Guinea pigs, are we ?

Just found another link:

Dr. Shiv Chopra is a world renowned scientist, author and public speaker. As a former employee of Health Canada (the Canadian equivalent of the US FDA) for 35 years, he was the Senior Scientific Advisor for the regulatory assessment of food and drugs, including new vaccines. When he changed job titles from human prescription drugs to the Bureau of Veterinary Drugs, the first file that landed on his desk was Eli Lilly's application to use rBGH in Canada.

In this interview he discusses subjects covered in his most recent book, Corrupt to the Core, which chronicles his many decades fighting for scientific principles against profit-hungry corporations and ultimately against his own bosses and the Canadian government itself.

Bump

Thanks Hymil, it,s a real big and hard pill to swallow. Being stage 3, they threw everything they could at me. Onco never told me about the danger of Taxotere, i.e. permanent hair loss. One would think that with the zillions, they could do better than these archaic, toxic poisons. Anyway, i dont want to get started....

"Pharmaceutical researcher going to prison for fraud faking research for 13 years

Friday, March 18th, 2011 at 12:56 pm  

Has anyone taken his drugs or are aware they did ?

It's being called the largest research fraud in medical history. Dr. Scott Reuben, a former member of Pfizer's speakers' bureau, has agreed to plead guilty to faking dozens of research studies that were published in medical journals.

Dr. Reuben has reportedly signed a plea agreement that will require him to return 0,000 that he received from drug companies. He also faces up to a 10-year prison sentence and a 0,000 fine.

He was also fired from his job at the Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass. after an internal audit there found that Dr. Reuben had been faking research data for 13 years.
Reuben was considered a prolific and influential researcher in pain management, and his purported findings altered the way millions of patients are treated for pain during and after orthopedic surgeries but it was all a fraud some of the drugs were that of Celebrex and Lyrica that were frauds and can be actually dangerous."

http://familyfraud.com/pharmaceutical-researcher-going-to-prison-for-fraud-faking-research-for-13-years-u-may-be-taking-those-drugs.htm

http://www.naturalnews.com/028194_Scott_Reuben_research_fraud.html

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=a-medical-madoff-anesthestesiologist-faked-data

OK, GIRLS, LET'S ALL GET ON THE DR. OZ SITE

AND ASK THAT THE GOOD DOCTOR BURZYNSKI BE INTERVIEWED !!!!

http://www.doctoroz.com/plugger?tid=637

Do you know that the whole Breast Cancer Awareness Month in October was dreamed up by the company that makes Tamoxifen?  True story!  They figured it would motivate more women to get mammograms, which meant more women would get diagnosed and then more women would take Tamoxifen and they would get rich.  

Here's a link-

http://www.preventcancer.com/patients/mammography/awareness.htm

Hi girls, welcome !!!!!

Thanks for the links, am sure glad things are coming out of the closet

Joy, re stage 3, two tumors were found in same breast, first one on palpation, second one on biopsy from surgery (dirty margins), so 2 lumpectomies within three weeks ( also my sentinel had gone extra capsular = systemic. Got TAC which is brutal. I correspond with a group of ladies who have been on Taxotere and have regrowth problems, quite a few people are coming out with this. Not only women, but men with other types of cancer. My hair has come back out like a babie's you know? Very fine and sparse, It,s growing, but cannot go without a wig, snifff ((( My onco never ever warned about the permanent hair loss from the taxotere, and acts like this is real big news to him, as if .....

WOW, Kate and Joy, am speechless but will scream so loud if they tell me I have to have another mammogram.  Will insist on MRIs:

"Cancer Risks from Breast Compression
As early as 1928, physicians were warned to handle "cancerous breasts with care- for fear of accidentally disseminating cells" and spreading cancer (7). Nevertheless, mammography entails tight and often painful compression of the breast, particularly in premenopausal women. This may lead to distant and lethal spread of malignant cells by rupturing small blood vessels in or around small, as yet undetected breast cancers (8)."

Using MRI for diagnosis could help prevent breast cancer progression

http://www.medicexchange.com/MRI/using-mri-for-diagnosis-could-help-prevent-breast-cancer-progression.html

MRI detects cancers missed by mammography in breast cancer patients

http://www.medicexchange.com/MRI/mri-detects-cancers-missed-by-mammography-in-breast-cancer-patients.html

Screening MRI allows detection of more breast cancers in high-risk women

http://www.medicexchange.com/MRI/screening-mri-allows-detection-of-more-breast-cancers-in-high-risk-women.html

MRI Superior in Detecting Early Cancer in High-Risk Women

http://www.medicexchange.com/MRI/mri-superior-in-detecting-early-cancer-in-high-risk-women.html

Mammograms' Value in Cancer Fight at Issue

"In the new study, mammograms, combined with modern treatment, reduced the death rate by 10 percent, but the study data indicated that the effect of mammograms alone could be as low as 2 percent or even zero. A 10 percent reduction would mean that if 1,000 50-year-old women were screened over a decade, 996 women rather than 995.6 would not die from the cancer - an effect so tiny it may have occurred by chance"

http://www.medicexchange.com/Mammography/mammograms-value-in-cancer-fight-at-issue.html