I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange

13643653673693701828

Comments

  • leggo
    leggo Member Posts: 3,293
    edited October 2012

    If you are a pedophile, child killer, child molester, you should not be allowed the ammenities and free health care of a prison. Sorry, but that's how I feel.

    ETA: I have my own opinion of what should happen to them, but I'll keep that to myself.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited July 2011

    It's one of the impossible moral bargains that a civilized society has to make, though. In the same way as I would die protecting the Ku Klux Klan's right to say what they want, I favor health care for pedophiles. It isn't that I care about the rights of the KKK or the health of a pervert. It is that ultimately everything exists along a continuum, much as we hate to admit it (and I am not a moral relativist). So a right taken away from one group may be seen by some as applicable to a similar group, and so on. If one person gets to decide to silence the KKK, what is to prevent another person from saying "well, I don't like what my neighbour, an ultra right wing race baiter,  says," and so on until less and less unpopular views are silenced. One day, my view is silenced.

    With pedophiles there is a similar slippery slope. Are we talking about a rapist of children, one who views porn, or a peeping Tom? These are gradations of a common theme, and not just because many are all three. The serial child rapist might possibly deserve the death penalty, but at some point a society has to draw a line. If the person gets to live, they must be considered human and therefore deserving of universal rights.

    As an individual, I might wish the pedophile the worst of the world, but as a member of civil society, I have to fight for his human rights, even while I punish him for victimizing children. Democracy always involves hard, hard bargains. But it is preferable to the easy despotism of totalitarianism.

  • leggo
    leggo Member Posts: 3,293
    edited October 2012

    Yes, I am talking about child rapists and child pornographers when I speak of pedophiles and all those who victimize children. I can't view them as human. The punishment is never ever enough, and the death penalty is too easy for someone like that. My opinion, of course.

  • leggo
    leggo Member Posts: 3,293
    edited October 2012

    ....and from what I know of the prison system (which is very little), they get what's coming to them there...and I'm good with that....almost.

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited July 2011

    Apparently pedophiles are the lowest of the low in the prison heirarchy.

  • molly52
    molly52 Member Posts: 389
    edited July 2011

    A large percentage of pedophiles were themselves sexually abused as children.  I don't excuse the perp, but strongly feel we need much, much more in the way of help for the victims.

    There has been too much covering up going on. 

    Further, I think the perp should have to pay, pay, pay cold hard cash to reimburse for all the costs of their victim's treatment.  

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited July 2011

    Yes, even murderers can't stand them. Often, they have to be put in isolation for their protection. Funny how the honor system works - especially because many murderers may have raped and tortured their victims.

  • leggo
    leggo Member Posts: 3,293
    edited October 2012

    No amount of money would every do. I've got to check out now before I open my big fat mouth and say something inappropriate for this board. See you all tomorrow.

  • kira1234
    kira1234 Member Posts: 3,091
    edited July 2011

    Don't even get me started with these people. As someone who has been personally touched by them anything they get they deserve and more!!!!!!!!!!!

  • AnnNYC
    AnnNYC Member Posts: 4,484
    edited July 2011

    Interesting perspective on the death penalty you almost never hear -- but a very compelling one:

    I have a dear friend who survived being kidnapped and held in a shack (yes, horrible crimes continued there) somewhere in the Rockies by a psycho who called himself a "Mountain Man" in the early 1970s -- during a 10-year moratorium on the death penalty in the U.S. (it was reinstated in 1977).

    She believes he probably would have killed her if the death penalty was in effect.  She is adamantly opposed to the death penalty because she thinks it endangers crime victims -- it gives criminals more incentive to eliminate witnesses.

  • AnneW
    AnneW Member Posts: 4,050
    edited July 2011

    Well said, Athena.

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited July 2011

    Cindy .. I also am opposed to the death penalty .. for the reasons you posted.  It is a complicated situation.  I think the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment.  I would not want to be on the jury of a death penalty case.  Maybe instead of death row, those punished to die should live in solitary confinement the rest of their lives 23 hours a day.  That would be a horrific punishment in the long term.

    Bren

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited July 2011

    I believe that retribution is one part of justice. It has its place. I have never thought that the death penalty is an effective deterrent. The reasons to impose it, for me, are moral, and strongly retributive. For monstrous crimes, a society needs that. Retribution should never be the cornerstone of justice nor the chief motivator for any punishment, but it is part of our system just as it's part of most major religions. Retribution, if properly seen, can be a form of cleansing and closure. As long as it never becomes the driving force in our system, it is healthy in a small dose.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited July 2011

    An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited July 2011

    Couldn't agree more, Blue.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited July 2011

    More like an eye for an eyebrow.

    As a counterpart to what I have just said, I was very, very proud, as an American, of the fact that after we captured Osama Bin Laden we gave him a proper Muslim burial. We finally did what Bush and Cheney seemed unable to even comprehend we needed to do in order to remain great as a nation: we differentiated ourselves from a terrorist and displayed magnanimity -even in victory. Again, retribution is a small piece. Magnanimity and compassion play stronger roles.

  • 3monstmama
    3monstmama Member Posts: 1,447
    edited July 2011

    As far as judicial "stuff" today I am more concerned about this afternoon's planned execution of a Mexican National by the State of Texas.  The defendant was not aprised of  his right to speak to a representative of his consulate.  Doesn't seem like a big deal does it?  And yet, if you or your loved ones travel outside the country, it is a VERY big deal.  If the US doesn't have to tell foreign nationals they have the right to speak to their consulate and make necessary arrangements, why does any other country who might arrest me (and consider, in some places the arrest could be for something innocuous) have to provide me the opportunity to speak to the US Consulate or tell the Consulate that they have arrested me?

    Last night we introduced the monsters to tragedy in the form of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet.  We took the easy route and watched the modern "Romeo + Juliet" with Leonardo DeCapri.  One thing about that version is that it really slams home the idea that it was a mere miss that left Romeo not knowing the Friar's plan with the faked death.   As it turns out, the monsters do NOT like tragedy.  Middle monster is quite disappointed in me for picking a movie that ends so sadly.  She says she will never trust my movie picking skills again . . . .

  • lassie11
    lassie11 Member Posts: 1,500
    edited July 2011

    One of the questions to ask:  what is the purpose of prison?

    Is it to exact some revenge? is it to rehabilitate the person so that they will commit no further crimes? Is it to remove the person from open society? Is it to make money for the privatized prison system?

    Certainly there are strong arguments to be made to show that capital punishment (murder by the state) makes no difference to crime rates. Otherwise, why does the US with its very high rate of capital punishment have more people in prison than most other countries?

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/world/americas/23iht-23prison.12253738.html

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited July 2011

    Interesting article Lassie .. a point was made that in the U.S. judges are elected, and thus the pressure for strong law and order enforcement.  The statistics of people in prison within the U.S. by state was interesting too.  Louisiana had the most per capita and Minnesota the least.  Texas led with the death penalty cases.

    A point was also made that our crime rates are about the same as Canada's, but our prison sentences are much longer.  So it appears longer sentencing doesn't deter crime in the U.S.

    The article also made a point of how easily accessible guns are in this country, as opposed to say Great Britain.  And there are far fewer violent murders in GB per capita as opposed to the U.S. 

    I don't feel that the purpose of prison is rehabilitative.  I think there are lots of repeat offenders out there. 

    Sometimes I think we still live in the wild west out here.

    Bren

  • revkat
    revkat Member Posts: 763
    edited July 2011

    To follow up on a question that was asked pages ago -- yes they ask your opinion on the death penalty during jury selection for a case where the prosecution is seeking the death penalty AND if you opposed to the death penalty you are automatically removed from the juror pool. Thus, the jury for any death penalty case is comprised entirely of people who are ok with sending the defendant to death if found guilty.

    I heard one commentator on the Casey Anthony case suggest that the prosecution was seeking the death penalty in order to get a more "prosecution friendly" jury (since all of us crazy liberal anti-death penalty folks would automatically be removed from the pool), in hopes that the would eat least convict for the lesser child abuse/manslaughter type charges.

    Ah the criminal justice system/prison system -- add that to the health care system, immigration, campaign finance, l'm sure I can add more -- as things that are totally broken in the US. 

  • 3monstmama
    3monstmama Member Posts: 1,447
    edited July 2011

    Prison in the US, in my humble opinion, is for vengence.  We don't really want to make anyone better, we want to get even.  I agree with BinVa---it is the Wild Wild West.

    revkat is correct about polling potential jurors about how they feel about the death penalty.  I believe the question is typically phrased related to would you uphold the law.  and yes, in theory you can end up with a panel that all is okay with the death penalty.  Of course, on more than one occassion, people who are strongly opposed to the death penalty have gotten on juries by evading the question.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2011

    wow, revkat, you must have been reading my mind when you wrote the above last paragraph ;(  I find it such a frightening time.

    Didn't know that about the question being asked of juror's re: death penalty.  As for prison, the best reason I can think of for rehabilitation, besides being humane, is that person will probably be back in "society" some day...

  • Alpal
    Alpal Member Posts: 1,785
    edited July 2011

    Back to books - as much as I love court room drama and mystery, I haven't been a John Grisham fan for a long time. However, his latest, The Confession, is about the very subject we're discussing. It really affected me and made me think. Good read, but disturbing.

  • BarbaraA
    BarbaraA Member Posts: 7,378
    edited July 2011

    Other authors I like are Jonathan Kellerman, Iris Johanson (although I think her quality has been going downhill), PD James, John Connolly and Michael Connolly. John Connoly has a series with a protagonist I love, Charlie Parker.

    For non-fiction I recently read Pink Ribbon Blues and Overdiagnosed. Both are excellent.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited July 2011

    Barbara: So you liked Pink Ribbon Blues....I have heard good things about it.

  • BarbaraA
    BarbaraA Member Posts: 7,378
    edited July 2011

    It is a very realistic view of all things pink. Highly recommend it.

  • revkat
    revkat Member Posts: 763
    edited July 2011

    During chemo I would go to the library a day or two before treatment and stock up on mindless mysteries. It took about a dozen to get me through the worst days following TC. On time girl checking me out commented "this should last you for a while", and I thought, "If only you knew, I'm just hoping this will last me the 5 days until I have enough strenght to walk across the parking lot here to get some more!" Continuous reading go me through the "run over by a truck" phase.

  • jancie
    jancie Member Posts: 2,631
    edited July 2011

    Just checking in - I won't be around Friday or Saturday.  Tomorrow I have to clean a house, then get my horse ready for the show on Saturday.  I will come in flopping exhausted Saturday evening so Sunday morning I hope to sleep in.  Hope to check in with ya'll Sunday afternoon sometime.

  • jancie
    jancie Member Posts: 2,631
    edited July 2011

    Revkat - I have always been an avid reader but I could not read during chemo or for 6 months afterwards.  I would start a book - get through a couple of chapters and find myself reading from the start again because I had no memory nor could I concentrate.  So instead I became a trash TV queen because it didn't matter if I remembered the stories or not.

  • DiDel
    DiDel Member Posts: 1,329
    edited July 2011

    Jancie like you I love reading the James Patterson books..I especially love the Alex Cross series.

    I also am sickened by the Casey Anthony verdict. There was also lots of stuff that was not admissable that the jury never saw or heard. I believe she is a sociopath and killed her daughter accidentally or intentionally..still murder. I like how she was all dolled up today in court with her hair done makeup on all giggles..I think she is just not right. Athena you should have given the closing.

Categories