Not Buying Into It
Comments
-
I am going to step over here and stand next to Pompeed on this one (as if she really needs the support!). I see no point in battering her about a hypothetical legal situation involving children (what was that all about?); and I think it's over the top to scold her because she has chosen not to post her dx in her sig line.
IIRC, Pompeed told us several pages ago that she's a patent attorney. Just as a "brittle" diabetic (do they use that term any more?) would not go to an orthopedic surgeon for advice about insulin dosage and blood sugar monitoring, Pompeed has explained that she does not practice family law and would not litigate an issue involving a minor child. To take the analogy down several orders of magnitude, a diesel truck mechanic does not ordinarily work on airplane engines, and vice versa. (Most) college professors would not do very well in a 3rd-grade classroom. (For one thing, they would lack the teaching credentials.)
(I am curious about Pompeed's area of expertise of patent law. I read somewhere that patent attorneys have to have a college degree or college credits in a field relevant to patent protection, like biology or physics or engineering. But, I'm just wondering about that because I think Pompeed is a very interesting and complex person. Really, it's none of my business. I am not asking or expecting her to post a reply here; and I would never chastise her for keeping parts of her life private.)
allalone, I'm going to back off on my statement about contralateral "recurrences" (versus new primary tumors). I believe my statement is correct; but "believing" in something doesn't make it true. I cannot find a clear, reliable source that documents the percentage of contralateral tumors that are recurrences versus new primaries; and I can't find a source that explains how a contralateral "recurrence" would be distinguished from a new primary. I've read articles referring to a 2-year (or even 18-month) cutoff, after which the contralateral tumor is presumed to be a new primary rather than growth of cells that spread from the original tumor. It is possible, anatomically, for cancer cells to spread to the other side; after all, they do get into the blood so they'll seed and grow in any tissue where the environment is suitable -- bone, liver, lung, brain ... so, why not the other breast? But, to know for sure that the new tumor is a recurrence of the old one rather than a brand-new primary would require some fancy genetic testing that would never be done in the usual clinical setting. (The ER, PR, HER2 stuff doesn't count for much, 'cause cells can turn those things off and on at will.)
Bec9861, I am in a bad mood this morning, too. Is it something in the air? This godforsaken cold weather, perhaps? My still-undone Christmas shopping? Maybe if I get out of this bathrobe and have another cup of coffee, things will be brighter.
otter
-
Make that three of us in a bad mood this morning, then (more down than angry here). Hang in there, Otter and Bec!
Edited to add:
In defense of Shaunna1212, she wrote to Pompeed:
-
To get to be a licensed patent attorney, which means an attorney who may practice before the Patent and Trademark Office of the US:
Sufficient undergrad credits in a "hard" science so four years of college minimum;
Law degree: that's another three years;
Law license in some state which means passing the state bar exam and then getting sworn in and admitted to practice law at least once;
Then obtain a Federal law license which is pretty much pro forma as long as one has a state license;
Courses and study for patent bar exam, passing the exam and then getting sworn in.
Could be about ten years. Maybe nine if one goes straight from college to law school and straight from law school into study for the Patent Bar. But that sequence is not how most people do it because it's unaffordable and it's easier to pass the Patent Bar exam if one has been working in a patent law firm or in the Patent Office for awhile and is familiar with the law and the process from work experience.
-
I am in a bad mood today too...I think its time to leave Pompeed alone.every single word she writes someone attacks her.Is she on trial here?It looks that way to me.
bc is hard enuf.
-
Pompeed, I apologize -- I didn't mean to leave out all the law-school and bar-exam stuff. I just assumed everybody knew that part was necessary to become an attorney of any sort. (I've had several classmates and friends and one college roommate go into law; I even considered it for awhile, when I was feeling even more argumentative than I am now.)
What I did not know until recently was that, to be a patent attorney (as apposed to the attorneys I typically deal with), someone needs a "technical" degree -- or at least the applicable college-level coursework -- and must pass an extra exam (the patent bar exam), in addition to the "regular" bar exam. Most of my friends who became attorneys majored in something from the liberal arts. One had a degree in fashion design, even. I did not appreciate until a few years ago that some attorneys are very good at rooting out and clearing up details in a real estate transaction; some are very good at family law (and "elder law," which is becoming increasingly relevant to me and my family); and some (fortunately) are very good at litigation. Of course, there are patent attorneys, too. The woman who was CEO (?) of the university's "Office of Technology Transfer" in my previous life was a patent attorney, it turned out. If all we ever did was watch "Law & Order," we'd never know about all the specialization. Awesome.
Totally off-topic, but awesome nontheless.
otter
-
Pompeed...I totally agree with you. I have only see one medical onc so far and she only wanted to discuss one type of chemo...ACT. I have researched CMF and she wasn't very happy that I knew about the different chemo regimens. She dismissed my statements that ACT has more cardiac toxicity...and cardiac problems run in my family. When I asked her what would happen if I take ACT, which is alot stronger that CMF, and the cancer came back in my breast or somewhere else, what chemo would you use and she tried to tell me that hey...with ACT it won't come back. C'mon, anyone has a chance of cancer coming back...I just wanted to know what my options are and she said well it wouldn't matter because they could only give me two years after that. I used the diagnostic tool on Cancermath and the difference between CMF and ACT is 10% mortality at 15 years. I think that is a small enough number to warrant a discussion about the two but she kept pushing ACT. This onc talked to me as though I didn't know anything and said that 'they are the experts'. Yeah, well, I found this lump in August of 09 ( i have always found lumps) and my GP didn't bother to read my mammogram report that said I had a large mass and need an ultrasound right away to it wasn't caught for a year. Needless to say, I don't trust doctors. The first surgeon I met with said a lumpectomy would be fine even though I asked about a mx...he said no way. The second surgeon told me a mx would be better. Thank goodness I trusted him because they found way more cancer in my breast. If I had listened to the first surgeon, I would be in big trouble. I am worried that if I insist on CMF chemo and she is not on board, it will be more of a difficult process. Maybe I should see another onc. I just wish these docs would discuss ALL the options with you instead of just the one that they push. There was an article in a magazine here in Canada called McLeans' and it was about the bad side of the breast cancer biz and the fact the docs don't tell patients everything....like the fact that 7% of women never get any any regrowth with Taxol. The women that are permanently bald said their oncn never discussed this with them
-
Pompeed- I felt the same way you do! The best two things a survivor said to me is...."everything you have to do is doable" and "be as aggressive as possible with the cancer". She was right...everything was doable...it is overwhelming to think of it all at once...concentrate on one step at a time. I didn't have many side effects from the chemo...no weight gain or loss, no mouth sores, ...really the only side effect that bothered me was the hair loss. The Tamoxifen I am on now isn't bothering me at all...and I am not gaining weight on it. I read that most people stay the same, the next biggest group losses weight on it, and the smallest group gains weight. My Onc says that any patient that has gained weight on it complains of low energy...that is why I take my pill at night. I was aggressive fighting this cancer. My friend that told me to be had a mother diagnosed at the same time as her with a much less severe case...the mother had a lumpectomy, radiation, tamoxifen...but refused chemo because she didn't want to lose her hair. The cancer ended up in her lungs and brain and she is now dead. Her daughter, whose cancer was much worse than the mothers, did everything the doctors said including chemo and a mastectomy and is now a 6 year survivor. I removed both breasts, even though the cancer was in one only, and I had the chemo the doctor recommended, even though I didn't want to lose my hair. Nothing I had to do was too bad...it was all doable! I am now growing my hair back and I have tissue expanders in...by March I will have a cute new hairdo and 20 year old breasts that defy gravity. There is a light at the end of the tunnel...just don't give up!
-
For Otter:
There are plenty of specialities and, in many states, certifications for them. Here's a partial list of legal areas of specialization and attorneys can get certifications as specialists in some of these areas where such credentials are allowed by means of special training with demonstrated expertise:
Taxation
Corporate and business law
Bankruptcy
Family law
Civil ligitation
Criminal law
Elder law
Estate and probate law, estate planning and estate administration
Constitutional law
Real estate, foreclosure and other real property matters such as leases, franchaise rights
M&A
Securities law
Legal ethics and professional responsibility
Quasi criminal law (DUI, traffic offenses and matters which are heard in lower level municipal courts which are often violations of motor vehicle codes and petty crimes)
Insurance and re-insurance
Cyber crime
Legal rights of children relative to education; legal rights of disabled persons
Mediation and arbitration
Social security law
International business law
International law of nations; law of the sea
Maritime law
Patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret and corporate espionage
Contracts
Labor law for either the employee or the employer
Mining and minerals law
Environmental law
White collar crimes
Generally speaking, any kind of an undergrad degree is sufficient for admission to law school given grades and LSAT scores and the rest of the credentials necessary for an application. To sit for the patent bar exam, however,, one must have a certain number of "hard science" credits at the undergrad level to apply to take the exam plus a law degree. Which is not the same as saying one has to have graduated with an undergrad degree in that science.
One can do trademark, copyright, trade secret and other related intellectual property law matters, like licensing contracts without being admitted to the Patent Bar. But for patent prosecution, one has to have a patent bar license. It's the only area of the law which requires an additional exam and special license as distinquished from a speciality certification. Anyone who understands patent prosecution can draft a patent. Only an attorney who is admitted to the Patent Bar, however, can sign it, submit it and defend it in the Patent Office.
And it's true: there are attorneys who are really good at deals but wouldn't dare set foot in a courtroom and litigators which can't do a deal to save themselves and are very comfortable in a courtroom. I would never touch a family law matter because I don't have the skills to handle those clients but I know attorneys who make a very good living at it because they have that skill.
-
Cat123~
I spoke to 3 oncologists before going with the one I was happy with. I did not want to do a chemo that took away my long hair. Not only was it a part of my identity I felt that if I lost my hair I would feel "sick" and not be able to participate in things with my children. Now, that is just how I felt about it, but this last oncologist respected my feelings and said we would find a chemo where I could try to keep my hair. We ended up doing TCH and I used the Penguin Cold Caps as a trial test in Virginia. They were cold but I was able to keep my hair and do the treatment that was suggested...I really value the oncologist who listens to their patients.
-
Athena: Maybe you missed the openly hostile and demeaning tone of this from Shawnna:
"Pompeed-Somehow i knew that was going to be your answer honestly it was just a bunch of mumble jumble that didnt make sense and again you danced around the question dosnt matter how long your post is or what you say "I wont buy into it"
"Your right you didnt have to answer what your stage and grade is but yet you shared so much more i didnt think on this forum it was all a secret!"
-
Pompeed,
I admire you so much for trying to delve into fact-finding rather than just going along, no questions asked.
Disregard the personal attacks. They reveal the limited thinking ability of the personal attackers.
-
Ang7,
Yes...I thiink I will see another oncologist. I suggested the penguin cold caps to the onc I saw last week and her and her assistant said 'no way'. They really didn't leave me any options. I am so glad you kept your hair. I think I could still order them and keep the caps in a cooler but if the hospital doesn't use them it might be difficult for me to try.
-
I also did my own research into taking Tamoxifen and AI's. Against AMA I declined both Tamoxifen and Arimidex. The SE's far outweighed the benefits to me (after having tried both).
We really need to be our own best advocates in this journey.
-
From BinVA:
"We really need to be our own best advocates in this journey."
Could not agree more. And by any rational test, that is NOT an easy task. The stumbling blocks and the pit falls and the blockades and dice rolls are monumental. And we're forced to dodge them all as best we can when we are in a personal crisis that doesn't necessairly have the mind in it's best deliberative and analytical focus. We're on a tightrope and it's not easy to keep one's balance.
-
Just a thought from my sister in the medical profession. I was talking to her about the percentages... and she said beware, because 3% or 5% etc might seem small, but she said you are taking in all ages, ethnicities.. etc. She said that those small percentages mean alot more than we think. I was discussing with her the whole, is it really worth it if it only adds 5%....I am not bringing this up to sway anyone, but I think some of the percentage stuff is misunderstood and not explained to patients!
-
Hope .. I weighed the percentages very carefully in my case .. and with a huge amount of research and forethought. The 5% benefit to me with Arimidex wasn't enough to choose unbearable SE's over quality of life. It's a personal decision ... and I can live with the choice I've made.
Bren
-
Hi
I've been following this thread from the beginning but haven't posted. I understand your thinking, Pompeed, and your mindset.
My son, in his teens, would argue that black is white, and put forward a very structured argument. We always thought that he would make a great attorney but after his law degree he went on to complete his accountancy exams. He's now the proud publisher of quite a few books,
His mindset came from me! Like you I thought about all the options open to me and I didn't want to waste any time on anything that wouldn't benefit me. My father died an awful death after his DX at 83 followed by chemo etc etc. But I was different, I wanted to live for my grandchildren etc. I still do and the treatment (chemo) was worth it. My only point of reference in all of this is my chemo buddy who died. She had secondaries in her liver and lungs and didn't have chemo the first time round and always wondered if she had, would it have made a difference. All I know is that I'm still here, and even though I am still unsure, I wouldn't have changed my treatment.
I'm here enjoying life but my chemobuddy isn't.
Mal
-
Totally understand BinVa, I didn't post that here to question anyone. I just thought it was interesting,
-
What I have found most important: read the studies carefully. What's the study population? Who is in it? What's the state of disease? The statistical conclusions only apply to the limitations of the study population.
Or read a really good summary of treatment options. One of the breast surgeon's I consulted with gave me a copy of a paper he authorered with a group of other MDs which is all about risk assessment. It's the state of the art and the standard of care.
It was tough going and I had to read it about three times and get some help from a pathologist / toxicologist I know to sort through it. But it was really illuminating and it informed my own decisions.
-
Hope .. it is interesting .. that's why I agree with what Pompeed just posted. We need to "carefully" read the studies and stats from a lot of different sources.
Hugs,
Bren
-
I haven't read all of the comments here but I had to stop in and say to Pompeed, I admire your spirit.
My first oncologist (who I sadly don't have anymore due to a move) was very clear to me when I moved and said, "YOU are in control of your medical treatment. You do the research, call me if you have questions and do what's right for you." It was the single best piece of advice I could have received - and he is right.
I am a writer/researcher by profession and I have researched BC treatments, diets, homeopathic and "standard treatments of care".All BC is different and each treatment is different. Each one of us responds to treatment differently. There is no guarantee with any of this. None.
Pompeed's life is in her hands, as it should be.
It's scary to stand by watching even a stranger refuse what we have accepted as "treatment", it puts doubts into our own minds... Are we making the right choices for ourselves? What if Pompeed dies? What if Pompeed goes on to live and full and healthy life? What would that say about our choices?
But in the end - we ALL have choices. Pompeed's finding her way, just like all of us have.
God's blessings to Pompeed and everyone here.
-
Everyone makes a choice which is right for them. If someone decides to not go for chemo or radiation that is their choice and I respect that. I also respect those who do go for these options
What I don't respect is when individuals go out of their way to defend their position, throwing out statistics, Scare tactics and so called studies to get others to see their position. If you stand by your choice there is no need to try to convince others.
-
Well, if there's no point in reading scientific studies and looking at statistics which give guidance, then making decisions about treatment will be even more of a crap shoot than it is now. Shall we all choose to be as deliberately ignorant as we can be? Will that make us happy? I doubt it.
I don't see that others, with a couple of exceptions, have tried to "convince" anyone else to adopt their choice of treatment. I've now read hundreds of personal narratives on this site. In just about every topic offered. Every narrative is different. I have yet to read the same narrative from two different women. And doubt I ever will.
And if everyone is standing on their own choices and there's no need to "try to convince others" to follow along, I don't know why I have taken such beating from those who have found the choices I have made for myself so offensive simply because they are different from the choices the same people have made for themselves.
We are told: "If you stand by your choice there is no need to try to convince others." Which ought to mean, as a simple corollary, that there's no reason to berate or belittle or denigrate or discredit the choices others do make or the person who makes them: no one else's choice will have an impact on whether I live or die and my choices will have no impact on whether someone else lives or dies.
I see no harm in voicing disagreements and sharing information. It's beneficial. But I see a lot of harm in personal retribution inflicted on others as a means to affirm one's own choices or settle lingering self-doubt.
-
I am anything but deliberately ignorant, thank you. I just find it so painful to read the narratives of women trying to defend themselves for having chosen chemo after others wrote all the negative stuff about chemo, and further treatment. Even women with stage IV cancer are defending themselves. I want to scream, you don't have to explain yourself, you did the right thing. There are so many different types of breast cancer, all requiring different type of treatments. Some of us have more options, lower grade of bc, can opt out of chemo or radiation. Than there are others, who have very few options and pretty much need chemo to survive. I also think it is not unreasonable for someone to ask, what type of breast cancer you have and what grade, given that 16 pages have been about you. If you decide not to have chemo or radiation and are node negative, ok makes sense. Not putting it into context makes it confusing and has allowed for very mixed emotions. I know I will get shot down again with harsh words.
-
I agree with you totally Gutsy!
Actually, I think this thread is BS and should be closed
-
I understand how you feel. However, I have been encouraged by this site and the ACS support group that there is life after all this....
-
DO NOT GO GENTLE INTO THAT GOOD NIGHT Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rage at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light. Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night. Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light. Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night. Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light. And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light. Dylan Thomas -
I love that.....
-
1Athena1- Thank-you and your right some of my words were harsh and for that i do apologise.
Bec- I could say the same thing to you but,.. never mind.!
I hope pompeed finds the answers to what she is looking for and finds peace.
I wont be reading this thread anymore because i dont want to be in a pissy mood every time i come here.
-
Just checked in to read more on this post. Well, I think the mood has switched from "jumping on Pompeed" to "jumping next to her". So, now, at last, we can have an opinion and remain friends with broaden horizons at the end of the day.
Athena's exit form this thread reminded me of my old college debate days when the debater(me) and the defensive debater (young male) got "pissed off" and stormed out of the room. I won the debate. He, of course, lost. His "talking points" were forgotten and my "talking points" moved mountains. I think our relationship was irrefutably damaged that day. Unfortunately, we weren't friends at the end of the day-definitely his loss.
Alot of discussion, on this thread, centers around statistics to choose treatment plans. When deciding what treatment plan I relied on my doctors to give me initial information. I researched their suggestions and choose the treatment plan.
After reading voluminous research studies, I felt comfortable with my choice. New studies supported my decision and armed me with new information. I was anxious to discuss the new probabilities of survival with my doctor.
My last visit with my breast surgeon resulted in some very sobering advice. I started to talk about a new research study-he abruptly cut me off. He told me he was going to give me some very sound statistical probabilities on my diagnosis.
His advise to me: your chance of recurrence is either 0% or 100%. So, quit reading about "cutting edge" studies on large groups of women and studies based on old stats that do not apply anymore and do not apply to you. I suggest you get on with your life and live everyday to the fullest.
Standing by my choice was made crystal clear, that day. And, we were friends at the end of the day.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team