnosis in the first place! I developed an intestinal anti-body 2 years later that make it impossible for me to absorb nutrients through diet. I have to go for monthly shots.  I am weak and tired a lot of the time. I also developed scarring in my esophagus which had to be surgically removed twice 2 years after chemo ended. The doctors told me that chemo ate up my intestinal tract and this scarring was an effect of that. Since those surgeries I can keep food down once again, thankfully.  I don't tell you all of this to scare you, but only to say that you really  have a choice of the lesser of two evils and there is no easy way to decide. These are serious complications that can and do happen to patients. They may be rare but nobody could predict them for me...I guess you have to ask yourself how much you personally can live with, not for just the 4or5 months of chemo but for the rest of your life because they can and do last a lifetime.

  • stage1
    stage1 Member Posts: 475
    edited January 2012

    This is different, but when I was trying to decide to do rads or not, I labored over the decision.  One hour I was sure I decided right, the next hour I changed my mind.  I was going bonkers back and forth for 6 weeks, I visited MO, BS, and RO each two times, gathering their thoughts, anyway, what RO said may have helped me the most...throw out the stats, stop quoting me numbers...what if you have one little cancer cell floating around and you choose not to kill it???

  • Laura5133388
    Laura5133388 Member Posts: 577
    edited January 2012
    luve2runn, I also had a very tough time trying to decide whether to do chemo. I used the cold caps and kept all of my hair. Research says they are safe. Wanting to keep your hair is not all about vanity. Keeping my hair allowed me to keep my privacy as well as helping me keep a positive attitude. I didn't look like a cancer patient. I am so glad I used them.
  • KorynH
    KorynH Member Posts: 301
    edited January 2012

    Not all hospitals are willing to work with you on the cold caps thing. Just make sure you check with the hospital first. I didn't even know about them when I went into chemo. I wore wigs for about 8 months and within a year I had enough for a hair cut. Now 3 years later I have more hair than ever. I know that isn't much consolation, but it has sort of helped the sting of what happened to me to subside. If you do decide on chemo and don't do cold caps, be sure to check out http://crickettsanswertocancer.com which provides FREE wigs, mastectomy prosthetics, bras and lymphedema garments to BC patients. I got my first wig free from them. I picked it out. They paid 100% for it and you do not have to prove financial need at all. They were wonderful to me.

  • ma111
    ma111 Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2012

    luve2run,

    It does boil down to want you want to do.

    Your thinking is correct about the 8% difference. You look young in your picture and that would probably mean a harsher chemo than navelbine, (Only hair thinning with that one). You would not be eligible for the Herceptin as it is a bilogicial for HER2+ cancers. So ask what kind of chemo they would put you on. AT the same time keep in mind that there are treatments for side effects that your sister probably did not have. If you want we can go into details of her meds to see if she had all the help possible to treat side effects if this will help make your decision.

    I am into people making an educated choice! You can PM me with details if you want.

    http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/breast

    http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/breast

    http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/breast

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited January 2012

    I would do the chemo. I had beautiful hair, seriously, and it was long and thick. I decided to take the hair loss as an experience, and now it is growing back. The loss is temporary.

    The side effects of chemo can be extremely unpleasant. Chemo is not easy. However, you can do a lot to make it a bit easier on yourself. Probiotics help with the stomach and thrush issues. Getting a neulasta shot can help with fatigue and prevent complications. Exercise can help with fatigue and with generally feeling  crummy. It is not fun, but it will improve your prognosis.

  • vlnrph
    vlnrph Member Posts: 1,632
    edited January 2012

    Lots of good advice above. You should probably clarify the lymph node status. Since I had micrometastases (a very small group of abnormal cells) found at the edge of the sentinel, not detected during the quick pathology done during surgery, it tipped the balance toward chemo.

    As others have said, this is a chance to do everything possible so you don't have to second guess yourself later.

    There was no need for me to have an Oncotype score since the decision was made to do Taxotere/Cytoxan. Then on to tamoxifen. No major side effects. My hair is coming back blonde & wavy, just like it was before. I had a fun red wig from the tlc catalog which looked pretty good for only $30! In another couple months, I will start going "topless"... 

  • buffy
    buffy Member Posts: 73
    edited January 2012

    luv2runne,  I can totally understand the overload trying to make a decision.  I do think you said in your post that you did NOT have any node involvement? correct?  That to me would make a huge difference in your decision making.  I was diagnosed 4 1/2 years ago and at that time the oncotype test was not done in the area that I live in Hartford Ct, but they plugged all of your stats(tumor size, node involvement, histological grade, nuclear grade etc) into a computer  program which then gave you the percentages of outcome based on your selected treatment plan.  Over time, many studies done have proven that chemo was being over used and actually did not help people and at times, even was detrimental to other organs in your body. I had a low grade cell and no node involvment and my onco said "you can have chemo if you want it" and I said why would I?  He really did not have any good reason why I should take chemo.  I have a close friend who is a pathologist and she advised me NOT to get chemo.  She advised me that if you do have a low grade cell, and again with no node involvment, the chemo would just pass over the low grade cell and not even kill it because it isn't deformed enough, therefore, I can totally understand the difficulty of your decision, as others have said, not to change necessarily to another physician, but definitely would get another opinion.  Good luck!

  • HappyTrisha
    HappyTrisha Member Posts: 614
    edited January 2012
    Buffy, if you read the bottom of luv's posts you'll see there was node involvement.
  • Pessa
    Pessa Member Posts: 519
    edited January 2012

    My onco score was 28.  The MO said that chemo would decrease my chance of recurrance by 4%.

    After chemo, BMX and on arimidex for 5 yrs (currently in the middle of my 2nd year), my chance of recurrance is still 9%.  Nodes were neg and was grade 1 and ICD was 9mm.  The MO said there were other factors (she didn't elaborate and I didn't ask) that made the onco score high (28--intermediate range).  Chemo was very doable.  didn't miss a day of work throughout the chemo.  As others said, there are meds for almost every side effect.  I wore a wig for about 9 months.  Got used to it but was glad to be able to stop wearing it.  My hair, unfortunately, is unchanged from what is was before it fell out (I was hoping for thick, curly hair but got back my thinning, frizzy, gray hair).

  • Gia259995
    Gia259995 Member Posts: 9
    edited January 2012

    Did u keep all your hair and how many treatments did you get?.I have been suggested 4 treatments at 3 week intervals with an onco score of 22. With the other changes to my body including weight gain around my middle my hair has become very important to me. I never thought of myself as a vain person but I guess now I just want to preserve what's left of my old self. I would appreciate your input

  • sundermom
    sundermom Member Posts: 463
    edited January 2012

    It looks like you had a positive node. I would do chemo. There's nothing to say there aren't a few rouge cells out there in your lymph system. The hair loss sucked, but I found chemo to be more manageable than I ever dreamed it would be. iMO an 8% reduction in recurrence rate is worth presevering through possible chemo SEs.

  • Pessa
    Pessa Member Posts: 519
    edited January 2012

    I lost all my hair.  I some ways it gave me a feeling of freedom.  Didn't have to dye my hair for > 1 year (I'm all gray, got my first gray hair at age 18!).  I didn't have to go for haircuts.  Had a good hair day every day because the wig didn't change. 

    I had AC every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.

  • Patriotic
    Patriotic Member Posts: 281
    edited January 2012

    With intermediate Oncotype scores AND a positive node, I would do the chemo. You are young and much more likely to fare better through any SE's. Chemo wasn't a picnic but it wasn't horrible, either. SE's can be managed pretty effectively. And, I do agree, the hair loss is very hard. The biggest thing it robs you of is the ability to have anonymity, as I only chose to tell family and close friends. So, I looked into Cold Caps (not cheap, inconvenient) but doable. I could not use them b/c my regimen was a little harsher and included AC.



    I just started Tamoxifen and have a relatively easy time with it. I was expecting problems, based on all the others who've had a rough go with it. I only say this because you do not know how YOU will do until you try. Even though your sister had horrible SE's, that doesn't mean you will.



    Good luck with whatever you decide.

  • gutsy
    gutsy Member Posts: 391
    edited January 2012

    I would do chemo, you only have only one window of time to throw everything at this monster of a disease. Chemo was hard but doable. I did alternative treatments such as acupuncture during treatment and it really helped. If you are relatively healthy otherwise you should do ok with chemo.

  • luve2runn
    luve2runn Member Posts: 15
    edited February 2012

    I want to thank everyone who posted feedback! I want to update you with my decision. I decided NOT to go with the chemo recomendation. I have been on the Tamoxifen for a little over a month. I have had minimal to no side effects. I have been having reiki weekly. For me, I am comfortable and at peace with this decision. The reiki has been very helpful and "healing" for me- both physically and emotionally. I have realized that everyone's path and decisions are very personal and unique. I will be having the tissue expanders removed and replaced with implants in 2 weeks. My hope is that perhaps I can offer strength and support to others. I am grateful for this site and for the feedback I have recieved. May each and everyone of you be blessed with positive healing energy!

Categories