Medical record: what would you do

Options
tarry
tarry Member Posts: 156

I got into an argument with my rad oncologist. She said that I should have 1-3 ;glasses of wine a week. I said that I have 1-2 glasses of wine a day, and I'd find that hard to give up.. I did also say that alcoholism runs in my family.



She started insisting that I go to AA. i won't.



My deepest feeling on the topic is that the whole situation is tricky because There are health benefits to having wine. Plus, I quit smoking very easily, relatively speaking, so I'll decide for myself what to do.



Here's what's now on my chart. '3. She was advised of the evidence linking alcohol consumption to breast cancer recurrence when alcohol is consumed in excess of two to three servings per week. She articulates that she believes she is an alcoholic and that she is unable and unwilling to cut down her alcohol use. She is resistant to any and all interventions. She is aware of my medical recommendation.'



There are a lot of question that swirl around here. E.g., what's the long term success ratefor AA? If you really don't want to give up your nightly wine with dinner, are you an alcoholic. BUT those aren't really the one's I'm interest in. My is: should I change rad onc's? My record will go to my pcp and so I can expect doctors from here on out to think I'm drunk much of the time. Also, at the time of the argument, i was just finishing rads and I don't think bullying was appropriate.



And I will never, ever discuss my wine use with another doctor.

«13

Comments

  • peggy_j
    peggy_j Member Posts: 1,700
    edited December 2011

    I have seen those studies too that show a link between alcohol and the risk of cancer or recurrence, so I suspect her advice is based on medical studies. (she's not just trying to give you a hard time).  FWIW, I've heard there are ways to get the same health benefits of wine from other sources (there's a supplement; maybe certain types of grapes too?).   I'm not expert on alcoholism but I remember seeing a list of some warning signs and one was justifying the drinking by saying you can quit anytime.  (you can probably find the list on google).  Maybe one option is to just try and see? What if you cut back to her recommendation for a few weeks and see how you feel? Maybe you'll find you won't miss it??? Good luck.

  • cycle-path
    cycle-path Member Posts: 1,502
    edited December 2011

    I have no idea of the success rate for AA nor even what the definition of an alcoholic really is. However, having read many, many studies about alcohol and cancer risks, I agree with her assessment that more than about 3 glasses per week raises your risk of recurrence or new cancer significantly.

    It's really a matter of what you want to do to lower your risk of getting BC again or another cancer. If you're ok with the risk, then you've made a decision about your life.

    You're really not being honest with yourself if you're justifying your position based on "health benefits to having wine," because medical research vis-a-vis cancer strongly indicates otherwise. You are completely entitled to make your own decisions based on risk factors, but I believe it's important to acknowledge that the decision you've made is one that carries a pretty significant additional risk. 

    We all make these risk decisions when we decide about eating, exercise, etc. IMO we just have to be honest with ourselves that we're making them.

  • exbrnxgrl
    exbrnxgrl Member Posts: 12,424
    edited December 2011

    I agree with cycle-path with respect to how we all consider risk when we make choices about life style, diet etc. The health benefits to having wine don't pertain to breast cancer. Your wording, ..." I'd find that hard to give up.", with respect wine drinking is a bit concerning. Would you rather not give it up, as a choice or would it truly be hard for you to do? If it is something truly hard for you to do, then confronting the possibility of alcoholism is something you need to explore , for more reasons than bc. AA is not the only path to sobriety. I wish you the best and happy holidays as well.

    Caryn

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited December 2011

    Tarry .. I've been thinking about your post for awhile now, and wondering how best to respond.

    There are no measurable results for AA.  It's based on anonymity and no records are kept.

    I would be concerned about your permanent medical record too.  If you don't agree with the doctor and feel it's in error, I would petition her or someone else to have the record changed.  I once was diagnosed with something I knew I did not have and didn't want a permanent record of it.  I discussed it with the doctor at length, and he changed the diagnosis.

    The fact that the issue was brought up at all, by you or your doctor, seems to me would indicate there is some concern about the amount of wine you are drinking on a daily basis.  I have no idea if it's at the level of alcoholism or not ... but the research for breast cancer does show it's best to keep it to a few glasses a week.

    I would think the best way to decide if you have a problem or not is to go to a meeting and see what the alcoholics have to say.  They're most likely the experts in this area.

    If you're sure the amount of wine you're drinking is not a problem for you, I would do my best to get the doctor to change the record. 

    Wishing you all the best,

    Bren

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited December 2011

    The decision is yours in the end, but I don't think the doc was out of line. My consumption used to be like yours, i.e. 1-2 glasses a day. I cut it out when I was DXed. It unnecessarily burdens my system during treatment and does appear to be linked to recurrence. Especially if there is a family history of alcoholism (in my family too), it is a very good idea to cut it out once in a while, just to remind yourself that you can.

  • starbeauty
    starbeauty Member Posts: 327
    edited December 2011

    Tarry...

    Ok... So everyone is right about the wine. I am sure you got it now.

    The issue is did the medical professional move past her role of advisor to the leader of the team... (you) and try to manipulate you to adjust your life/qol issues to reflect what she deems research says is best? I think she did. A professional should provide you with education... Not guilt you into compliance... And then let you make the executive decision. Are you making the right CHOICE? Not her business nor anyone else's. Her documentation reflects her censor of your choice not just her review of what she explained to you.

    I think if everyone was honest they would admit they have at least one area where they could do better in protecting themselves medically... I sure do... And please know I have been censored for that decision to avoid the GYN by my onc... He told me to be a good girl and go... There are reasons why this is difficult for me to do. It is a critical qol issue now... I am not going... Even if I die. My comment to the next MD that wants to discuss it... That is my decision... Thank you for your concern and info... Done.

    To answer your question... The professional that laughed at me for my fears at the oncs office... I refuse to ever be seen by again. the onc is being tolerated because I don't want to see another onc at this point in the disease process. The rad onc... I simply don't go there anymore. The pnp understands the issues... Took time to listen... I would finish rads and not go back there. I would write a letter specifically requesting the Rad MD to not release any info related to my ETOH use on pain of law suit... Noting I found her documentation of the matter offensive and in error without substantive evidence to support her assumptions. Keep a copy... Next MD that asks appearing to know something... Take the rad MD to court.

  • Nel138281
    Nel138281 Member Posts: 2,124
    edited December 2011

    Tarry,

    Separate from whether you have a problem, I to would be upset about that particulary wording in my file.  The difficulty becomes if you ask to respond or her to edit, it will just fuel her sense that you have a problem.  I have asked to items removed from medical and schooll records before and it has happened, but alcohol is dicey becasue of everyone's perceptions of what they would consider your denial.  You have to decide how to go on this.

    Regarding the use or abuse of alcohol, I was well on my way to having significant difficulty, as was pointed out by both of my kids.  This was before my DX by about 2 years.  I found women for sobriety online and they have been a great source of information and support.  They have very active boards and chats and in some areas face to face meetings. Coming to terms with drinking and where I was has not been easy.  My recommendation is google women for sobriety and join the boards.  You will pretty quickly recognize yourself in others there or not. The philosophy is positive and empowering and based on women's needs. 

    Be well on this journey.

    Nel

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited December 2011

    I don't feel that another doc would see you as an alcoholic as 2-3 drinks a week is very, very low and I truly believe that anyone who drinks on a regular basis drinks MORE than 3 drinks a week. I think the stronger you fight it, the more you'll dig yourself in. "She doth protest too much...." Her wording is just saying that you admit to drinking more than 3 drinks a week. Big deal, let it go.

    I used to split a LITRE of wine (BIG bottle) EVERY night with my DH as spritzers. EVERY single night we shared a litre of wine and club soda. We drank until we finished the bottle and then we went to bed. I was never drunk. When I saw the stats on recurrence I made my mind up that if there was one thing I COULD do, it would be to stop drinking. I did it cold turkey and haven't had a drink in over 3 years. It's a small thing I can do for my body, but the point was I DID it. I wasn't sure if I could...that was a LOT of wine I was drinking!! I worried that I was an alcoholic as my mother was, but it was truly easy. We saved $600 a month by not drinking! My DH did it with me. We drink a LOT of tea now. I didn't want the alcohol, I wanted a drink!! Tea is great.

    Good luck, sweetie, no matter what route you chose, it's your route. Walk it with pride.

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited December 2011

    Barbe, I also drink vats of all kinds of green and herbal teas now.

  • momof3boys
    momof3boys Member Posts: 896
    edited December 2011

    I thought that what she wrote was well written, but that you didn't like her opinion, which is what it is. She has an obligation to give you her best opinion and recommendation, similar to if she told you that she believes, and studies have shown that cigarette smoking may cause cancer... If she didn't make these disclosures to her patients, how could SHE sleep at night?

    Now, it's up to you to heed her advice, or not, but she did her duty in disclosing that alcohol info to you...

  • susan_02143
    susan_02143 Member Posts: 7,209
    edited December 2011

    I am rather surprised by the responses to this post. A glass or two of wine per day is not excessive unless each glass is 64oz. These responses are on a website that oftentimes celebrates "better living through chemicals." How many women on these boards are taking chemical-altering drugs like exxefor and cialis and who all knows what. Another group take drugs daily to sleep, wake up, reduce anxiety, etc.

    I would probably spend some time thinking about my relationship with alcohol since at least one doctor thinks that you have a problem. Perhaps substituting a citrus seltzer drink for the wine for a week. How does your body respond? How about your mind? 

    As to whether or not this particular doctor has over-stepped the doctor/patient relationship, probably not. However, the note that she put in your records sounds like your RO has her own issues with alcohol. If you feel the essential essence of this note is fundamentally wrong, I would ask to have the portions you think are incorrect removed or ask that you be allowed to create an addendum. And yes, I would switch doctors.

    Spoken from someone who recurred without alcohol use.

    *susan* 

  • tarry
    tarry Member Posts: 156
    edited December 2011

    Starbeauty and Nel, thanks so much for looking carefully at it from my perspective.



    In this last fall, I've dealt with breast cancer, a group of doctors who've jeered at me for not being interested in the cosmetic procedures they recommended, the discovery that my only child may be schizophrenic, an attempt by my department at a university to unseat me as director of a science center while I was receiving radiation, and a lecture tour in England shortly after I finished radiation. I'm listening them in order; not all were bad, and I had a very easy time through radiation. I was very fortunate.



    I have few reserves left at this moment, like many women here. Finding that the bully doctor took out her irritation on my medical record and created a problem I could have for years left me shocked.





    I looked at the medical research on the wine- cancer link with a friend of mine who does basic research at a university. He thinks it is not sound. For example, all the data we looked at is based on self- reports. Alcohol use is notoriously underreported. Perhaps someone managed to do what is required by the 'gold standard' in research - where you randomly assign subjects to, in this case, those drinking and those not drinking, and control their access to drink. But we couldn't find anything like that. that's not to say it is worthless; it is one very important factor in a decision.



    There are also population similarities that are worrying. One would expect French womento have a higher rate, but they don't.



    The doctor raised the issue because she was going through the list of things I have to do. She did try to bully me, and was certainly not interested in listening to anything I had to say. And, believe me, there would be huge problems with my going to AA, even if I thought having a pretty entrenched habit of having a glass or two of wine a day was a problem. Neither my psychotherapist nor my gyno, with whom I discused my drinking wine before I saw the rad onc, think there's a problem.



    I think this turning out not to be a discussion I'm going to handle well, though I do thank you allnfor spending your time on my problem.

  • tarry
    tarry Member Posts: 156
    edited December 2011
  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited December 2011

    Wow Tarry!!! You really set us up to fail you in our responses. You are adament that the information readily available on the internet MUST be wrong because you wish to continue drinking. And the fact that you don't have the maturity at your older age to keep private any meeting you attend does not say much for anything else you type. I have never heard AA to have that low of a success rate. Perhaps you could do better?

    Susan, a 'glass or two a day' IS considered excessive. That's why we are all saying "Then what's the point?" For women, more than 2-3 glasses of wine a WEEK is considered excessive. And Tarry, if women are 'under reporting' then I guess you drink more than you admit to. I can see why you are so defensive.

    I fear you have tripped on your route to recovery. I wish you only the best in the rest of your journey. Good luck!!

  • lisa-e
    lisa-e Member Posts: 819
    edited December 2011

    Well, I would have a problem with a doctor misrepresenting what I said in my files.  Tarry, you said you didn't ttell your rad onc that you thought were an alcoholic.  If you didn't say that, that shouldn't be in your files.  There is a hugh difference between saying you don't wan't to decrease your current alcholol consumption versus saying you are an alcoholic.  

    In my mind, the rad onc is not qualified to diagnois you as an alocholic.  Her role should be to advise you on your specific risk of recurrence and how continuing to consume alcohol at your current rate will effect you.  Period.  It is your choice what to do.

    My onc and I discussed my alcohol use in relation to my risk of recurrence.  I don't think it is worth changing the habits I enoy based on a slight decrease in my risk.  I'll concentrate on exercise as that will have more effect on my chances of recurrence and is something I am more likely to do.

  • dlb823
    dlb823 Member Posts: 9,430
    edited December 2011

    Tarry, did you, in fact, articulate to your rad onc that you think you're an alcoholic?  If so, then it seems like what she's discussed with you and written in your file is appropriate, since it's her job to try to get and keep you NED. 

    Of course you can change rad oncs, but it seems to me like that would just be shooting the messenger -- IF what she's written is based on what you told her or maybe other things you haven't shared here.  If that's not what you told her, and if there's no more to the picture -- if she misunderstood what you said about alcoholism, or if you said it in jest -- then I think you need to bring it up to her and correct her impression.

    One or 2 normal size glasses of wine a day normally doesn't make someone an alcoholic, nor would it elicit a referral to AA.  Perhaps she just believes so strongly that alcohol could factor into a recurrence that AA  seemed like a logical program to help you stop, even if you're not technically an alcoholic?  Otherwise, I'm guessing there could be more to her observations and file notes than the picture you've given us -- like maybe defiance at stopping that she's translating into a problem?

    Sure hope you can figure this out.  Deanna   

  • 208sandy
    208sandy Member Posts: 2,610
    edited December 2011

    Jumping in here - my beloved sister passed away 8 years ago from bc and she "only drank two or maybe three glasses of wine with dinner" it was "only wine" - well she drank her "only wine" until she died at the age of 60.  I had read many years before that the Junior League had done some research and from that had ascertained that wine and hard liquor had the same effect on women's bodies so I pretty much gave up regular drinking at that time (by regular I mean maybe once or twice a month on a weekend) - now I will drink a little scotch or a glass of wine when I am celebrating something with friends and probably only two or three times a year - the old definition of an "alcoholic" I used to hear when I was in the "oil patch" was "if you can remember when you had your last drink - you are an alcoholic" - tough but probably true.  As for AA's success rate - who knows but it can't hurt to try (or can it????)  As for the oncs notes I'd ask her to change them so they reflect your true conversation with her.

  • Kathy044
    Kathy044 Member Posts: 433
    edited December 2011

    I do think that it is important to have regular use of alcohol listed on medical records, especially if over age 60 and female, just so that hospital medical personal are prepared to treat withdrawal symptoms after emergency admissions due to accident etc.  It doesn't take much to develop a dependance.

    JMO after going through this experience with an elderly relative who was NOT a drunk, just took a drink or two each evening to help sleeping. No one in the family even knew she was doing this.

    Kathy

  • FireKracker
    FireKracker Member Posts: 8,046
    edited December 2011

    Saw one too many go down hill from 1 or 2 drinks.Especially if it runs in your family.I wish you the best.hugggggs K

  • exbrnxgrl
    exbrnxgrl Member Posts: 12,424
    edited December 2011

    Let's be clear that no one is saying that no drinking guarantees no recurrence. Thus far there is nothing that will do that. As to the number of drinks that qualifies one to be labeled an alcoholic, there is no number. It is more about whether one MUST have that drink on a regular basis or if that drink(s) changes your behavior or interferes with your life. Sadly, I have lots of first hand experience with "functional" alcoholics. Caryn

  • Claire_in_Seattle
    Claire_in_Seattle Member Posts: 4,570
    edited December 2011

    Oh Tarry.  I don't think you deserve the attacks you got.  I also don't think you need a trip to AA.  YIKES.  Here is a more balanced view of the subject.

    http://ecancer.org/tv/pubdate/364

    Remember that everyone is assuming here that alcohol consumption is accurately reported.  My own view is that it is most likely significantly underreported.  I say that because there is a "right answer" and also because we tend to underestimate the exercise we get and underestimate the calories we inhale.

    After seeing this, I decided to continue to drink wine, and I mean more than 3 glasses per week.  I am indifferent as to where my risk of mortality comes from.

    Anyway, I felt like I was at a Women's Christian Temperence Movement meeting upon reading the earlier posts.

    I would ask to get the chart corrected.  Say that there was a misunderstanding, and that you were referring to specific family members.  I would use evidence of why you said this.  This is important.  Say you were sorry about not being clear, and eat some crow.  But don't let them get away with branding you an "alcoholic".

    Good luck.  You can make the decision to drink or not drink.  I didn't drink during chemo because of the strain on my liver.  But I am not willing to give up wine either.  I think your RO may need a bit of education too.  The study made major headlines.  It also did not separate out women who have used hormonal therapy, so we don't have a good read there either.  (They didn't have a large enough sample....I checked.)

    You have to remember too that advice reflecting alcohol consumption may also reflect the lifestyle of the particular physician you have.  My first oncologist was all about permanent abstinence, whereas my breast surgeon (who greatly enjoys her wine) was about "moderation".

    But get your medical record amended. - Claire

  • Claire_in_Seattle
    Claire_in_Seattle Member Posts: 4,570
    edited December 2011

    So have I Caryn.

    I think about my ex boss who worked from home and I knew not to call prior to 10 AM or he wouldn't be dressed.  He used to go off to serious bars and not drink with his peers when at corporate gatherings.  Not that his peers couldn't put it away, but they weren't in his league.

    The poor guy is dying of stomach cancer.

    We are talking about bottles, not glasses here. - Claire

  • Shrek4
    Shrek4 Member Posts: 1,822
    edited December 2011

    Tarry,

    I understand perfectly where you come from. I also have alcoholism in my family (my Dad). 

    I used to drink - not wine, but beer, 1 or 2 cans every evening (I live in OK so it was the 3% alcohol one). In my youth I used to drink a lot, especially in college, until one day I said "whoa, I don't want to be like Dad" and since then I only had my 1-2 beers.

    My "luck" if you want, is that I had to take so many pain killers after multiple surgeries and then have the chemo and more surgeries and I totally HATED the added dizziness. So since then, yes, I might have a beer or two but that would be MAYBE once a month. Or maybe a glass of Irish Cream on the holidays.

    The thing is, you came here for advice regarding your medical record, not for us to tell you how much you could or should or not drink. One thing is for sure, none of the replies you got was to criticize you, everybody pitched in because we CARE and want to help another sister.

    If I think the RO was stepping over boundaries? yes. You do not treat an adult woman who just went through Hell and back like that. The discussion with you should have sufficed - she's not supposed to be your counsellor, just your physician. She should have referred you to a counselor. The "I told you what to do and you dont' want to hear, I wash my hands" is a very poor approach.

    As for my little piece of advice, and please take it as concern and care: did you think of trying to slowly replace the wine with "placebo"? I.e. get some really really good grape juice, and start mixing it with the wine.. First a little bit, and every day or every few days change the proportion, using more grape juice and less wine, until you replace almost all the wine. It might work?

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited December 2011

    Or, do as I did for years and have your wine as a spritzer. That's assuming you are having white wine.

    No one here is saying a number of drinks = alcoholic. We are just repeating what even this forum says is considered "too much to drink" by the professionals, and for women, that is no more than 3 drinks per WEEK. 

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited December 2011

    I just listened to that link with Dr. Holmes. That link is from 2009 and utilizes the "Nurse Health Study" that has been used for so many diseases and is becoming obsolete. She spoke about recurrence AND obesity. But didn't mention current breast cancer patients and alcohol. She mentioned nurses without breast cancer being more apt to get breast cancer with alcohol consumption. You have to listen really hard to hear the differences.

    We already have breast cancer. What is our risk of recurrence with more than 2-3 drinks a week? I've heard as high as 30%!! With those kind of numbers, I quit. I've also heard that high alcohol consumption (more than 3 drinks a week) IMPLIES a certain 'lifestyle' that puts women at risk; smoking, bad eating and alcohol and drug use. Just because we drink doesn't mean we shoot heroin!!!

  • lisa-e
    lisa-e Member Posts: 819
    edited December 2011

    Barb, our risk of recurrence with 2-3 drinks a week is not as high as 30%.  One 2009 study indicated that heavy drinkers (3 or 4 drinks per week) increased their risk of recurrence by 34%.  But that is a relative figure, not an absolute figure.  I calculate having three or four drinks a week (more than my normal alcohol consumption) would increase my personal recurrence risk by about 4 or 5 percent.  While that is a lot, that is a lot less than 34%.   If you are going to use data to make a  decision, you should have an accurate understanding of the data. 

  • Claire_in_Seattle
    Claire_in_Seattle Member Posts: 4,570
    edited December 2011

    Barb.....The Women's Christian Temperence Movement strikes again!  You might want to look at the video one more time.  Michelle Holmes is one of the most respected epidemiologists in the world.

    She pointed out that Overall Mortality was no different between women who drank alcohol and those who didn't.  Women who drank up to 2-3 glasses of wine daily were more likely to die of BC, but less likely to die of heart disease.

    Then she pointed out that this was consistent with other work she has done.

    I just went out and had three glasses of really wonderful Washington State wine from the newest American Viticultural Area (AVA).  So Cabernet Franc from Naches Heights.

    I also need to comment on this:

    "I've also heard that high alcohol consumption (more than 3 drinks a week) IMPLIES a certain 'lifestyle' that puts women at risk; smoking, bad eating and alcohol and drug use. Just because we drink doesn't mean we shoot heroin!!!"

    I came back to a meal of smoked pork shop from the German butcher, red kale, carrots, and potatoes anna.  Plus a ripe persimmon.  I would say that there is also a significant "foodie" lifestyle.   I am steaming Christmas Puddings tomorrow (with brandy)

    The only other "drugs" I take are anastrazole and aspirin, again because of the work of Michelle Holmes.  No "sleep aids" and no "antidepressants".  I use exercise instead.

    Off to bed in a couple.  No drugs, but will take my new Hot Water Bottle.  This represents the "H" in my case.  I expect to sleep soundly. - Claire

  • tarry
    tarry Member Posts: 156
    edited December 2011
  • SheChirple
    SheChirple Member Posts: 954
    edited December 2011

    Tarry:  I hope you do not leave such a generally supportive forum over this one topic.

    Personally, I see that you did not post this question for advice or comments on your drinking habits.  You clearly are concerned and asking about what is now in your medical record. 

    My take: The doctor has the right, and obligation, to note the discussion he/she had with you regarding his/her medical concerns.  However, the comment "She articulates that she believes she is an alcoholic and that she is unable and unwilling to cut down her alcohol use. She is resistant to any and all interventions.", if false, should be removed from your record.  You have a right to have that removed.

    I suggest you tell the doctor to do so at your next visit, and if he/she refuses, take it up the chain of command.  It is an inaccurate reflection of your statements.

    As a medical attorney, I review and apply patient comments in medical records to legal proceedings.  It is very, very common for me to ask a witness "isn't it true that you reported to your physician that you knew you were an alcoholic and refused treatment for same."  So, yes, if you did not make those statements, they should be removed from your record.  It is good that you noticed it and should push for it's removal.

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited December 2011

    lisa-e, thanks for the reminder on the differences between relative and absolute percentages!!

    Claire, Dr. Holmes spoke of the risk BEFORE the women had breast cancer, not after! If I missed out on that point, however, you seem to back it up by saying that she says women who drink 2-3 glasses of alcohol a day were more likely to die of breast cancer.

    Tarry, you were told that this is a very hot topic!! If you leave, that is of course your choice, but you would yet again be avoiding the opportunity to hear what other women experience in their lives. 

Categories