I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange
Comments
-
Great new title, Blue! And great new avatar, Rocky . . . funny and scary at the same time!
Blue, I hope that they're able to adjust/recalibrate so that your PD symptoms come back under control double-quick. I know from others that it can take some tweaking. Doesn't make it any less discouraging, I know.
Floralgal, funny, I always thought it was "verklempt." Now I see that they're two alternate spellings. (It's such a great Yiddish word, I'm going to make a point of using it more often.)
Medigal, once a thread is gone, it's gone, I'm afraid. Or at least, that's how it's always been in the past.
Hi to everyone!
L
-
Glad to see y'all have landed back on Earth again. Yes, we can change BCO screen names without re-registering or changing any of the stats from our previous life. One of my chemo buddies did that when some people from her other life figured out who she was here and started harrassing her.
Lindasa, here's that link to the Kaiser Family Foundation page showing the implementation timeline. I made it active (I think .... we'll know in a few minutes when I shut up and submit this):
http://healthreform.kff.org/timeline.aspx
Blue, ... I sure hope your neuro docs can do their magic and settle things down again.
otter
-
Team Canada beat Team USA in the world Junior Hockey semi finals today at Buffalo NY. Next Canada plays Russia for the gold.
-
Thanks for the fix, Otter! I thought that website offered the best compact, easy to read info.
I think Blue's experience has been expected, which is why she will have the electronic stimulator set, regulated and, if necessary, re-regulated until the movements are under control. Blue, correct me if I'm wrong, please!
Lassie, I watched the last few minutes of the game (which took place in Buffalo). I swear 3/4 of the fans there were from Toronto! Always ready to help the New York State economy!
-
Blue just know I am praying for you. Glad to see you back Rocky.
-
Blue .. thinking about you this morning.
hugs,
Bren
-
GOP to move on repealing healthcare.
"Obamacare is a job killer for businesses small and large, and the top priority for House Republicans is going to be to cut spending and grow the economy and jobs," said Brad Dayspring, spokesman for incoming House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-VA.
"Further, Obamacare failed to lower costs as the president promised that it would, and does not allow people to keep the care they currently have if they like it. That is why the House will repeal it next week," he said."
Because House Republicans will have such big numbers in their new majority, they likely have the votes to pass the health care repeal. But Republicans admit the repeal will almost surely die in the Senate, where Democrats maintain control.
My question is .. why spend all the time and energy on repealing the Bill, when they know it will fail in the Senate?
-
Agreed. It is a move designed to send a message to the voters that they heard them. Stupid. Should be spending time on important things like cutting spending. But that's our government. Stupid.
-
Linda, you're spot on. I've lowered my meds because I was basically symptom free for the first 10 days or so. Based on that, I feel that once the stimulator is turned on, I should be feeling pretty darned good.
Bren, they gotta show their voters they are doing something, even if it means they are wasting their time. hehe!
-
The Republicans have to try to repeal health care reform, because they said they would. This will fail so they will then waste their time and our money holding hearings and trying to pick the thing apart. Wow. Responsible government?
-
The Senate may have a majority, but they don't have a 60% majority. So, they would have to convince a few Independents not to repeal the law or parts of it.
I need to find the exact numbers.
Democrats - 51
Republican - 47
Independent - 2
-
The NYT commentary at the other end of this link mixes government legislation, Supreme Court decisions, First-Amendment rights, Internet anonymity, and societal behaviors -- all in one article. I stumbled over it this morning on my daily wandering through Google News: "Anonymity and the Dark Side of the Internet"...
Before anybody starts pressing any buttons, let me assure you I do not agree with the writer's position on the issue. Or, do I? I guess I don't know. My genes are Libertarian, but my roots developed in the politically schizophrenic soil of Minnesota.
otter
-
Well, the repub. reps are sort of in a damned if they do, damned if they don't position. There is a whole segment of voters who will accuse them of lying to get elected, if they don't try to overturn the bill. Wouldn't it be nice if they could issue a statement saying that they realize it will never pass the Senate and they have decided not to waste time and money trying to overturn it - and they'll let the courts decide? However, that would be the kiss of death for them with a segment of the voters. Oh dear - did I just defend them? Yikes!
-
"The inherent worth of . . . speech in terms of its capacity for informing the public does not depend upon the identity of its source, whether corporation, association, union, or individual." Or, in other words, a writing or utterance says what it says independently of who happens to say it; the information conveyed does not vary with the identification of the speaker.
There are at least two problems with this reasoning. First, it is not true that a text's meaning is the same whether or not its source is known. Suppose I receive an anonymous note asserting that I have been betrayed by a friend. I will not know what to make of it - is it a cruel joke, a slander, a warning, a test? But if I manage to identify the note's author - it's a friend or an enemy or a known gossip - I will be able to reason about its meaning because I will know what kind of person composed it and what motives that person might have had.
Copied from the article Otter posted.
-
Alpal, sometimes we have to agree with dems, reps and inds. Depends on if they are doing the right thing for the country. The best way for them to deal with this is for Boehner and McConnell to come out and say: "we heard you wanted the health care bill repealed. It will not succeed because we cannot trump Obama's veto so rather than waste time and money on it, we need to get to get down to the business of running the country."
I mean, people have got to get real. Ain't gonna happen so don't waste time.
-
Otter .. I agree with the author of the article. If my sis sends me a note calling me a goofball, I know she is teasing me in a loving way. If someone I don't like and who does not like me, sends me a text calling me a goofball, I would take it as a slight and that the person was insinuating I was stupid.
So, in fact, it does matter WHO is doing the writing, not just the written word itself.
Bren
-
I, myself, like the proposed change in rules requiring that every bill, when introduced, include a slip of paper saying which section of the Constitution grants Congress the authority to pass the bill. Sounds good, right? Patriotic and stuff? Well, there's already a rule requiring the same thing, but when the amended bill is finally passed.
This, like the reading of the Constitution, is political theater.
Barbara - I can't remember where we were yesterday, but I think it was Medicare. Oh, right, I posted a link to the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, complaining about Medicare way back in 2000. My point was that doctors' gripes about Medicare are nothing new, and that it sounds like Medicare needs some fixin' and has for a long time. At least, I think that was my point. Hahahahahaaaaarimidex!
Hope everyone has a great day!
E
P.S. Lassie and lindasa - Congrats on the win! I'm happy to share since we beat y'all so badly last year. ;-)
-
BarbaraA - I really don't know enough about Boehner but I can assure you that my Senator McConnell will never, except under threat of death, issue such a statement. Hope I have to eat my words. Bren - when I was growing up my dear father described me and my sister as a dreamboat and a goofball. Yep, I was the goofball and proud of it!
-
Alpal .. I love ya! Just a couple of "sister" goofballs in the family!
-
Yeah E, we can agree that Medicare needs fixing and cutting the benefits and raising the retirement age really frosts me, since I was planning on retiring in 3-5 years. Right. Work for 46 years and be told your benefit will be x then to be told scratch what we told you; the benefit will be y and oh by the way, you have to work 3-4 years longer. Great.
Alpal, I fear you are correct. McConnell is a true party man regardless of how stupid the party position is. Don't know enough about Boehner but suspect we'll find out soon enough.
Edited to correct my typo. -
Barbara -
I think what you're seeing is more political theater. There's an anti-entitlement mood among a small and loud group of voters so the Republicans are going after the most visible entitlement programs to "cut the deficit." Of course, neither Social Security nor Medicare have anything whatsoever to do with the deficit, and they KNOW that, yet they keep putting it out there to show that they're doing something.
It's ridiculous.
E
-
E .. at the end of the last thread we were also talking about how the area you live in plays a big part in whether doctors are cutting medicare and medicaid patients. I live in a small impoverished area, and there is no way the docs in this area could cut those patients.
In large metropolitan areas, the docs may have more than enough patients with insurance to be able to let go the medicare and medicaid patients.
IMO.
Bren
-
Bren, Since all of FL is pretty much mostly Medicare patients (they call it God's waiting room here in St Pete), doctors would be cutting 2/3 of their business so I guess they will go for quantity and less quality. Nice.
-
That's right. Thanks, Bren!
-
Barbara -- What's the doctor situation in Florida? A shortage, or more than enough?
-
Barbara -
On the deleted thread, I also rambled on about tort reform. I believe Texas has tried that with no corresponding decrease in physicians' expenses. (If I'm wrong, somebody please point me in the right direction!)
Tort reform assumes that if the cost of lawsuits drops, then the cost to doctors will also drop. Unfortunately, the cost to doctors is dictated by the malpractice insurers. If the insurers choose not to drop premiums even though there's a decrease in their expenses, then the doctors won't experience any cost savings to pass along to us. Odd how it keeps coming back to insurance companies, right?
E
-
We are having a shortage over the past few years as the malpratice insurance rates are insane and docs are bolting. We still have docs but if I need a new specialist, I have usually a 30+ day wait for an initial consult (unless it is urgent and my referring doc kick starts me up the appt. ladder).
-
Maybe the malpractice insurance industry needs a makeover.
-
And for all you rabid hockey fans out there, a funny lunchtime video:
http://www.kuklaskorner.com/index.php/hockey/comments/video_the_russian_spy/
Edited to make the link clickable.
-
Now that is too logical to actually expect our reps to look into the "malpractice" insurance industry. They probably have a big lobby to make sure they don't change things. I recently had to pay a chunk of money for double ultrasounds on my right boob because this "young" PA was too dumb to realize what she was feeling was a lump of fat! I think the "malpractice" scare makes these doctors and their assistants go batty to make sure they aren't missing anything which could cause a possible lawsuit. How many people have probably had to have all these needless tests just so the medical people can cover their butts!
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team