Staging Confusion

Options
CherylinOhio
CherylinOhio Member Posts: 623

Hi all.  I have been a member here for a few weeks now and I am notcing that there are women who have twice as many LN as I had taken out and the same tumor grade as me but they are either stage III a or b and not c like myself. Does anyone know why this is? I have an appt with my onc in January and will ask him.  When I had my mamm and ultrasound I was told the bulk of my lump was acutally a radial scar and the tumor appeared to be very small in situ and was most likely a stage 0 or early stage1. When I went into surgery to hav bmx and reconstruction surgeon wanted to test a few nodes and found the positive ones.  I am so confused!!???

Comments

  • pupfoster1
    pupfoster1 Member Posts: 1,484
    edited December 2011

    "They" (whomever that is) changed the staging for stage III a while back.  I thought I was IIIb, but now they say anything over 10 positive nodes is IIIc.  Bummed me out for a while, but it is what it is right?  I am not a number, so......Not sure about the grade issue.

    Unfortunately your situation seems way too familiar.  They originally thought my primary tumor was about 3cm (large enough thank you---which btw was NOT picked up on my yearly mamos) and it ended up being 6.5!  I really think the docs should inform their patients that in the early diagnostic stage that the numbers could change depending on what they find in surgery.  I've heard many other ladies with the same story.  Better to prepare for the worst and hope for the best in my opinion.

    Take care,

    Sharon

  • fredntan
    fredntan Member Posts: 1,821
    edited December 2011

    my doc never said if I was a,b,c. I thought I looked it up on here somewhere. that I was stage llla.

    but 13/17 positive lymph nodes IDK

  • NancyD
    NancyD Member Posts: 3,562
    edited December 2011

    Staging is mostly used for treatment choices, not for prognosis. An earlier staged, less node involved patient can end up with metastatic breast cancer, especially if they are under-treated. With Stage III (all letter classifications), they give us everything they've got! No equivicating, so we know we've done all we can do.

  • CherylinOhio
    CherylinOhio Member Posts: 623
    edited December 2011

    My onc says he gave me the best out there right now. I just hope it worked!  Yes I am confused by the number of nodes and staging. I will ask at my next appt. I keep hoping the cancer society or whoever makes the stages will say "O women are living much longer now so we should say stage 3 is the new stage 2" and so on.  It probably would not make much of a difference but it might make me feel better mentally. I hate waking up and night and thinking about this crap. Just when I think Hey I am having a great day, BAM it hits me: My life expectancy has been altered. That sucks.  I am looking forward to having the girls back. Am hoping for PS to just do implants for now to get me thru the summer. I bought a pool so would like to enjoy that next year.

    Anyhow, thank you ladies for your posts! I just love this sight it has been so wonderful to talk with others about what I am going thru. We seem to have similar issues: hot flashes, leg pain, WTF? syndrome. 

  • kim40
    kim40 Member Posts: 904
    edited December 2011

    Good question and I've always wondered the same thing.  I don't know if I was a,b,or c and no one really told me the difference!  But I think I read somewhere that it all depends if your cancer was attached to the breast wall or not, but I'm not 100% sure on that.  If it has to do with the number of lymph nodes positive then I guess I would be a C!  

    I'm curious to find out and maybe someone will be able to chime in for clarification. 

  • kimf
    kimf Member Posts: 334
    edited December 2011

    I've always read, and was told by my Onc, that if you have 10+ nodes you are IIIC. I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news if you find it that way. But its really just a number. You are already surviving and thriving and living life! The a, b or c doesn't really matter. Just keep on doing what you're doing! Live healthy long happy lives! Happy Holidays! 

  • KerryMac
    KerryMac Member Posts: 3,529
    edited December 2011

    I agree, the number is just a number.

    I've always said that your cancer doesn't know what stage it is! Onc's use staging for treatment, that is why it is done. One "benefit" - you get everything thrown at you, and you take it happily.

  • CherylinOhio
    CherylinOhio Member Posts: 623
    edited December 2011

    I never thought of it that way KerryMac, that docs need to know what they are going to throw at us for treatment.

    And to kimf: You are not the bearer of bad news, my surgeon was.

    Anyhoo,  I know this may end badly for me but I really hope that all of us are here to post at 10 years!!  I am trying to live my life and am hoping to go to Puerto Rico next year. I know having a positive attitude helps but then I think why be positive if I am just going to be dissapointed?  Just have to keep thinking that this too shall pass and I wil be posting here for the next several years, inspiring others like me.

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited December 2011

    Hi all,

    The main Breastcancer.org site has helpful information on Stages of Breast Cancer that can help clear up any confusion. There's also a useful chart on the stages on this page.

    Hope this helps!

    --The Mods

  • KerryMac
    KerryMac Member Posts: 3,529
    edited December 2011

    I really do think in the future the current staging system will be obsolete - there are so many factors that are more indicative of prognosis and treatment, like Her2, etc. rather than just tumor size and nodal involvement.

    I think as therapies become more targeted, the "generalised" staging method will be used less and less when deciding on treatment.

  • shells43
    shells43 Member Posts: 1,022
    edited December 2011

    Neither my surgeon nor my onc ever said "you are stage 2b" or any stage. When I was brave enough I looked it up myself using my pathology report. Later I asked what kind of treatment I got "considering the size of my tumor" to beat around the bush...and my onc said "I treated you as stage 3". He then went on to explain that I would have received the same treatment whether I was stage 2b or 3, which was chemo and radiation, using a third generation chemo and IMRT to the chest wall. I think it was beneficial for me NOT to hear the actual stage. I knew from my pathology report and cancermath website what I was up against. I think different docs handle things different ways. I'm sure he would have told me directly had I asked at the beginning. I just remember him saying "don't worry, we'll get you through this" and I believed him.

  • CherylinOhio
    CherylinOhio Member Posts: 623
    edited December 2011

    I went to cancer math and hopefully I did it wrong. I don't like stats and such.  I was told however by someone in a posting that my treatment (chemo) was 2nd generation? What is that and how do you know? Is one better than the other?

    About pos nodes, I feel like they did their job. Lymph nodes are like the gabarge dump of the body and at least mine did not let anything out. Hope it stays that way!

  • MaxineO
    MaxineO Member Posts: 555
    edited December 2011

    Cheryl- I agree with NancyD, staging is mostly for treatment choices. Also, KerryMac is right, staging is so general.  The newer TNM staging is an improvement on the old, but it's also probably out of date, given the huge advances being made in treatment.

    I am sorry you are struggling right now.  BC sucks extraordinarily, any way you cut it. And those moments of harsh realization that we ARE fighting for our lives are very difficult. But it is good to know that we are not alone. Sending you lots of prayer and good thoughts.

  • Claire_in_Seattle
    Claire_in_Seattle Member Posts: 4,570
    edited December 2011

    Hi Cheryl,

    What a nasty shock!!!  The good news is that treatment options are getting better every day, and that all of us can expect a much better outcome than even ten years ago.  The important thing is to do everything recommended.  MD Anderson stats show that 70 years ago, only one in six women with regional breast cancer survived ten years.  Now five in six do. 

    I didn't sweat the treatment decision.  One thing about being "high risk" is that you get the message immediately.  I was in a trial comparing 4 ways of delivering a third generation protocol.  I got the standard of care, but more.  If you got TC, you got one of the heavy hitters, so don't sweat that.  The important place to focus is going forward, which will be a trip through hormonals.

    I am doing those and just fine.  Two years from treatment, I am back to where I was going in, with my focus being on rebuilding my career.  This will get me where I always wanted to be.

    In doing research, I learned there are three factors associated with better survival going forward:

    1. Exercise
    2. Weight management
    3. Aspirin (which is also helpful with preventing heart disease, so one baby daily if you tolerate aspirin well)

    Diet appears to be less important than the above, or at least they couldn't separate it out as a factor.  This work is from the Nurse's Health survey, with the bulk of it being conducted by Melinda Irwin (Yale) and Michelle Holmes (Harvard).

    Exercise is also important in terms of well-being and of course weight management.  It makes my brain work as well as other parts of my body.  The only downside is that buying clothes is a lot more tempting.

    Feel better and enjoy the holidays.  Things do get better......promise.  This is a normal time of grieving and moving forward.  You will get there.

    Meanwhile, try to get out and do some walking in the sunshine.  That will lift the gloomiest of moods.  Plus, always funny things to see.

    Right now you have two courses of action.  You can sit and worry about what you will ask your oncologist a month hence.  Or, you can get out and enjoy the holidays, including exploring new things.  One of these could be eggnog.......I'll do the eggnog any day! - Claire

  • CherylinOhio
    CherylinOhio Member Posts: 623
    edited December 2011

    Hi Claire, thanks for the reply.  I am not sure what TC is? Does that mean Taxotere and Cytaxan. ( I am not sure about the cytaxon I know I got 2 types of chemo and one starts with cy) Anyhow, I don't know if I am "high risk" my onc never said that but who knows. I put myself in with everyone else, we can all have it come back or not. I feel like it's hit or miss. But I am exercising and eating right. I cut out coffee with my 3 tbs of sugar and lost 7 pounds! Yea!! I do take a baby aspirin 3-4 x a week. I am planning on having a nice relaxing holiday as our company is shutdown between xmas and new years, so 1.5 more days to go for me then off....I am planning on getting a tattoo, yes I know more body abuse but it will have meaning for me. I am also hoping to go skiing and visit with some friends. Most of all I am looking forward to taking bubble baths, listening to relaxation music and reading, all while petting my beloved cats!! :)

  • Claire_in_Seattle
    Claire_in_Seattle Member Posts: 4,570
    edited December 2011

    Oh good Cheryl.....

    TC is "taxotere and cytoxan" and is one of the standard protocols for Stage III.  "High risk" includes anyone with nodes + Grade 3.  I fit that one.

    Go for the tatoo unless it covers your entire body!!!  (Tatoo removal is a growing business here in Seattle!)

    Congrats on the 7 pounds.  I seem to be able to eat enough to make up for whatever I burn off.  But stable weight is just fine.

    Freezing your tail off skiing......or having the time of your life.....will do wonders for taking your mind off the other.  I still have a tinge of frostbite from cycling.  I need to get skiing, but that will have to wait until I get past the creeping crud.  Talk about dragging!!!!

    Enjoy your holiday.  I still have puddings to steam.  Also work to do on the article I am writing with two colleagues, but that will have to wait until my brain starts working again.

    As for "will it come back?".  I think we have a life choice here.  Mine is to assume I am cured until proven otherwise.  But also to tip those odds in my favor by doing all treatment and the lifestyle choices I outlined above.

    I got the feeling I was on the right track when my oncologist said she should be doing some of what I am doing when she took a look at my upper body.  She is 20 years younger than I am.  YAY!!! - Claire

  • shells43
    shells43 Member Posts: 1,022
    edited December 2011

    CKGray,

    I agree the cancermath stats are scary - BUT-- keep in mind that it does not take any radiation into account in their "Therapy" calculations. There is added benefit to doing that. Also, the mathematical modeling they use is not validated for my condition (9.7 cm tumor, no nodes), so it isn't perfect. It's just an algorithm.

  • Claire_in_Seattle
    Claire_in_Seattle Member Posts: 4,570
    edited December 2011

    p.s.  My late kitty Rosalind could never figure out what I saw in taking baths.  She would come to the edge of the tub, put her paw in, and walk away shaking her head!!

  • CherylinOhio
    CherylinOhio Member Posts: 623
    edited December 2011

    Then TC is what I had. Onc says he gave me the best out there. It's actually still in the 40's and 50's here in Ohio so don't know if I will be skiing. I do not like the cold so if it was below 40 I would not be out doing anything. I think taking a bubble bath and reading sounds better.

    I just want to start the healing process. Have to take care of my body since my hormones turned on it.  Just a small tatto on the back of my neck. Then next year the bigger one on my back, maybe. 

  • Claire_in_Seattle
    Claire_in_Seattle Member Posts: 4,570
    edited December 2011

    Cheryl.....time to widen those horizons and go for a walk.  They make warm clothes, including hats which are really important when you have microlocks.

    THEN.......the bubble bath is a reward.  The only drawback is that you have this ungodly smug attitude so no one can stand to be around you.

    It's grey, nasty, and chilly here and I am planning a walk.  Plus, I felt better during most of chemo and I am still walking.  So get out there lady.

    Actually, the December landscape is really beautiful with the low light.  Tree bark is stunning, and you see other wonders that are normally obscured by foliage.  That's my story and I'm sticking to it. - Claire

  • bak94
    bak94 Member Posts: 1,846
    edited December 2011

    I get stressed about what stage I am also, but I try to think I was treated best to my situation. My docs originally said stage 3 but did not put a letter behind it and then a doctor that read my ct scan said I was stage 4! That really hit me hard, but my mo still said I was stage 3, I just had a positive node that was on the wrong side of the border line and that made me "technically stage 4" but survival statistics as a stage 3. Another strange thing with me is I had I think it was 4 positive im nodes but 0 positive axillary nodes. Docs said I could call myself stage 3 or 4 and be correct, so I go with stage 3!

  • CherylinOhio
    CherylinOhio Member Posts: 623
    edited December 2011

    Well it is a rainy and balmy 51 today in Ohio. I love the rain, glad it's not snowing, though many others disagree.   I am awaiting a call from a good friend who met a 5 year survivor and wants to share with me her inspirational story. I love those!  I did walk on treadmill last night, though it is not the same as being in the park. But it has been raining here for the past 3 days and it is very wet out.  I have plenty of warm sweaters that I can't wear to work due to those nasty hot flashes. But can wear them outside and just bought some fun hats as well.

  • CherylinOhio
    CherylinOhio Member Posts: 623
    edited December 2011

    My onc never told me what stage I was, I think he just went at it as hard as he could. He told me the second time I met him, "I will not sugar coat anything for you". I love that about him, he is a great guy with a wonderful staff.  After I started this thread Nancy D said that staging is what the docs use for treatment choices. That makes sense to me. I am no longer looking at it as my prognosis.  I know my onc said that the TC combo he used was the best out there.  I am still going to get my ovaries removed though, I am going to go get an GYNO appt here in the next couple of weeks to see about getting that done. Anything I can do to reduce reoccurence, I am doing. 

  • Outfield
    Outfield Member Posts: 1,109
    edited December 2011

    Hi CKGray,

    The "generation" terminology is used to mean similar to what it means with people. 

    The first generation is the oldest, second is next oldest (so a little younger), third is even younger, and so on.  It doesn't necessarily mean good/better/best or bad/worse/worst, it has to do with order in which drugs and protocols were developed.  Usually there's a hope that newer is better, but sometimes it's just different.  I'm not speaking specifically about any drugs here, just about the terminology.

    That terminology is used throughout medicine, for example it's also used for antibiotics. 

  • CherylinOhio
    CherylinOhio Member Posts: 623
    edited December 2011

    Hi Outfield, thanks for the reply!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2011

    CKGrayoh -- How funny you mention "radial scar".  That's what they said on my PET scan but they were very very very wrong.  I like to think it just didn't light up because it was a lower grade tumor. But with 6+ cm you pretty much have all grades sometimes.....  hang in there

  • mokenagirl
    mokenagirl Member Posts: 24
    edited December 2011

    First I did chemo, then  had surgery. When I went for my post surgery check up, the surgeon said my patholgy report put me from Stage 3B to Stage 0. I was very relieved to hear this. I did not ask her questions about that.

     When I went to see the radiation doctor, I told him what the surgeon said. He disagreed with her. He said you don't change stages. Go figure.   

  • NancyD
    NancyD Member Posts: 3,562
    edited December 2011

    Mokengirl, I think when drs downstage it's just a reference to how well (or how badly) chemo did it's job. It's especially hard with neoadjuvant chemo to get an accurate stage if all they rely on is the post-surgical pathology because in some cases, the response is complete...and then the patient theoretically could be staged as 1 or even 0. But we know that probably wasn't the case.

    So I would tend to agree with the radiation doc. You don't really get downstaged. You just get told how well the chemo hit the cancer by the remainder of it in the removed area. And they use the staging reference because that's what people tend to understand.

  • CherylinOhio
    CherylinOhio Member Posts: 623
    edited December 2011

    I am still confused and will ask my onc next month but I am reading a post from a very brave gal who is grade 3, 35/35 nodes pos and is 111b? I am considered 111c, I am so confused.... hope my onc will clear it up.

  • dobbins_margie
    dobbins_margie Member Posts: 13
    edited July 2012

    ckgrayoh, I don't know if I can help with your confusion, but, from my understanding: The stage describes the extent of the cancer in the body. Staging is based on; invasive or non-invasive, size of tumor, number of lymph nodes involved, and if it has or has not spread to distant areas. Staging is an important factor in determining prognosis and treatment plan. This is why staging cannot be accurately determined until all tests have been done; biopsy, CT, PET, MRI... Stage can be based on the results of physical exam, biopsy, and imaging (called the 'clinical stage'). Or on the results of these tests plus the results of surgery (called the 'pathologic stage') Pathologic staging is more accurate than clinical staging.

    Then there's the T, N, and M staging:

    The letter T followed by nbrs 0-4 would describe the tumor size and spread to chest wall under the breast or skin. The higher the nbr, the larger the tumor or wider spread into tissues around the breast. {T0=No evidence of primary tumor} {T1=T1a,b,or c=Tumor is 2cm or less} {T2=Tumor is more than 2cm but less than 5cm}{T3=Tumor is more than 5cm}{T4=Tumor any size which has grown into the chest wall or skin, and also Inflammatory b/c falls into this category}

     Letter N followed by nbrs 0-3 describe if cancer has spread to lymph nodes near the breast, and how many.

      Letter M followed by nbrs 0-1 describes whether the cancer has spread to distant areas, such as brain, liver, bone, lung..

    I don't know if this will help you, but if you are like me, this only confused me more in the beginning. Makes sense now.

    I wish you the best! And may God bless you with a long and fulfilling life!

    Margie

Categories