Komen and Planned Parenthood

11213141618

Comments

  • jacee
    jacee Member Posts: 1,384
    edited February 2012

    Wow HL, your comment speaks volumes.

  • Faye33
    Faye33 Member Posts: 180
    edited February 2012

    If Planned Parenthood could not restructure for what was the equivalent to them of $30 a year, to offset that.06% of the revenue of a grant they didn't qualify for, it's not Komen's fault. 

  • LovesChristmas-Barb
    LovesChristmas-Barb Member Posts: 706
    edited February 2012

    We aren't anti-choice...we just believe that the choice is when a woman decides to have sexual relations with a man. If she doesn't want to risk getting pregnant, CHOOSE not to have sex.

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited February 2012

    HappyLibby Pro-life people do have the right to their opinion. I respect that right and therefore don't call them names like "anti-choicers." I get annoyed when they call me "Pro-Abortion" or "Baby killer supporter." but refuse to come down to that level of disrespect.

    Sometimes people forget that this site/forum is here to support women & men who are fighting and/or surviving breast cancer. Calling names can get people very upset. I don't think stress is good for our health or immune system.

    But as mentioned before this isn't about pro-choice/pro-life.  This is about Komen's politics and how they let their own personal agendas get in the way helping women in need get healthcare.

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited February 2012

    So does yours. I don't attempt to force other people to live by my beliefs. Why do you think it is OK to force other people to live by your beliefs? Against abortion? Don't have one, but don't tell other people what to do.

  • Faye33
    Faye33 Member Posts: 180
    edited February 2012

    Amen, PatMon!!!!!

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited February 2012

    I never did get an answer to my question -- why is is OK for anti-choice people (sorry, Iago, but I believe we are all "pro-life" -- nobody is pro-abortion) to exercise their rights to support or not support entities in accordance with their beliefs, but it is NOT ok for pro-choice people to do the same? Why is it bullying when they decide not to fund Komen, and why is it OK to call PP a bully when it seeks new funding to replace funding it losing?

  • LovesChristmas-Barb
    LovesChristmas-Barb Member Posts: 706
    edited February 2012

    Komen was going to give the money to other organizations for breast cancer screening. Women who needed screening were still going to be served. Perhaps there are women out there not being served who Komen was going to be serving. Are their lives any less valuable than the lives of the women PP was serving?

    I think the point that Faye was trying to make is that PP's income is so huge that they could still probably manage somehow to screen those women for breast cancer. Maybe they could divert some money from their abortion program and redirect it to saving lives instead of ending them.

  • Pompeed
    Pompeed Member Posts: 239
    edited February 2012

    Where is the evidence that Komen was going to redirect the funds to other organizations specifically to fund the same breast screening functions the money had been used for when provided to PP? 

    Which organizations specifically?  What are the names?  How was this information communicated to the public and when?  How and when was it communicated to the alternative organizations? 

  • Faye33
    Faye33 Member Posts: 180
    edited February 2012

    Thank you LCbarb!  You translated my math (and sources which were cited) perfectly.

    This was not hurting PP.  If an organization of that size can't restructure and compensate for .06% of their revenue, there is a problem.  The women who go to PP weren't going to get their breast exam (or referral) cut out of their physical just because Komen denied them some grant $s.... and IF (and this is a very large if) PP decided to cut that 1-2 minute breast exam and referal out of their medical exams, based off what Komen did, it would have proven that it really wasn't about women's health for PP. 

    And Komen's money could have possibly went to help women (underinsured) who live many hours from the nearest PP clinic.

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited February 2012

    Hey all,

    Just a reminder to please keep this civil and respectful.  Everyone here has a right to their opinions; if you do not agree with those opinions, there is always room for a healthy respectful debate. If members are not able to remain respectful in this discussion, we ask that you kindly take a break from this discussion, or the boards, if necessary.

    This issue has stirred a lot of emotions, but please remember our focus is breast cancer.

     The Mods

  • Pompeed
    Pompeed Member Posts: 239
    edited February 2012

                 I am not pro-abortion.  I don't know anyone who is.   I don't know where all of these supposed pro-abortion people are or where they live.  In millions of miles of international travel, I have never met any such person. Everyone I know is pro-life.  I'd believe that there actually are pro-abortion people in the world if someone would actually introduce me to one.  As far as I know they are all figments of some pretty wild imaginations.              

                 I am staunchly pro-choice.  All possible choices for myself and all possible choices for  everyone else as they wish to choose too.

                 I am also staunchly anti-compelled pregnancy as social policy.  As I would not wish to be compelled by anyone else to be pregnant and forced into child rearing so I do not wish to compel anyone else to be pregnant and forced, at the point of a gun, into child rearing either.

                 I'm going to get hot under the collar the next time someone here dares to call me pro-abortion -- I don't know know any such people  and neither does anyone else here -- and I'm going to get equally steamy under the collar when someone tells me that compelled pregnancy, under threat of criminal penalty, is a morally defensible position.

  • LovesChristmas-Barb
    LovesChristmas-Barb Member Posts: 706
    edited February 2012

    Komen's original statement said they were going to insure that there would be no interruption for women who needed screening services. They would work with other affiliates to insure that.Komen wasn't deciding where women can go...they were just going to give them different options. And if PP cares so much about women getting their breast screening then they could redirect funds for that purpose.

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited February 2012

    People who live with glass breast shouldn't throw stones..........

    shokk

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2012

    Happy Libby,

    You might get answers to your questions if you stopped ignoring those providing the answers, but given what you wrote, I think that maybe you peeked.

    In the USA justice system, accomplices are considered just as guilty of a crime as the perpetrators of that crime.  Those who finance criminal activity are considered to be accomplices, even if the perpetrator does good things in addition to their criminal activity.  Why is it so hard to understand that people who are pro-life object to financing what they consider to be murder?  You don't have to agree with that point of view, but if you are truly pro-choice, you would respect the choice to not in any way fund those who engage in providing abortions without the name calling.

  • Pompeed
    Pompeed Member Posts: 239
    edited February 2012

    LovesChristmas wrote:

    "We aren't anti-choice...we just believe that the choice is when a woman decides to have sexual relations with a man. If she doesn't want to risk getting pregnant, CHOOSE not to have sex."

                 Be sure to say that to the woman who was raped the other day.  And to the fifteen year old kid molested by her father or her brother or her uncle.  Tell that to the woman whose life is on the line with an ectopic. 

                Tell them they all had choices about having sexual relations with a man and if they are now pregnant and that's a problem, oh, well, that was their choice.

                I really do want to see the very people who suggest such things have the guts to stand up in public and tell those three women that compulsory pregnancy in the circumstances is exactly what each of them deserve for having been so damn careless about their own sex lives.  

  • Pompeed
    Pompeed Member Posts: 239
    edited February 2012

        One cannot say, even as a general proposition, that an accomplice to a crime is equally criminally culpable for the crime.  It's just not true.

         Were it true there would be no distinction made between criminal actor and criminal accomplice.  Yet there are two words and two phrases which distinguish one from the other.  That is true now and always has been true going back to the time that Athens was founded. 

  • LilSchatzie
    LilSchatzie Member Posts: 430
    edited February 2012

    I think most of you all have dug your lines so deep in the sand that there is no way you all are going to agree.

    Honestly my biggest problem is that Planned Parenthood is coming out the hero in this.  Since I was diagnoised I never really liked Komen, but I never really liked Planned Parenthood either.  I won't even touch the abortion issue.  My problem with Planned Parenthood is that in this country you can not drink until 21, you are not considered an adult until 18, you can't get a drivers license until around 16/17.  Now whether you agree with these laws or not they are our laws.  However at Planned Parenthood they can treat 14 and 15 (and younger I'm not sure) for things that I really feel should have a parent involvement.  Any doctor will tell you that a teenager that age has not fully grown up, but we are alloying them to make decisions by themselves that will effect the rest of their lives.  I really don't get why they are the hero's here.

  • LovesChristmas-Barb
    LovesChristmas-Barb Member Posts: 706
    edited February 2012

    This is true...in those few cases when women are raped they do not have that choice. But they can still chose to have that baby and if they don't think they can raise it themselves, they can choose to have someone else adopt their child. I know someone in that situation who did just that and she is glad that she made that choice.

    A very difficult choice indeed, but not impossible.

  • Pompeed
    Pompeed Member Posts: 239
    edited February 2012

                Komen's stupidity does not elevate PP's status to hero or anything else.  That's silly.  

                The value of PP's reputation rises and falls on its own merits. Just as Komen's reputation has just fallen on its own merits.

                 One thing we do know: at least until this past week, Komen was happy to fund PP's merits as they pertain to women's breast health concerns.

  • covertanjou
    covertanjou Member Posts: 569
    edited February 2012

    Pompeed, where is the like button!

    I am pro-choice;  I believe people have the right to choose if they want to have sex.  They have the right to choose birth control; they have the right to choose who they want to marry; they have the right to choose whether or not they want to have an abortion; they have the right to choose which charity they will support; they have the right to choose what to believe; they have the choice about what religion if any they want to follow. 

    I hated what Komen did, so I choose never to support them.  I choose to give my money to organizations that help ALL women.  

  • angelsister
    angelsister Member Posts: 474
    edited February 2012

    I work with children and young people. One of my best friends at work shares your religious views loveschristmas. Difference is that she understands that people make mistakes, make poor choices, are in situations they cant control or simply need education on their rights and support to assert themselves. She is incredible, she doesnt judge young people or those in need of support, she doesnt moralise and preach, she steps up and helps out even in a world that is unlike her own. No one has posted any comments stating what people should and shouldnt do other than you. I may be apalled by your lifestyle but frankly its none of my business. I am interested in promoting health and wellbeing not forcing people into seeing things my way or living their lives my way. Good night all

  • Pompeed
    Pompeed Member Posts: 239
    edited February 2012

                Yes, I guess under a compelled pregnancy policy enforced by the threat of ciminal prosecution, one could say, as LovesChristmas does, that the fifteen year old pregnant kid has a "choice" to be compelled to remain pregnant and have a kid at that age.  Or to go to jail as the alternative.

                For the first time in my life I now finally understand exactly what the compelled pregnancy contingent means by "choice."

  • LovesChristmas-Barb
    LovesChristmas-Barb Member Posts: 706
    edited February 2012

    I'm not judging anyone...that is in God's hands. Only He can judge because only He knows what's in a person's heart. There's a difference between judging and saying that something is wrong. I understand that people make mistakes; no one is perfect. But I don't think that an innocent child should have to pay with their life for the mistake that one or both of their parents have made. 

  • Pompeed
    Pompeed Member Posts: 239
    edited February 2012

    In the compelled pregnancy scheme of things, the innocent fifteen year old raped girl with the ectopic situation gets to "pay" with her life.  Either compelled to risk being a parent or compelled to go to jail as the alternative.  How very nice for her to have the morally more righteous than she is tell her those are her choices.

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited February 2012

    Mods you really should just take this thread down.......Komen is going to continue to fund PP......there is no reason for the name calling and having the abortion debate here.......there are plenty of other websites where these views can be discussed.......this site is about breast cancer.....

    not about rape and 15 years old........and the energy here is becoming very toxic........

    shokk

  • LovesChristmas-Barb
    LovesChristmas-Barb Member Posts: 706
    edited February 2012

    Aborting her child does not take away the trauma of the rape. And I am definitely not saying that this would be easy....it is definitely a horrible situation.

  • covertanjou
    covertanjou Member Posts: 569
    edited February 2012

    Shokk, you have wirtten more than once that you wouldn't be coming back here. Why read here if it bothers you?  I believe in freedom of speech; don't you?

    Komen and their decision to defund PP:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/05/karen-handel-susan-g-komen-decision-defund-planned-parenthood_n_1255948.html 

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited February 2012

    Actually Covert you know that by my politics that I am completely against freedom of speech.....

    and you know also that I cannot be trusted nor believed..........

    shokk

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited February 2012

Categories