None of MY patients get LE
The same day the JAMA article came out, this happened:
At the rad onc center where I work, there is an older woman who got extensive treatment at Dana Farber--mx, ALND, lots of chemo, and she developed LE while getting rads a few months ago and got a sleeve and glove. At its worse, it was her arm and hand.
I saw her back yesterday, and her arm is better, but still at least 4 cm larger at mulitple points: so I get ahold of the note from her Dana Farber breast surgeon from a week ago or so and it says "patient examined: no lymphedema"
Is this like magical thinking? If I say it's not there, it's not? Did he just look at her and come up with that pronouncement? I mean, this is not subtle.
Usually, I see notes where LE is ignored, but to outright deny it?
So, this from the mecca where they told me they intended to make LE a sentinel event. If it's not present, even when it is, hard to report on it as a surgical complication.
I have a lot of respect for Dana Farber, but this kind of denial just leaves me kind of at a loss.
Kira
Comments
-
I think many surgeons are extremely territorial..........I saw it happen first with my husband who had a kidney stone and the surgeon put in a stent. Immediately my husband got a raging fever - back to the hospital - the doctor blamed everything else on the fever, but of course not on the stent........until a week later I had a hissy-fit and INSISTED he take it out. Of course my husband immediately recovered. Then my PS refused to acknowledge that my pain and fever were caused by an infection in my abdominal incision - until he was forced to aspirate the fluid which was cultured and of course it was positive. Then he refused to acknowledge that I had a hernia - kept telling me "normal post-surgical swelling" even months later.......he even insulted me saying "maybe you've gained weight" when in fact I had lost weight. My PCP saw the problem and ordered the cat scan which proved I had a hernia (of course I switched to a new PC then.)..............I've come to believe that some doctors have such huge egos, then are in total denial even if it comes to the point of outright LYING to the patients! I guess to them it's no big deal - they've been lying to themselves for so long, it feels normal to them.
-
Kira - I hope that you're doing better. I saw my LE therapist today. She's trying to educate the surgeons at our local hospital about LE. She told me that she met with 2 last week and one said, my patient's don't get LE. He then asked the other surgeon if his patients got LE. That surgeon replied, unfortunately sometimes, yes. So, when my therapist got back to her office she looked at some of the records and found several patients who's surgeon was surgeon #1. She made the point that some patient's develop LE when they are no longer being followed by their surgeons but she's going to send him the patients names so that he's aware that some are being treated for LE. I switched to a surgeon who recognizes LE as a real problem and I'm sure that many other patients have too. My original surgeon told me that I was too young and too thin to have LE even after I was being treated~how I wish that were true!
-
Well... I wonder if they are doing a count so that they can "say" their patients don't get lymphedema... so if he denies it, then their numbers look better???
I have to say, my surgeon in Cali was up on LE... too bad she didn't give me reconstruction options... but I guess being proactive in one area is better than not being proactive in any areas...
-
I was thinking about this, and the irony is that Mass General, just down the road, the protocol is to measure women pre-op with perometry and post-op with perometry and early referal to PT if it changes. So that institution has acknowledged and "de-stigmatized" LE and their patients get treated.
After I went to the Dana Farber survivorship conference a year ago, and LE was ignored, I took it on as a project--re-wrote their web pages, talked to their PT departments, and I got no where.
So, now I have this surgeon flat out denying LE, when it's so easy to prove him wrong: I'll copy the note with the measurements as small act of trying to set the record straight, and just continue to wish that more medical providers would get on board.
I do think surgeons are ashamed and their mentality is really acute care, not so much continuity.
And when you're a surgeon at a top rated institution, hard not to get an ego issue.
Kira
toomuch--my hand is much better, now I'm dealing with limited shoulder motion due to the cast...off to the PT
-
So, after i get the LE under control, are they going to say, See You are better now we have cured you you no longer have LE? Or worse, No you aren't swelled you don't have LE.... Like if i was diabetic and i got my blood sugars under control, i'm still gonna be diabetic.... FUME!.
-
Hymil--that happened to me! I was seeing this well trained LE PT--at a regional Mass General--and when I no longer had a 2 cm discrepancy, she sent me an email that I had swelling, but it wasn't LE!
So I said, if we treat someone's high blood pressure, and the numbers come down: do they no longer have high blood pressure? I have TREATED LE! And I complained to her boss, who is doing the perometry study at the main Mass General. Stunning.
There's a great article by AW Stanton about subtle presentations in LE: it's a free download:
http://britishjournaloflymphoedema.com/journal/0101_arm.pdf
And this PT is the one who told me about AW Stanton!
I watched the director of the first year medical student class on introduction to clinical medicine tell the students this week that: it is ethically appropriate and okay to document that you forgot a portion of the physical exam, it is unethical to document that the exam is normal if you forgot to do it.
If you examine a patient and document "no lymphedema present" and her lymphedema is obvious in her arm, it that unethical? lack of knowledge? denial to the point of medical error?
I think what gets us so upset is the denial of our reality: like SwimAngel's surgeon's denial of her infection and hernia.
OMG--Nordy got a puppy! And he/she is gorgeous!!!! I didn't even notice--Congratulations!!
Kira
-
yes, my *other* local hospital does the pre-op arm measurements. Mine doesn't. Ah well.
I would think if your job is to examine patients for LE and you don't spot it, then that could be an unethical level of lack of knowledge, when if your next-door neighbour doesn't spot it, that's simple ignorance. I'm glad they are now teaching that it's okay to be human and forget to do something, not need to cover up mistakes.
I just found what seems to be a stretch mark on the back of my upper arm - Now it's not pretty but it could be useful, like the line of flotsam left behind after a really high tide...swelling has been here...
How does it go - denial, anger, depression, acceptance, adjustment uh, did I miss one? I'm oscillating between non-directed anger and depression at the mo. Lovely LE.
What a cute little pup!
-
Hymil, I think you got the Kubler-Ross stages down. Amazing how you can achieve some acceptance, and then anger just rushes back in. And depression comes from the loss of control.
LE rots.
Kira
-
I LIKED being in denial. It was a safe place, even if I was wrong. But reality breaks through eventually.
Bargaining, that's what i forgot. D@m! No wonder it's gone pearshaped, I missed a vital stage!
-
LOL - lymphedema does rot.
Thanks for the compliments on our puppy... We should have him tomorrow if all goes as planned!
-
UGH!
I have also met some puffy ladies who deny they have LE as well...when I can se that compression is needed.
As long as surgeons are more concerned with liability than research, I think denial is the name of the game. In my own case, I think nothing went " wrong" in surgery---I think I had too many surgeries in the same area over many years before mastectomy----and my vascular system was not resilient. I blame nobody. But I do think the ER docs who have had me present with early cellulitis and were unable to comprehend that w/o a visible skin break I still needed antibiotics with diagnosed LE ----I DUB THEM NIMRODS OF THE HIGHEST ORDER.
It only takes ten minutes to get educated with the INTERNET. Medical practitioners need to step up.
Moogie
-
I am swimming in medical practitioner denial right now and about to flip my lid! I am still working on getting my in network Rehab doc on board with the RIBP. He swears there is no pain involved in RIBP, so I couldn't possibly have it. Meanwhile a surgeon who specializes in it says I do and that I just have to wait for the muscle atrophy to increase enough to show up on an EMG. I got my records from the neck MRI rehab doc ordered before he read my results to me over the phone plus a brachial plexus MRI I had soon after. He actually lied to me on the phone and tried to blame my pain on arthritis in my neck. I read that report prior to call and it clearly stated no significant difference from last MRI of neck which was 10 years ago!!!!!
I have been very busy girls trying to get somewhere. The pain has become increasingly unbearable and evolving at a rapid rate. The flattening of the web between my thumb and forefinger (Telltale sign of progression according to RIBP Specialist) is progressing as well. There are days when I actually find myself wishing paralysis would set in so I didn't have to feel the pain any more. God forgive me, but it get's that bad! All they do is add more pills that just add more problems and round and round I go. Pain Management doc on board. PCP on board. But the guy in my network who has the credentials to diagnose it, to offer to monitor me and eventually provide medical evidence for it (when that time finally comes) so I can stop working and get on disability is struggling with his ego, his education and clinical practice guidelines that leave me ......... well ............ orphaned! Mailed in all sorts of research from reliable sources describing the pain that can or can not be involved. Thank God for Joe Zuther's recent blog entry on it, it literally kept me from checking myself in to the nearest psychiatric hospital. I am that depressed. When professionals mess with your reality like that you question yourself. Then Rehab Doc tries to cover up my pain with bogus verbage that refers to my neck????
PCP sends me to see a neurologist for nerve pain eval and he says "There is nothing I can do for you. Go back to your radiation oncologist" . WTF? Good God can I say that here? Oh yea, like us boomers haven't been around the block long enough to know the fox in the hen house isn't going to lay any eggs!
When, someone please tell me when all this insanity will end? When do we get to be treated with respect and the dignity we deserve for owning our own bodies and knowing something about them that a doctor doesn't? Or that a doctor's liability insurance demands they create a friggin conspiracy of denial and web of refusal to acknowledge they might be wrong?? It only adds to our struggle by creating stress that exacerbates everything.
My radiation oncologist? Palease!
-
Anyone who has looked at systems safety could have predicted that making LE a sentinel event would result in complete denial that it ever happens. There is far too much out there that recognizes that pointing out problems in a way that assigns blame will lead to hiding the problems. So making it a sentinel event with the associated stigma and trauma to those involved is a big deal, and human nature is to run from pain not to it. The whole idea behind culture of safety is to identify problem events ASSIGN NO blame, but, identify several steps which could have been taken to correct it or to identify and treat it sooner. Only when involved workers feel comfortable to identify problems and get help correcting them can you acutally start changing a system. That doesn't mean someone feeling unfettered and empowered to point out LE on a clinic visit because they assume the blame in on the surgeon and not how an IV was inserted or a blood pressure done, etc. It means you constantly identify problem areas like positioning on the OR table, hwo blood pressures are done, how clear signs and wrist bands are warning people who come into the room that the patient is at risk of LE, of watching for it and asking about symptoms and clinic visits and getting it treated. The concentration is on the system and not the surgone or nurse , when culture turns from accusation and blame to safety and improvement only then will you get positive real changes.
Sentinel event means high level reporting, multiple meetings of assigning blame along every path of the way that led to the event and write ups and reports. Anyone who tries to lead and motivate in a positive way to make systems change would recognize what a very lousy idea that was.
-
Kate, that was what I told the Brigham and Womens head of PT--I had been to medical safety lectures, based on NASA protocols--and the whole point was to have the safety to report errors or "near misses" without repercussions--I told her to change her goal to 100% early recognition and therapy (which is the goal at Mass General) and she just flat out refused--said they were so good they "didn't want to hide their light under a barrel". She completely lost me there.
As a Dana Farber patient I made a concerted effort to get them to acknowledge and treat LE and update their horrible info on their website, and I got no where.
I am going to send this surgeon my note with detailed measurements of the patients two arms: just for the hope it goes into the record. But it won't change the system error.
Moogie also has a great point about patient denial: I rarely leave this forum, but Binney asked me to post on another thread recently, and I was amazed at how many women had swelling or even called it LE, but we have never seen them here, and many just said "when I do step aerobics my arms swell". It's hard to constantly be the bearer of bad news, so I didn't push it on the thread.
Kate I wish I could send your post to Dana Farber/Brigham and Womens: it all started when I approached Ken Miller, head of the Lance Armstrong Survivorship Clinic (came from Hopkins where they also never have patients with LE) and said "your mission statement says you treat LE, and this is a three day conference on survivorship and there's no lecture on it: how do you treat LE?" And he didn't know.
Why can't they look at Mass General and see that acknowledging LE and treating it is the best goal, not punishing people.
Educating them on how to avoid it is great, punishment will just lead to more flat out denial.
Kira
-
I so agree Kira
-
Kate, just wanted to clarify my relationship with Dana Farber: I got my treatment locally, but finally went for a second opinon 6 months later--upset over the LE and lack of communication from the rad onc and surgeon--there was a bit of confusion over my path--their pathologist read some LVI and refused to re-read it--just fed-exed the slides back here, and when I called the fellow in distress, she said "But she's a WORLD EXPERT", and the local pathologist did the special staining and showed it to the whole department and called me at home and said no one saw LVI down here. So, in pathology there are subjective differences, but I didn't appreciate the pathologist--who did not re-read the core biopy where the LVI question was raised--and refused to talk to me or the fellow. I'll never know whose reading is the "right" one, but I do appreciate the second look and D-40 staining and call to my home from the local pathology department.
But they were enrolling in a tamoxifen metabolism trial, so I kept going back, and the oncologist is smart if not into clinical work, and when it finally got out of the IRB, I was no longer eligible.
After my last visit up there, about 4 months ago, I decided that 2 oncologists was a waste of health care dollars, and I will hold Dana Farber in reserve for if/when I need them.
I did read the records of a patient whose pathology made the rounds: local, Dana Farber, Beth Israel Deaconess--and the same pathologist at Dana Farber read her path (or signed off on the resident's reading) and there was a feeling that her reading was the least accurate.
So, I'm a Dana Farber patient, who respects the research they do, but I'll skip the ride and time off from work at this point.
But I will continue to go to the Survivorship Conference (missed it this year because I broke my hand that week) and give them grief over LE.
Kira
The first visit, the fellow was amazing and checked me thoroughly for LE and admitted she didn't know where to send the patients with LE. The oncologist was chatting with my husband about dental work--my husband is a dentist--and was affable, and we get in the car to drive home, and my husband says "That was a good visit" and I'm reading the path report they printed out for me, with the LVI and I start to cry and say "I"m going to die." I was up all night on pubmed, making myself sick, until I called the fellow back in the morning, and emailed the onc--who stands by his pathogist's reading, but told me be reassured by my oncotype score.
-
To his credit, after my first surgery, my surgeon said that because of the location of my tumor (axillary) and nature of surgery, even though I only had 2 nodes removed, I had a 10-20% chance of LE. After my second surgery (nasty dissection of axilla and arm, ALND level 1 & 2), he said that he still put the odds at 20%. He said I should blame him if I got LE, not the radiation. Even with surgery + radiation, he said my risk was only 20% (not the 50% reported in the literature) because I was very fit, thin and young. So, he certainly didn't pretend it wouldn't happen, but he did minimize the risk. On good days, I am grateful to my surgeon that my LE is mild despite all that was done. But, on bad days, I am furious that he did an ALND 1 & 2 (which I did not consent to) even though my SNB was negative (not even micromets).
I am never angry with my radiation oncologist. She was perfectly blunt, saying that the radiation would cause additional damage, and realistically, the question was not whether I would get LE, but how bad LE. She took my LE concerns very seriously and kept them in mind when designing radiation tx. When I see her, she always asked about my LE and says how sorry she is that I have it. She has suggested things that no one else has (e.g., sleeping on my side not my back, looking for online LE groups). Heck, she even pointed me to lymphediva sleeves.
Maybe it's just me, but I think a lot of patients would be a lot less angry if their doctors admitted that LE is a real risk rather than deny that it can happen to their patients. - KS1
-
Doe, hang in there, girl! So glad Joe Zuther's blog post came at the right moment for you. The second part of his RIBP article should be out soon.
Please, oh, please do volunteer for the RIBP study, yes? Just from my own exposure to RIBP I know you'll find when the study results are published that you're by no means alone in this.
We recently posted new information on the StepUp-SpeakOut RIBP page -- a research review, some new coping tips (including yours
) and information about using Kinesio taping for both shoulder stabilization and LE control (and some pain control).
You're not alone -- and we're here for you! Be well, Doe,
Binney -
KS1--Sorry to pour out all my personal stuff in the previous post: I think you are completely correct--just acknowledge the risk of LE, and assist the patient--don't deny it, but acknowledge it and try and help, and we wouldn't feel so abandoned and have this lingering anger.
Kira
-
KS1 said: "Maybe it's just me, but I think a lot of patients would be a lot less angry if their doctors admitted that LE is a real risk rather than deny that it can happen to their patients."
Hear, hear!
otter
-
Binney,
Can I Volunteer for the study without the medical evidence?
-
Binney,
Just read step up speak out entries. Thanks! God bless you guys! You are awesome and you are and will continue to make a difference!
-
Doe, you need a diagnosis of RIBP -- which you have, yes? It doesn't have to be unanimous, or insurance covered, just a diagnosis.
Thanks for the kind words -- really do hope there are pieces there that give some hope and direction, since it's so hard to get that anywhere else!
Onward!
Binney -
I have a verbal diagnosis. An RIBP specialist is convinced I have RIBP, but until the muscle atrophy progresses significanly enough to show up on an EMG, she could not give me an 'official' diagnosis. She told me what to look for, a continung flattening of the web between my forefinger and thumb. It is getting worse. But I'm standing alone out in a field somewhere, wondering exatly when I need to go get that next EMG.
I don't do waiting very well. I'm just too pro-active.
-
Agreed -- waiting rots!
If in doubt, email the study author and ask.
Binney
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team