Komen and Planned Parenthood

1121314151618»

Comments

  • CherrylH
    CherrylH Member Posts: 1,077
    edited February 2012

    Birdllady, really - PeePee? Not a very Christian way of addressing someone.

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited February 2012

    @angel, Good, She was a lightning rod for conflict, whichever side of the argument you stand.

  • -angel-
    -angel- Member Posts: 222
    edited February 2012

    Agree .. In spite of her denials, she brought politics into this which is the entire problem!

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited February 2012

    Politics and an ideology unrelated to breast cancer......

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited February 2012

    What happened with Komen reminds me of the BP oil spill. I still will go out of my way to avoid filling up at their gas stations. Although I usually vote Democratic, I'm really more like an elephant than a donkey. I NEVER forget!

    Wink

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited February 2012

    Angel ... thanks for posting the link.

    Yay!  I am so glad Handel resigned.  She brought politics to Komen and did it a huge disservice.

    Hllchk ... I wonder if their reputation can be saved.  I doubt it.  Breast cancer survivors are not going to forget what Handel did.

    It's ironic that Handel did more for Planned Parenthood in 3 days than all their donations combined. 

    I know I won't forget what she did.

  • Faye33
    Faye33 Member Posts: 180
    edited February 2012

    Komen's public policy became political the minute they gave their first dollar to Planned Parenthood, in my opinion.

  • Pompeed
    Pompeed Member Posts: 239
    edited February 2012

                 I suggested elsewhere: having given such a boost to PP and to other charities on account of former donors who have left and will not go back until hell freezes over, maybe it can survive on the donations of the minority of people who never gave before because of the PP connection but were willing to give without it.  That way Komen can continue with it's political agenda and find supporters which back it.  Relationship with PP can be severed the way it should have been severed -- can't put the genie back in the bottle now since the entire World knows -- in the first place and everyone is happy. 

                  People can support breast cancer in the ways which are comfortable for them and Komen and the pro-compulsory pregnancy contingent can do what they can do with a much smaller funding base.

                  Everyone lives happily ever after. 

  • 122312
    122312 Member Posts: 8
    edited February 2012

    Dear Shokk,

    You know by now how much I respect you.  And yes the numbers have been crunched, as they always are. Disagreements have been as expected with alternative positons from those among us who are brave enough to take a clear stand.  In my view, we should take the politics out of this one, and friggin send our small pittances to those organizations which are demonstrably committed to finding a cure for cancer.  The other issues seem to me more appropriate for the voting booth.   

    TheLorax 

  • Faye33
    Faye33 Member Posts: 180
    edited February 2012

     hillck stated:

    "That attitude that "they could always go somewhere else for care" is SO easy for the right to make"

    Could someone please explain why it is OK for PP to tell women to go somewhere else to get a mammogram, but it's not OK for "the right" to say PP doesn't offer mammograms, you have to go somewhere else to get them.  Sounds like the same information, coming from two different sources.

  • Faye33
    Faye33 Member Posts: 180
    edited February 2012

    hillck -

    Nope, and he isn't funded or backed by Komen or any other non-profit that I'm aware of.

    So, I guess it boils down to this is all about the referral for a mammogram?

    OK, well, I guess if we are down to the fact that if Komen cut funding to PP, PP would cut out referrals for mammograms.  By all means, if PP isn't willing to invest in the health of a woman enough to make a referral for a mammogram, somebody needs to step in and intervene.

  • AnneW
    AnneW Member Posts: 4,050
    edited February 2012

    I thought this summed it all up nicely, without the snarkiness.

    http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/07/opinion/king-komen/index.html

  • Wabbit
    Wabbit Member Posts: 1,592
    edited February 2012

    Good article ... thanks AnneW.  Covers all the 'stuff' that has been going on with Komen very nicely.

    Faye33 ... I think you are forgetting all about the 'paying' for that mammogram part of it.  PP does not physically do the mammogram but they provide vouchers to pay for it or have arrangements to make it affordable. 

    Those of us with good health insurance sometimes forget that not everybody can just show an insurance card and walk right in and get whatever we need.  I've been in line for check-in at my local Catholic hospital and heard them turn people away ... no pay upfront, no test ... it happens. 

  • Faye33
    Faye33 Member Posts: 180
    edited February 2012

    hillck and whiterabbit -

    Thank you for the very informative and respectful explainations.  This is what I enjoy about conversations like this, I can learn from others perspective.  I appreciate you helping me out.

    I'm still trying to process this all... thank you for providing information which will allow me to do it honestly.

  • Pompeed
    Pompeed Member Posts: 239
    edited February 2012

    Thank you, Ann.  I had not seen that piece.  Very enlightening.

  • Wabbit
    Wabbit Member Posts: 1,592
    edited February 2012

    There is another factor here also.  PP is already the place most young, uninsured and poor women go to for pap tests and birth control.  They are already there to be referred for screening mammograms.  Or if one of these women notices a lump they are much more likely to call PP to get it checked ... and PP facilities are everywhere nationwide.   State services on the other hand are a mishmash and vary widely depending on where you are.  If somebody asked me about it I would immediately tell them to contact PP.  The alternative would be 'try calling your county health department, or maybe there is a state program, or you can call around and see who participates in the BCCTP'.  And a lot of people faced with the bureaucratic nightmare of a zillion phone calls and being transferred from here to there will unfortunately decide to ignore it and hope it goes away instead.  We can argue about whether that is smart ... it's not ... but honestly it's going to happen a lot.  I remember how hard it was to just call my doctor's office ... it's panic time and we are not really up to undertaking a huge research project.

    My local PP does not get any support from Komen anyway and still provides these services.  But none of it can be done without money from somewhere.  Unless Komen can come up with an easily located source of these services ... available nationwide so everybody knows about it ... I think helping PP do this is the wisest use of resources.  Thus I don't think that pulling those funds from PP and sending them to this agency in one area and another agency in another area and yet another someplace else will ever work as well. 

    Ideological issues aside,  I am a big believer in using resources wisely and I expect any charity I support to do so. 

  • LovesChristmas-Barb
    LovesChristmas-Barb Member Posts: 706
    edited February 2012

    I understand your concerns about poor women getting these services but I cannot in good conscience ever support PP or any organization that I know donates to PP. I understand that you ladies do not agree with me.

    My husband and I will continue to support organizations that help poor women to get cancer screening and health care but don't provide birth control or abortions. We have tried to live our belief by supporting groups that help young women  finding  themselves pregnant and needing financial and emotional support. We have also adopted children, including our youngest son who is special needs. I am so grateful for the gift of life that their birthmothers gave them....these children have been a joy and blessing in our lives. I am thankful they exist.

    I wish good health for all of you ladies and the peace that only our dear Lord can give.

    A blessed day to all....=)

  • Pompeed
    Pompeed Member Posts: 239
    edited February 2012

    I wish those who speak so passionately against a medical procedure which is legal in the US would have an equal passion on behalf of and advocate for birth control which plays a well-known and major role in precluding the need for the very medical procedure which they find so objectionable.

  • LovesChristmas-Barb
    LovesChristmas-Barb Member Posts: 706
    edited February 2012

    Sorry, but my conscience won't allow me to do that either. My faith teaches chastity, self-control, and an acceptance of God's will for our lives as the way to eliminate the "need" for both birth control and abortion.

  • jacee
    jacee Member Posts: 1,384
    edited February 2012

    Barb- well said. Thank you for expressing my views exactly.

  • Pompeed
    Pompeed Member Posts: 239
    edited February 2012

                   LovesChristmas wrote: " . . . but I cannot in good conscience ever support PP or any organization that I know donates to PP."

                No one ever asked or expects anyone else to support any institution or organization which does not suit their own subjective point of view or meet their personal charitable intentions.

                The speech and comments which demean organizations to which others contribute, according to their own conscience, with demonstrable slanders and falsehoods just throw up more blockades and injure women in need of the very medical health services which find breast cancer early. 

               

  • LovesChristmas-Barb
    LovesChristmas-Barb Member Posts: 706
    edited February 2012

    I think it was me that said that....

  • LovesChristmas-Barb
    LovesChristmas-Barb Member Posts: 706
    edited February 2012

    And my beliefs have been demeaned on here by others.

  • LovesChristmas-Barb
    LovesChristmas-Barb Member Posts: 706
    edited February 2012

    PP does give out birth control and do abortions and that is what I object to.

  • Pompeed
    Pompeed Member Posts: 239
    edited February 2012

                That's what planning for parenthood means to the vast majority of people of a wide variety of faiths who believe that planning for parenthood is important to them and to their children: procurement of effective means of birth control consistent with whatever their private interests may be is legal all over the US. 

                 What any one chooses to do with their own body is their own business and how others plan their families -- or don't plan their families as the case may be -- is no one else's business either.  No reason for anyone to be in anyone else's bedroom or have any interest in what goes on in anyone else's bedroom. 

                 Access to family planning, however people choose to go about it, has nothing at all to do with breast health concerns for women.  Never did.  Never will.  Those women need the same surveillance and access to good health care all here, as breast cancer patients already in a place I hope we would never wish on anyone else, would want to have for ourselves or our daughters or our sisters or our mothers. 

                 One is either an advocate for the same result for all women however any particular woman (or group of women) obtains good health care for herself and her family as one obtains it for oneself.  Or one isn't. 

                 That's a moral and ethical position.  There's no grey in that equation.  It is all black or all white. 

                 

                

  • Faye33
    Faye33 Member Posts: 180
    edited February 2012

    It's kind of like the analogy I heard with making brownies...

    So I'm making brownies, and I decide to put lots of really yummy things in the batter - butter, sugar, chocolate, flour, eggs - all very good and fine things on their own and even mixed together.  But, if, at the end I decided to mix in one of my cat's turd into the batter, would you want a brownie?

    Why not?  It's mostly good.  Actually, I would argue at least 97% good.  Maybe there is only 3% bad in those brownies.  Surely that doesn't make the whole pan of brownies bad does it?  Of course it does.

    I would never argue that these women don't deserve care or shouldn't get care.  If PP wants to use breast health care as one of the good ingredients in their organization, that's fine.  But, nobody (including Komen) should have to take part in sponsoring planned parenthood if they don't want to take part in making brownies which are mostly good, but 3% cat turd.

  • LovesChristmas-Barb
    LovesChristmas-Barb Member Posts: 706
    edited February 2012

    If you don't think that what PP does is wrong, then what I say shouldn't be demeaning to PP to you; it shouldn't seem slanderous. I understand that you don't have a problem with what they do.  I believe that unborn children are just as alive and human as any child that is born and I am appalled that it is legal for these unborn children to be murdered. I believe that it is just as wrong to murder them as it is to murder someone who is born. That is why prolifers want abortion to be illegal again.That is why we fight to defund PP and other groups that do abortions. That is why we fight to change the law. 

    I, of course, want women to have screening for breast cancer and I would NEVER wish cancer on anyone else. You want to screen women in one place and I work to have women screened in places where the entire emphasis is on preserving life; not preserving some people's lives and ending others'. I understand that you don't believe that and I understand that you have the right to give to whoever you want and that other people are free to go where they want.

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited February 2012

    Thank you, everyone, for your perspectives and opinions about the advocacy issues around the recent events. Now that the conversation has moved on to be an exchange of views on political and religious points of view, we're closing this thread.

    The Mods

    .

Categories