complementary vs. alternative?
Comments
-
Hi all,
Just want to point out also that Kat is ER-/PR-, a group for which chemo has shown to be most effective. Also, she is 32 years old (she wrote in a post somewhere.) Chemo is also more effective for the pre-menopausal crowd.
Out of a large pool of early-stage ER-poor women under 50 (including node positive and node negative), 25 percent who had chemo recurred within 5 years, compared to 39 percent who did not have chemo. (Data from metaanalysis by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Group, published in the Lancet. Link here:
http://www.ctc.usyd.edu.au/cochrane/publications/EBCTCGpaper.pdf
Kat, as to your question about skipping surgery...in my opinion, it's not a good idea. You'd be leaving the tumor in there to potentially seed distant metastases which could kill you....and even if it never metastasized, it would continue to grow and eventually break through your skin to cause bleeding/infection/horrible smells/even death -- and you would certainly lose your breast then.
Overall, the best line of defense against breast cancer seems to be hitting it hard as early as possible with the tools we *know* are effective...at least for some people. It's impossible to know specifically who the treatments will work for, and who not.
I might be wrong, but I think that if you chose to skip the treatments that have proven effective (surgery/chemo, etc.) and your cancer progressed and became terminal, you would probably regret not doing what might have saved your life. You have the chance right now to beat cancer, I hope that you -- and all of us -- do so!
-
KK, u have just been diagnosed here by ms. thenewme who does not have the credentials to do so and is using the same scare tactics she accuses others of doing. i personally choose to ignore her
-
kks_rd, one more comment and then I'll shut up.
In my experience, the people who held the strongest opinions of what I *should* do were the ones who never had a cancer Dx. All the women I know who are long-time BC survivors (10 yr, 15++ yrs) or who knew a lot of BC survivors (women who volunteered at our local BC support center), always framed their statements with phrase like "it varies for different women" or "this is what it was like for me." So if someone is suggesting you only do alt treatments and not even consider traditional treatment, that may be a big red flag. Tangentially, when my hubby is faced with a decision with a lot of unknowns (i.e. investing in a volatile stock market) he asks, "What choice can I make so I won't feel stupid a year from now?"
Obviously we all want the best possible outcome, but our decisions have so many unknowns that it makes them a bit of gamble. We each get to make our own decisions of what's best for us, based on all the info that's available right now. My BC counselor said the ideal goal is to make decisions so we have no regrets, regardless of the outcome. If I choose one option (in my case, no chemo) and then it turns out my guess was wrong (a mets occurs) how will I feel? Good luck! If it's any help, one volunteer told me that this info-gathering and decision making process was the most emotionally difficult part of the process for her. Once she started treatment, things calmed emotionally. That's been the same for me.
-
edited out by evebarry
como-neu dcis...multifocal...2011 mucinious stage 1 cancer. Es & Pr 3 +++
Diagnosis: 1/7/2011, IDC, Stage I, Grade 1, ER+/PR+ -
No one can *get* chemo unless it's offered by their doctor. So it doesn't much matter what we recommend...
But with Kat's stats, if they are correct (the size, receptor status, and age), she will be offered chemo...if her doctor follows the standard of care.
Evebarry, you say that "usually early stage cancers don't require chemo." Actually, many do. Those that have particular 'poor prognosis' features, like young age, larger tumor size, HER2 positive, LVI, ER/PR negative, etc....are offered chemo.
P.S. Don't let "poor prognosis" scare anyone, it just means that about 10 to 20 percent or more will have a recurrence....it does not mean that everyone is doomed!
-
Sorry to interject here, but I don't get why thenewme is getting the remarks to her comments that she is??? From what I gather, she's just trying to be helpful and saying Ask Questions and Get Opinions, as many as you like, and to really look at evidence based studies from reputable sources. I'm really not clear what is wrong with that? It may not be everyone's style, and by no means does anyone have to agree with her, but it's just getting a little harsh around here and I find it so awkward. Everyone is here looking for help or offering it and while I love reading studies and research, I also enjoy the personal stories that are shared as they offer a more personal insight into how we are doing with certain treatments etc. I also realize we are all different and I make my own decisions based on a lot of different sources. Yes, people are pro and anti chemo, but in the end, they have to make the choice and I think it's great to hear all sides and bring up as many questions as you can with your healthcare team so you are, in the end, comfortable with your decision.
Again, sorry for butting in, hope I'm making sense.
KK, I'm sorry to hear about your MRI and situation. I hope you find some help here to get you on your way, whatever you may choose.
-
Sherbear,
To me, based on my time on BCO, it feels like the nasty, totally unsolicited comments being made to thenewme by Luan et al are so creepily similar to others made before. Thanks for interjecting an objective comments.
Frankly, these really creepy people on BCO who scream troll and are nasty all the time take so much away from this site. These creeps are why I don't come here that often anymore. I can't imagine if I had any personal information here..as we've seen, they use it to their own advantage and personal agendas. Really a shame to ruin a whole site, but I guess it makes them feel more powerful? Who knows...
-
Hi Kat,
First of all, I am sorry that you were one of the unlucky lottery winners. The truth is that while doing everything right can reduce one's chances of getting BC, it doesn't mean that we won't. So my first counsel would be not to even waste time trying to figure out "why". Other than being BRCA positive.
To answer what I think is your question. My own view is that while things like arthritis, Type 2 diabetes, high cholesterol and other illnesses can often be helped by alternative therapies (good diet and get moving), cancer is a different animal. It isn't the result of a metabolic disorder exacerbated by the wrong lifestyle choices, but because cells are running amok, and hell bent on taking over.
So they need to be stopped. My own view is that you go for the most appropriate treatment possible, and sooner as opposed to later. I would have loved to have been early Stage I and not needed treatment. I wasn't and gratefully did everytthing offered. That is what oncologists are here. Yes, you need to put the "cancer factory" out of business.
Your specific questions:
As mentioned previously, being healthy doesn't prevent BC. I will add though that it makes us better able to withstand treatment. This is important. So does healthy food and as much exercise as you are capable of doing. This gets at the "complementary" piece. Another word is "integrative medicine". Worth reading up on.
"Since my dx I have had several people tell me I should postpone any traditional medicine approaches until I have exhausted all alternative therapies first." My own take is that you need to go the traditional route, and you are right about not wanting to waste time. One of the surprises to me was well-meaning people who had "advice" that could have killed me, had I followed it.
"So I'm wondering what alternative therapies DO work? Is it possible to embrace a totally alternative approach and actually RID myself of the cancer and also achieve the goal of having thiis hell never visit my life again?" No guarantees either way. And none either even if you didn't have BC. But this is a game of odds. You need to discuss these when you meet with your oncologist. You want the odds to be in your favor, and to understand how each recommended therapy impacts them.
"I totally embrace nutrition, physical activity, peaceful living, meditation, avoiding toxins and plastics, massage etc. etc. and will include them into my life more than ever now (for example - I am embracing every meal is an opportunity to kick cancer's ass!)... but can this alone take the place of surgery? Can this take the place of rads or chemo? Or does it just work along with the more traditional approaches?" The last statement applies.
This table is from MD Anderson showing how treatment has improved survival over the past 60 years. Note that the overall survival stats reflect the patients they treat, and do not reflect all patients nationwide.
Sorry, you need to scroll down for the table, but it shows 10 year survival for Local Disease improving from 55% to 86% due to advances in treatment. - Claire
YearsPercent survival at 10 years (number of patients) Local DiseaseRegional DiseaseDistant DiseaseOverall* 1944-5455.0% (120)16.2% (191) 3.3% (92)25.1% (410) 1955-6456.0% (462)23.9% (656) 4.0% (306)30.5% (1,449) 1965-7459.3% (440)28.8% (566) 4.7% (321)34.6% (1,387) 1975-8472.0% (701)46.9% (828) 7.4% (367)49.3% (1,983) 1985-9478.5% (1,036)57.4% (1,268)11.2% (364)61.6% (2,927) 1995-0486.1% (1,898)74.1% (1,569)22.2% (455)76.5% (4,653) *Also includes patients with in situ or unknown stages of the disease
-
I give up on trying to paste the link and edit the prior post. Here is another try to provide the MD Anderson link. - Claire
-
patzee, your post makes such an excellent point about similarities yet differences between each of our dx's. At first glance, you and I do appear to have a similar dx. But I also had multicentric disease (a total of 4 lesions) that were multiple types of bc (LCIS, ILC, DCIS, IDC and a tiny spot of tubular). I also had a close margin after my mast, and a very funky positive node. So if I were to put too much stock in what tx you did (or vice versa), whether conventional, alternatives or somewhere inbetween, it might not be what's best for either of us -- not to mention age, family genetics, menopausal status, etc. That's why I think it's so important to choose a medical team that's dedicated to treating breast cancer and sees enough of the variations and oddities to help us make wise tx choices.
And just BTW, I think thenewme is one of the few women here who actually is TN, as Kat may be (although I'm not sure if Kat knows her Her2 status yet). I think that makes her eminently qualified (more than most of us) to weigh in here. I also think she's extremely well-read, especially from her TN perspective.
Claire, I love your new avatar! Ski season must be over! (((Hugs))) to all, and let's please keep this thread respectful. As Sherbear and Digger said, the other stuff embarrasses us all and does nothing to further the BCO community. Deanna
-
Thanks on the avatar Deanna. Yes, ski season is over and on to cycling. I have a wine country adventure planned for this coming weekend, including a canyon ride on Sunday and a half century on Saturday.
The shades are because I ran over my old ones giving my car Rexxie a post-season spa day at the U-Detail-It place. So off to the resale shop and of course the Chanel ones were the ones that did it.
I need to get back to what I told my client I was "working on".
Shirt is one of the ones designed by Everyminute. It was finally warm enough here to wear it last Saturday. - Claire
-
Sorry KK, I quote:
"...there are several.things that stand out to make your disease especially agressive....all point to agressive disease with a quite high recurrence risk"
I,ve been through the process 18 months now, am stage 3, and at no time did my BS, onco, radio onco ever used the language quoted above and for that i am extremely grateful. When i ask a pointed question, they admit to not knowing and are always extremely encouraging with me. I am so glad now that I did not ask for the opinion you are getting from some, as that would have really scared me. But that's me. Good luck with everything -
Claire and Deanna, thank you so much for ALL your posts to date! I don'y write much and often but read everyday and I have to say that you are both most respectful, well informed and inspirational. Claire, I am also huge biking and skiing (downhill) aficionado, so I understand your "drive".
Best to all,
Agnieszka
-
Patzee, I was just rereading your post, and I'm curious... Did you have the Oncotype-DX text? (I didn't, because back in 2008 my insurance co. didn't cover this test with a positive node.) And is your onc @ UCSF on board with your not doing chemo? And I'm guessing that you've probably also said, "No," to an A/I? Are you doing any holistic (alternative) things (anti-estrogenic diet, natural estrogen modulator, etc.) to lower your estrogen?
What concerns you about reconstruction? Obviously, it's not for everyone, but I think the vast majority of women who decide to do it are happy that they did, and the really serious problems seem few and far between -- at least that's my general impression.
When I answered earlier, I wanted to keep the focus on Kat's question, but in rereading your post, I thought maybe I'd missed some of your questions or need for input.
Agnieszka, I'm a skier too (sort of), having lived for years in Aspen, Steamboat, Vail & Park City, but now the California desert. I guess we ski gals think a bit alike. Deanna
-
I am in St. Louis so not much skiing here either but I do take anventage of any opportunities during winter months.
-
Patzee ~ The Oncotype-DX is a test that's done on a bit of the tumor that's already been removed. It looks at 20+ genetic factors and comes up with a number that indicates how much chemo will or will not benefit you. However, depending on when you had your lumpectomy, chemo may be a moot issue at this point, unless you were to have additional surgery.
It kind of sounds like you have allowed yourself to sort of slip through the cracks with UCSF, and that the choices you've made have mostly been by default or denial. Do you have a copy of your surgical pathology report? Do you know, for example, how close your margins were? Did anyone tell you that Stage IIB is very treatable, and that your odds of surviving it with appropriate tx are excellent?
On the positive side, I'm sure you had a skilled surgeon and beautifully done lumpectomy at UCSF. And the eating well and exercise are so important. But if you were my sister or friend, I would hope that you might consider getting a second opinion at this point -- just to sort of fill in what seem like information gaps in your thinking. For example, not all of us have implants. Many of us have had natural tissue reconstruction, such as Diep. And would a re-excision to get a clean margin make a big difference in your prognosis?
Just some thoughts... (((Hugs))) Deanna
-
Dear Kat and Pat,
Don't mean to burst your bubble, but I turned alternative when I was first diagnosed as Stage 1 a decade ago, and now today I'm Stage 3 with a massive tumor which has broken through the skin and covers my breast, and has just extended to my upper torso and towards my right armpit. It is ulcerating, fungating, oozes fluid like a tap and stinks horribly. In the past 2 years. my oncologists have tried hormonals and chemo but the beast keeps surfacing and growing. Meanwhile, I continued living a very healthy lifestyle (something I've done for more than a decade, which included taking complementary supplements, foods,and trying alternative therapies like the Budwig Protocol (that one made the cancer grow even faster).
I had a lumpectomy at Stage 1, nothing else. My onco then said that chemo wasn't necesaary and I refused Tamoxifen because my DH and I didn't have any kids and wanted a family. Well, the cancer recurred about a year later but I stuck to a purely alternative route. The lump stayed no larger than walniut-sized until about 3 years ago, when it started bleeding. That's when I tried the Budwig Protocol for the following 14 months. During that time, the cancer grew so much that it covered more than half my breast, was lumpy all over, turned a maroon red and bled copiously.
After putting me on just oral chemo and Tamoxifen, tmy first onco managed to reduce the growth to nothing. Normal skin even began to grow back and I could see a breast appearing again. We worked on letting the damaged area shrink and heal further before attempting surgery. Unfortunately, the cancer recurred before that could happen. Sadly, a series of errors happened which delayed treatment for almost 2 months and caused the cancer to spread considerably during that time. The biopsy was delayed for almost 2 weeks. Then the lab got the results wrong, diagnosing me as ER-/ER- and HER2+ when I was still ER+/ER+ and HER2-. Unfortunately, my onco had just quit to join another hospital, so he had no access to my report, so nobody noticed the error until a new onco was assigned to me a few weeks later.
So the cancer re-established itself firmly in my breast, and has been growing ever since. All hormonals don't seem to work for me now, and chemo only causes the tumors to retreat for a while. Surgery would only be palliative and cause me a lot of pain and suffering as a great deal of my chest, upper torso and back would have to cut out. I have been told the cancer will recur anyway, and death was very likely.
I still try to keep up with my healthy lifestyle and diet, plus some supplements. I've done practically every alternative therapy you can think of over the years, and none stopped the cancer. I've just started on a Gemzar and Carboplatin chemo cocktail. It's been two infustions so far (yesterday was the second) and the tumors have shrunk by about 15%. I'm also taking Indian frankincense (Shallaki or Boswellia Serrata) capsules and Middle-Eastern frankincense (Boswellia Carteri) essential oil mixed into my wound dressing. Both are anti-infammatory and anti-tumoral.
Pat and Kat, if I were in your shoes today and had the knowledge and experience I have had, I would seriously consider some conventional treatment, while continuing with a healthy lifestyle and diet. Don't wait until it's too late. You don't want to look the way I look today, and suffer as much as I do everyday.
chillipadi
-
Patzee, the very top bar of this page is the informational side of BCO. If you click on Symptoms & Diagnosis and then search for "Pathology Report" or "Margins," etc., you will find all sorts of helpful information.
Here's a recent research study I pulled up that should give you a better understanding about margins:
http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=121152
( I'm too tired at this hour to figure out the cm to mm conversions for yours, but maybe someone who's more of a math whiz can.)
A positive lymph node means that your invasive bc knows how to travel beyond the breast, and also that the node was doing it's job by protecting your body from an invader (the bc cells). How this and the other unique things about your dx (such as the size of your tumor) might impact any recommendations for tx are things you really need to discuss with an oncologist -- maybe even an integrative oncologist if you lean towards alternative medicine.
Hope this helps! Deanna
PS ~ Chillipadi, we were writing at the same time, but after reading your post, I just wanted to edit mine to add that I hope and pray the new chemo you're on will make a huge difference in your situation.
-
Chillipadi - Thankyou for sharing your story. I'm so sorry you are in this situation - my heart goes out to you. Hopefully your experience will knock some sense into those who are considering alternative treatment only.
Sue
-
I have really appreciated reading from all these different perspectives! Every reply gets me thinking. I did want to clarify though. It's not the case that I am seriously considering NOT doing some form of conventional treatment... in my case, it sounds to me like it would be a death sentence if I were to forego surgery at least. But I feel like I owe it to those who are urging me to exhaust all non-traditional treatments before going the traditional route to ask the question of those who have more or less been in these same shoes.
As peggy_j said:
In my experience, the people who held the strongest opinions of what I *should* do were the ones who never had a cancer Dx. All the women I know who are long-time BC survivors (10 yr, 15++ yrs) or who knew a lot of BC survivors (women who volunteered at our local BC support center), always framed their statements with phrase like "it varies for different women" or "this is what it was like for me." So if someone is suggesting you only do alt treatments and not even consider traditional treatment, that may be a big red flag.
This is essentially the situation in which I find myself. But I don't know any long-time BC survivors. I don't even really know anyone who has had BC before (although I have just been tipped off about two co-workers I could talk with). So I'm asking all of you!
Ultimately, I know I have to do whatever it takes to save my life. And, given that I work in the medical field, I am actually quite comfortrable with doctors and hospitals and all the terrminology. I'd like to think I'm smart enough to make a critical judgment of all the research and evidence out there. I am giving all options the consideration they deserve am trying to settle on what decisions make the most sense - the options I can live with, without regret. FWIW, if I had to make the decision today I would probably try chemo (to see if the tumor could be shrunk), then a lumpectomy, supporting myself all the way through with complimentary treatments. I don't have to make the decision today though, and so long as I am in the info-gathering phase I want to learn as much as I can from as many knowledgeable people as I can. Hope that all makes sense.
Thanks again to all who have responded.
-
kks - If you are triple negative as I think you are, based on your signature, I would suggest researching that type of breast cancer and look at the treatment options. My onc said I was fortunate being triple positive as there are targeted therapies to deal with the HER2 status and the hormone receptor status. There is a triple negative forum on here - go and read some of it. There is also a forum for BRCA1 people - read some of their stories. I hope you come to a decision that is right for you - all the best.
Sue
-
kks, you wrote: ".....I feel like I owe it to those who are urging me to exhaust all non-traditional treatments before going the traditional route to ask the question of those who have more or less been in these same shoes...."
I beg to (respectfully) disagree: I feel you don't owe anything to anybody but yourself. And I tend to go with Deanna when she writes this: "....Then I heard the term, "integrative medicine," @ UCLA, and it all clicked for me: I could do the conventional medicine doctors I really trusted were recommending, along with the scientifically proven CAM therapies they also believe in that would hopefully complement and help me get through the conventional stuff, as well as heal and rebuild faster. So that's what I did, and it was absolutely the right choice for me...."
Personally, I just wished I "the conventional stuff" had evolved more, and used more innovative, imaginative tactics (which is currently impossible: they have to keep on sticking with the same old, same old, same....and that's due to the huge financial interests at stake).
I further tend to deplore, like Dr. Barry Kramer, Director, NIH, that:
"......With overdiagnosis, we often end up ‘curing' cancers that didn't need to be cured in the first place," said Dr. Barry Kramer, director of the NIH Office of Disease Prevention and an expert on cancer screening......
http://www.cancer.gov/ncicancerbulletin/102009/page6 "
My point is, and has always been: the "conventional" treatments that are currently available need to be better targeted, to avoid continuing to give everybody everything: many of those substances, while helping some cancer patients, are very strong drugs, with substantial side-effects, and, for a portion of the patient population, are only able to deliver limited benefits.
A long time ago, someone posted on this board, that she opted for all of the treatments below: "..........I had 4 rounds of dose dense AC, 12 weeks of Taxol/Herceptin, and 13 additional treatments of Herceptin. My staging was "clinically" 2B or 3A. Unknown because I did neoadjuvant therapy. I also had a lumpectomy + AND, and 33 radiation treatments....."
Frankly, I wonder if this person could have fared better with a more targeted approach to her treatment. Just a thought.
-
dlb823. What were the scientifically proven CAM therapies that you did?
Thank you
-
I would also like to know more about the proven CAM therapies.
Also, just wanted to note than I am unsure of my HER status as my BS says if it's not ordered on the biopsy (and it wasn't), then he usually diagnoses it on the "whole specimen." I've been told that given my age and BRCA status, it's more likely than not that I am triple negative, but we don't know that for sure (yet).
-
kks_rd,can you ask your doc to run the test to find out if its HER-? It might be good to know. FWIW, on my biopsy sample, the path lab messed something up and had to do a "do over" (restain the slides, etc). So it's not unknown for them to deviate from the normal routine. Of course, my hubby always asks if the test results are "actionable." i.e. if you know this result today (vs. when you get the final path report), would you do anything differently. Maybe not...
When I was diagnosed I took awhile to tell people. Guess what? I already knew long-time survivors without realizing it (a former co-worker's wife was diagnosed at 31 and is cancer-free, 30 years later; one of our neighbors is around 70 and was diagnosed 15 years ago. Both caught their tumors early and did conventional treatment --both did MX; the neighbor followed up with Tami). I've gone to some cancer related services (I'm not mentally ready for an official support group yet) and even though I'm kind of shy, I've met people there. Everyone is very open and supportive. They're your tribe. I wish you had some support center near you. Here in No. California there are so many support services, it's kind of overwhelming. In terms of CAM therapies, I talked to my RO about this yesterday. (he's head of the RO dept, teaches at Stanford and is also open minded. i.e. He initiated getting CAMs at his medical center; and along with traditional medical advice, he said to eat cruciferous veggies several times a week) When I asked how would I know which CAM are proven, he said the ones they offer are the ones they've screened and have proven to have some effect. He seems particularly open to the mind-body connection ones, like healing imagery, as CAM. So maybe one place to start is to see what the cancer centers are offering, even if they aren't located near you. What does Sloan-Kettering say, for example? For some reason, I cannot paste a URL here, but if you google "stanford cancer support" you'll find a link to their list of CAM. There's also a link to Breast Cancer Connections, a well managed support place here in No. California. It sounds like you're not local but I wonder if you contact them, maybe they might know of support centers closer to you or ??? Obviously you've hit upon a topic that's of interest and concern to us all, even those of us who are ahead of you on this journey by many months and years.
-
Here's a link to UCLA's Integrative Medicine website: http://www.simmsmanncenter.ucla.edu/ If you go to Information Resources (to left), then Archives: Insights Into Cancer Videos, you will find all sorts of presentations, including a video by David Servan-Schreiber, MD, PhD. There's also really good information from Sara Hurvitz, MD (she was my oncologist) on the hx of chemotherapy for bc, along with charts & stats.
Personally, the CAM things I did and often recommend include BellaRuth Naperstak's guided imagery CDs for both surgery and chemo; healing touch massage during chemo & RT; Healing Art Classes during chemo; Andrew Weil & Ann Marie Chiasson's Self Healing With Energy Medicine CD; supplements such as B6 and Biotin to address chemo-related SEs; an indepth consultation with UCLA's integrative specialist (explained on their website; I did this post-tx) to discuss diet and fine tune the dozen or so supplements I take; significant diet changes with an emphasis on foods that heal (a la the writings of David Servan-Schreiber, Keith Block and Patrick Quillan, all integrative specialists I highly respect); and probably a few more that aren't immediately springing to mind.
I realize this is a far cry from CAM proponents who choose only things like Vitamin C infusions and Iscador, but with aggressive, multi-centric bc and some of the other things about my dx, even though I'd always been anti-pharmaceuticals, I just wasn't comfortable going that route. Deanna
-
patzee - you wrote - "So, what if someone does every conventional treatment possible but ends up with metastasis nontheless. I think I would feel pretty upset about that."
Yes you might be upset, but at least you would know that you did everything possible. We are all in that situation, but I will never regret throwing everything I could at it. I get very upset when I read about women who are Stage IV from the first diganosis because they didn't get that chance. If you end up Stage IV one day (I sincerely hope you don't), I hope you don't regret not having had chemo. You can't go back and change your decision. I always said I would never have chemo too, but when it came down to it, I would have been crazy to refuse due to the HER2 issue.
Sue
-
Patzee, take good care of yourself, treat yourself gently
Hugs, Luan -
This idea of "exhausting alternative treatments first" might work for other diseases but not for cancer. Your best shot against cancer is your first shot and if it recurs or metastasizes you will be playing catch up. Some women are fortunate and they can catch up. Most don't.
I agree with Yazmin that we need to be more targeted in our treatments. Breast cancer is further along in the individualization of treatment than other cancers, but still we over treat some women and under treat others. But your cancer is specifically the kind for which chemo is most effective. So please consider that you might be in the sweet spot for conventional treatment. And that you can supplement with complimentary approaches.
Frankly, it sounds like this wouldn't be an issue at all for you except for some buttinskis putting a bug in your ear with their theories. These people should not be putting pressure on you. especially since, I assume, they've never had cancer themselves. Stand up for yourself and decide for yourself.
The conventional treatments aren't fun but you go through them and they're over and you move on. I'm more than 6 years out from my treatment and recently ran my first marathon. you can do this.
-
Patzee, Chillipadi's post was upsetting for all of us. But would you rather live in ignorant bliss, God forbid have a recurrence, and then ask, "Why in the world didn't someone tell me this could happen?"
I strongly believe that in many situations what's going on it our minds can trump what's going on with us physically. For that reason, I would never intentionally criticize or belittle someone's alternatives-only or surgery-only approach, partly because I think the mind is such a powerful thing. If they truly believe they're cured via their tx choices, then that's something very important to recognize and respect. OTOH, when someone comes along with a kind of fatalistic outlook, but also seems to be oblivious to what could happen to them between now and then, well I think that's a different situation. So as difficult as Chillipadi's post was for all of us to read, I think it provided some information that you, Kat and others needed to have. At least I hope so... Deanna
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team