Decision making tourture.

Options
StacyRose
StacyRose Member Posts: 21

I was recently diagnosed with DCIS and have not yet had treatment.  I'm in that decision making stage that I'm sure everyone else has experienced, lumpectomy & radiation or mastectomy.  I'm vering towards bilateral mastectomy for many reasons, my age (I just turned 40), the type and size of my lesion, family history, preference to avoid radiation and personal preference to as thoughly avoid recurrence as possible. 

Whenever I let my treatment team know that I'm thinking mastectomy, for which surgery is scheduled on the 18th of this month, I feel like they're trying to talk me out of it.  They say that mastectomy is a good decision while at the same time trying to talk me into the lumpectomy & radiation.  Between my surgeon and the hospitals "breast care coordinator" they've gone so far as to change what they initially told me about lumpectomy & radiation to see if they can make me change my mind.  Like, initially they said radiation would be 7 weeks or so and after I decided on mastectomy the breast care coordinator said they might be able to do the radiation in 3 weeks (turns out that's for more flat chested gals though). And, initially the surgeon told me that the recurrence rate with lumpectomy and radiation tends to increase by 1% per year, but then when I told her that was one of the reasons I'm choosing mastectomy she took that back and said maybe it's actually half that.  It's hard not to think they're only telling me mastectomy is a good decision to make sure to cover themselves legally, but personally they think it's an overreaction to do mastectomy for DCIS.  I'm probably just being hypersensitive because of my own lack of confidence in my decision. 

I know it shouldn't matter what other people's opinions are and I can't let other people make this choice for me because they don't know me well enough to know what's best for my life.  But, it would be nice if the people preforming the surgury were supportive of my dicision.

 On another note, I tried out our hospitals Breast Cancer Support Group a couple weeks ago.  The breast care coordinator had encouraged me to try it out.  It was really strange for me though because I was the only one there with DCIS, everyone else had invasive bc.  And I was the only one who wasn't well into their treatment or finished with their treatment.  I just felt like I didn't belong.  Like I was sitting in on a conversation that I wasn't a part of with women who had real problems, unlike me who just has a potential problem.  I'm not sure if it's that I haven't really accepted my diagnosis or if it's because I'm truely in some cancer grey area.  Maybe it would be better if they had seperate groups for those with invasive DC and DCIS. 

  

«1

Comments

  • anoym
    anoym Member Posts: 26
    edited December 2011

    Hi Stacie-Rose...I don't want to sway you in any direction but can only tell you how I feel. I had a DMX in June 2010 for DCIS. My mother, grandmother and great grandmother all died of breast cancer (I was adopted and got that info 10 years ago) Before surgery I had wanted a breast reduction because I felt that they were awful looking. When I was preganant I was an I crazy huge, you know G H I. So they were completely ripped off my chest wall. I was told I could avoid, chemo, radiation and tamoxifen which avoids menopause right now. Well I thought I'll probabley get more cancer or they said 15% chance other cancer was there just not detected. If I had radiation I knew that would impact reconstruction in the future if needed. Well...I have second guessed myself to death. Not to be to personal but having breasts that don't have and feeling in them really decreased sexual pleasure and desire, I realize many women are stuggling to live so this may sound superficial but that can really affect your relationship with husband or significant other. I really haven't let my husband see them and he definately hasn't touched them. I got implants and if you have read any of my other postings you'll know how much I hate them. So if I could go back I would have had the lumpectomy. Hind-sight and all. You know, no one ever told me I was over treating everyone seemed to think I was doing the right thing. This of course makes my husband very mad. He feels that I  100 % made the smart decision. Well anyway if you want to ask me any questions don't hold back. I'm an RN and really don't want to give any advice just let you know my experience. Happy New Year.   

  • Letlet
    Letlet Member Posts: 1,053
    edited December 2011

    anoym raises a good point if this is factor is important to you. Women do bilateral mastectomies all the time but bear in mind you wont have any sensations across your chest where your real breasts were once since nerves will be cut. You probably know this anyway but I am just pointing it out.

    anoym, your hubby hasn't seen or touched your reconstructed breasts since June 2010? I struggle with my 1 reconstructed breast from my uni mastectomy, but hubby has been supportive and loving, it took him a while to get used to it but he has eventually touched them. I don't blame him, (my hubby) it took me a while to touch it or look at the mirror without flinching... 

  • judyfams
    judyfams Member Posts: 148
    edited December 2011

    You should also check out the article (link below)  about the new oncotype test for women with DCIS to help determine if they need radiation.  That may help you make your decision.

    http://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/testing/new_research/20111207.jsp

    Also something else to consider - if you have a lumpectomy first and they do not get clear margins you can then go back and have a mastectomy.

    I had a lumpectomy, chemo and radiation for my IDC, and am happy with my decision. I must say honeatly that I chose lumpectomy because I did not want to lose all sensation on my chest by having a mastectomy.

    You must make a decision that will give you peace of mind and fit in with the quality of life you want for yourself. That should be the overriding reason for whatever decision you make.  

    Judy 

  • CaitlinB
    CaitlinB Member Posts: 121
    edited December 2011

    Hi,

    I am the same age as you and have a similar diagnosis.  I am leaning toward a bmx as well.  I think you have to make the decision in your heart and not worry about what others say. You will be the one living with the end result.  Personally, I don't want to live in fear that it will come back as invasive cancer and that's a very real possibility with DCIS, grade 3. 

    Best of luck to you!

    Caitlin 

  • lewisfamily503
    lewisfamily503 Member Posts: 621
    edited December 2011

    I was in this same situation exatly four years ago. I was a bit older than you (49 at the time).  I decided on the bilateral mastectomy.  It was that OR radiation and tamoxifen.  Neither appealed to me then or now for that matter!! I can say without a doubt it was the best decision ever!! Not only did I avoid radiation on my left (heart side) but I didn't have to do any horrible drugs like tamoxifen.  Also, my sister-in-law didn't get a mastectomy after her diagnosis, and now she is dying of this horrible disease (she just went into hospice last week).  I would do the same thing again now and i just feel like getting these breasts loped off was the best decision I ever made.  My sex life is better than ever by the way, but then, I have the best husband EVER!!! Good luck to you and whatever decision you make, it will be the right one for you!!! Hugs!!!!

  • julianna51
    julianna51 Member Posts: 438
    edited December 2011

    A very tough and personal decision.   I had a BMX in May of this year.   No regrets, however, I do miss the feeling in my breast area and I miss my breasts.  BUT, I do not miss that feeling of something lurking over my shoulder like I have in the past.

    Something to think about is that having a MX/BMX does not necessarily mean that you can avoid radiation.   I had narrow anterior margins and was told I needed radiation...a very controversial subject for DCIS.   I went to 3 different ROs before I finally accepted it.  There are more and more women that have DCIS and a MX/BMX that end up having to have radiation (see Beesie's posts).

    As for intimacy issues....I am divorced and live alone, however, I have met the most incredible man and when I told him about my BMX I could not have hoped for a better response.  He has been so supportive and has been a great sounding board for me as I look into other reconstruction options (started with TEs to go to implants, radiation threw a kink in that).   Intimacy has been better than I've ever experienced and I've had no fears of letting him see me as I am now.

    Good luck in your decision.   Do what is best for YOU and what you want - but first look at every side effect, every change that you'll be making and weigh how important that is to you.

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited December 2011

    "initially the surgeon told me that the recurrence rate with lumpectomy and radiation tends to increase by 1% per year"  What???  That's not true at all.  Most local recurrences happen within the first 5 years. Your recurrence risk over the next five years is lower and then it declines even more significantly after 10 years. So it is absolutely untrue that recurrence risk increases by 1% every year.

    That aside, the decision between lumpectomy, mastectomy and BMX is a difficult one. Following is a list of considerations that I put together a while ago for someone who was making this choice. I've posted this quite a few times now and have continued to refine it and add to it, thanks to great input from many others. Some women have gone through the list and decided to have a lumpectomy, others have chosen a single mastectomy and others have opted for a bilateral mastectomy. So the purpose is simply to help women figure out what's right for them - both in the short term but more importantly, over the long term.

    •  Do you want to avoid radiation? If your DCIS isn't near the chest wall, then it may be possible to avoid radiation if you have a mastectomy. This is a big selling point for many women who choose to have mastectomies. However you should be aware that there is no guarantee that radiation may not be necessary even if you have a mastectomy, if some DCIS is found near the chest wall. Radiation might also be recommended if it turns out that you have a large area of invasive cancer in addition to the DCIS and/or if it turns out that you are node positive (which is only possible if you have invasive cancer). Hopefully this won't be the case but you really don't know your diagnosis until all the surgery is done. In about 20% of cases, those initially diagnosed with DCIS are found to have some invasive cancer, although usually just a small amount (which doesn't impact treatment)
    • Do you want to avoid Tamoxifen? For those who are ER positive who have DCIS, this may be possible if you have a mastectomy and particularly if you have a bilateral mastectomy. Tamoxifen provides 3 benefits: 1) It reduces the risk of local recurrence; 2) it reduces the risk of the development of a new breast cancer in either breast; and 3) it reduces the risk of a distant recurrence. For most women, a mastectomy will reduce the first risk to a low enough level that the benefit from Tamox will be minimal. For most women, a bilateral mastectomy will reduce the second risk to a low enough level that the benefit from Tamox will be minimal. The third benefit, protection against a distant recurrence (i.e. mets), isn't a factor for women who have DCIS, since by definition DCIS cannot move beyond the breast. However for those who have invasive cancer, this is a crucial benefit and is not affected at all by the type of surgery. So if you have an invasive tumor that is ER+, usually Tamoxifen (or an AI) will be recommended whether you have a lumpectomy, mastectomy or a BMX. However if you have DCIS (and therefore face virtually no risk of mets) or a very small non-aggressive invasive tumor (and therefore face only a very small risk of mets), it may be possible to pass on Tamox with little change in your long-term prognosis.
    • Does the length of the surgery and the length of the recovery period matter to you? For most women, a lumpectomy is a relatively easy surgery and recovery. After a lumpectomy, radiation usually is given for 6 weeks. A mastectomy is a longer, more complex surgery and the recovery period is longer. How do you feel about going through a longer surgery and a longer, more restricted recovery period?
    • Do you plan to have reconstruction? If so, be aware that reconstruction, even "immediate" reconstruction, is usually a long process - many months - and most often requires more than one surgery. Some women have little discomfort during the reconstruction process but other women find the process to be very difficult - there is no way to know until you are going through it. Are you prepared for this?
    • How will you deal with possible complications with reconstruction? Some lucky women breeze through reconstruction but unfortunately, many have complications. These may be short-term and/or fixable or they may be long-term and difficult to fix. Common problems include ripples and indentations and unevenness. You may have lingering side effects (muscle pain, spasms, itching, etc.) on one side or both. If you don't end up with symmetry (symmetry is not a sure thing by any means, even if you have a bilateral mastectomy with reconstruction done on both sides at the same time), will you regret the decision to remove your breasts or your healthy breast? Are you prepared for the possibility of revision surgery?
    • How you do feel about your body image and how will this be affected by a mastectomy? A reconstructed breast is not the same as a real breast. Some women love their reconstructed breasts while some women hate them. Most probably fall in-between. Reconstructed breasts usually looks fine in clothing but may not appear natural when naked. They may not feel natural or move naturally, particularly if you have implant reconstruction. If you do choose to have a mastectomy, one option that will help you get a more natural appearance is a nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM). Not all breast surgeons are trained to do NSMs so your surgeon might not present this option to you. Ask your surgeon about it if you are interested and if he/she doesn't do nipple sparing mastectomies, it may be worth the effort to find a surgeon who does do NSMs in order to see if this option is available for you (your DCIS can't be right up near the nipple).
    • How do you feel about losing the natural feeling in your breast and your nipple? Are your nipples important to you sexually? A mastectomy will change your body for the rest of your life and you have to be prepared for that. Keep in mind as well that even if you have a nipple sparing mastectomy, except in rare cases (and except with a new untested reconstruction procedure) the most feeling that can be retained in your nipples is about 20% - the nerves that affect 80% of nipple sensation are by necessity cut during the surgery and cannot be reconnected. Any breast/nipple feeling you regain will be surface feeling only (or phantom sensations, which are actually quite common and feel very real); there will be no feeling inside your breast, instead your breast will feel numb. For some, loss of breast/nipple sensation is a small price to pay; for others, it has a huge impact on their lives.
    • How will you deal emotionally with the loss of your breast(s)? Some women are glad that their breast(s) is gone because it was the source of the cancer, but others become angry that cancer forced them to lose their breast(s). How do you think you will feel? Don't just consider how you feel now, as you are facing the breast cancer diagnosis, but try to think about how you will feel in a year and in a few years, once this diagnosis, and the fear, is well behind you. Keep in mind as well that most women are pleased with their decision to have a mastectomy or bilateral when it's first done - they are relieved that the cancer is gone and the surgery is over and in most cases it wasn't nearly as bad as they feared. For women who are affected by the loss, the real impact usually doesn't hit until many months or even years later. That's why trying to think ahead to a time when this diagnosis is long behind you is important.
    • Will removal of your breast(s) help you move on from having had cancer or will it hamper your ability to move on? Will you feel that the cancer is gone because your breast(s) is gone? Or will the loss of your breast(s) be a constant reminder that you had breast cancer?
    • Appearance issues aside, before making this decision you should find out what your doctors estimate your recurrence risk will be if you have a lumpectomy and radiation. Is this risk level one that you can live with or one that scares you? Will you live in constant fear or will you be satisfied that you've reduced your risk sufficiently and not worry about it except when you have your 6 mth or annual screenings? If you will always worry, then having a mastectomy might be a better option for you; many women get peace of mind by having a mastectomy. However you need to know yourself. After a breast cancer diagnosis there is always something to worry about so those who are prone to worry will always find some reason to worry, whether they had a lumpectomy, a mastectomy or a BMX. Be aware too that while a mastectomy may reduce your local (in the breast area) recurrence risk, it doesn't eliminate this risk entirely and it has no impact on your risk of distant recurrence (i.e. mets), should it be found that you do have some invasive cancer. This is why the survival rate is the same whether for those with invasive cancer whether they avhe a lumpectomy with radiation or a mastectomy. BC in the breast is not the problem; it's BC that has moved outside of the breast that is the problem.
    • Do you know your risk to get BC in your other (the non-cancer) breast? Is this a risk level that scares you? Or is this a risk level that you can live with? Keep in mind that DCIS cannot recur in the contralateral breast so your current diagnosis doesn't impact your other breast. However, anyone who's been diagnosed with BC one time is at higher risk to be diagnosed again and this may be compounded if you have other risk factors. Do yourself a favor and find out your risk level from your oncologist. When you talk to your oncologist, determine if BRCA genetic testing might be appropriate for you based on your family history of cancer and/or your age and/or your ethnicity (those of Ashkenazi Jewish descent are at higher risk). Those who are BRCA positive are very high risk to get BC and for many women, a positive BRCA test result is a compelling reason to have a bilateral mastectomy. On the other hand, for many women a negative BRCA test result helps with the decision to have a lumpectomy or single mastectomy rather than a bilateral. Talk to your oncologist. Don't assume that you know what your risk is; you may be surprised to find that it's much higher than you think, or much lower than you think (my risk was much less than I would ever have thought).
    • How will you feel if you have a lumpectomy or single mastectomy and at some point in the future (maybe in 2 years or maybe in 30 years) you get BC again, either a recurrence in the same breast or a new BC in either breast? Will you regret your decision and wish that you'd had a bilateral mastectomy? Or will you be grateful for the extra time that you had with your breasts, knowing that you made the best decision at the time with the information that you had?
    • How will you feel if you have a bilateral mastectomy and no cancer or high risk conditions are found in the other breast? Will you question (either immediately or years in the future) why you made the decision to have the bilateral? Or will you be satisfied that you made the best decision with the information you had?

    I hope that this list is helpful. The thing to remember is that everyone's experience with surgery is different, everyone's pro vs. con list is different and everyone's emotions are different. Keep in mind too there is so much in this situation that you can't control..... how your breast looks after a lumpectomy..... how you feel about your breasts after reconstruction..... whether you breeze through radiation or have problems with your skin..... whether you have pain from your mastectomy or reconstruction or not... whether the fears you have now, just after you've been diagnosed, will still be as strong in 6 months or 2 years..., etc.. So it's important to not be swayed based on what someone else did or the experience that someone else had or how someone else felt - because your experience might turn out to be completely different. Make the decision based on knowing yourself. Do what's best for you.

  • StacyRose
    StacyRose Member Posts: 21
    edited December 2011

    Thank you all for your imput.  It's great to hear feedback from a variety of experiences.  The list you added Beesie offers a lot of things to consider. 

    There are a number of reasons why I'm vering towards the BMX.  My individual recurrence rate is higher than average considering the 6cm lesion, high grade, and my age (40).  My family history of bc is higher than average, and my family history of other cancers is very high.  I'd very much like to avoid radiation, although I realize I may not be able to avoid it even with BMX entirely.  And finally, I'm learning about the hormone treatment issue since I'm ER+/PR+ and it seems that BMX may be a wise choice for that issue too because I have a history of blood clot (DVT during pregnancy) which will make hormone treatment limited to removal of my overies.

    Considering cosmetics.  The plastic surgeon thinks I'd be unhappy with the divit that will be caused my removing a 6cm lesion.  I've lost about 65lbs over the past few years putting me at a healthy weight now which is great overall but does no good for the breasts.  In other words, I could do with a lift in the first place.  If I have reconstruction on one side I'll certainly need at least a lift on the other.  The plastic surgeon said it's much easier to control the cosmetic outcome if you do the same on both sides.

    Considering emotions related to my breasts.  After having a benign tumor removed 15 years ago, then going though breast feeding 2 kids and having mastitis 6 times with that and now the breast cancer I don't really see my breasts as sexual things that much.  I feel like they've never really be on my side. Laughing  I certainly don't feel much love for the glands inside my breasts.  I don't really see my BMX as loosing my breasts.  I see it as having the glands taken out of my breasts.  Glands that have been a problem for years, and will possibly be life threatening to me in the future.  The only concern I have is the idea feeling numb across my chest.  I don't care for the sensation of numbness, like when you have your mouth numb from dental work or when you have an epidural.  My mother in law, who has had a mastectomy herself, said it's not that extream though.  And that some sensation returns over time.  That's kind of a unknow for me though.

    Another consideration for me is that I already have some challenges in life.  I've unfortunatly delt with depression and anxiety all my adult life.  It takes most of my perseverence and energy to deal with that and take care of myself well.  I really don't feel like I have it in me to deal with adding concerns about breast cancer recurrence.  And I am an anxious person by nature.  I can try my best not to indulge my worries, and I do okay, but life's stresses still sit in the back of my mind even when I force myself to not worry.         

          

  • judyfams
    judyfams Member Posts: 148
    edited December 2011

    StacyRose,

    Have you researched the breast reconstruction options that use your own body tissue rather than implants if you decide to have a mastectomy?

    These autologous reconstructions are the DIEP, Tram Flap, latissimus  and other kinds where they can take tissue from almost any part of the body to reconstruct the breast(s). Most of these will allow sensation to the breast.  Of course they are more complicated surgery and you must find a PS that has experience doing that particular type of reconstruction.  From what I have read on this website many women are pleased with the results they obtain from the DIEP surgery.

    If you are considering mastectomy and a certain type of reconstruction I would suggest that you post your questions in that particular forum on this website to get answers from the ladies that have had the surgery.

    Judy

  • lane4
    lane4 Member Posts: 175
    edited December 2011

    "They say that mastectomy is a good decision while at the same time trying to talk me into the lumpectomy & radiation." I think some surgeons genuinely feel that it's a shame to lose a breast to a non-invasive cancer. Also, there's so much controversy out there now about DCIS being overtreated, maybe surgeons do think mastectomy is overkill. There seems to be a big push toward breast conservation for DCIS. However, in some cases, mastectomy is the only option. Above all, it is your body and your life and you are the one who has to live with your decision. It sounds like you have really searched your heart and you know what will give you peace of mind. Wishing you the best...

  • julianna51
    julianna51 Member Posts: 438
    edited December 2011

    For whatever it is worth....I have a friend who had BC (not sure if it was DCIS or another) about 10 years ago and did a lumpectomy.   A couple of years ago she had a recurrence/new cancer.  She says now...that she was always waiting for the "other shoe to drop" and wishes she had had a BMX the first time.

  • rubalou
    rubalou Member Posts: 137
    edited December 2011

    Stacy Rose - tough decision. I was diagnosed with DCIS last August and chose to have a DMX. I have a Step Mom who has been through first one breast being removed and then 10 yrs later  the remaining one. She's been through rads and chemo. With a DMX I did not have to do rads and chemo. Important to me after seeing what my Step-Mom went through.  I also never wanted to have that news that I had BC again! For me it was 'Off with the Ta-tas!'

    It was also important to me that I could get a better cosmetic result with reconstruction. I am thin and was small breasted. So meet with a reconstrucive surgeon and discover your options.  I can tell you that now 3 months out and with TE's in, I have feeling back everwhere except for on the incisions. I guess I am lucky that it has come back. Don't know what will happen after exchange surgery.

    Anyone out there get feeling back and then loose it when you had your exchange?

    Good luck on your decision. Research and trust yourself !!!

  • AnneW
    AnneW Member Posts: 4,050
    edited December 2011

    One other thing to consider if you do surgery--they'll want to do a sentinal node biopsy. You don't have invasive cancer, so avoid that. the surgeons will say the SNB will lessen your risk for lymphedema, yet there are many, many women who now have LE after their SNBs. Most docs can't limit themselves to just one node in the removal process--they take a clump of 3-5 "just to be sure."

    I had a Stage 1 IDC almost 10 years ago, did lumpectomy and rads. I was glad to have my own breasts for 5 more years befoer getting a new primary in the other breast. Then I had the BMX done with recon. And recon is fraught with problems--multiple surgeries, infections, anesthesia risks, etc.

    You are at the toughest stage of your process. Take your time to examine your values (Beesie did a great job of laying that out for you!) then decide and don't look back with all the "what if's" or "I shouldda's".

    Good luck!

  • XmasDx
    XmasDx Member Posts: 225
    edited December 2011

    I had a UMX Feb 2011 w/ immediate DIEP reconstruction.  No problems or complications, but the numbness bothers me more than I expected.  Zero feeling in my reconstructed breast after 10 months, and also completely numb for about an 8" radius surrounding my {relocated} navel.  It can be a very disconcerting feeling, but at least it's not painful.  Sometimes also itching in the recon-breast, and had some pain after first starting to exercise and after nipple reconstruction for a couple days.  Funny how it can be 100% numb but then you can get some shooting pains even though you can't feel anything.  Overall I'm happy with my result.  Like you, I wanted to avoid Tamoxifen & radiation. 

    With over 6cm or Grade 3 DCIS plus a family history, I definitely don't personally think you're over-reacting by thinking MX.  But you may want to consider UMX instead of BMX.  Hard to say, I'm happy I did not do BMX even though I don't have complete symmetry.  I'm glad to minimize the numb sensation and preserve the sensation of the unaffected breast.

    I was also tortured with the decision, but when my BS really re-reviewed my MRI results after a 2nd biopsy of a benign area then she told me I had no choice but to have MX.  I was strongly leaning that way anyway, so I was relieved to have that decision made for me.   Even though it was what I wanted (again, to avoid drugs/rads), I didn't want to live with the guilt if I had a bad outcome.  (We only knew about 6+cm of Grade 2 DCIS before my MX, the Grade 1 invasive was found after surgery - my understanding is that happens about 15% of the time?)

    Good luck to you in your decision!

  • StacyRose
    StacyRose Member Posts: 21
    edited December 2011

    Hey Anoym,

    Thank you for your feedback.  And I'm sorry you've felt regretful about your decision.  It sounds like it didn't turn out to be what you were anticipating with the implants. 

    I imagine that once you've made the decision to go one way and experienced that down sides of that decision that it probably seem another decision would have been better.  But, even if you'd never had any recurrence (which there's obviously a strong chance of with your family history), you still would probably have needed more treatment than just the lumpectomy and may have really disliked the results of that as well, ie the cosmetic changes and potential numbness from lumpectomy, as well as the side effect and cosmetic changes due to radiation, and the many sturggles of hormone suppression.  I guess it's like the "the grass is always greener" senerio. 

    I hope you're able to find a way to eventually embrass the decision you made because it's obviously not a bell you can unring.  I really feel for you. 

    Thank you for sharing your experince.  It's really helpful to hear. 

  • farmerlucy
    farmerlucy Member Posts: 3,985
    edited December 2011

    Stacy - I'm sorry you are having to deal with this at such a young age. It is a tough decision. 

     I am planning a prophylatic bilateral mastectomy this year. I had a recent biopsy/partial mastectomy which revealed ADH and ALH. The BS surgeon sent me to a genetic counselor who gave me a 50% risk of developing BC based on the path report, my family history, and my busy breasts. I am 51. I decided long ago, on yet another mammo call back, that if anything ever came up I would have my breasts removed. I feel incredibly lucky that the atypia was found at such an early stage. Of course the prevention is a huge deal to me, but so is the thought of no more high risk screenings. BTW - they said Raloxifene would reduce my risk by 40%, but I can't take that until I am post-menopausal. I wouldn't anyway. For me the PBMX is an easy decision. I am healthy now and have good insurance. That may not always be the case.

     Have you had any genetic testing? Would that help you in your decision? I am BRCA negative, but that does not change my decision.

  • anoym
    anoym Member Posts: 26
    edited December 2011

    happy new year everyone...I'm waiting for some friends to come over. Beesie I loved your list. Very thouhtful and informative. I'm sure many women will benifit from it. StacyRose....any questions you have please ask. It's a really tough decision. I remember waiting for the previous bx results, it seemed it was always holiday time. That is very stressful. One thing I really liked in Beesie's list was the feeling that having a double mx. will always remind you of your cancer. I am really interested in seeing if my breasts stop being so much a focus to my physical well being. Take all the time you need and I hope you don't have the regrets I do.

  • cinnamonsmiles
    cinnamonsmiles Member Posts: 779
    edited January 2012

    I had DCIS and PASH in the other breast. I had bilateral mastectomies with no reconstruction. I have sensations across my chest. I have read that women who have reconstruction have no feelings on their breasts. I don't think this is the case for all women who have BMX with no reconstruction.

    I am very happy with my decision. My breast surgeon really was the person that helped me the most. She drew a picture on the white board of what a mess my breast was with ADH and DCIS. She presented the lumpectomy + rads or mastectomy. I knew right then and there I wanted the mastectomy. I did sleep on it though. She did not pressure me to make one decision or another. But afterwards she did tell me she thought I made the right decision. I think the medical team is there to present us the information and help guide us to the right decision. Not pressure us!

    Just a side note....Just because you have a mastectomy doesn't mean you will not have the need for radiation.There are some women who have the mastectomy, and afterwards, find out they need rads anyway.

    I wish you the best making the decision that is right for you.

  • Laurie08
    Laurie08 Member Posts: 2,891
    edited January 2012

    I had dcis and a family history.  My reaction with my diagnosis was " I want them both gone"  my Dr said ok, I can do that.  I asked her "am I nuts to want this?"  Her response was "  I wouldn't remove your breasts if it was nuts." 

    It was what I needed to do.  I didn't want to wait and see, I didn't want rads to my body if I could avoid it.  That being said I miss my breasts.  But I would still do it again.  Hope this helps...

  • velutha
    velutha Member Posts: 102
    edited January 2012

    I think it is important for anyone going into a surgery to feel she made the right decision, even if there is no wrong decision. It is also important that your decision does not hinge on one particular reason. Plenty of ladies have posted stories of changes in treatment plans, unexpected cosmetic results, postop infections. Go into the OR with trust, but somewhere in the back of your mind make space for the possibility that there will be more surprises.

    Keep your care team informed about your mood, and start seeing someone ASAP for onco counseling.



    I had a bmx, no choice for lumpectomy. My surgeons insisted they could do a good recon with UMX as far as symmetry was concerned, but I'm only 32 and have a strong family history. I hoped the bmx would save me from chemo. To the disappointment of my BS and me, it didn't. But I am still happy with my decision. I am at peace with my choice. I think that makes the negatives easy to live with.



    Walk a labyrinth or meditate or pray or take some long walks. Do what you need to do to process this. Make sure you believe you chose the right surgeons. Have your support at home ready. Then dive in.

  • momand2kids
    momand2kids Member Posts: 1,508
    edited January 2012

    it is torture, isn't it???? When I was dx, no one ever mentioned mastectomy--I had  lump that was no where near my chest wall- very discrete-and they knew they could get it out with great margins--and they did....I did chemo and radiation-- and I am glad I did what I did..... I now know that I would not have dealt well with a mastectomy-although if there had been medical indications that it was necessary, I would have done it....

     I think the biggest issue here is what you can live with-what will give you peace.  I don't worry at all about recurrence (and it should be noted that people can have recurrences even with mastectomies although it is a small number).  But, if you are someone who will worry, I would imagine a bmx would give you some peace.  

    It is really hard to imagine how you will feel--but one option would be to have the lumpectomy, get the pathology then figure out if a bmx is for you--- gives you a little breathing room...... I never understood why  people whould have a lumpectomy then have a mastectomy anyway---now I do.... during this diagnostic phase, we need as much breathing and learning room as we can get.... you can always have the mastectomy--- but you can never put them back, if you know what I mean.

    this is one of those gut decisions, that when you finally make it, you will know you are right....

    keep us posted--best of luck   We really do "get it"

  • iLUV2knit
    iLUV2knit Member Posts: 157
    edited January 2012

    I was in your shoes just a few short months ago.  I opted for a BMX.  At first I was going to get the lumpectomy with rads but then they found something on the MRI of my other breast. I had a biopsy and they found ADH.  That was the deal clincher.  I didn't want rads on both sides or a lumpectomy on both sides either.  I have been very happy with my decision to have the BMX.  It wasn't that bad of a recovery even though I had one drain that was in for 7 weeks! 

    I had my surgery on 10/13/11 and feel really good.  I tend to over due things and probably shouldn't have done some of the activity that I did while recovering....but I healed up pretty well with only a minor set back of infection that was cured with oral antibiotics.

    I am now looking forward to my swap of the tissue expanders to implants in March.  I like my smaller breast size and alot of feeling has already returned...much to my plastic surgeon's surprise!

    It sounds to me like you are leaning toward the mastectomy.  I will just say, that I am happy with my choice and couldn't take the worry and future mamms if I had opted for the lumpectomy.

    Good luck!!  we are here when you need us....!!  We have all been in your situation and came here too just like you did to look for advice and friendship.  We are your BC sisters...let us know if we can help with anything!!

  • LWA
    LWA Member Posts: 39
    edited January 2012

    Re this: "And, initially the surgeon told me that the recurrence rate with lumpectomy and radiation tends to increase by 1% per year ... "

    I was told a somewhat similar thing--that with lumpectomy and IORT, my 10-year risk of recurrence would be about 4% while my 20-year risk of recurrence would be 8-10%.

    Then it was explained that this is just arithmetic--if you have, for example, a 1% chance of a recurrence in any given year, once 20 years have passed, that adds up to a 20% recurrence risk over that 20-year period, which does make sense.

    It doesn't at all mean that risk of recurrence goes up after five years. Indeed, it goes down, but if you add all those teeny percentages up over the years, that's how you end up with the higher number.

    Linda

  • anoym
    anoym Member Posts: 26
    edited January 2012

    Hi StacyRose...and all who posted here. It's very good to hear what you all have to say. It seems like ever little bit helps. I keep trying to tell myself if I didn't go the BMX route then I would be getting screening every 6 months and I'm sure mulitple bx's. Yes that is stressful. If after going the lumpectomy route and having rads down the road reconstruction could be affected. Lack of intimacy for me self imposed hasn't been any fun either. I'm pretty sure I should take antidepressants but I am all ready 10 lbs over the weight I was when this all began, more weigh would suck. Is it a given you gain weight with antidepressants does any one know. I certainley get that impression from reading about them. 

  • stephN
    stephN Member Posts: 284
    edited January 2012

    Hi StacyRose,

    I had a 6 cm DCIS+ a small area of microinvasion removed by lumpectomy this summer.  I also had a re-excision after that where they removed more tissue, but I don't know how much.  It was on right breast at 9 or 10 o'clock.  Anyway, I was worried about how it would look with losing such a large chunk.  It looks different than the other one--the nipple is a little higher, the breast a little smaller--but no one would notice unless they were really looking.  I had seven weeks of radiation which I hated every day, but it's over now.

    Edited to add: Anoym, about the anti-depressants...I've been taking Effexor and haven't gained weight.  I've been on it about three months. 

    I second guessed for a while, but I'm happy with my decision too.  I like having my breasts.  I know I will have to be vigilant about follow-up but my doctors are on top of the situation.  I'm not really that worried about it.  I like that they are following up with me.  And I'm a worrier by nature, so for me to say that is kind of big.  Anyway, I thought you might want to hear another lumpectomy story.  :) 

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited January 2012

    I think it's important to clarify that recurrence risk declines over time.  Even annual recurrence risk goes down after about the first 5 years.  LWA, I know that you were just giving an example when you said that "a 1% chance of a recurrence in any given year, once 20 years have passed, that adds up to a 20% recurrence risk over that 20-year period" however this example is misleading and it might unnecessarily scare a lot of women.

    Most recurrences happen within the first five years after surgery.  Some studies I've read indicate that most recurrences happen within years 3-4, but other studies suggest that the peak recurrence years are earlier than that.  

    A few excerpts:  

    "Among women who had a lumpectomy, 50.9% of recurrences occurred within three years and 30.2% of recurrences were diagnosed three to five years after surgery."  http://foodforbreastcancer.com/news/regular-breast-cancer-surveillance-should-continue-years-after-lumpectomy

    "Most local recurrences after breast conservation surgery (lumpectomy) occur in the area of the original tumor, on average three to four years after the initial treatment."  http://www.dslrf.org/breastcancer/content.asp?L2=4&L3=1&SID=178

    "Breast cancer can recur at any time, but most recurrences occur in the first three to five years after initial treatment. "  http://www.cchs.net/health/health-info/docs/1800/1862.asp?index=8358

    After lumpectomy surgery, once the full detail of your diagnosis is known, including the amount and size and pathology of the cancer, and the size of the surgical margins, your oncologist should be able to tell you what your recurrence risk is prior to any additional treatment and what it would be with additional treatment (radiation and/or Tamoxifen).  Based on this you make your treatment decisions and have any additional treatments.  And that determines your recurrence risk. 

    Let's say that after treatment, your recurrence risk is 8% (this is a pretty realistic average recurrence rate).  That's your total recurrence risk - it won't ever go higher than that.  It will however decline signifcantly with time.

    If your recurrence risk starts at 8%, and approx. 70% of recurrences happen within the first 5 years, this means that over the first five years, your recurrence risk is 5.6% - or about 1.1% per year.  After five years, your remaining recurrence risk is only 2.4% (the original 8% risk minus the risk that you've "left behind" over the first 5 years).  If another 70% of your risk occurs over the next five years (years 6-10 after your treatment), this means that your risk over that 5 year period is 1.7% (70% of 2.4%) - which is only 0.34% per year.  By 10 years after surgery, your remaining risk is only 0.7% (8% original risk minus 5.6% minus 1.7% - all this risk is now behind you); this risk is spread over the next 10+ years.  So after 10 years, your annual risk is a fraction of a percent per year.

    This is just an example - the percent of recurrences that happen within the first 5 years might be 60% or it might be 80% - but it's a reasonable example, and is a whole lot more accurate than saying that the annual recurrence rate remains constant over the years.  And it shows how significantly recurrence risk declines over time.  

    I don't know where people get the information that recurrence risk increases over time. That is absolutely incorrect and it's frightening to think that people may make treatment decisions based on such bad information. 

  • iLUV2knit
    iLUV2knit Member Posts: 157
    edited January 2012

    Anoym--I think alot of people end up on antidepressants for various reasons.  Antidepressants are not just for depression anymore.  I was subscribed one for pain and they found the 'side effect' of the antidepression med was that it helped nerve pain...I have been taking them for over 5 years.

    Effexor is said to help with hot flash symptoms.  Even though I suffer daily with hot flashes (I had to go off hormone replacement therapy due to being ER+/PR+) I chose not to add Effexor to my daily medicines.

    I actually lost weight on antidepressants (about 10 lbs) because

    1. I feel better and therefore am more active

    2. I find I am not as hungry.

    3. I find that I have more interest in everything.  I feel like 'before' my life view was black and white.  After being on my antidepressive, my life is in full technicolor again. I just feel better!

    I would weigh the odds (no pun intended :-) and don't go into taking the antidepressants lightly.  Once on them, they can find one that works for you, but if you decide they are not working or what you want, you have to safely wean yourself off and not just stop taking them abruptly.  Some people find they need a little help when dealing with a traumatic event (I think BC would qualify!) and then go off of them...some just stay on them because they just work for them.

    Talk to your doctor about all the various ones out there and make a good informed decision.

    Don't let a little weight get in your way of loving who you are --

     we get one life to live..love it..

    live it :-)

  • StacyRose
    StacyRose Member Posts: 21
    edited January 2012

    Yes, anoym, I've taken antidepressants before.  I had postpartum after my last child was born, 6 years ago.  My postpartum was relentless and the antidepressants were no magic pill either.  I'd say they hardly made a difference for me.  I took Lexapro for 2-3 years.  My cravings for sweets and carbs was crazy while taking them and I gained 40lbs over that time.  I've been off them for 2-3 years now and have had to work my weight back down (it didn't just come back off easily).  That being said, if the depression is bad enough and the meds work for you then take the risk anyway.  They may not increase your carb cravings like they did mine. 

    I've had much more success fighting my depression with self care.  I go to therapy and have learned lifestyle changes that help me a lot.  Exercise is a huge effector on my depression, avoiding sugar altogether is also huge for me as is choicing healthy foods altogether.  A good sleep schedule, good daily routine, postive self talk, and taking time to relax helps me too.  I also have to be vigilant about keeping my healthy relationships active and participating in hobbies (even when I don't feel like doing anything or interacting with others).  And of course, the support of a good therapist really helps.

    Anyway, just some things that have been helpful for me.  Everyone is different.  I know that depression certainly can effect sex drive so maybe there's hope for improvement for you there even unrelated to your BMX.

    Sending positive thoughts and hope your way.     

  • StacyRose
    StacyRose Member Posts: 21
    edited January 2012

    The issue of recurrence it truly a complicated one.  I imagine it's hard to give a blanket number to cover recurrence because, from what I understand, it depends on various factors like family history, lesion size, type of cancer cell, and the width of margin at excision.  I'm planning to see a MO before my surgery to further discuss my chances of recurrence.

    I think my surgeon gave the increase of 1% per year as a blanket statement.  At the point she said it, she didn't know all the specifics of my situation and was referring to all breast cancers not just DCIS. 

    Recurrence of this specific cancer may decrease over time as has been mentioned, I'm not sure, but our chances of developing breast cancer as women (ie a whole new cancer) increases with age.  The breast care coordinator mentioned to me that we go from 10% chance at my age to a 1 out of 3 chance by the time we reach 55.  That's a pretty significant chance.  And since our bodies have already produced one cancer we have more chance than average of producing another.  So, maybe that factors into some of the stats.  Something to add to my list of questions for the MO. 

    In any case, I'll be glad to talk with the MO.  When I was first diagnosed the surgeon said I should wait and see the MO after my surgery because we wouldn't have adequate info for him until then.  I'm glad that I've talked them into refering me before surgery though because I think, or hope, the MO will have more specific info concerning my case and more more overall cancer knowledge than either of the surgeons I've see or the breast care coordinator.  

    One example of why it would be best for me to see an MO before my breast surgery is that I have a history of DVT.  Since I'm ER+/PR+ I should do the hormone suppression treatments to reduce my recurrence by another half, but I won't be able to do that, at least not through medication, because the various meds are counter indicated for history of DVT.  So, if I go with lumpectomy and radiation I may need to have my overies removed as well.  Not really something I'd want to do.  But if I have the BMX I wouldn't need that, assuming they don't find invasive cancer at surgery.  I believe all these recurrence rates we're discussing assume the hormone suppression treatment when appropriate for ER+/PR+.  

    It kind of makes me mad that I had to figure this out on my own through study and questioning.  Neither of the surgeons addressed this issue at all with me, even though I told them I have a history of DVT, and can't do hormone suppression though meds.  I'm sure seeing an MO in the first place would have brought this issue up.  It does have an impact on my decision.   

  • cycle-path
    cycle-path Member Posts: 1,502
    edited January 2012

    "Most recurrences happen within the first five years after surgery."

    It's also my understanding that this is part of the reason hormonal therapy is for 5 years -- one's need for protection is greatest in those first 5 years. 

Categories