Post-BMX - Stage 1a IDC HER2+ - Facing Herceptin/Chemotherapy

Options
1101113151620

Comments

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited December 2011
    That's great Blair - I told you she would be "boring" Smile
  • orange1
    orange1 Member Posts: 930
    edited December 2011

    Thanks for clarifying Beesie - I misunderstood the situation. 

  • Hindsfeet
    Hindsfeet Member Posts: 2,456
    edited December 2011

    Omaz, :) I'm thinking out side the conventional medicine box so there's no stats for what I'm doing. Logically what I'm doing makes sense to me, although it doesn't make sense to a lot of bc sisters here....so the link you posted wouldn't apply to my treatment plan. My oncologist is willing to work with me although if the pathology report comes out with a worse dx/prognosis, I'm sure she will try to persuade me to do chemo & etc. If I do have a more advance cancer, before chemo or etc I will do what I can to get aggressive treatment at an alternative cancer center. If that doesn't work then I'm more apt to look at conventional treatment.

    Yes, the 15% was given to me based on my first pathology report. I thought that if the tumor was below 2 Cem- it is stage 1. If it is slight above it's stage 1b. If it's 3 or more C it is stage 2. Beesie...the 1% is the risk factor for local cancer recurrence after mx. It hopefully means no more breast cancer.

  • AlaskaAngel
    AlaskaAngel Member Posts: 1,836
    edited December 2011

    Beesie and/or Orange1,

    Can you point me to some understanding of the number that doesn't seem to be specifically pointed out in all the discussion? Could you mention the percentage of those who do the recommended treatment and recur anyway, in those situations you discuss?

    I feel for the women who have recurrence despite doing everything they were directed to do and who then recur anyway. This is something that should be said out loud in advance, in honesty.

    I think everyday of a young woman who once wrote me after she recurred after having done the recommended treatment. By doing treatment, she and her husband had, without understanding or knowing ahead of time, had also traded their sex life for that treatment, and during the decline until her death some time later, they did not have that precious part of their life to share anymore even though they remained very much in love. It was something precious that was "overlooked" in the panic to do "everything they could".

    I support whatever choices people make as long as they are given the chance to know in advance what all of the possibilities are, even when they are "less likely" by the percentages.

    AlaskaAngel

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited December 2011

    AA - if I ever did end up with mets, I would know I did everything I could to prevent it - that's what it's all about. If someone who is HER2+ve chooses not to have chemo/herceptin and ends up with mets, then I bet they would be really sorry they didn't do the treatment. You can't go back and change your choices. In your case, the chemo may well be what kept you from recurring - have you ever thought about that? We are not given any false guarrantees at all, we are told the truth - at least I was by my oncologist. You just have to give yourself the best chance to beat this thing and as far as I'm concerned, I would rather suffer SE's from chemo than face a higher risk of death.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2011

    Alaska....I had taxol weekly for 12 weeks/herceptin with few side effects. My intimate life was far more interrupted by the reconstruction process, which included an infection that required removal of the expanders, and then restarting. I basically had surgery in February, May, August and November. That recovery from those definately had an impact.

    If I have a recurrence that doesn't go well, at least I will feel like I did all I could to stick around and I won't be saying..."what if...". But I fully respect anyone's decision to choose a different path, as long as they are comfortable with their decision, particularly if they end up on the wrong side of the odds.

    Sure, there are some things that I have learned as I have gone along, but I really did my research so nothing was overwhelming surprising. I have helped a few women since diagnosis, and my advice every time is to do your research. I give them a list of sites I have used and books I read to make sure I was informed. We all talk about how it is our body, and as such, I think it is our responsibility to educate ourselves so that we are also a part of the "team" we surround ourselves with for treatment, and we have asked the best questions, and made the best decisions for ourselves, whatever that may be.

    Eve-I chose bmx for two reasons....one-I had very dense breasts that made finding anything on a mammo dificult, and two-I just could not live with the worry and the stress evey six months. Sheesh, even after the BMX, I worry about a distant recurrence all the time. I'm not sure I could have looked at the right side everyday and added the stress of what they can't see. They did find a non-cancerous fibroadenoma, decently sized, after removal and that didn't show up on the mammo or the mri.

    Blair-I am so glad your wife is comfortable with her decision. Now, for the first infusion on the 20th, hopefully you can go with her to the first one. I felt much better with my husband there that day. The rest I rolled in and out of on my own.

    Get an advance prescription for EMLA cream from the onc. Slather it over the port (don't rub it in), 30 minutes before, cover with saran wrap until time to access it. Virtually totally numbs it. Check to see what your infusion area has for perks and then decide what to take accordingly. My place has warm blankets, so I never needed a blanket. If yours doesn't, a snuggy works great to give you covered arm movement. BUT....MOST IMPORTANT....get frozen peas or ice bags, one for each hand and foot. I put mine in an insulated lunch bag and then over the ends of the fingers and toes on each hand and foot (got the lunch bag tip from another thread), ziped it,  and keep it there all the way through the infusion. Take them out occassionally to avoid frostbite. This will hopefully help with nails. Get some acetyl l-carnitine and start taking it before first infusion and keep taking it. Should help with neuropathy. Some days she will be wiped out. Try to have someone to help with the kids on those days. Take some healthy snacks, drink lots of water the day before, day of and day after. My oncology nurses said you want to get the chemo in, move it around to do its job and get it out. I always showed up with a large iced tea.

    I always felt really good after infustion due to the steroids, I think, so I made sure I worked out on that day and usually the day after so I could maintain some fitness. All the chairs and rooms at my place have individual tv's and since my digits were iced, and couldn't really turn pages, I usually just watched the morning shows and napped off and on. You might take one of those airplane neck pillows. That helps in the recliner a lot Ithink. That is all I can think of for the moment.

    They usually got a chuckle when I cam in with my little cooler with my snacks and 4 bags of peas, my non-matching neoprene lunch bags, my drink and pillow.

    I went early so it was usually me and a couple of significantly older people who slept a lot, so I got to know the nurses well and they would usually hang out and visit.

    Well, off to sleep...my birthday is officially over. Thankful I lived to see another year!

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited December 2011

    FluffQueen - it is really interesting you girls over there don't get the special iced gloves - They seem to be standard practice here in Australia. It would be weird to turn up with frozen veges :) The gloves didn't help anyway, still lost most of my finger nails and strangely none of my toe nails which weren't iced.

  • AlaskaAngel
    AlaskaAngel Member Posts: 1,836
    edited December 2011

    Everyone makes the choice they think is best given their circumstances. We all hope for the best for each other. There is no need to justify or rationalize no matter what the choice might be. It is just as difficult to forgo treatment and hope for the best as it is to do treatment and hope for the best.

    A.A.

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited December 2011

    I found the decision to do the treatment exceptionally easy. The facts are that HER2+ve bc is VERY nasty. I guess I'm a very logical thinker being a software engineer and having a mathematical/scientific background, so the logic says do it - you can't afford not to.

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited December 2011

    Meanwhile, we've highjacked Blair's thread - back to topic - his wife.

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited December 2011

    AA, I will answer your question but to Susie's point, I don't want to continue to take over Blair's thread.  So I will answer you in Eve's "Why I'm Not Doing Chemo" thread in the Alternative forum.

    Blair, hoping that you and your wife get good news today! 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2011

    Susie...I think the gloves stuff is center by center. My doc doesn't have them as it is he isn't a huge believer in them. My nails stayed really good throughout, although no idea if it is due to icing. Now just on herceptin, I continued to uce until the last couple. They still look ok, but are very dry thin and peely.

  • AlaskaAngel
    AlaskaAngel Member Posts: 1,836
    edited December 2011

    Thanks, Beesie and susieq 58, I agree, we hijacked it. 

    I am glad the Penn opinion helped your wife and you, Blairk, and that your decision is the right one for both of you.

    AlaskaAngel

  • AmyIsStrong
    AmyIsStrong Member Posts: 1,755
    edited December 2011

    Blairk - I thought Fluffqueen's advice on what to bring to chemo was right on.  I would add -if you did get her the IPAD, DEFINITELY bring that, and some headphones. There were a few times I was there (our chemo room was one large room) and aonther patient was having a difficult time - either trouble finding a vein or bad news or whatever - and crying/screaming, and it was EXTREMELY upsetting to me. It was a lifesaver to be able to put the earbuds in and listen to my IPOD (didn't have an IPAd at that time - they weren't INVENTED YET!).

    BTW, I never heard of icing fingers/toes and didn't have any nail problems. I did take l-glutamine which was supposed to help with neuropathy - never had that either.   I also took whey protein each day (after the first few days of chemo) to help my bone marrow do its thing (on the advice of the naturopath). Never needed the Neulasta shot either. They checked me each time and I always slid through without it. I don't know if any of the stuff I did helped or not. Just telling you my outcomes.

    I would strongly advise an advance tour of the chemo environment, if they do not automatically include it. It was VERY helpful to know what the place looked like, how I would sit, where I would be, etc.  I actaully walked all around, sat in the chair, really wanted to know ahead of time, and it made it much much easier that first day to know what I was walking into.  So definitely request that if it is not standard protocol for everyone.  I brought a large refillable water bottle, so it was easy to have it refilled and keep myself drinking.  Plus, obviously all that drinking made you have to use the bathroom. I hated walking around with that IV pole, so I made sure to sit closer to the bathroom, so I had less of a walk.  All the things you learn.....

    Remember she will very likely be charged up (energy-wise) the day or two after infusion, from the steroids. I never had them orally, but they were put into the drip.  I had so much energy - when I went for a walk, I couldn't stop myself from running. I wanted to move the furniture around. It was a little crazy. But it all faded away about 48 hours after. Just so you don't be surprised.

    Ask any questions you may have - or feel free to come over tothe TCH board. Even though the chemicals are slightly different than she will be getting (Taxotere, Carboplatin, Herceptin), it is close enough and you will get a lot of great info.

    Love to you and your wife. You can do this. 

  • twoputter
    twoputter Member Posts: 115
    edited December 2011

    Hi.  My diagnosis was very similar to your wife's.  Diagnosed in January 2011; thought at first it was DCIS, and then discovered invasive ductal carcinoma.  About same size, HER2+, ER+, PR-.  I had a lumpectomy followed with 16 weeks of TCH.  The oncologist explained that rresults were the same for mastectomy with chemo or lumpectomy with chemo and radiation.  Had TCH every 3 weeks, and herceptin every week.  Followed by 33 radiations.  Still taking herceptin every 3 weeks through March 2011.  And started taking arimidex last month.  I got through it with some difficulty.  Had to start taking shots (neulasta) to keep white blood cell count up, and had low blood pressure which caused me to feel weak and actually passed out one time. I was pretty sick the first week of chemo, feeling so-so the second week, and pretty good on the 3rd week.   I'm glad I went through it, though.  Still hopeful.

  • BlairK
    BlairK Member Posts: 399
    edited December 2011

    Today my wife received the result of the MRI of the liver.  One small benign cyst.  She had her pre-chemo and pre-treatment visit to the first oncologist.  I am in Singapore on my way to Hong Kong.  I get home Saturday and the treatments will start Tuesday December 20th.  I will update everybody later.

  • Omaz
    Omaz Member Posts: 5,497
    edited December 2011
    Good news BlairK!
  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited December 2011

    Blair, that's great news about the MRI.  It's good that the MRI 'saw' the same lesion that the CT scan saw, and it's great that the MRI shows it to be benign.  Let's hope that this is the start of a long string of good news!

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited December 2011

    Excellent news!!!

  • bucky317
    bucky317 Member Posts: 216
    edited December 2011

    Great News Blair K!!!    I will be thinking of her on the 20th!!!  She will do fine.  The three months goes by fast on the chemo and the Herceptin is a breeze. I didn't have any issues with my finger/toenails (besides being weak and splitting) and I never iced them. I know alot of women on these boards have had terrible nail problems, but I (fortunately) had none Smile I drank ALOT of water, and watered down gingerale was my friend.

  • beacon800
    beacon800 Member Posts: 922
    edited December 2011

    BlairK I am so happy to hear about the good results of the liver imaging.  Really, really happy for you and your wife.  What a relief.

  • Omaz
    Omaz Member Posts: 5,497
    edited December 2011
    BlairK - I saw an oncology nutritionist during chemo and she told me to eat a lot of protein.  You may want to meet with one if they are available, it was very helpful.
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2011

    Woo hoo Blair! Great news. Amy and omaz are right about the protein. I forgot I used whey protein also. Husband made me a smoothie every day with spinach, the protein, an apple, sometimes banana, whatever fruit we had he would throw in. They tasted so fresh and delicious and always made me feel healthy.

  • BlairK
    BlairK Member Posts: 399
    edited December 2011

    I assume many of you read the attached on breastcancer.org.  What are your comments on risk of heart damage and frequency of MUGA scans during herceptin treatment.  I asked our oncologist if my wife can have monthly MUGA scans instead of every three months and he said no problem via e-mail. 

    BUDAPEST (MedPage Today) -- Breast cancer patients often develop early signs of cardiotoxicity within months of starting treatment with trastuzumab (Herceptin), according to a small study with implications for heart failure prevention.

    Serial echocardiographic assessments didn't point to full-blown heart failure by three months in any of the 51 women on trastuzumab evaluated, but 19.4% developed impaired ventricular relaxation within that time, Hélder Dores, MD, of the West Lisbon Hospital Center in Lisbon, and colleagues found.

    That early echo observation likely signals patients who will go on to develop heart failure if nothing changes, Dores told MedPage Today here at the European Society of Cardiology's EuroEcho meeting.

    "We need to more frequently evaluate these patients clinically and echocardiographically," he said in an interview.

    But the message is also to start screening early, potentially after even the first round of trastuzumab, Dores suggested.

    He didn't recommend switching to a different cancer treatment regimen based on early echocardiograhic warning signs alone, although he suggested that any symptoms picked up with early and frequent echo screening might prompt reduction in trastuzumab dose or frequency of dosing to reduce risk of chronic heart failure.

    "It's clear that there is a need for cardiologists to be involved in following these patients closely," James D. Thomas, MD, president of the American Society of Echocardiography, commented in an interview with MedPage Today, "because if you look at cancer survivors they're more likely to die in the long run from heart disease than from recurrence of cancer."

    Cardiotoxicity is a well-known risk with trastuzumab, but the pathophysiological mechanism behind it is poorly understood, making early subclinical signs ill-defined, Dores noted.

    His group's study included 51 consecutive women (mean age 55.4) treated with trastuzumab for advanced HER2-positive breast cancer, who had clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic assessment before starting the drug and at the third month of treatment.

    Most of these women had cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension in 35.3%, dyslipidemia in 25.5%, diabetes in 11.8%, and obesity in 18.8%.

    Trastuzumab treatment led to a significant increase in pericardial effusion (one case at baseline versus six at three months, P=0.021) and a small but significant rise in average troponin I levels, suggesting an increase in cardiac cell damage (0.03 versus 0.04 at three months, P<0.001).

    Most patients showed some degree of reduction in left ventricular systolic function (57.9%), although only one patient dropped below 55% of expected and the overall average percent of the expected value did not drop significantly (69.3% at baseline to 67.1% at month three).

    Left ventricular diastolic function changed significantly with an increase in the E/e' ratio measure of left atrial pressure (3.9 at baseline to 8.0 at month three on trastuzumab, P<0.001).

    Factors that didn't appear to account for early cardiotoxicity -- due to a lack of significant change over three months -- included blood pressure, heart rate, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion as a measure of right ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial volume, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).

    Echo screening before starting trastuzumab and then three, six, and 12 months afterward and at the end of therapy to watch for cardiotoxicity is routine at Dores' institution, although how common it is internationally isn't clear, he noted, explaining that prior studies have described symptom prevalence at only six to 12 months.

    The ideal screening would be every three to four weeks, after each treatment cycle, he suggested.

    Further studies in larger populations are needed to determine characteristics that predict progression to overt cardiac dysfunction, Dores noted.

    The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest to disclose.

    Thomas reported having no conflicts of interest to disclose.

    Primary source: European Association of Echocardiography Source reference: Dores H, et al "Early trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients" Eur J Echocardiography 2011; 12: Abstract P315.

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited December 2011

    Blair - I had 3 monthly echos. I think they are easier than MUGA  - not sure. Stop worrying!!!

    Sue

  • BlairK
    BlairK Member Posts: 399
    edited December 2011

    Susieq58 - Worry is my middle name.  I am still in Hong Kong and go to Shenzhen China tomorrow for a day of meetings.  I go home Saturday to the US and can't wait to see my wife and kids.  Thank you for your support and happy holidays.  BlairK

  • Omaz
    Omaz Member Posts: 5,497
    edited December 2011

    I think the ECHOs are easier too.  My onc only does ECHOs and switches to MUGA is there is a problem.  for the ECHO you just lie there and they use a wand to look at your heart function.  Super easy.

  • TheLadyGrey
    TheLadyGrey Member Posts: 231
    edited December 2011

    BlairK, thank you for the article.  The cardiac issues are of grave concern to me.  My mother has severe heart disease and I have high blood pressure.  Right before this mess started, my insurance company decided not to cover the drug I had been taking for sixteen years (?) and I started on a new one.  My B/P is always high at the oncologist's and in the infusion room, but they attribute that to tension. I'm not so sure.  I worry that the anti-hypertensive is not working.  

    So I am making an appointment with the cardiologist suggested by the oncologist.  I'll let you know what he says about the appropriate level of cardiac observation.   

  • AmyIsStrong
    AmyIsStrong Member Posts: 1,755
    edited December 2011

    I would not have more MUGA scans than quarterly. First of all, I HATED having them. For me, it was the worst part of my whole treatment. They draw blood (mine would not use the port for this), mix the blood with a radioactive substance, then put the blood BACK into the vein. it required multiple sticks and they always had trouble finding the vein. Very traumatic.  I would not want any more of that nuclear substance  - def not once/month.  The ECHO sounds much less invasive and easier - if I had it to do over, I would have requested that instead.  

    As it is, I had an initial MUGA (pre treatment), then one after the 3,6,9 months and then one at the end. They were all consistent except for the one at the end, which dropped a bit. But i could already tell it was going to - noticed being more easily winded on the treadmill. And by that time treatment was done so there was nothign to do. Over time it got better - no more tests, but I can tell. I take CoQ10 and now L-carnitine to help repair heart function.

    I appreciate that worry is your middle name, but there are downsides to too much testing, too. If she notices a change in her heart function, she could have an extra test then. I have a friend who that happened to - she noticed it and was tested to confirm it and then the Herceptin was stopped.

    Just something to think about.  And remember, in the study above, MOST of the women had cardio risk factors, which you have said your wife does not.

    Amy 

  • Omaz
    Omaz Member Posts: 5,497
    edited December 2011
    Amy - thanks for the description of the MUGA - it does sound much more intense than the ECHO.

Categories