Do I change Drs?

Options
Kimmom
Kimmom Member Posts: 32

I had my surgeries Jan (lumpectomy) and Feb (right Mastectomy) Chemo in March and rads started in August of 2009. When the Dr staged me he kept saying I was stage 2 with 3 positive nodes (my nodes were melted together). I have always felt this was wrong because of the things I have read on here...today his nurse practitioner saw me and I told her I felt like I didn't have all the information. She brought in my path reports and went over everything. Apparently I am 3 c, she said the cancer they found had spread beyond the nodes. I did do Adrimiacin/cytoxin/taxotere and know I would have had the same treatment no matter what but I feel like a bomb has been dropped on me. I don't know if he was intentionally misleading or maybe I was confused at the time (I still have horrid chemo brain).

Comments

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited January 2011

    My staging was on my path report. I don't believe it was my BS or ONC that staged me but the pathologist. Did you ever get a copy of your path report? If not you should. Make sure the NP had the right path report. If your NP is correct I think you need to discuss this with  your doctor. It might be a total misunderstanding. 

    What does that mean "spread beyond the nodes" It still sounds like you might be a stage 3A. Here is some staging information:  http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/breast/Patient/page2 

  • karen1956
    karen1956 Member Posts: 6,503
    edited January 2011

    Whether or not you should change your doctor is how comfortable you feel with him...how do you feel about going to him again?  My pathology changed from Dx to post bilat.....It is hard to hear the different report, but if you got all the Tx you should have, then that should put you at ease a bit....no need to rush into making a decision....give yourself time and then decide....hugs

  • shells43
    shells43 Member Posts: 1,022
    edited January 2011

    Kimmom,

    Neither my surgeon nor Onc came out and gave me a stage at diagnosis, and I didn't ask. It was at my first followup after chemo and rads that I asked, although I already had staged myself using the info I had, when I was ready. I think if you didn't have your pathology report, I can see where you would be confused. My staging was not on my path report, as Iago's was, but it did give the size of the tumor, the grade, and the number of nodes, so with that I could figure it out.

    When I did recently ask about my stage, my onc said he doesn't want me getting hung up on a number. He said it doesn't really mean much, and I found out too that he gave me a treatment as if I was stage 3 and not 2 because of the size of my tumor. So in the end, you are right, it probably wouldn't have changed much as far as your treatment goes. So much of this disease is mental, so try to stay positive and don't fixate on your stage. I know ignorance is not bliss, with cancer. I'm just saying that your onc may have his own reasons for not being completely honest with you.

    Peace and blessings,

    Shelley 

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited January 2011

    To add to what shelley said you can't stage prior to surgery because they don't have all the information. When I asked my BS before surgery if there was any way I could be a stage IIB. He was doubtful given the fact that at that time they thought my tumor was 7cm and it was very fast growing, grade 3 and there was a good change of micromets in my nodes… but guess what, my nodes were clear!

    I do believe I was treated as aggressively as many stage III given my HER2+, age (under 50) and fast proliferation rate. It's not all about nodes, size and grade. Many other things are taken into consideration.

  • Kathleen26
    Kathleen26 Member Posts: 210
    edited January 2011

    I don't think the oncologists want to give out a diagnosis like IIIc.  If there's obvious mets then they have to be honest about the limitations of what the possibilities are, but they don't want patients to get so overwhelmed by the staging that they can't cope with it.  I don't think it's their intention to deceive as much as to make sure patients don't lose hope.   I do understand their thought process, but they also have to understand that when patients don't feel as though the doc is being straight with them, they begin to lose trust in them.

    The 'spread beyond the nodes' part sounds like what is putting you into IIIc territory.  I would ask more questions about the specifics of this part of your diagnosis, so you understand which nodes, where, and whether they were treated with the rads you had.   Hopefully you are on some kind of hormone therapy to deal with any cancer that may have made it through all your other treatments.

  • Kimmom
    Kimmom Member Posts: 32
    edited January 2011

    Thank you for all your thoughts. I do like this Dr and his wife, she has been my primary for 10 years. I have the feeling with him that he may have been trying to protect me, and he is not one to give explanations for things unless asked (typical guy). After some thought today I am going to keep him but I am going to ask for the occasional appointments with his np too, she is much better at conveying information. I have been on tamoxifen and will be tested soon to see if I can switch to arimedex. I know the number shouldn't matter when we have done all we can anyway. It was just a bit of a shock when the words were actually said out loud.

  • Leah_S
    Leah_S Member Posts: 8,458
    edited January 2011

    Kimmom, my onc never told me stage at the beginning of my tx and I didn't ask because I didn't want to know. We discussed all the details of my path report (I also had a copy) and treatments but not numbers. 

    The websites I saw staged me at either IIIa  or IIb so for over a year I called myself IIb since I liked the stats better. When I finally asked the onc at a follow-up visit he said he'd staged me at IIIa.

    The point is, you got the best treatment for your particular pathology no matter what "stage" the onc said. Staging is not an absolute; it is intended to help decide treatments.

    All the best.

    Leah

  • Celtic_Spirit
    Celtic_Spirit Member Posts: 748
    edited January 2011

    My staging changed from diagnosis (stage I) to auxillary node dissection (stage II) to mastectomy (stage III). And neither my surgeon nor my oncologist talked much about staging; I figured that out from comparing the path report to information I found on the Web.

    I had multiple tumors and affected nodes on both sides, with the largest tumor in my left breast. When I asked my surgeon what stage I was, he said, "Stage II on the right, stage III on the left." Okay, so does that make me a Stage II-and-a-half?

  • faithfulheart
    faithfulheart Member Posts: 544
    edited January 2011

    I never asked my stage it was pretty clear with all the nodes involved.

    I guess that is what makes me a c, but sherri, all my nodes were in there little  capsules.

    See thats where I get confused, tumor 4.5 big,  10 nodes, but had not gone outside the nodes, so

    I don't know for sure, maby I don't want to!  Kim, lots of prayers are coming your way!

    You can do this!

    stephanie

  • Kimmom
    Kimmom Member Posts: 32
    edited January 2011
    I get what you ladies are saying and I appreciate your input and prayers. It is just a number and being 2 or 3 or abc doesn't matter because I am NOT getting bc again. I refuse! Laughing
  • jenn3
    jenn3 Member Posts: 3,316
    edited January 2011

    Kim - I get what you're saying.  Although the treatment is the same and logically you know that with either dx you would have rec'd the same treatment, it's still hard to hear that it's staged a little further than what you thought.  My surgical onc was wonderful, explained everything and refused to give me a stage before surgery, my primary said they couldn't stage, but guessed it was 2.  After surgery was when I was staged at 3A.  I do remember my drs telling me everything, as I asked the questions and not explaining more than I was asking.  Maybe they do that in order to not overwhelm us or in the midst of explaining everything it was forgotten or overlooked.

Categories