I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange

Options
126272931321828

Comments

  • Alpal
    Alpal Member Posts: 1,785
    edited January 2011

    Laura, I don't need your prayers. Actually, I could use some prayers but not in connection to Sarah Palin. BTW - I'm not an Atheist. I don't think she meant to offend anyone. But, it certainly appears that she doesn't have enough sense to surround herself with people who would know the history of that phrase and advise her that it would be offensive to a large group of people. Using the excuse of "I didn't mean it that way" only goes so far. If she herself knew that it could be offensive and used it anyway, that's a whole 'nother story.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited January 2011
    I thought God was female?????????Cool
  • Claire82
    Claire82 Member Posts: 684
    edited January 2011

    It's beautiful, Laura.

  • Medigal
    Medigal Member Posts: 1,412
    edited January 2011
    Blue:  Ok, I will give you a catechism lesson that was never explained to me as a child.  GOD is both MALE and FEMALE.  The reason the child sees God as a Male, imo, is because everything she was probably taught or knows about God is through Jesus who IS a male and at the same time God in Man!   It amazes me that a well educated lady like yourself who can appreciate the gorgeous Jim Morrison thinks God was a female!  Maybe you had a "feminist" for your catechism class nun.Wink  No thanks needed.  Glad to be of help!
  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited January 2011
    My hat's off to you Medigal!Wink
  • worldwatcher
    worldwatcher Member Posts: 205
    edited January 2011

    Kadeeb

    I did the exact same "refresh the page thingy" yesterday.  You know the old saying, "great minds think alike"... <snort>

  • sunny210
    sunny210 Member Posts: 292
    edited January 2011

    Boy, what is hate speech has turned into a thought provoking topic. According  to good old Wikipedia, in the US, hate speech is defined as "any speech, gesture, conduct or display which is forbidden because it may incite violence or prejudicial action against or by a protected individual or group, or because it disparages or intimidates a protected individual or group." These groups must have a common characteristic, defined by law, including race, gender, ethnicity, nationality, religion, sexual orientation or any other common characteristic. I did a very quick search and got the impression from several Supreme Court decisions that prominent legal scholars struggle with a precise definition as well. It seems to me to be like pornography. We know it when we see it, we just don't all see it the same way.

    Just because something may be legal however, doesn't mean it's the moral or the smart thing to do. I myself prefer thoughtful analysis to venomous invective. I think we can all agree that society in general has become more vitriolic in the last 20 yrs. or so. I can't see that this vitriol has been helpful in any way. However, I doubt that it's going to go away just because I don't care for it. 

    Sandy 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2011

    It is UNBELIEVABLE that you girls have zeroed in on TWO FRICKIN WORDS of Sarah's commentary. Think about it...how absolutely ridiculous! My gawd... all I can say is that I will pray for each one of you. Feel blessed, not insulted. 

    This is far more disgusting than a possible misuse of TWO WORDS:

    Sanders Fundraises Off Arizona Murders  

    There has been no shortage of individuals and institutions that have sought to capitalize on the shootings in Tucson. Add Vermont senator Bernie Sanders to that list.

    This afternoon Sanders sent out a fundraising appeal, seeking to raise money to fight Republicans and other "right-wing reactionaries" responsible for the climate that led to the shooting.

    He writes:

    Given the recent tragedy in Arizona, as well as the start of the new Congress, I wanted to take this opportunity to share a few words with political friends in Vermont and throughout the country.  I also want to thank the very many supporters who have begun contributing online to my 2012 reelection campaign at http://www.bernie.org/.  There is no question but that the Republican Party, big money corporate interests and right-wing organizations will vigorously oppose me.  Your financial support now and in the future is much appreciated.

    Sanders lists several events as evidence that right-wing rhetoric led to the attacks, and then continues:

    What should be understood is that the violence, and threats of violence against Democrats in Arizona, was not limited to Gabrielle Giffords.  Raul Grijalva, an old friend of mine and one of the most progressive members in the House, was forced to close his district office this summer when someone shot a bullet through his office window.  Another Democratic elected official in Arizona, recently defeated Congressman Harry Mitchell, suspended town meetings in his district because of the threatening phone calls that he received (Mitchell was also in the cross-hairs on the Palin map).  And Judge John Roll, who was shot to death at the Giffords event, had received numerous threatening calls and death threats in 2009.

In light of all of this violence - both actual and threatened - is Arizona a state in which people who are not Republicans are able to participate freely and fully in the democratic process?  Have right-wing reactionaries, through threats and acts of violence, intimidated people with different points of view from expressing their political positions?

    A staffer in Sanders' campaign office confirmed that the letter went out today.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/sanders-fundraises-arizona-murders_533487.html

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited January 2011

    Laura .. how come you posted the same thing twice?  We already read that article about Sanders.

    Bren

  • Alpal
    Alpal Member Posts: 1,785
    edited January 2011

    Do we all now have to repeat our replies? This is getting really boring. Last night I said I was too nosy to use the ignore button, but I'm rethinking that.

  • worldwatcher
    worldwatcher Member Posts: 205
    edited January 2011
    2tzis: Re Palin

    Bren, I think she was using a term to describe the news media's eagerness to blame her for the events in Arizona. Using the "blood"of the victims to "libel" her by pinning the blame on her. I thought it was an interesting and effective turn of phrase. Others might think it is pure hyperbole. Likely to be a big difference of opinon about it. And that's what it is, opinion.

    Well the drive-by media certainly isn't going to let Sarah get away with calling them out on their calumny. (cal·um·ny/ˈkaləmnē/Noun 1. The making of false and defamatory statements in order to damage someone's reputation; slander. 2. A false and slanderous statement).

    ABCNEWS: She 'once again has found a way to become part of the story'...

    CBSNEWS: 'Plays the victim card'...

    NBCNEWS: 'Ignorant' for using 'blood libel' term...

    After five days of the media blaming her for "inciting" the psycho they're gonna show HER.....she'd better not defend herself, by God!

  • molly52
    molly52 Member Posts: 389
    edited January 2011

    oaky 2tzus, I am gonna try and take a crack at answering your questions about the Alberta case.  I skimmed about 30 pages of it, until I got bored.

    The guy in question was not a pastor - he was a mail order something or another (from the US) - he didn't have a church or any churchy duties.  At the time of the decision, he was working in an auto parts job (or similiar).  

    He didn't do what he did privately to his religious group - he put a letter in the newspaper opinion section.  And he used terminology something like - this is a call to arms -

    He worked with a group of youths, shortly after the publication, one of the kids from his group bet up a young gay fellow.  Red Deer is a small town - so everybody knows pretty much everybody.

    Another gentleman who ran a support group for the gay community placed the complaint - as it was one of his members who was hurt.

    Once the complaint was placed, the courts heard expert testimony and from all the participants and it was decided in court.

    I think one of the factors included in the decision was that he left the call to arms (or whatever) open ended.  So it could have been interpreted litterally (sp) - he claims he meant it figuratively.

    I hope this helps.  Never ever gave any of this any thought before - so no expert here and I did only peruse.

  • iodine
    iodine Member Posts: 4,289
    edited January 2011

    By the way for those who have questions about anything:

    www.google.com

     My dh kept asking our very computor literate son questions over the hols, unfortunately, dh didn't listen to the answers, nor does he ask questions very well, so kept rephrasing "What?"  Finally, ds was worn out and recommended dh utilize the "how to" or "why" preface to the questions on google.

    Now dh is so proud of himself for "researching" to solve his computor problems with only a few words typed into the search line of Google.

    Just thought I'd share to save some folks time.

  • otter
    otter Member Posts: 6,099
    edited January 2011

    Re:  strange people, hate speech, and toning down the rhetoric...

    I stayed up late last night because a certain Heisman Trophy-winning college football player was scheduled to be on the Tonight Show ("with Jay Leno").  The trouble was that a certain "American stand-up comedian, television host and social critic" (a.k.a. Bill Maher) was also there, being interviewed before said football player was introduced.

    Leno asked Maher for his "take" on the tragedy in Arizona.  Maher replied, "...we’re gonna have to hear from the NRA a lot, that this shouldn’t stop anything they want to do. The NRA should just change their name to The Assassin’s Lobby…".  The audience groaned.  Maher continued, "I’m so tired of hearing about the 2nd Amendment and the Constitution.  If you love guns, just admit it.  It's just a vice -- it's like alcohol, or drugs, or sex addiction, or gambling.  It's just a vice. It's something you like, it’s not good for you or anybody else.  You just like it.  But, stop the bullshit [the word was bleeped] about the 2nd Amendment and the Constitution.  [?] a much bigger issue which is the psychology of this country which loves guns.  It’s just a very armed country with a lot of crazy people which is not a great combination." 

    [There were other comments dealing with gun control and the right-to-carry laws in Arizona, but those were missing from the video I used to write this up.]

    Leno then asked Maher about reports that FOX News was going to "scale back the rhetoric" -- would this last?  Maher replied, "No, because that’s the rhetoric they love… the right wing loves …  the go-to rhetoric for them is, 'wouldn’t it be fun to kill the people we disagree with?' "

    The audience groaned some more.  Maher continued, "They try to put across this false equivalent…", and then he realized he had lost the audience.  He said, "No?".  And some members of the audience shouted, "No!".  Maher responded, "Really?  Then, do you read?  Have you seen what people have said?  Have you seen what Sarah Palin says?  She talks about …  don’t retreat, reload… she says it like a pull-toy that’s broken, every 5 minutes." 

    Maher went on to cite what he considered inflammatory statements from other Republican politicians.  Then he said, "Left wingers don’t talk that way.  And also, left wingers, even if they do sometimes make a gun analogy or something, their audience isn’t hysterical.  They’re already talking -- the right wingers -- to people who are hysterical and are irrational and are highly armed to begin with."

    Maher continued:  "Newt Gingrich -- and, by the way, among the right-wing douchebags I hate, I hate him the mostest -- he says, ... he said the Obama Administration is as much a threat to us as were the Nazis and the Soviet Union.  Now, it’s not just ridiculous, but when you characterize the opposition -- political opposition -- it's not just the opposition, but the enemy -- the Soviet Union and the Nazis were our enemies ... of course, you’re going to have borderline people who go and take this over the line....".  There was some applause from the audience.

    "So stop telling me that the Left and the Right are both crazy.  Yes, there are crazies on the Left, but they’re not the same.  They're not gun crazy, they’re not violent crazy. Who goes to gun shows?  Who was for the war in Iraq?  Who’s part of militias?  When you hear the phrase 'armed compound in a secluded rural area,' what is that -- a bunch of Democrats?  Is that Dennis Kucinich out there?"

    Lovely man, that Bill Maher.  Tone down the rhetoric?  Really?

    otter

  • iodine
    iodine Member Posts: 4,289
    edited January 2011

    I saw that, too.  Maher is making great money on HBO with his satire/comedy.  He keeps it up on shows like Leno because that's exactly why he's invited on them.  I don't watch him, neither do I watch Beck.  They both irritate me with their scartistic comments that are many times way off base, if not entirely lies.

    At least Maher knows he a comic.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited January 2011

    I'd rather take my chances up here.  Thanks.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited January 2011

    I don't know......"free" speech and easy guns. Something wrong with that picture, or do I just have a wild imagination.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited January 2011

    Nawwwwww.........I feel pretty safe and protected up here.  No one worries about getting shot and we have great health care.    Besides can't do without those hockey players or moosemeat!

  • worldwatcher
    worldwatcher Member Posts: 205
    edited January 2011

    "President Obama and first lady Michelle Obama will be in Tucson Wednesday to attend the "Together We Thrive: Tucson and America" event at the McKale Memorial Center on the University of Arizona campus.

    Together We Thrive??  At a memorial for six who are not exactly "thriving"?

    "Every person has their own individual concerns and is grieving in their own way, but we're all coming together and joining in unity," said Associated Students of the University of Arizona President Emily Fritze, a senior majoring in political science. "And this is the physical representation of that.""Every person has their own individual concerns and is grieving in their own way, but we're all coming together and joining in unity," said Associated Students of the University of Arizona President Emily Fritze, a senior majoring in political science. "And this is the physical representation of that."

    Words fail.

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2011/01/the-schedule-for-together-we-t.html

  • Medigal
    Medigal Member Posts: 1,412
    edited January 2011

    Blue:  All these posts and I now find out you are a foreigner.  You live in Canada?  You sound so much like one of us that I am astounded.  Nothing wrong with being Canadian.  I used to have a Canadian friend but not any longer.  It's so nice having this international group and Laura too!  It's obvious she's American because she seems to have a problem with people not liking Palin.  BTW, I saw a show today where this guy was ripping Palin apart over what she said.  All I could see was our Laura screaming at him!  I am not going to reveal who he was but it was "not" Beck!  Lots of other people besides "me" dislike that rooting tooting woman! 

  • konakat
    konakat Member Posts: 6,085
    edited January 2011

    2tsuz -- that is not an accurate summary -- perhaps you didn't read the entire document or just didn't understand it.  Also, the wiki definition of hate speech (posted above) in the US is very similar to that in Canada.  Interesting...

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2011

    When someone disagrees with you, it doesn't necessarily mean that the person doesn't understand the issue, just that they have a different opinion, perspective or interpretation.

  • konakat
    konakat Member Posts: 6,085
    edited January 2011

    it has nothing to do with opinion --  I assumed she wanted to summarize what was in the legal document (i.e., what the judge decided on what it was based on), not what her opinion was about it.  Something new to some I guess, stating the facts without spin or opinion?

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2011

    And when did Wikipedia become a trusted source of information? 

  • worldwatcher
    worldwatcher Member Posts: 205
    edited January 2011

    tee shirts

    They are putting out the logo tee shirts on the seats at the venue.  Tee shirts? Really?

  • konakat
    konakat Member Posts: 6,085
    edited January 2011

    I was just repeating what a previous poster said and commented on the similarities.

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited January 2011

     "That was the point I was trying to make a couple of pages ago. In the US, Mr. Boisson would never have been prosecuted because that would have deprived him of his Constitutional right to free speech (give his opinion) as well as freely practice his religion (prosleytizing his beliefs)."

    Proactive vs Reactive.   

  • Alpal
    Alpal Member Posts: 1,785
    edited January 2011

    Why are you reduced to ridiculing the name of the event?  By "administration" do you mean the Obama administration or the administration of the university? It's a university sponsored event and I think that reasonable people would assume that the university came up with the name. I think it means the people who are gathered there will find some solace in their unity. I might not have chosen the word thrive but I wouldn't have chosen "blood libel" either.  Edited - typo

  • Claire82
    Claire82 Member Posts: 684
    edited January 2011

    I actually love the word thrive so much better than survive

  • revkat
    revkat Member Posts: 763
    edited January 2011

    I would respectfully suggest that if you are already upset by the title of the gathering today and/or the way it is being handled that you simply don't watch. Nothing earth shattering or life changing is going to happen at this memorial. You won't miss anything and your blood pressure will thank you.

    Instead of spending the evening being critical why don't you find someone you love and do something fun. (Learned from experience during the Bush administrations)

    Hey Otter, what was it that Bill Maher said was incorrect? Wink 

    He's like most of the pundits on TV, they make their money off of controversy. Sometimes he's funny, sometimes he's not, always he's irreverent. 

Categories