LE with only two nodes out?
I've had two chemo infusions, six blood draws and quite a few blood pressure readings on my left arm, since that side only had two nodes taken out. (the right side had 22 taken out)
My left arm is swollen on the top of my hand where it is also red and burns from the chemo infusions. My wrist is swollen as is the upper arm. My PS and oncologist both said it wouldn't be LE because I only had two lymph nodes taken out.
Both times I had chemo, my arm hurt for the entire infusion. My oncologist said that it shouldn't hurt. But it DOES hurt.
Tomorrow I will be calling PS BS oncologist and PCP to see if I can get a referal to LE Specialist. Any suggestions on what I should say when they tell me again, that since I only had two nodes taken out, LE isn't an issue.
I understand that this might not be LE, but there is definately something wrong with my arm and Onc and PS have no idea what is wrong with it. Just that it isn't LE.
Comments
-
Hi Anette. I am not an expert on LE but I go to see an LE therapist and she told me that the number of nodes taken out does not really determine LE. She said that she has seen patients who just had a biopsy of their LN who develop LE.
Second of all, the symptoms in your arm is really concerning. I am surprised that your onc does not seem to be on top of it? From what you are describing I am hoping it is not extravasation, which is when chemo goes directly into the tissues of the arm not into the bloodstream. It happens when the needle goes out of the vein into the arm tissues. It causespain, reddening and can be very serious. I would call you med onc again and ask him/her to evaluate your arm asap.
-
Hey Annette .. my greatest fear is/was LE ... I have done so much research for prevention etc. 13 lymph nodes removed on the right and 3 on the left ... the first few months are so critical for the internal healing and then the nerve healing can take up to a year ... I agree with what Letlet has to say Plus the chemo can have a negative affect on the lymph drainage system as well. I am so annal about doing my own Lymph massage every morning and when I have my bath, plus I put Traumeel Cream on everyday, sometimes twice. I DO NOT carry grocery bags or a heavy purse or do anything weight bearing with my arms ... so far so good ... but, the healing is still taking place even though I have my full range of motion back and my arms are pretty much normal. Be super careful ... there is no revearsal on the LE from what I have read. Keep doing your homework ...
-
Annette: I had 3 nodes out, Binney had 1, Jane had 2--there is a real risk whenever ANY nodes are removed.
I'm very concerned that they're using your arm for chemo--lymphedema occurs when the lymphatic system is unable to handle the load--so you try not to compromise it--the fact that your veins are being irritated on a regular basis can lead to inflammation, and compromise of the lymphatic system, which is already compromised from the surgery.
I work in rad onc, and I have a number of patients who have had bilateral node removals, and there is so much resistance to 1) taking ankle blood pressures 2) doing foot draws 3) not putting an IV in "at risk" arm if it means a port, a neck IV or a foot IV
I think seeing a lymphedema therapist is a wonderful idea: you'll get measured, assessed and risk reduction will be reinforced--and hopefully you'll have another advocate to support your sense that the arm must be protected from harm.
http://www.stepup-speakout.org/Finding_a_Qualified_Lymphedema_Therapist.htm
If you meet resistance, tell them that the risk of lymphedema with "just" a sentinel node biopsy is unknown--as no one agrees on the diagnostic criteria--but at a minimum it approaches 10% and there are plenty of women on these boards who got it with just a few nodes out--or on the side of a prophylactic mastectomy, with no axillary surgery. Even with just a low risk, if happens to you--it;s 100%.
One of the women on this board, when faced with resistance,told her doctor that if he/she wanted to have lymphedema for her, then they could ignore her risk.
Trust your instincts: you have swelling and redness--they need to leave that arm alone and you need an evaluation.
Please let us know how you're doing.
Kira
-
Annette,
Couldn't you ask your medical team if you could have a port-a-cath placed? Then they won't have to be fiddling with your veins each time. Maybe it's too late or it's harder with BMX, but a port sounds so much simpler.
-
Jainey,
I don't have lymphedema, but with 19 nodes out, this could still be in my future. My arm didn't feel normal for a long time and it still feels funny, tingly, itchy sometimes, especially on long-haul flights.
My prevention strategy was to move my arms everyday (dancing) and I now lift weights everyday. There was just a study out which concluded that in cases like ours (with so many nodes removed), weight lifting reduced the risk of lymphedema by 70%! It is a lot of work and no, one doesn't have to exercise everyday, according to the study. We need to be exercising anyway to reduce our risk of recurrence/progression, so we can reduce our lymphedema risk right along with that.
-
Heidi- I'm sorry if this sounds like a rant--but I've spoken to Dr. Schmitz and emailed her, and she says she wants the facts to be very clear--but her official web site is exactly what you wrote, and it's misleading, and potentially dangerous, IMO.
-the JAMA article by Schmidtz et al showed that weight lifting by women "at risk" done in a VERY controlled manner, did not cause more lymphedema, and in the women (94) who had >5 nodes out there was a reduction--but the number was so small, and it is just one study, that no conclusion could be drawn.
Here are the facts: from the article:
Results
A total of 134 participants completed follow-up measures at 1 year. The proportion of women who experienced incident BCRL onset was 11% (8 of 72) in the weight lifting intervention group and 17% (13 of 75) in the control group (cumulative incidence difference [CID], -6.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -17.2% to 5.2%; P for equivalence = .04). Among women with 5 or more lymph nodes removed, the proportion who experienced incident BCRL onset was 7% (3 of 45) in the weight lifting intervention group and 22% (11 of 49) in the control group (CID, -15.0%; 95% CI, -18.6% to -11.4%; P for equivalence = .003). Clinician-defined BCRL onset occurred in 1 woman in the weight lifting intervention group and 3 women in the control group (1.5% vs 4.4%, P for equivalence = .12).
Conclusion In breast cancer survivors at risk for lymphedema, a program of slowly progressive weight lifting compared with no exercise did not result in increased incidence of lymphedema.
Okay, so that's impressive--but it's one study and very small numbers. On her PAL site, Schmidtz does state that women with >5 nodes had a 70% decrease of onset of lymphedema--of course that was only in the first year, and we're talking about 94 women who did a study and were closely followed--it can not be a global recommendation to lift weights if you had >5 nodes to reduce LE.
When you read the article in JAMA, the conclusion discussion is that weight lifting did not rise to the level of "superiority" but caused no harm--but these women used a very specific protocol, called the PAL protocol, lifted light weights with few reps, supervised, for two days a week along with stretches.
Here's the SABC abstract:
http://www.abstracts2view.com/sabcs10/view.php?nu=SABCS10L_9027
Balancing Risks of Deconditioning vs. Weight-Lifting for Breast Cancer Survivors.
Schmitz KH, Cheville A, Ahmed RL, Troxel A. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Background
Clinical guidelines for breast cancer survivors with and at-risk for lymphedema have advised against upper body exercise, preventing them from obtaining established health benefits of weight-lifting. The primary hypotheses of the Physical Activity and Lymphedema Trial were that lymphedema onset and worsening would not differ after a one-year weight-lifting intervention compared to no exercise among survivors at risk for and with breast cancer-related lymphedema.
Methods
We performed a randomized controlled trial of a twice- weekly progressive weight-lifting intervention involving 141 breast cancer survivors with stable arm lymphedema at study entry and 154 survivors at-risk for lymphedema at study entry. Treatment group participants were provided a gym membership and 13 weeks of supervised instruction; the remaining nine months were unsupervised. Control group participants were provided the intervention after study completion. The primary outcome was the change in arm swelling at one year, as measured by water volumetry of the affected and unaffected arms. Secondary outcomes included the clinician defined incidence of onset and exacerbations of lymphedema, lymphedema symptoms, and muscle strength. Participants with lymphedema were required to wear a well-fitted compression garment while weight-lifting.
Results
Among the women who entered the study with lymphedema, the proportion who experienced a 5% or greater increase in arm swelling (interlimb difference) was similar in the treatment and control groups (11 % versus 12%; cumulative incidence ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.00 (0.88 to 1.13) As compared with the control group, the women in the intervention group with lymphedema had greater improvements in self-reported lymphedema symptom severity (p=0.03), and a lower incidence of lymphedema exacerbations as assessed by a certified lymphedema specialist (14% versus 29% in the control group, p= 0.04).
Among the women who entered the study without lymphedema, more control than treatment group women experienced lymphedema onset defined by 5% increase in interlimb difference (17 versus 11%, p = 0.35). Among higher risk women (5+ lymph nodes removed), this comparison was statistically significant (22 versus 7%, p=0.04). Clinician-defined BCRL onset occurred in 1 treatment and 3 control group women (p=0.62).
Conclusions
Slowly progressive weight-lifting had no significant impact on arm swelling among breast cancer survivors with lymphedema, and resulted in a reduced incidence of lymphedema flares and improvement in symptoms. In breast cancer survivors at risk for lymphedema, a program of slowly progressive weight-lifting, compared with no intervention, did not result in increased incidence of lymphedema. In secondary analyses, women with 5+ nodes removed who did weight-lifting were less likely to experience increases in arm swelling.Wednesday, December 8, 2010 6:00 PM
So, we all need to know the facts and limitations of the study and what it means for woman in the real world--who are not in a clinical study.
I sure wish she wouldn't declare that weight lifting decreases the incidence of lymphedema in women with >5 nodes by 70% on her PAL web site---one study, just a few women, short follow up, can't make a global recommendation.
Kira
-
Thanks for all the input, everyone.
I asked about a port before I began chemo and my med onc said it was up to his nurses, if they could find a vein, we wouldn't need a port. For my second tx, one nurse (if she even is a nurse) needed the help of the other nurse (who later told me she is a medical assistant) After the assistant got it in, the first gal asked her why it was so hard to get in. Was there a valve in the way?
When I told them it was really hurting my wrist and arm, she said that it is in the vein. If it wasn't in the vein, then my hand would be swelling up. Then they said it probably hurt because the meds just came out of the fridge. I took percocet and started feeling better after a bit. I'm not sure if it would have kept hurting or not....
I complained a week later to the onc that my arm was swollen and red and hurt and he put me on antibiotics. He said, "I don't think it is infected but we will try the antibiotics" He also said "It isn't that the iv went into the tissues, or it would have swelled up immediately."
While having a debridement (sp?) surgery, I asked the anesthesiologist if she didn't think I should have a port. She agreed and then stopped short and said, "Wait, you are here because you are not healing. You probably shouldn't get a port."
Anyway, PS is in surgery all day, Onc is on vacation, BS will see me on Tuesday and maybe get me a referal for LE specialist then. And, PCP won't give me one without me coming in next week. So, I struck out for today, but maybe next week I can get a referal.
I am completely dreading chemo 3 on Thursday. I just don't see how my hand/arm can handle one more. I guess I should get in to onc on Monday and complain AGAIN about my hand and arm.
Oh and, I'm diabetic, so a foot IV probably isn't recommended. I've never heard of a neck IV. Maybe that is what I should have......
Thanks again for all the input. I will keep you updated.
-
I haven't read all the posts but I saw an LE MD last week and he said any arm that gets nodes removed is at risk. Yes the risk is less but still there. I had 4 nodes from my sentinel done on my right arm. When the did my port surgery I insisted all sticks/IV must be done through my foot. That's what they did.
Put also note that chemo will also cause you to retain fluid. I don't have LE in my right arm but the upper arm does swell. My left arm had mild LE and it blew up last night after Tuesday's chemo. Better today especially since I had LE therapy today.
Bottom line, get it checked out by an LE specialist. If it's LE and they treat it early this will be better managed for you.
-
http://www.breastcancer.org/tips/new_research/20100113.jsp
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2806631/
kira, thanks for copying the article.
Above are links to the summary and to the text of a Spanish study financed by the Spanish Health Ministry which reaches pretty much the same conclusion (72% risk reduction). There are other European studies, but I can't cite them, sorry. I do recall a German one. Unfortunately, it is up to us to undertake the necessary precautions/interventions because the protocols described in these studies are not standard of care. In an ideal world, every woman at risk should have access to interventions post-surgery before any sign of lymphedema, just as you would be entitled to complete rehabilitation if you had broken an arm. After all, 80% of lymphedema cases are diagnosed during the first year after surgery. Interventions like the Spanish one, following close to surgery, would help so many people. The recommended exercises are described in the article. The Schmitz study using weights looks at patients having therapy at least one year after surgery. So either way seems to work. Doing both probably would help most. Maybe the best approach is to for people to ask their doctors what their risk of LE is and ask if preventive measures could be taken that doesn't imply hiring a personal valet to carry groceries and such (the personal valet idea is from Dr. Schmitz, as quoted here ).
-
Heidi--have you read the BMJ article? It was early physiotherapy for women with ALND and it consisted of typical lymphedema therapy as well as stretches--no weight lifting, and there was a subset of women who developed axillary web syndrome who overwhelmingly developed LE.
It's a free article, with the link you provided'
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2806631/
Here's the intervention:
Intervention The early physiotherapy group was treated by a physiotherapist with a physiotherapy programme including manual lymph drainage, massage of scar tissue, and progressive active and action assisted shoulder exercises. This group also received an educational strategy. The control group received the educational strategy only.
I've spoken with Dr. Schmitz, I've read her articles and heard her lecture at the NLN conference: you can not make a global recommendation that weight lifting will reduce the onset of lymphedema by 70% when it was only observed in 45 women, observing a strict protocol--
The global recommendation is that women should be active and do it gradually, but if you read Dr. Schmitz's conclusions--she doesn't extrapolate that tiny subset finding to a global recommendation, she just says that careful, progressive weight lifting appears to be safe.
We can not state that weight lifting prevents lymphedema by 70% in all women with >5 nodes removed--the data just isn't there, and if you talk to women clincally, many of whom did Livestrong protocols, they have developed LE with weight lifting.
We can't disseminate misinformation: we can report on early promising studies, but we need to be very, very careful about the comments we state as indisputable facts.
If a woman followed your advice--without the caveats of doing this specific protocol with a certified trainer-- and developed LE, how would you feel?
Kira
-
Kira .. you have a nice way of being factual yet including all aspects ... basically we are all so very individual ... I lean to the side of safety first, and always have ... inactivity is the worst at one end and then overexertion is the worst on the other ... my ND Onc emailed me last week to remind me it takes at least 8 weeks for the physiological healing after surgery in optimal conditions ... So, that being said ... who is in optimal conditions??? Lots to factor into the equation ... Plus .. nerves can take up to a hear to repair themselves and everything is intertwined and individual ...
I asked my PS and he was so 'out to lunch' stating ... you dont have LE and you probably wont get it (it is not quite 8 weeks since my surgery) and then I shared some info regarding others who have gotten it a couple years later when flying in an airplane ... he was beside himself ... He did not believe me or was not aware ... doesnt matter, he was oblivious to what I was talking about. So, we cannot assume that our PS or BS is educated in this area. Plus, my PS does lots plastic surgery outside of BMX etc with respect to cancer ... So, he is specialized in the reconstruction, and I must remember this. That is why it is So VERY critical that we have these sites and threads ... I am spinning my head here .. but, doing all the grinding research so that I do not have to learn by trial and error ... Oh, Ladies ... Thank you so much for the websites and personal writings ... Prayers to us all ...
-
Annette you wrote you are worried about what will happen at Chemo 3 on thursday, i think in your shoes i would postpone this until after you've had the chance to speak to PS and PCP and get that LE referral sorted. If you don't show up they can't do anything bad to you. What bad will result from one week delay with chemo, probably not much, compared to more damage to your arm that would be irreversible. Also as you have diabetes you gotta look after those veins, they might be needed for more urgent things than chemo! Go with your gut instinct and good luck.
-
Jainey, so few medical providers know about lymphedema--they aren't taught it in medical school or residency and there are so few continuing education lectures on it.
There was one study of axillary node dissection, and although most women got LE in the first few years, women continued to get it for the next 20 years, at a lower rate.
I posted a link to an article in Cure about limiting LE:
http://www.curetoday.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/article.show/id/2/article_id/1632
Limiting Lymphedema
BY KATHY LATOUR
One of the primary goals of sentinel node biopsy is to reduce the need for axillary dissection to minimize a woman's chance of getting lymphedema, a chronic buildup of fluid that occurs as a result of the body's impaired ability to drain lymph fluid from tissue. Lymphedema, which can be managed but not cured, can leave a woman's arm significantly enlarged, greatly affecting her quality of life.
According to statistics compiled by the American Cancer Society, the percentage of women who get lymphedema as a result of full node dissection and radiation ranges widely, from 6 to 48 percent. While studies concur that sentinel node biopsy reduces the risk of lymphedema, the rates vary depending on a number of factors, such as whether the woman received radiation. But it doesn't eliminate the risk, says Wendy O'Rear, PT, a certified complete decongestive therapist at Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas.
The huge variation in statistics also reflects that whether someone gets lymphedema depends on a number of factors, including location of the tumor, body mass index, age, physical condition and other medical conditions that can contribute to unbalanced fluid levels in the body.
O'Rear treats women with lymphedema using complete decongestive therapy, which clears lymphatic pathways of fluid and decompress fluid-filled areas to allow the limb to return to normal or near-normal size. Patients then may use special compression garments to prevent the arm from re-swelling while learning exercises to help the arm eliminate fluid.
"Who gets lymphedema varies, and it's multifactoral," says O'Rear. "I have had women who had sentinel node surgery who swelled immediately, and then I have another patient who had surgery 38 years ago when they took all the nodes and followed it with radiation-and she just got lymphedema."
Typically, O'Rear says, she sees fewer women with immediate problems if there were fewer than 10 nodes removed and there was no radiation. She emphasizes that it's important for women to understand that the fluid in the tissue contains protein, which is inflammatory and produces scar tissue. When lymphedema is not controlled, it will increase in severity, she says. O'Rear emphasizes that women need to be vigilant for the rest of their lives and follow the guidelines from the National Lymphedema Network (www.lymphnet.org) to reduce their risk.
"We have had women tell us that someone told them that after five years they could begin getting blood pressure taken on the affected arm, and that isn't true," O'Rear says. In fact, she says, as women age and their tissue becomes more firm, particularly if they have had radiation, they can lose lymph function faster.
Jainey--that's what we're trying to do here, get out the facts--such as they are--and arm women with knowledge.
Hope you continue to heal well, and I agree--who of us is "optimal"--but we try.
Kira
-
Kira, I did not say everyone has to lift weights. I lifted weights only after maybe 10 months of plain arm exercises without resistance myself. My post says exactly that and what I am advocating is people ask their doctors how they can prevent lymphedema through one of these protocols, preferrably both. I provided the links so people can read for themselves what these protocols are about. The medical world does not seem to be paying attention to our needs. I did my research as I am at greater risk with 19 nodes removed and paid out of my own pocket for the preventive services I believed I needed, including manual lymph drainage, scar massage, physiotherapy, as in the Spanish study (which I did read), and 8 months after surgery a personal trainer, doing a progressive program like in the Schmitz study. I feel very lucky that I did these things and wanted to share this message with others. At the time of my surgery, these studies were not out, but there were other European studies I had read/read about, which brought me to my conclusion that massage as well as muscle conditioning/contraction was important in preventing lymphedema. And that now that these other studies are out, doctors should realize this has to be standard of care. Why do women have to wait until they get swollen if they are at risk and there are prevention strategies with studies to back them??? Please pester your doctors about this. Even if you only get the "Spanish treatment" (no weights), you are already far ahead of the game. I'm sorry if I didn't make this clear, Kira. I do understand your concerns more than you think. Jainey, you're welcome. We need to educate our doctors about this.
In my case, I have been lifting weights daily for 2 1/2 years now. That's a longer follow-up than the Schmitz study. I started VERY gradually because my bone mets had reached the stage where I could not carry my handbag, much less grocery bags and that was even before surgery. So I feel strongly that if I could do it, most others can, too.
-
Jainey It is not unsual for PS or BS not to understand the risks of LE. Most don't even know what cording is. Without this knowledge they can't properly inform you about prevention. My BS did give me a print out regarding prevention as well as a prescription for sleeves for flying. It still didn't have enought info on it. I do feel my LE could have been prevented but at least I caught it early.
I feel lucky that when I called my PS regarding LE he sent me to of of the top MDs for LE.
If you are looking for an LE PT check out this site for a LANA trained therapist if you are located in North America: http://www.clt-lana.org/therapists/default.asp
-
Heidi,
Thanks for clarifying things.
It upsets me that when you click on the PAL page, the official page, it states that weight lifting prevented onset of lymphedema 70% more in women with >5 nodes out--yet the numbers were so small, and the study conclusion didn't support weight lifting as effective and safe lymphedema protection.
I was in early LE therapy and still got LE with just 3 nodes out--but the problem was perpetuated by an axillary seroma that wasn't treated and axillary web syndrome.
I think it's great that you've carefully gained strength.
I know that we are all different: many women with LE tried to lift weights after the first Schmitz article in the NE Journal, and many found that even with a good trainer and going slow, they couldn't tolerate it. Other women can, so the key is to be individualized in your approach.
Deconditioning isn't good for us, but even Sherry Lebed Davis, of the Lebed method, blogged how she hired a PAL trained trainer, and her arms swelled no matter what she did when she tried weight lifting.
So, I'm glad it's worked for you, but there are others who won't tolerate weights, and even more women who won't have access to a well trained trainer who knows the PAL protocol.
But being fit is a goal we should all strife for.
Kira
-
Heidihill, Wow! You have done so well ... thank you for your input and sharing ... again, we are so very individual (diet, medical conditions, medications, hydration, age, and more) are all what makes us so individual ... PLUS ... knowing our bodies-being connected and being aware of immediate and small changes/reactions-Thank you for sharing. I am only 8 weeks post surgery ... still in the healing process and getting more frustrated each day for having to be 'less active' (not even driving my truck yet) ... but, in the end it will be have some postive effect. You have seem to beat many odds:-)
Kira - Thanks for the websites and info, it so helps to keep reading from good sources.
Lago - Thank you too for helping me with my confusion ... I so want to trust, but Patient Beware is always good to keep in mind when not dealing with the Expert in each field. I will search out a specialist in my area and see what I can come up with.
Cheerss! hey, the sun is finally coming out:-)
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team