Stage 1 and Mets

Options
mari65
mari65 Member Posts: 131
edited June 2014 in Stage I Breast Cancer

When your stage1 grade 2, 0 nodes you really don't have to worry about a reoccurance with mets do you?? Just a question that came up..

«1

Comments

  • Lowrider54
    Lowrider54 Member Posts: 2,721
    edited December 2010

    The chances are very much reduced but bc isn't a very predictable critter - there may never be a recurrence so worrying isn't a way to live life.  Just be vigilant and listen to your body - get anything that seems odd checked out - mets can be detected earlier now and can be very treatable. 

    Don't live your life worrying...but mets can happen - statistically, your chances of a recurrence are extremely small. 

    Hoping you never have to join our Club Mets...Hugs....LowRider

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited December 2010

    Low said it well. When I feel something is wrong with my body I get it checked out until I am comfortable with the answer. That being said, I still worry, but have learned to make long-term plans!

    Unfortunately you can jump right to Stage IV with only one test, but the chances are very low. Exercise and diet do help your body fight, keep that in mind.

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited December 2010

    The chances of a recurrence are low .. but we're only human and we worry the cancer will come back, no matter how low the chance of it is.

    hugs,

    Bren

  • ravdeb
    ravdeb Member Posts: 3,116
    edited December 2010

    chances of recurrence are low. also depends on whether it was hormone positive or TNBC and how many years out. After 5 years out with TNBC, chances are very low but hey..I'm 5 years out and have had 2 biopsies this year cuz the onc was worried. Benign. But that just means you need to be watchful.

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited December 2010

    And those of us who are hormone positive have to start worrying AFTER the five year mark. We have a slower growing cancer and are often undertreated (I was). So they are finding an inordinate amount of stage I and II recurring after the 5 year mark as they only tested to that point. Doi!

  • Medigal
    Medigal Member Posts: 1,412
    edited December 2010

    barbe:  I was reading your post about hormone positive having to worry "after" five year mark. What do you mean you were undertreated?  I was given a lumpectomy, Chemo, Rads and am going on 7 years with Arimidex.  I don't know how much more they could do.  I know some patients refuse Chemo and/or Rad and won't go the whole 9 yards with Arimidex etc.  In that case, they may be opening themselves up for future problems, IMO.  

  • LJ13-2
    LJ13-2 Member Posts: 235
    edited December 2010

    Part of the 5-year issue is that the AIs and Tamox are typically taken for 5 years which suppresses tumor growth/recurrence. Once these drugs are removed, there is a spike, statistically, in recurrence rates.

  • gillyone
    gillyone Member Posts: 1,727
    edited December 2010

    Recurrence on an individual basis is a straight forward yes or no, you either get mets or you don't, whatever information you choose to take from statisitics. The hard part for all of us is to live our lives without constantly worrying "will I be the one?"

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited December 2010

    Medigal I had a double mastectomy 2 years ago today. That's it. No chemo. No rads. Not AI's. Nothing. I wasn't even assigned an oncologist. Demanded to see one last year to get peace of mind. She even said I kind of slipped between the cracks! 

    That's what I mean by undertreated. Wouldn't you say so?

  • Back-to-Wellness
    Back-to-Wellness Member Posts: 4
    edited December 2010

    Barbe1958 (I was born that year, good year!)

    Why did you have a double mastectomy?

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited December 2010

    I had NEVER not been called back for more mammogram pictures, ultrasounds, 3 biopsies and 2 surgeries before my 2nd lumpectomy! When that came back as cancer and not clear margins I said take them off!

  • Back-to-Wellness
    Back-to-Wellness Member Posts: 4
    edited December 2010

    Barbe1958

    What I mean to say is what was your prognosis?  Maybe you were in such early stages that you did not need anything more. 

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited December 2010

    With a lumpectomy without clear margins I would have had to have either more surgery or rads. The tumour was at 6 o'clock on my chest wall so rads right over my heart when I already have a heart condition wouldn't have been wise.

    Doesn't matter what your stage is. You can jump to stage IV with only one test. I had Papillary Carcinoma, a very rare cancer, less than 2% of all breast cancers. Gets treated as IDC, and I was ER+/PR+ HER2-. So no Herceptin for me.

  • IsThisForReal
    IsThisForReal Member Posts: 384
    edited December 2010

    Barbe - I know what you're saying about slipping between the cracks!  I was 'this' close.  They triaged my file incorrectly and apparently it was going to be a loooong wait for me to start tx.  A person always has to be diligent about their care, and I'm so thankful for the internet and this website or I may not have realized how aggressive HER2+++ can be, and may not have pushed the system.  Knowledge is power ladies.

  • SandyAust
    SandyAust Member Posts: 393
    edited December 2010

    Mari65 If you want a really comprehensive answer your oncologist can probably give you one.  The important thing is to make sure you really want to know and how you will deal with the information.  Everybody approaches their diagnosis in their own way and that is how it should be.  Do what is best for you. 

    I know a lot of people don't like statistics but I do.  I know new things are coming up all the time but I take the best that medical science has to offer at the time, both with treatment and risk assessment. 

    My tumour was 18mm, grade 3, 0/2 nodes, ER+PR- Her2-.  I was 36 and therefore premenopausal.  I had a mastcetomy, due to a large amount of high grade DCIS as well as the 18mm tumour. No rads, 4 rounds of EC and five years of Tamoxifen.

    After my chemotreatment my oncologist said my risk of recurrence was 20%.  That's 1 in 5, at 36 to me that was not a small risk, but better than many others, but not great especially when you have two four years olds.  At five years out, interstate move, new oncologist.  Told 5 years out my risk of mets was 6 or 7%.  Much better.  In ER+ tumours the risk drops, as has mine, but then it just cruises along unchanged.  I asked for how long. I was told, up to 25 years.

    This is my reality.  It could be a lot worse and I am grateful that it's not worse and I deal with it.  Hey I am saving for retirment!  However I don't think that risk is small and certainly not extremely small. 

    Due to family history I also have a 20% lifetime risk of ovarian cancer.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 inconclusive (we don't get negative results in Australia).  My risk was assessed by my geneticist.

    I am six years out.  Happy, grateful and mostly unworried.  However my life will never be the same since that day a few months after my 36th birthday.

    Everybody circumstances are different based on their cancer (sorry I hate that terminology) and its characteristics.  So if you really want to know, ask your onc.  I did and when she told me the risk would be there for 25 years I said "Gee thanks".  And she said "Well you asked"  and I thought "Well yes I did and I wanted to know so I am just going to have to deal with it."

     Do what is right for you. 

    Take care,

    Sandy

  • redhead54
    redhead54 Member Posts: 3
    edited December 2010

    I think I know where Barbe is coming from.  I was stage 1 ten years ago at 43 years of age.  Was told that I had a GREAT prognosis and cancer would probably NEVER come back.  So I had a lumpectomy and radiation even though I had a medium aggressive tumor and was only 43 (should have been diagnosed at 41 but gyno didn't read my mammo report).  I've since had TWO recurrences.  Second in same breast and then had mastectomy...nothing else.  Three years later, had a recurrence in SAME breast.  Mets to the skin.  Tumor removed and hormone therapy.

    I know no one wants to hear this but I DO NOT believe in lumpectomies AT ALL.  If I would have had a mastectomy from the get go, I do whole heartedly believe I would never had have a recurrence.  Plus now I've had more opportunity for the little buggers to go elsewhere in my body.

    So, I do believe some woman are under treated.

  • Honeybear
    Honeybear Member Posts: 554
    edited August 2013

    I had two stage I, grade II tumors (1.4cm right breast 2002, 1.7cm left breast 2006), then bone mets in 2007.  I never had a positive node or anything.  It doesn't make any sense at all, but like everyone else has said, BC is so unpredictable.  Oh, and I did everything-lumpectomy first, bilateral MX in 2006, chemo, radiation, etc...

    Peace and hugs to you.

  • nikola
    nikola Member Posts: 466
    edited December 2010

    I believe lots of women are under treated. I think once diagnosed we should be very aggressive with Tx. I went to check one area, mammo showed nothing, u/s picked up two cancers, pathology from mastectomy showed three cancers. My "good" breast was precancerous. I am thinking what would happen with my third cancer if I only had lumpectomy, would it show up 5 years from now? I had chemo and I am going for Zoladex inj on Tuesday. Still I do not have any guarantees.

  • LtotheK
    LtotheK Member Posts: 2,095
    edited December 2010

    I'm quite positive about my future, but there's definitely a lot to worry about.  With no chemo, AI or Tamox, my chances of being disease free in 10 - 15 are just 67%.  I did chemo, am on Tamox.  That still only gives me 80% and change.  I was a 1.2 cm grade 3 IDC ER+ node negative patient with a 12 Oncotype score.

    As my mother says, someone has to be in the 20%.  The truth is, I think we will move forward as one community when we realize we are all in the same boat to some extent. ER+ tumors can come back anytime.  Cancer is sadly totally unforgiving. I'm not being negative, I'm thrilled to be alive and move forward.  But I'm sober.

    And my latest battle cry:  second primaries. Which I have a wholloping 1% per year cumulatively.

    Regarding over or under-treatment, I went aggressive due to my age, however, there is no solid evidence that chemotherapy promotes overall survival in a patient not manifesting mets. Treatments need to evolve to be more targeted, less slash-and-burn, with a whole lot more attention to the long term side effects.  Particularly in younger women.

    I've also wondered about mast vs. lumpectomy.  I had a lumpectomy.  For me, the potential damage to my working arm was too risky with a mastectomy.  I have heard a lot of mastectomies that resulted in picking up pre-cancerous or other tumors in the breast, and it alarms me.  I also know they say only 30% of pre-cancerous cells ever become full-blown cancer.

    I will add finally that your Oncotype score points more to your survival statistics than grade and stage at this point.

  • texasdonna
    texasdonna Member Posts: 36
    edited December 2010

    Wow. I'm so glad to see all the different outcomes and bumps in the road with you guys. I thought my cancer was long gone after almost 3 years, but now there's a nodule on my left lower breast at the chest wall. Hopefully it's a benign little growth, but I'm seeing the oncologist tomorrow to see if I can have it biopsied. It's so comforting to know that even if it turns out to be malignant, I've got this site and all of you to look to for support.

  • mari65
    mari65 Member Posts: 131
    edited December 2010

    Thank you all for the great information. Everyone is always so helpful..

  • sem474i
    sem474i Member Posts: 2
    edited December 2010

    Does anyone ever feel "dismissed" by your doctor? When I shared concerns with my oncologist last visit he told me it would get easier living with my fear. He used the analogy of learning to drive a car when your 16 and getting better at driving the car as time goes by.  I really feel like even though my chance of reoccurence is lower, he should listen to my concerns.

  • nanadee
    nanadee Member Posts: 31
    edited January 2011

    Was reading the comments about being undertreated and was wondering about my personal situation.  I'm 51 and was diagnosed with mucinous carcinoma(rare), stage 1, grade 1...tumor was .7 cm. ER/PR positive and HER negative.   I had a double mastectomy in July-2010...but received no suggestions for follow up treatment.  Saw an onc who said he would not recommend chemo at this time and seemed disinterested when I tried to discuss hormone therapy.  Acted like he just wanted me to go away.  At my appointment with him he yawned 'literally' over 30 times and I felt that because of my initial path reports that he blew off my concerns regarding my future and the possibility of a breast cancer reoccurance.  I have a strong family history of bc.  Grandmother, aunts, and my mother who lived only 6 mos. after diagnosis.    Since apparently I had to have breast cancer, I am extremely grateful for my path results but as everyone knows, cancer is a tricky animal and doesn't always follow the rules.  I would rather fight a battle with an enemy when it is small in number than to wait and have to fight a war with it when it has multiplied.  I don't know...maybe my logic is flawed or the bc diagnosis I have expected/dreaded since my mother's death has turned my use to be nerves of steel into mush...but I can't help but feel that I should be doing 'something'.  Thanks for listening....

    Dee

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited January 2011

    Dee, I feel like you! Can't remember if I said it above, but my doc said to "save the big guns for next time!" At that time, I was grateful, but now I think it's a horrid comment!

  • voraciousreader
    voraciousreader Member Posts: 7,496
    edited January 2011

    Nannadee-  I edited this!!!  This is the 2010 NCCN guidelines link!  I posted the 2011 a little further down!!!

    http://www.nccn.com/images/patient-guidelines/pdf/breast.pdf

    Look at page 20 of the new 2011 NCCN Guidelines.  It specifically talks about mucinous breast cancer treatment.  Hope it helps.

    Also, I would get a second opinion.  And if you're still not happy, get a third opinion.

    You can also do a "search" here at bc.org.  When searching, put in the word "mucinous" or "colloid."  There's a bunch of us, including me, who have mucinous breast cancer.

  • voraciousreader
    voraciousreader Member Posts: 7,496
    edited January 2011

    Oops! I gave you the link for 2010 --- I'm sorry!!! Let me find 2010 because there is an important change for mucinous and tubular breast cancer treatment!

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited January 2011

    Voraciousreader, can you just cut and paste the wording? My computer sometimes doesn't link properly and I'd like to see what it says.

  • voraciousreader
    voraciousreader Member Posts: 7,496
    edited January 2011

    http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/breast.pdf

    page 19!

    If the link doesn't work -- Do a google search "NCCN 2011 Guidelines"  and then register and look at page 19!

  • voraciousreader
    voraciousreader Member Posts: 7,496
    edited January 2011

    Barbe1958

    I tried to cut and paste it -- but it didn't work!  I always try that first because you never know if a link is ever going to work.  Oy -- the internet!

  • JanetinVirginia
    JanetinVirginia Member Posts: 1,516
    edited January 2011

    Dee, it's certainly not too late to see another onc and get a second opinion!  Did you have an oncotpye test done?  With your stats the score would probably be low & chemo not recommended.  But hormone therapy is pretty standard for everyone ER pos.

Categories