I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange

Options
11171181201221231828

Comments

  • Alpal
    Alpal Member Posts: 1,785
    edited February 2011

    Erica - why do you have such a problem with teachers?

  • Claire82
    Claire82 Member Posts: 684
    edited February 2011

    she was one once...

    something happened...

    just put on ignore

  • konakat
    konakat Member Posts: 6,085
    edited February 2011

    It's so refreshing seeing teenagers with a social conscious and supporting their teachers.  All too often you hear of kids and teachers carrying guns and being little terrors.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited February 2011

    She does seem to rag on teachers a lot.  My brother is a teacher and I worked with teachers for 16 years and I can tell you, regardless of the benefits, I wouldn't want that job for all the tea in China.  A thankless job as noted by some of the posts here.  Teachers deserve a medal of honour!

  • Alpal
    Alpal Member Posts: 1,785
    edited February 2011

    Shirley, surely you're not anti teacher, too. Or are you just anti union? Isn't your SIL a teacher?

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited February 2011

    Yeah, I'm one of those hated Government employees, who thanks to our union, is being taken care of now that I am unable to work.  Bad bad unions.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2011

    Union Boss John Gage Calls Those Who Believe in Cutting Spending "Mentally Retarded"

    On February 8th members of the American Federation of Government Employees picketed outside the Capitol demanding more taxpayer dollars for their already bloated salary and benefits. We caught up with AFGE President John Gage who told us those who say federal pay should be cut are "mentally retarded".

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yr54UdXPpsA 

    These workers should be happy they have jobs! The greed of the woman in this video is disgusting. Private sector employees are taking pay cuts.

  • ananda8
    ananda8 Member Posts: 2,755
    edited February 2011

    I was a Federal employee.  I paid for my health care and my retirement plan.  All Federal employees including Senators and Congressmen do.

    BarbaraA,

    That's an interesting list of the largest earmarks.  The Senate numbers are more indicative because they represent the amount requested by one Senator, where the House numbers can represent a group of congressmen.

    I wish the article gave more information on what the earmark was for.  One of the earmarks McCain objected to during the 2008 election was for study of the life cycle of the white fly.  He made a big deal over what a waste it was.  It turned out that the white fly is a major agricultural pest and the farmers and orchard growers were none too happy that McCain bad mouthed the research.

    Some earmarks are a waste of money but many are not.  We need to educate ourselves on which is which and not just fall for sound bites and jingoism.  Here is an interesting article on the history of earmarks.  It appears that the first earmark was to provide funds to establish our nation's capital.

    http://www.congress.org/news/2010/11/23/an_earmark_by_any_other_name

    "The conversation also reveals a gradation of opinion on earmarks that is far more nuanced than the public posturing - and not at all simply pro and con.

    Breaking down the comments suggests at least five rough schools of thought:

    • Earmark pragmatists, who see them as necessary for members of Congress to do (and keep) their jobs.
    • Earmark originalists, who see them as a solemn duty under the Constitution.
    • Earmark purists, against them on principle, either because they waste money or because they invite corruption.
    • Earmark symbolists, who oppose them for symbolic reasons only or because they've been browbeaten.
    • Earmark asterisks, who oppose them, except, of course, the ones they don't oppose.

    "Advocating for transportation projects for one's district in my mind does not equate to an earmark," Minnesota Republican and tea party favorite Rep. Michele Bachmann told the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. "I don't believe that building roads and bridges and interchanges should be considered an earmark."

  • River_Rat
    River_Rat Member Posts: 1,724
    edited February 2011

    I ran into this looking around at one of Notself's links and found it very interesting -

    Federal Taxes Paid vs. Federal Spending Received by State, 1981-2005

    http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/22685.html

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited February 2011

    I confess that I prefer to wait and see what Paul Krugman says about the budget before I rweach a conclusion. A part of me says that Obama's cuts were politically savvy moves to steal the narrative from the GOP......

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited February 2011

    .....ansd that the cut in home heating assistance was cynically parlayed in public to stop accusations that Obama is a socialist.....

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited February 2011

    ....the question is, when will Washington realize that political posturing is destroying the country? Then I wonder whether Obama merely crafted a budget the way we all do: with some painful sacrifices but well placed investments that promise a return in the country's future. This would be a wise man's budget..

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited February 2011

    The truth probably lies NOT Somewhere in between, but squarely in both camps at the same time. Excuse the disjointed multi-posting. My phone's connection times out very quickly.

  • lewing
    lewing Member Posts: 1,288
    edited February 2011

    There's no better - or more politically astute - football team than the Green Bay Packers:

    http://wtaq.com/news/articles/2011/feb/15/green-bay-packers-players-join-unions-rejecting-go/#

    I am now officially a cheesehead. 

    L

  • ananda8
    ananda8 Member Posts: 2,755
    edited February 2011

    I can't find the article, but I think I read that the home heating bill was originally based on oil being over $100 per barrel.  Since oil is now at around $85 per barrel, perhaps the cut is not so steep as it looks.  I also agree that a political component(s) could also be involved.

    Political posturing will always be with us and it is up to us as voters to find out as many facts as we can.  I am always surprised at the shear number of people that have their opinions spoon fed to them by pundits rather than doing the most simple and basic research for themselves.  There used to be an excuse when one had to rely on newspapers but with the Internet fact check sites, that excuse is fading fast.

    River_Rat,

    Thanks for the link.  I was surprise to find that California is actually paying more in taxes than it receives in federal spending.  It appears that the East and West coasts are supporting the rest of the nation.  Perhaps the way to balance the budget is to pass a law that States can only get as much federal spending as they pay in taxes.  My State would be in real trouble.  Surprised

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited February 2011

    Linda .. gotta love those Packers!

    Bren

  • revkat
    revkat Member Posts: 763
    edited February 2011

    If you look closely at those taxes-out-federal-spending-in charts you will discover the most interesting correlation. States that tend to send more money to the feds than they get back in federal spending tend to vote Democratic rather than Republican. Could be cause we're suckers, could be cause we're socialists and happy to do our part, could be cause these states tend to have strong, diverse economies with lots of well educated workers. And the well educated tend to vote Democratic.

    (Please note the use of "tend". These are correlations not causal statments!) 

  • 3monstmama
    3monstmama Member Posts: 1,447
    edited February 2011

    Federal employees pay for their health insurance --government pays for part and individual pays for part based on what plan you pick.  If you joined government after 1984 or so, you pay into a retirement plan.  The government pays 1% regardless of whether you contribute but good luck retiring on that.The government matches up to the first 3% or so but basically if you don't pay into retirement, you may be unhappily surprised by your retirement income.

    Don't know about all states but as a teacher, my mother paid into retirement plans  in both states where she worked--it was not free.  And neither state provided sufficient retirement for anyone to actually retire---she had IRAs and did private saving for retirement.  That said, don't we as a society think that the work performed by teachers is important enough that they should get a decent retirement?  I mean if the children in society are not educated, exactly who is going to perform the work and keep society going when we are all old and gray and hoping not to be mugged at a bus stop.

    I'm about to go on vacation and won't be around for a bit.  That--in combination with the very lovely cognac I've been drinking--will be the excuse for the rest of this post.

    Federal Taxes. I file the very easiest of easy tax forms.  We don't itemize.  We don't own a house. We have no deductions other than the standard and the ones per dependant.  My tax debt is significantly less than 10g--we are getting a nice refund because I am a tax coward and always prefer to pay more and get a refund than have to write a check.

    I am scratching my head--as I do every year-- trying to figure out how the tiny amount paid by our family of five can cover the benefits our family receives as citizens.  How can the tiny amount I am paying cover roads?  protection of the borders? military?  education?  parks?  protecting the air we breathe? negotiating with foreign governments?  I know what stuff costs---our landlord just paid nearly $1000 for a new fridge.  Not a high end fridge, just a basic thing from Sears.  But it was nearly a grand. 

    In a universe where a simple fridge costs a grand, how does the money I personally pay in federal taxes cover squat?  When I look at what we pay--and what we receive as citizens of the US---   I can't help but think that many of my fellow citizens have some issues with wanting stuff and services but not wanting to pay.

  • ananda8
    ananda8 Member Posts: 2,755
    edited February 2011

    If we can find the money to support two wars, then we should find the money to care for our injured veterans.

    VA BUDGET PROPOSAL A STARTING POINT

      

    WASHINGTON (February 15, 2011) - The national commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the U.S. is appreciative of the funding increase President Obama proposed Monday for the Department of Veterans Affairs, but he has some serious concerns about proposed reductions in programs ranging from construction and infrastructure to medical and prosthetic research.

    "The VFW appreciates the proposed increase because it recognizes that the proper care and treatment of wounded and disabled veterans are ongoing costs of war," said Richard L. Eubank, who leads the 2.1 million-member VFW and its Auxiliaries. "Our concern, however, is that the total discretionary request of almost $62 billion is just not enough for VA to improve all the programs and services on their watch."

    The proposed VA budget for fiscal year 2012 is $132.2 billion, of which $70.3 billion is for mandatory benefits such as disability compensation and pension. The remaining $61.9 billion is discretionary funding, primarily for the Veterans Health Administration, which represents about a 10-percent increase over FY 2010 funding, but just 3 percent more than the proposed but never passed FY 2011 budget.

    In contrast, the Independent Budget recommends $65.3 billion, or 14.4 percent above 2010 levels and 8 percent about 2011. The VFW coauthors the Independent Budget - now in its 25th year - with AMVETs, Disabled American Veterans and Paralyzed Veterans of America.

    The VFW national commander said there are budget highlights, such as proposed funding increases for medical services and support for women veterans and those veterans with psychological and cognitive health needs, as well as expanded caregiver benefits and veteran homelessness programs. But he also said there are funding reductions, most notably in construction, infrastructure, Information Technology, and medical and prosthetic research that can only be considered short-term savings.

    "The average 60-year-old VA medical facility is not going to improve with age, military medical records will never get digitized for seamless transition initiatives, and new prevention and treatments will go undiscovered unless the VA leads the way," said Eubank, a retired Marine and Vietnam combat veteran from Eugene, Ore.

    "The VA has great plans to better care for women veterans and those suffering from Traumatic Brain Injuries and other traumas, but it takes funding, an infrastructure, and a commitment by a nation that creates veterans to fulfill its sacred obligation to care for them when they return home wounded and disabled,"

    "With the President's budget submitted, the VFW now has a starting point to work with the Administration and Congress to ensure that promise is kept," he said.

    The FY 2012 Independent Budget is available online at http://www.independentbudget.org/.

  • kadeeb
    kadeeb Member Posts: 305
    edited February 2011

    Notself,

    Now if the east and west coast are supporting the rest of the country with federal taxes and they vote Democratic, (and by the way they also have the most votes in congress) then is it the Democrat's fault that the east and west pay so much more and get less? Just saying..................

  • BarbaraA
    BarbaraA Member Posts: 7,378
    edited February 2011

    Dave update - He failed the swallow test so he had an NG tube put back in. He is starving but due to swelling  around his trachea (from the infection and also the ventilator) he can't swallow well yet. He is also going stir crazy. Plus he seems loopy. The nurse yesterday asked if he was mentally challenged. Well, he is way smarter than I am so I told her that. Maybe it is the cumulative effects of the sedation. Maybe it is aphasia from being on the ventilator for so long. Fingers crossed. I really don't need another brother incapable of taking care of himself. Geez, that sounds so selfish. I guess I am just exhausted from all this running around. Thanks all for asking

    RiverRat, interesting link. FL usually votes red but surprises everyone from time to time and we are in the black as far as $ collected vs. paid.

  • kadeeb
    kadeeb Member Posts: 305
    edited February 2011

    BarbaraA,

    Had an aunt who was on the loopy boat for a while after hip surgery. Could be many things but hopefully will begin clearing up if they can get the meds regulated. We do what we have to do but it can sometimes sound selfish. It's not, it's normal. Hang in there! 

  • rosemary-b
    rosemary-b Member Posts: 2,006
    edited February 2011

    I am an idiot when it comes to links so I am cutting and pasting. I hope this is not tooo long. The sale of GM stock was in November. If more was sold now , the price woulld go way down and that would not be good for taxpayers. Also, financial institutions got government help with no government ownership and their bonuses are  much higher, as is their pay. GM has done a good job its workers made sacrifices.  Can we say the same about bankers?

    New York Times

    Updated: Jan. 5, 2011

    Overview

    For most of the 20th century, General Motors was the biggest company in the most important industry in the world. It not only led in automotive innovations, but helped define the new breed of massive, bureaucratic multinational corporations that shaped the post-war economy. It was the world’s largest car maker from 1931 to 2008, when it was surpassed by Toyota.

    By the time it lost that distinction, such figures were the least of its worries — in the fall of 2008, despite two years of steep cutbacks, G.M. found itself on the brink, reduced to begging the federal government for the cash it needed to stay afloat. That December it received $9 billion in federal aid at the order of President George W. Bush. In March 2009, President Obama forced out G.M.'s chief executive, Rick Wagoner, rejected the company's restructuring plan and forced it into bankruptcy court after its creditors balked at deep write-downs.

    The bankruptcy process was completed on July 10, when G.M. sold its good assets to a new, government-owned company. Brands like Chevrolet, Cadillac and GMC were folded into the new company, renamed the General Motors Company. The federal government holds nearly 61 percent of the new company, with the Canadian government, a health care trust for the United Auto Workers union and bondholders owning the balance.

    But after one of the biggest corporate collapses in history, the new company made one of the biggest rebounds ever.

    The new G.M. is far smaller and leaner. Brands like Saturn, Hummer and Pontiac were shut down or sold. Hourly labor costs were cut by more than two-thirds, to $5 billion from $16 billion in 2005.

    In its new incarnation, it is proving that it can be profitable at a lower sales volume. The automaker said total sales in 2011 could reach 13.5 million. G.M.’s sales rose 6.7 percent for all of 2010, punctuating a year in which it completed the largest public stock offering in history.

    In that public offering on November 18, 2010, it raised $23.1 billion with an opening stock price of $35 per share. The sale cut the Treasury Department’s ownership stake to 26 percent, from nearly 61 percent.

  • rosemary-b
    rosemary-b Member Posts: 2,006
    edited February 2011

    Barbara

    The news about your brother is frustrating. Healing can take a long time. Hang in there. You know we are all pulling for you and for him.  Try to do something for Barbara today, no matter how small.

  • kadeeb
    kadeeb Member Posts: 305
    edited February 2011

    Good article Rosemary - Hope the federal gov can do some of the same before we all go belly up!

  • 208sandy
    208sandy Member Posts: 2,610
    edited February 2011

    Sorry your brother is still having problems - it's tough for you too and I hate that.  I also think you need to take a little  space for yourself today - you won't be good for anyone if you wear yourself out.

    Hugs,

    Sandy

  • IronJawedBCAngel
    IronJawedBCAngel Member Posts: 470
    edited February 2011

    Barbara,

    When my Dad was in ICU after his colon resection, he altered badly after being given ativan. There is also an "ICU" psychosis that many experience.  Once we got him home and off of all the meds, he went back to his normal self until the last couple of months when the kidney infection and Alzheimers have taken over.  Hopefully your brother will progress quickly once he can be weaned off all of the tubes.  Take care of you.

  • lewing
    lewing Member Posts: 1,288
    edited February 2011

    BarbaraA, I think the other posters nailed it.  Hospitals - especially the ICU - are disorienting places, and when you add sedation and who knows what other meds . . . well, of course your brother is loopy!  I'm surprised and a bit dismayed at the nurse's question.  (In the May08 chemo group, we have a running joke about the shovel brigade, standing ready to go after particularly obtuse and insensitive doctors, co-workers, relatives, neighbors, etc.  If you ever need an assist from angry women with shovels, just ask Otter or me, and we'll send out the call!)

    Seriously, I hope you're taking care of yourself, and that this is just a bump in the road on yourr brother's continued recovery.

    L

  • BarbaraA
    BarbaraA Member Posts: 7,378
    edited February 2011

    Thanks for that explanation IJBCA. I feel better now. Off to check in on him now.

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited February 2011

    Thinking of you this morning Barbara ... hope your brother can get off the ventilator .. I know how exhausted you must be.

    Sending hugs,

    Bren

Categories