Coban 2 layer compression system

Options
KS1
KS1 Member Posts: 632
edited June 2014 in Lymphedema
I got a google alert about Coban 2 layer compression system.  Has anyone used it (or even heard) about it? It sounds pretty cool. - KS1

Here's a snippet from their website:

"3M Skin and Wound Care now introduces to Canada the CobanTM 2 Compression System for Lymphedema, a two-layer compression therapy designed to deliver sustained therapeutic compression to improve comfort, mobility and quality of life for patients.

It is a disposable single-use system that is cost-effective and eliminates the time and expense of washing and re-rolling bandages while minimizing the risk associated with potential contamination. Additionally, new application techniques make wrapping sessions less taxing for clinicians and patients. The materials used in the two thin layers of the system are safe for skin and were developed with unique stretch and cohesion properties to provand when you have a minute, ide ideal compression and help patients overcome the challenges of wearing bandages during lymphedema intensive therapy."

If you go to the website given below, there's a link to a long brochure.

http://www.3m.com/intl/ca/english/market/health/Coban/features.html

Comments

  • Binney4
    Binney4 Member Posts: 8,609
    edited June 2011

    KS, thank you! I have heard about this product but never seen it. I couldn't imagine how it could be cost-effective, since our short-stretch bandages are re-usable for long periods of time and this is a one-time wrap. But their claim on the website is that because it can be left on for four days at a time you only need to see the therapist twice a week, and that saves on the therapy costs. So no wonder 3M, which is a US company, is starting in Canada -- here most insurance won't pay for the wrapping supplies, but they will pay for therapy, so for US patients this would amount to a huge out-of-pocket expense.

    My other question (which wasn't answered by anything I could find on the site or in the brochure) is about the Complete Decongestive Therapy itself, which includes the therapist doing MLD daily, not twice a week. So this sort of flies in the face of the gold standard of LE treatment. The one study I noted on the site was done with 20 people and no detectable control group, so this would seem to be an unproven modality at best.

    Still,  it looks comfortable, yes?Smile

    I hope if some of our Canadian gals get to try this out they'll let us know how it works for them. Please?!

    Be well,
    Binney

  • kira66715
    kira66715 Member Posts: 4,681
    edited June 2011

    http://www.3m.com/intl/ca/english/market/health/Coban/features.html

    I think I'm getting the back story here: I heard from the head of the Vodder School, based in Canada, that there is a move to get rid of MLD--and to prove it's not effective--he shared two horrible studies with me, and he felt the attempt to discredit MLD as part of CDT was a cost saving move. 

    And it says so, right on the long brochure.

    Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not out to get you. He was worried about this. He was right.

    Neat product, but it souuld remove the MLD portion of CDT if left on for days.

    Kira

  • otter
    otter Member Posts: 6,099
    edited June 2011

    I hate Coban.  Some lab techs (phlebotomists) use it instead of a band-aid to secure a wad of cotton over a venipuncture site.  It always leaves a grid imprint in my skin, no matter where it's put.  (I don't let anybody draw blood from my at-risk side, so the imprint is occurring on my good side.)

    Plus, I hate how it feels.  It's like prickly elastic -- it adheres to itself.  No wonder it's promoted as "disposable single-use."  You can't reuse it most of the time.  Once it's stretched out enough to wrap around something and stick to itself, it's deformed permanently.  If you peel it off and try to re-wrap it, it won't wrap smoothly and won't stick anymore.

    3M makes a product identical to Coban that they call "Vetrap".  It comes in oodles of colors, which pet owners like.  (They can have their dog's paw wrapped in their favorite school's colors.)

    Ooooo...  Guess what I just found!  Vetrap even comes in hot pink!

    Surely someone will see an obvious connection there...

    Okay, I read the 3M "Coban 2-layer compression" brochure.  I understand that the product(s) used in this "system" might be different from the typical Coban/Vetrap used as an outside layer over an absorbent bandage.  I also saw that 3M is marketing this "2-layer system" for bandaging limbs etc. in people with wounds and other causes of swelling besides cancer-related LE.

    I just wonder if it really works, and is really better than short-stretch bandages.   I've worked with 3M on new product development and testing.  They will jump at the chance to develop a new market for an existing product.  Is this one of those situations?

    Color me cynical....

    otter

  • kira1234
    kira1234 Member Posts: 3,091
    edited June 2011

    OMG I hate the stuff. Never new what it was called. It is used on me all the time because of my allergies to everything.

  • kira66715
    kira66715 Member Posts: 4,681
    edited June 2011

    Otter, doesn't Coban/vet wrap contain latex?

    (And yes, my daughter was very fussy about what color we used on our horse....Since he died, I've used it when the dog hurt her dew claw.)

    What struck me about the brochure was the push that it's cost effective to wrap a patient, and only have to seem them twice a week....

    Add me to the cynical list, and I don't have your wealth of experience.

    Kira

  • KS1
    KS1 Member Posts: 632
    edited June 2011

    You all are absolutely right - it's a case of cost-shifting.  I'm embarrassed  I didn't catch the every 4 days means fewer therapy session.  (I was too busy thinking about the infrequent showers.)

    I hate hate hate insurance right now.  I've known for a while that my health insurance premium was probably going to quadruple.  Today I learned that, absent a miracle, my insurance is going to provide 0% coverage for out of network.  All of the 9 cancer and non-cancer specialists I see and the three hospitals I go to are out of network.  No grandfathering. The one exception is they are making is that, if you are being treated for CA, they will allow you to continue to see your out-of-network doc for 1 year from the initial cancer diagnosis.  'Cause everyone knows cancer is all better in a year.  KS1  

  • otter
    otter Member Posts: 6,099
    edited June 2011

    kira, I didn't know whether Coban contained latex or not, so I checked.  Turns out, the regular Coban is made out of rubber.  I found a 3M Material Safety Data Sheet on line that said Coban is 98% natural rubber. (It's a pdf file so I can't provide a link.)  One vendor warned that the "rubber latex" in Coban "may cause allergic reactions in some individuals":  Conney Safety Products - 3M Coban

    OTOH, there is a latex-free version of Coban ( = 3M Coban LF):  http://www.shop3m.com/3m-self-adherent-wraps.html  According to the 3M website, the "Coban 2-layer compression system" uses the latex-free Coban:  http://www.3m.com/product/information/Coban-Compression-System.html .

    otter

  • Nordy
    Nordy Member Posts: 2,106
    edited June 2011

    Okay... okay... I am going to tell you this about Coban... LMAO... You all know that I will try anything, right? So... about 5 years ago I tried wrapping my entire arm with Coban. I thought maybe I would see if it was any different than the short stretch bandages - maybe it would be better?! Well, it certainly was different. It was so uncomfortable, I ended up ripping it off during the night. One thing I will give to Coban is I do like to use it on my fingers. I have got the wrapping of it down to a science - because it is super easy to wrap too tight with Coban. I am able to use the Coban wrap on my fingers for about a month before I have to toss it and start with a new one. For me, this is more cost effective than buying the Elastomull - which always seems to shred and unravel long before its time. I would like to try the finger wraps that are washable... now if I could just remember what website I saw them on!!!

    In the end - having to buy Coban twice a week is not cost effective. The fact that it is SO easy to wrap too tightly with it is a big red flag. And the fact that they are trying to do away with CDT is absolute insanity. CDT is the best way to help the body learn to reroute lymph fluid to other node beds for drainage. Good heavens... anything to make a buck... anything to save a buck... and they obviously don't care who suffers for it. Frown

  • sisterinspirit
    sisterinspirit Member Posts: 204
    edited June 2011

    When I saw my therapist in May, she had just gotten back from a meeting of LE therapists.  She indicated that there is a movement to discredit portions of CDT, such as the MLD portion.  So perhaps 3M is trying to play that angle in their marketing efforts.

  • Marple
    Marple Member Posts: 19,143
    edited October 2011

    Bump.

    I wondered if anyone has any updates on Coban 2. 

  • cjain
    cjain Member Posts: 15
    edited November 2011

    My plastic surgeon gave me coban when he saw how awful my hand looked wrapped with the white finger wraps.  It was a miracle product for me.  Three months of PT could not pull down the swelling in my hand (although the arm swelling was reduced).  It got so bad that when my glove finally came in, it was too small.  Because Coban allows for greater compression of the fingers and back of the hand, it successfully reduced the swelling almost overnight.  I can now fit into the original glove.  I would NOT want anyone else to wrap me because of the touriquet effect it can have when wrapped too tightly.  I did like that I could unwrap my hand to take a shower then rewrap with the same bandages.  However, I would not wear more than 2 days in a row.  The bandages just get dirty.  I would imagine it would be uncomfortable to use as an arm wrap. 

     I hope people can keep an open mind because although this isn't the answer for everyone, it might be for some.  Lymphodema sucks.  I found it more depressing than the BC because I thought I was almost through this battle once chemo was finished.  I wanted to go back to work with a great looking wig, new boobs and no outward signs of the illness. The best laid plans .... The magic of coban was that it lifted my spirits when I really needed some lifting.

  • kira66715
    kira66715 Member Posts: 4,681
    edited November 2011

    cjain: that's great that the coban worked for your hand--I have hand swelling, and it's tough.

    There's a new product by coban: coban 2 that is being marketed as an alternative to short stretch bandages--in the US they market it for leg ulcers, in Canada for lymphedema. It's expensive and the claim is that it's cost effective--can be left in place for many days.

    http://www.amazon.com/3M-Coban-Layer-Compression-System/dp/B001QF63FE

    The old fashioned coban has been recommended for hand/finger swelling, but exactly as you said, with caution, because it's a lot of compression.

    Yep, lymphedema stinks, but it's great you got it under control.

    Kira

  • cjain
    cjain Member Posts: 15
    edited November 2011

    Thanks for the link.  I'm surprised at how expensive it is.  Seems all they have to do is label something for medical use and the cost skyrockets.  But if it's a solution that works, that's great. 

Categories