Help!

Options
bexybexy
bexybexy Member Posts: 151

I have been going out of my mind with worry!

Read a previous post by Beesie that talked about facts to do with DCIS and this really scared me:

 "20% of DCIS cases also have IDC" from what I understood from what you put you are saying that even after full mastectomy there is a 20% chance they will find invasive breast cancer. Please tell me I have read your post wrong or interpreted it wrong. I thought there was an almost 100% survival rate if diagnosed with DCIS. I have endured a lumpectomy and was told by my consultant I have DCIS which is not confined to one place which is why they have to remove the breast and that would thus remove any of the cells, and that there is unlikely to be any lymph involvement. I was also told and have read that there is a very low rate of re-occurrence. All this I read reputable cancer websites now I am very confused and needless to say haven't slept!

Comments

  • BlairK
    BlairK Member Posts: 399
    edited November 2011

    Dear bexybexy - The first thing you should do is read your pathology report.  If it is high grade and has comedo type with necrosis, then there is a higher chance of there being IDC.  If it is low grade and non-comedo type then there is a lower chance of there being IDC.  My wife actually had one breast with DCIS high grade comedo type with necrosis and one breast with DCIS medium grade and non-comedo type.  After a BMX, the first breast turned out to have IDC and the second breast only DCIS.  You must also pay attention to some other things.  HER2 positive means the cancer can be very aggressive.  In that case the reoccurence rate without treatment (chemo and Herceptin) is 25 to 30 percent. With treatment is 2 to 3 percent.  My wife's cancer is HER2 positive.  If it is all DCIS and HER2 negative and you had a good surgical margin and had radiation after surgery then your reoccurrence rate will be very low.  DCIS survival is not 100 percent but could be 98 to 99 percent.  There is always a very small number of cases where something might have been missed.  My wife was told that her chances of not needing more treatment after a BMX was 90 percent.  Unfortunately she is in the 10 percent and will need chemo, Herceptin and Arimidex.  Good luck and happy to answer more questions if you post back.  However, Beesie is far and away the biggest expert on this section of the bulletin board.

  • bexybexy
    bexybexy Member Posts: 151
    edited November 2011

    Thankyou so much for that. I hope Beesie can help me on this as it down to her original post that I have gotten myself so worried (I don't mean that to sound disrespectful) I saw the report but didn't really take it in, I should of taken a copy. I just remember he said it is intermediate with no evidence of any lymph involvement (although he will still do that test). I rung the nurse today to put my mind at rest and she said not to worry. She said I have had biopsy, mammo, ultrasound and the lumpectomy and it all points to it being a DCIS confined to the milk ducts, inactive and intermediate grade. The consultant when telling me this said he felt relaxed about it and said I had no cause to panic. The nurse also said they wouldn't be scheduling me in for reconstructive surgery at the same time if they didn't feel confident on this. The recurrent rate as you say is low and she did say "stop googling" lol I will take her advice on that I have been on the cancer.org and macmillan sites but too much reading other places is stressing me out! I will stick to coming on here for just advice and support but not worry myself too much medically about stuff.

  • redsox
    redsox Member Posts: 523
    edited November 2011

    It is true that about 20% of those initially diagnosed with DCIS wind up with a diagnosis of IDC.  That number is based on the information available after the initial biopsy and imaging. Because a biopsy only takes a sample of tissue from one or more places in the breast and is not intended to remove all of the cancer, that means that the cancer remaining may still include something other than what was included in the biopsy sample.

    After surgery intended to remove all of the cancer (which you had with the lumpectomy), the percentages will depend on your particular situation.  The most important factor is margins, how wide an area around the edge of the removed tissue is free of cancer cells.  If the cancer cells go right up to the edge of the sample, it is likely that the tissue still in the breast adjacent to where that tissue came from may still have cancer.  Or if the margins are very small (<2-3 mm) the DCIS may have skipped a space and there still may be cancer in the breast.  So the most important factor for you is -- how wide are the narrowest margins from the specimen removed from your breast?

    Margins are not an easy or clearcut topic. It also sounds to me that your surgeon may be recommending a mastectomy because your DCIS is multi-focal or multi-centric and that makes it more likely that another spot of DCIS might remain in the breast.

    Nothing is ever 100% but survival rates for DCIS that is properly treated are >99%.  Even if a small IDC showed up, survival rates for Stage I breast cancer are practically the same as for DCIS. 

    I think you should talk to the consultant again and ask about margin status and the multi-focal aspect of your results.  There is so much information to absorb and process that no one can understand it all in one visit, no matter how good the communication is.  

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited November 2011

    Bexy-  Make sure no one is rushing you into any surgery choices until you've had a chance to research and have all your questions answered.  One luxury of DCIS is we have time to do that.  I took a full 3 months between diagnosis and surgery.  You should fully understand your diagnosis.  Like redsox recommended, I would request a sit down with your consultant and tell them you need things explained thoroughly.  I also wanted to add that I hope they are offering you nipple sparing as an option with your mastectomy.  If your DCIS is not too close to the nipple, and you are not extremely large breasted, you may be a candidate.  If you haven't been told about this by your surgeon than chances are they aren't trained in the procedure.  (A lot of them aren't.)  I would definitely schedule a consult with someone if this is the case.  Nipple sparing can go a long way towards accepting the mastectomy.  Good luck with everything and keep us posted.   (((hugs)))

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited November 2011

    bexy, I'm sorry that my post scared you.  As redsox explained, you did interpret my post correctly. Women who have a preliminary DCIS diagnosis after a biopsy have approx. a 20% chance that something more than DCIS will be found once the final surgery is done and all the cancer cells have been removed and analysed.

    This is important to know because sometimes women come here saying that they had a needle biopsy that showed DCIS, and since DCIS is pretty much harmless, why should they even have surgery? Why remove something that is harmless? One of the big reasons is because a biopsy doesn't tell the whole story.  Where there is DCIS in a biopsy, there is a risk that something more serious might be found.  So surgery is necessary to confirm that the diagnosis really is just DCIS.

    In your case you've already had a lumpectomy, not just a needle biopsy.  So much more of your area of cancer has already been removed, and only DCIS has been found.  This means that the risk that something more might be found during your mastectomy is much smaller than if so far you'd just had a needle biopsy.  So you've already passed the big test on this one!

    As for the survival rate, DCIS cannot spread into the nodes or the body, so it's true that the survival rate for those diagnosed with pure DCIS is 100%.  There are a few "buts" to this statement, however.  

    1. The first "but" is that this assumes that the final diagnosis, not just the biopsy diagnosis, is pure DCIS.  If some invasive cancer is found at any point during any surgery then the diagnosis changes from DCIS Stage 0 to IDC Stage I (or higher).  With that, the long-term prognosis changes.  However as redsox pointed out, the presence of only a small amount of invasive cancer, a true microinvasion (1mm in size or less), has very little impact on the prognosis.  That was my diagnosis by the way - I had a microinvasion along with my DCIS.
    2. The second "but" is that this assumes that all the cancer cells have been found and removed and fully and properly analysed and confirmed to be DCIS.  If there was a very tiny area of invasive cancer that somehow is missed, this could change things.  This does happen but it's extremely rare - not something to worry about.  
    3. The third "but" is that this assumes that there is no recurrence.  This means that all the DCIS is fully removed during surgery and/or killed off by radiation and/or hormone therapy and there there is no recurrence.  A recurrence after an initial diagnosis of DCIS could change the prognosis if the recurrence is not found until the cancer has evolved from DCIS to IDC. Approx. 50% of DCIS recurrences are not found until they are already IDC. 

    I hope that this explanation hasn't scared you more than you were already scared.  Unfortunately DCIS is not as simple as it's often presented to be; there are lots of "ifs, ands or buts" associated with any diagnosis.  And DCIS is not a homogeneous type of cancer - there are lots of different DCIS diagnoses.  Some women have a tiny amount of non-aggressive DCIS that can be easily and quickly treated (sometimes a lumpectomy only) while other women have large amounts of very aggressive DCIS that requires more extensive surgery and treatment (mastectomy maybe even with radiation or lumpectomy with radiation and hormone therapy). And there is everything in between.  

    I don't know what your DCIS diagnosis is. The risk that some IDC may be found hiding in with the DCIS varies greatly depending on the diagnosis.  The risk of recurrence will also be very different depending on the diagnosis, the pathology (particularly the margins) and the treatment option selected. One case cannot be compared to the next. You need to have all the information about your own diagnosis and pathology to understand what your specific risks are. 

    Having said all that, for most women a diagnosis of DCIS turns out to be a one-time occurance, the DCIS is removed and treated and that's it.   

    One last point, a clarification to Blair's post. If your diagnosis is pure DCIS, the HER2 status doesn't mean anything. For those with invasive cancer, HER2 status is very important and can have huge impacts on treatment plans and long-term prognosis. With DCIS, it has no impact on the treatment plan or the long-term prognosis (assuming that the DCIS is adequately treated and does not develop into invasive cancer).   Sometimes HER2 status isn't even provided for those who have pure DCIS; if you do get your HER2 status, don't worry if you are found to be HER2+. Somewhere between 40% - 60% of all cases of DCIS are HER2+ (in other words, it's really common) but only about 20% of cases of IDC are HER2+.  The medical and scientific communities don't understand yet why so much more DCIS is HER2+ but it reinforces that you shouldn't put much weight or worry into an HER2+ DCIS diagnosis.  

  • CookieMonster
    CookieMonster Member Posts: 1,035
    edited November 2011

    Bexy, I responded on another of your posts, but you put more information here so I wanted to respond again. I'm going to tell you my story and hopefully it'll set your mind at ease since you're already going to have a mastectomy and your DCIS sounds similar to mine.

    If you've already had a lumpectomy, my guess is that they told you that the margins were not clear. But they did take out the main site of the DCIS? If so, if there is IDC, it likely would have been found in what they took out in the lumpectomy. Definitely ask for copies of ALL of your pathology, I have them all now and at my last follow up with my BS, she offered it to me before I even asked for it, then again, I was not in a great mental state at that time.  But anyway, if you've had a lumpectomy and they didn't find IDC, it's highly unlikely that you have IDC elsewhere.

    My story is that I was diagnosed with DCIS and had a lumpectomy (wire loc in two spots, one DCIS and the other worrisome from MRI, but was OK). The area of DCIS that they took out was LARGE (7.9 cm in it's largest dimension - yes, cm not mm). In the middle of what they took out they found a "strand" of IDC 1.1 cm long (the oncoloist said it wasn't a big 1.1 cm thing that was round, but more accurately it was long and thin and the 1.1 cm was its length). They also found that four of the six margins had DCIS too close to the edge so the surgeon wanted to go back and recut the 4 "dirty" margins. Also, since they found IDC, they needed to do a sentinel node biopsy. 

    So, about a month after the first lumpectomy I had a second one along with a SNB. My nodes were clear, but still one of the margins came back with a focus of DCIS too close, so the BS suggested another re-excision. Of note is that they didn't find a continuous line of DCIS, but instead another small point of it.

    So, about a month after the second lumpectomy I had a third one, just a simple lumpectomy, one incision, pretty easy healing really. This past Wed. I had my follow up with the surgeon and she said that once again there was a small focus of DCIS too close to the margin. She said exactly what I'd been thinking after the most recent surgery. DCIS sometimes does this where there's an area of clear and then a small focus of disease and so on throughout the duct system in the breast. She said that even if we did a fourth lumpectomy and it came back clear, she would not be confident that all the disease was found and gone. She thought it was time to step up the treatment and become more agressive. So the new treatment plan is to have a mastectomy.

    It sounds like you probably have a similar situation, DCIS is likely spread out throughout the breast so removing it is the best bet for being disease free. Removing the breast is also likely to mean that you will not need radiation, but not a 100% guarantee. If I'm understanding what you've said correctly, then it seems unlikely that you have IDC, if you did they'd be scheduling a SNB along with whatever further surgery you're having. Now once they do the pathology on the removed breast tissue, you'll know for sure, and as my BS told me, there may be nothing there but healthy tissue, but we've tried three times for clean margins and it's just not worth the risk anymore, so off it will come. (I'm making light of it here, a bit, but I'm all kinds of an emotional wreck inside over it). BC is a bitch!

    Hang in there and ask more questions if you have them!!

  • bexybexy
    bexybexy Member Posts: 151
    edited November 2011

    Thankyou soooo muchy everyone I feel so much better now! Phew a lot to take in there so am gonna just post back my initial response to what you have all said but will have another read later. I promise I will not do any more googling from now either! Firstly Beeslie I think the main part I misinterpreted what the biopsy/lumpectomy part. Of course as you say I have had the lump out so this changes things a lot. The consultant said he could see no sign of lymph node involvement and he genuinely seemed confident about it. I hope you don't think I hold you responsible for my sleepless night, it was a genuine mistake on my part. I am afraid I in a kind of heightened state of alert and anxiety and finding it hard to think rationally at the moment! It is great that you know so much on this topic and nice to hear things in laymans terms, which despite my surgeon being great I sometimes wish he would do that!

    Redsox I will ask about the margins when I go to see the consultant this week as I couldn't really take it in last week. The biggest shock for me last week was that I had gone there thinking in my mind it was just a follow up to say the lump was benign. Or that if there were cells that were changing they were all in the lump they had removed, I genuinely went there almost regarding it an inconvenience. I had all my plans made for the weekend even my dinner at home ready for when I got back. To suddenly hear words like cancerous, mastectomy I can't even begin to describe my feelings. I will be more rational when I go back this time!

    I am definately having the mastecomy and not taking any chances. Nothing scares more more than getting invasive cancer, no operation or surgery could ever touch that fear. They are going to do one that involves taking fat from my abdomen and filling the breast it is a skin sparing one and nipple sparing too I think but again need to check all that when I see my reconstructive surgeon. I am thinking every cloud has a silver lining at least I am getting a tummy tuck!

    Cookie Monster - the surgeon just basically said that after looking at the results of the lumpectomy it was DCIS with no sign of lymph node involvement and it was kind of spread out so the mastectomy is the best option. He said it gives me a kind of 101% good prognosis for afterwards. You know what you said about the SNB - well they are going to do that. That is scheduled for the day before but he said that is purely a precautionary measure. He said it is highly unlikely as it states on ther report and the percentage is very low that it could spread there but he just wants to be doubly sure in his mind. Does that sound about right? Cos am kind of worried by what you said there!

    Also when I spoke to the nurse about it to put my mind at rest she said not to worry and that the whole reason they are doing this mastectomy is to get out everything they can and get me free of this. She also said it would be unlikely if they thought there was IDC that they would be doing the surgical reconstruction at the same time as there would be no point if they were then going to use radiotherapy etc..

    Hmmm kind of feel better but just a little worried about the SNB hoping you can put my mind at rest on that one.

    Thankyou once again!

  • bexybexy
    bexybexy Member Posts: 151
    edited November 2011

    I think I am confused Cookie Monster as you said if your surgeon finds any IDC they will do the SNB but he definately said I only had DCIS! He said if I wanted to call them pre-cancerous cells I could he called them non-invasive, inactive cells and said it was important to remember they hadn't turned into anything they were confined within the duct. Now I AM worried!

    I found this on a cancer website that would confirm what I thought was the case - that the SNB was just a procedure to make sure it hadn't spread and nothing to worry about

    "The risk of lymph node (LN) metastases with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is very low. However, with a pre-treatment needle core biopsy (NB), there is a risk of finding invasive cancer at surgical resection. Lymph node staging with sentinel node biopsy (SNB) may be considered at the time of surgery for DCIS, especially if mastectomy is performed."

    And I found this on the Macmillan site which is putting my mind at rest

    Women who are having a mastectomy usually have a test called a sentinel lymph node biopsy (see below). This is to make sure that there isn't a small invasive cancer in the breast that has spread to the lymph nodes under the arm

  • CookieMonster
    CookieMonster Member Posts: 1,035
    edited November 2011

    Bexy,  I have not heard of doing an SNB with DCIS, but that doesn't mean that someone doesn't do it.  Definitely discuss all this with the surgeon that you see next time (or whomever it is that you'll see).

    My understanding is that DCIS cannot move to somewhere else in the body, that you would have to have invasive cancer for it to get to the nodes and beyond.  Of course, I'm not a medical professional, it's just my understanding from what I've read and been told.

    If you had a biopsy instead of a lumpectomy they could have not seen IDC (that's what happened with me), so when they do the lumpectomy they find IDC inside the area of DCIS.

    I'm unsure about doing the SNB the day before the MX. They did my 2nd lumpectomy and the SNB in the same surgery. Maybe they want to check the nodes before they do the MX in case it might change the treatment plan?

    Keep us posted on your progress and what you find out. Hugs and best of luck to you.

  • cycle-path
    cycle-path Member Posts: 1,502
    edited November 2011

    "I have not heard of doing an SNB with DCIS, but that doesn't mean that someone doesn't do it."

    My experience is just the opposite -- I've heard of very few women who got lumpectomies for DCIS and did not also have an SNB. The doc doesn't know until s/he receives the pathology for the lumpectomy itself whether there's any IDC. My doc was 99.9% sure I had no IDC but she did the SNB anyway. And this is the same story I've heard from dozens of women. I suppose it could be a regional thing -- I'm on the West coast - but I don't know. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited November 2011

    bexy- I had DCIS and MX and also did a SNB.  There's pros and cons for doing one and not doing one.  Having it done gives you added peace of mind that no cancer has entered the lymph nodes.  Once you have the MX it is impossible to go back later and do a SNB.  Having one done, though, does put you at a higher risk of getting lymphedema.  It is a much lower risk than regular node biopsies, but a risk nonetheless.  Anyway who has had lymph nodes removed should take lymphedema precautions.  Ultimately, they will leave the decision up to you and you'll have to decide what's best.

  • bexybexy
    bexybexy Member Posts: 151
    edited November 2011

    Thats exactly what the surgeon said, what you just put last - he said we are doing the SNB to check the cells haven't escaped into the nodes which would then make it an invasive cancer and would have to be treated accordingly. Also the passage I got from the Macmillan site

    Women who are having a mastectomy usually have a test called a sentinel lymph node biopsy (see below). This is to make sure that there isn't a small invasive cancer in the breast that has spread to the lymph nodes under the arm

     Surely this says it all! It is saying to make sure there isn't a small invasive cancer in the breast NOT saying there already is one. If they knew there already was a cancer in the breast would they need to do that at all?

    Cycle Path I think I will go with what you say (sorry cookie monster) this just ties in much more with that my consultant told me, and I know he wouldn't lie or sugarcoat anything or withhold any facts from me as I implicitly asked him to be blunt with me all along. My consultant is also 99% sure but as he said himself he just wanted to be sure. When I had initially found the lump after a mammo and an ultrasound the specialist told me they both came up clear but they had to do a biopsy as they didn't feel happy professionally or personally not taking it seriously and this is what they are doing now. I am fine with this would rather be safe than sorry.

  • CookieMonster
    CookieMonster Member Posts: 1,035
    edited November 2011

    No offense taken, Bexy.  I was wrong, I just hadn't heard of it. Now I know better, right? I too am on the west coast.

    I guess mine was the out of the ordinary case with no SNB w/the first lumpectomy.

    And to answer your other question, if there is IDC in the breast, they still need an SNB because that allows them to hopefully see if it has spread out of the breast and they have to look for it elsewhere in the body. The lymph nodes would be one of the first stopping points for the cancer cells on their way out of the breast and into other parts of the body. If they don't find any cancer cells in the lymph nodes then it's very unlikely, but not impossible that they've gotten to any other parts of the body.

  • bexybexy
    bexybexy Member Posts: 151
    edited November 2011

    Yeah that is true and I keep reassuring myself that even if the worse came to the worse and they found some in the lymph nodes at least that can also be treated and usually successfully just by what I have heard in general regarding cancer. I think I am just gonna go with what the consultant told me and kind of not focus too much on it as it tends to stress me out more, there is nothing I can do either way may as well try and relax and not become run down or ill with worry. Thankyou xxx

  • motheroffoursons
    motheroffoursons Member Posts: 333
    edited November 2011

    I had a lumpectomy for DCIS and they did a SNB at the same time.  As I understand it, if the biopsy shows a high grade and commedonecrosis, the surgeon sometimes does a SNB even with DCIS.

    Bexybexy, what is a consultant to which you refer?  What does it mean? 

  • bexybexy
    bexybexy Member Posts: 151
    edited November 2011

    I am from the Uk over here a consultant is basically the specialist. He said I had intermediate grade he was just wanting to do the SNB to be completely sure.

  • bexybexy
    bexybexy Member Posts: 151
    edited November 2011

    I have found this really good explanation on another post on this site that explains the reasons why they want to do an SNB

    Now that I will be having a mastectomy, they are going to do a SNB, primarily because sentinal node mapping cannot be performed after a mastectomy has been done. The finding of lymph node metastasis in pure breast DCIS (without microinvasion) is not unknown, but is a very rare occurence if the primary tumour has been completely excised and microinvasion has been ruled out by a thorough histologic examination by an experienced pathologist. It is done in conjunction with a mastectomy to insure that occult metastases are not missed. The chance they will find anything is quite low, but if you have to go through such an extensive procedure for Stage 0 cancer, knowing that they got it all and there is no occult disease identified will help you sleep at night.

    I am going to leave it at that and would love it if people could not reply anymore I don't mean this to sound rude it is just I am barely sleeping at the moment and if people say they have not heard of this procedure being done unless someone has invasive cancer - that is really worrying for me. The nurse has assured me this is standard procedure within the department where she works it is entirely down to the specialist who has deemed this a suitable operation for me.

    Many thanks xxxxx

  • Sunone
    Sunone Member Posts: 151
    edited November 2011

    I had a SNB done with lumpectomy 2 years ago, I was told it was because the DCIS was high grade with comedo necrosis. I now have a new dx of DCIS on the other breast. This time it is not high grade, but intermediate,  so if I choose a lumpectomy I was told there would not be a SNB, but if I choose mx they will do a SNB as once a mx is done they can no longer do one. Not sure what to do, bmx seems very aggressive for 4mm of DCIS, but I have been given this choice since it is a second occurance in a 2 year period.

  • Sunone
    Sunone Member Posts: 151
    edited November 2011

    Sorry Bexybexy -  I just read you asking for people to not reply anymore (after I replied) - I know this is a stressful time, hope all goes well for you - hugs

  • Iz_and_Lys_Mum
    Iz_and_Lys_Mum Member Posts: 126
    edited November 2011

    Hi Bexy



    I had a diagnostic biopsy which indicated DCIS. Then I had a lumpectomy with SNB, which is becoming embedded as standard practice here in the UK. Maybe its different in the US? I remember reading (a year ago when i started) that SNBs havent always been standard with lumpectomy but they are becoming standard. The SNB indicated no invasion, however my DCIS was 6.5 cms, so it was followed up with a mastectomy. The path report after the mastectomy showed additional DCIS and some fibroadenoma, but still no invasion cancer cells.



    So take heart that sometimes, it can just be straightforward.



    Hugs xxx

  • bexybexy
    bexybexy Member Posts: 151
    edited November 2011

    Thanks and thats ok. My situation is very common and as you say once they have done a mx is done they can no longer do the SNB so this is purely why they are doing this with me. I have intermediate by the way.

    I think I was just reading other peoples comments as if they were trying to suggest an SNB is only done when invasive cancer is present and my surgeon was quite implicit that he thought this highly unlikely, so it made me then doubt the surgeon which I shouldn't have to do and it was just making me panic.

Categories