All About Gummies
Comments
-
Okay, I think I finally climbed my peak today. I decided to try on my cleavage-dependant clothes today and am quite happy with the results. I also just added a swim-suit edition photo on the other site.
I can see that the implants are larger than my natural breasts in this swim suit shot because it's pulling at the bottom of the cleavage. Oh well, I guess a new bathing suit is in my future. The dresses looked very much like they did pre mastectomy. So this has really brought a smile to my face and I feel like I have moved past the valley of gloom and sadness.
Deborah, not sure if you read this thread but you are very right about bra sizing. I found this website that actually had a video of what bras should and should not look like. I can tell you that I have never worn the right size bra! I can hardly wait to get back to the US and go bra shopping at Nordstroms. In the meantime, I will have to buy a couple to wear until I can get there. I will start to read the bra thread because I'm completely clueless as to what I should be wearing with implants that won't push them in or pull them out or whatever else they aren't supposed to do. Definitely a learning curve!!
-
Hi
I posted something about gummies earlier this week and am facing a dilemma. I am facing the exchange and my hope was to have everything done in 2010--since I had chemo, radiation and some intermittent issues during treatment I stepped back from my consulting business; I did that under the idea that it was only for a year and I can focus on myself for that time period.
I moved back to St Louis midway through treatment to be closer to family--that meant giving up one of the best PS's in the country and the lead investigator of the 410s. I found a great PS in StL--but he is not using the 410s. And, the only docs using them either don't do reconstruction or are not in my insurance plan. They also won't let me go back to have the exchange in my original city b/c that would violate the study guidelines???
My StL PS can do the surgery on Dec 30 this year--but only with a round silicone. My original dr. is adamant about using the 410 on me. I've started asking about replacing an implant I get put in this year with a 410 later. If I go that route, his nurse will find out whether I should use a shaped saline implant instead
IS THAT EASIER TO FIND THAN A GEL SHAPED SILICONE? DOES HAVING THE EXCHANGE DONE THIS YEAR AND HAVING A 410 LATER MAKE SENSE?
Thanks!
-
Gemini -- it can certainly happen! Lots of women end up exchanging one set of implants for another set, often within a year's time, due to being unhapy with the results for one reason or another; your doctor would have to get approval from insurance... but it seems to happen a lot so I gather it CAN be covered by insurance. The women I've encountered on this site who have had different implants have been: women who switched from saline to silicone (because they wanted softer and less ripples); women who switched from silicone to saline (because they wanted bigger than what silicone can be); women who switched from gummies to silicone rounds (because they found the gummies too firm); and probably there have been some who have switched to gummies from rounds, though to be honest I can't think of any at the momen.
Did you ask the PS in your previous city this question you asked us and what did he/she say?
I think you have to do what makes sense for YOU. But here's my question: assuming that your gummy PS thinks you could go from round silicone to gummy at a later date (as opposed to starting now with anatomical saline... which I guess is what you mean by shaped)... why not let the St L PS give you what he/she thinks is the BEST they can do (short of a gummy) and see if you like it? You might find you DO like regular silicone (for example)... and not want to switch to a gummy later.
That said, I will tell you in case no one else has: you don't get implants for life... they have a shelf life of around 10 - 15 years... so an exchange is in your future regardless (just a matter of when).
-
Lilah and gemini- This is part of an article from Dr. W. Grant Stevens that was sent to me about switching from rounds to gummies.
The shaped form-stable gummy bear implants, such as the 410 and the CPG, are not ideal implants for women who have had previous breast surgery and have already pockets for those previous implants. Those women have pockets which are generally too large to safely accommodate the shaped form-stable implants.
The whole article can be found here:
http://www.marinaplasticsurgery.com/article-gel-implants.pdf
It's one of the questions that I will be asking my surgeon at Sloan tomorrow as I want to switch my round for the 410 gummy.
Gemini - why not go to a surgeon at Sloan that will allow you to live in another state? Where is your gummy doctor located?
-
Lilah, I I'm just trying to understand something you said. Are you saying that if, for example, 10 years had already passed would we be able to get gummies again since we currently have them? Also, just curious, how do you know when you've reached the expiration date of your gummies? Do they look or feel different? Does an MRI determine this?
-
As I understand it, MRI's are needed to tell if the round silicones have leaked. But with the gummies, they are not sure of how long they will last as they haven't been around for more than 15 years. I assume that an MRI would be needed to see if they needed replacement. Some say that they could last much longer than round silicone or saline.
-
My PS told me they recommend (even for the gummy) that you get an MRI every 2 or 3 years. The only way to tell if silicone has failed is by MRI as I understand it.
Mantra -- yes I assume we would be able to replace with gummies when it is time to replace... and it could last 20 years too so it's not clear (as Claire pointed out) exactly how long they last. But they are not permanent... they do eventually need to be replaced.
Claire -- that is very interesting. I guess that's why I have not heard of women going from round to gummy. But I think that means that if Gemini implants an anatomical shaped saline (which I believe exists, no?) then she would be ok going for the gummy later. Anyway let us know what your PS (my PS too hehe!) says about that when you see her! I have to agree the requirement that you live in the city where you get the gummy is one I have not heard of... and certainly Sloan Kettering doesn't require that! I live in a different state and I went there and got a gummy.
-
Thanks ladies. Here are some answers to your questions:
WHAT IS THE NAME OF YOUR PS AT SLOAN???
1) My original PS is in Wash DC--he also happens to be the lead investigator in the 410 study.
2) My understanding from Allergan (who is running the 410 study) is that you have to live within 90 miles (or no more than an hour) away from the doctor who is operating on you because of the monitoring they do in the first 2 weeks (?) and then again over time. So you have to be able to see the same doctor for 3 years (I could travel easily and have family in New York).
I'm curious who the PS is at Sloan???
Frankly, I think my original PS would do the surgery then let me leave after a couple weeks until I moved back permanently, but his nurse and Allegan squashed that.
3) My original PS said I should DEFINITELY NOT put in a round silicone and then replace it later with a gummie. Instead, if I'm set on having the surgery done this year, his nurse is finding out if he thinks I should have a shaped saline implanted now. He is adamant that a round silicone not be put in.
4) That is an excellent question--what can my current PS (in St Louis) offer? He is supposed to be among the area's best PS's. My guess is, he can offer a Natrelle silicone but am not sure--my TE is a Natrelle. But see my earlier comment--he definitely doesn't want a round silicone put in if there's a chance I'll opt for the 410 later.
5) Someone also said on this board that many doctors may be reaching their quota limits in the 410 study so are not taking as many patients as they once were. Not sure if that's what I'm running into...
With all this info, I'm really torn. Do I move ahead with my plan and get the surgery done in 2010 just to get it done and plan on a later exchange with a 410?
Or, wait until I'm settled into a job, a permanent location (which could take how long :-) and then get a 410 hopefully in one easy step.
Are the salines that horrible??? Thanks for listening!!
-
I'm using Dr. Andrea Pusic at Sloan. I live in CT over 100 miles from Sloan which is about a 2 1/2hour commute. I hadn't heard of the 90 mile rule. And I'm getting sadder about not being able to replace with a gummy. I'm wondering if you've only had the round for 4 months, if it makes a difference?
-
Mantra-thank you so much for your encouraging words on my pics. I'm glad you are now much happier and liking your cleavage. I'm telling you the truth you look great!! I don't think your going to have ripples since the gummies are form stable and adhere to your skin. Thats a good thing.
Girls-replacing gummies..this is what my Dr told me. I had the choice of going with gummies or rounds and couldn't decide. Was set to go with gummies but at the last minute went with rounds. I just didn't know what to do, but he told me don't worry you can switch to gummies if your not happy later on. I know it is true sometimes that the pocket would have to be adjusted especially if you had a large silicone rounds. I have a friend who was expanded for saline rounds and then found out about the gummies. My Dr said he could do them on her but he would need to revise her pockes to make them smaller. I don't think it is ideal but I think it can be done in most cases. Any how Lilah makes a good point in most cases with either implant they will have to changed at some point in our life. It would seem to make sense that the gummy may last longer? I'm just guessing that since it is more form stable and wouldn't leak, but I don't know if that has anything to do with its longevity factor. Good question for your gummy girls to ask your Dr's.For all of us I hope we see even more advances in medical options with implants in the future. Maybe in 10 years there will be something even better, no ripples, softer, etc
-
See what the doctor says.
Gemini - Given this information that you cannot go from rounds to gummies, that leaves you with two choices: get anatomical salines (they can be firmer than gummies, as I understand it) or find a doctor who will give you gummies if that is what you feel you MUST have. (Third choice is get smooth rounds and be done with it -- and frankly that is NOT a bad choice). I have to say that I, like Claire, have never heard of this distance rule. It's too bad the doctor in Washington can't find his/her way to working with you long distance. I had my follow up with my PS about a week after exchange... then 6 weeks... then 3 months. This is what is normal (I think) for any exchange surgery. As far as it being the gummy study... I had to fill out a bunch of forms and I think once a year I have to go back and answer some questions. It's late in the trial phase at this point and really they are just collecting data now. Perhaps the reason for the rule, though (now that I think about it), has to do with the fact that one tends to fly for longer distances... and there might be concern about flying soon after surgery? I wonder what would happen if you were able to arrange to be in town (in Washington) for a week or so following exchange? Would that change things for your doctor there?
Sweetie -- so true about the future! And as I understand it ALL implants degrade with time just from being in our bodies. Saline implants are contained within a silicone exterior so it's the same deal with all forms of implant. I should think your PS is right that it CAN be done (round to gummy)... and probably it just depends on the individual and how the capsule forms. But you know I had a TE that was round... and lived with that for several months... and then at exchange the doctor removes the capsule and puts the implant in (whereupon a new capsule begins forming).... so it does make sense to me that it's POSSIBLE to go from round to gummy... especially if after a short time.
-
Hi Gemini, Not true about the distance rule or follow-up requirements. I live 5 hours away and had my initial surgery and then exchange to gummies at Memorial SK. I did not have my post-op visit for over a month -- the PS and I agreed that, unless I had a medically urgent situation - for which I'd need to be seen locally -- there was not anything to be gained by a sooner follow-up visit, and the study did not seem to require anything sooner. BTW, I know that others have liked MSKCC, but I had horrible nursing care both inpatient and outpatient, bad care at the hands of the residents and fellows, and-- most important-- very disappointing experiences with my BS and PS. The PS did do a good job, cosmetically (
), though I would not recommend taking a risk on how the gummies feel.
-
Thanks for all the great comment.
Jerusha: When you say "you would not take a risk on how the gummies feel" what do you mean? You weren't happy going from silicone to the gummies following your exchange?
This distance issue is confusing. I spoke to Allegan's clinical trial director last week and she stated emphatically the "no more than 1 hour away" rule.
I wonder if it's true what others have said--that some doctors have a quota of 410's they can use, and when they get close they have to back off? Anyway, I"ll try to find out more tomorrow and post here. Thanks!
-
Hi Ladies. Latest update is now the pros are leaning towards radiation. May be going to MSK for second opinion. Everyone we've talked to say they've seen this one time in their 30 years of practice, so there is no definitive "right path". I was majorly depressed last week. At least the first time I was diagnosed, I was sure that the bi lat mastectomy was the sure fire way to never have to deal with this again. So now I feel if that didn't work, then there really isn't a sure fire way to beat this and feel like I'll worry forever. I was also really upset about the prospect of radiation messing up my reconstruction. I'm feeling a bit better after having sat with it for a few days, but I don't know if I'll ever get that sense of security back.
I posted new pics on the pic site, under same name...Sharon2010. They are from last week and still very bruised. I'll take more tomorrow or later this week, when I'm not so "post Chinese food bloated" and post more then.
Sweetie and Mantra- I posted comments on the pic site, but just want to say that you both look amazing!
I don't think the 410s have tabs that are sewn down. I think that's just the tissue expanders, but I can't be positive. If they had tabs, there would never be an instance of implant rotation, and I know that's a risk factor with the gummies.
As for what to call them... I have a hard time referring to them as breasts as well. I call them "foobs" fake boobs.
Gemini, I haven't heard anything about this distance thing, but who was telling you that, the PS or the insurance company? Could your PS be trying to keep you with his practice by making you think you don't have the option to go back? You might want to consider contacting Allergan and asking them directly.
-
Sharon -- hmm... you know what you are right it's the TEs not the implants and I got it wrong. Sorry. That said, the original reason I mentioned it was that Mantra was worried about her gummies falling out of their pocket. I think that in the first several weeks post-exchange you DO have to be careful... but once the capsule has had a chance to fully form and the tissue to adhere to the implant (textured means the implant adheres) then it's not likely though, of course, it's true that a shift CAN happen with the anatomicals that is not desireable. I wonder if that is a bigger risk in the first several weeks?
I can only imagine what you are going through... it does sound rare indeed but it does happen (they always say 1 - 3%, don't they, after double MX... but who ever thinks they will fall into that tiny pool? I hope and pray that whatever course of treatment you pursue it will truly mean the end of BC for you! No more BC for Sharon! No more!
Jerusha -- I know you are suffering and had a bad time with MSKCC but I did not for what it's worth. Especially with my PS. Also I am not completely convinced that the pain you feel is from the gummies. It sounds like trunkal LE.
Gemini -- that is just bizarre about the distance rule. Maybe there are different phases of the study with different rules. As for quotas -- I believe they all have a limited access but the limit varies. A place like MSKCC -- being a large research hospital -- has got more units at its disposal than, say, a small practice. That said, I do recall that when I was scheduling my surgery I asked the staff about this issue and they did say their quota is a monthly quota. I never asked how many... but got the impression that there were rarely issues with this and, even if there were, they would simply reschedule me if need be. That did not happen.
-
Hi Sharon 2010-
Yep, contacted Allegan directly and they (and the PS nurse) are the ones who shared the "1 hour away" rule as being part of the study. It was wierd. I think the doc would be ok with me coming in to do the study, then stick around for 2 weeks while I recovered then came back to StL.
Is it worth it to contact Allegan and let them know that I've done " research" and it seems that others have traveled as far away as 5 hours for surgery? (nicely) She said the rule is in place because I would have to be monitored after one and 2 years--which doesn't seem to be that big of a deal.
But why should it? Lots of people travel for medical procedures.
Here's how we left it Friday: The PS's nurse would find out if he is ok with me having a shaped saline implant in lieu of the gummie, then replace that with a gummie later. That way I can get all this done with this year (my original goal).
If he is not ok with that (he definitely doesn't approve of a round silicone if I want to replace it later wtih a gummie) then I guess I won't have the exchange this year and just wait it out...Or get a round silicone even though it's not ideal (according to PS #1)
-
Lilah, I know you had a good experience at MSKCC. Others have also, particularly with your PS. And I know that you are happy with your gummy... That is all very wonderful! I think it is great to share that. But I do think that women need to hear about the possibilities of bad care and undesirable outcomes. Its not sour grapes...it is honest reporting and I think that we all need all of the information we can get ... positive and negative so that we can weigh our options. Sometimes the negative reports come at a bad time, like just when we think we have made up our minds to go a certain route. On this sort of forum, its bound to be bad timing for someone. Hopefully it will be just the right time for someone else to use the info constructively to help with choices. Before I got my gummies I was advised, actually right here at bco, that more than half of women are unhappy with them. I felt so persuaded by the merits that I convinced myself that I would not be in that half. I wish I had read more personal stories from women who were unhappy with them...maybe I would have been more able to imagine that I might fall into that group. (Maybe not, I'm pretty hardheaded...) It is hard for me to be a harbinger of bad outcome... I usually hold back as I don't want to be a party pooper. But I honestly believe that we don't do each other any favors to sugar-coat or be less than honest.
BTW, my gripes with MSKCC, the poor quality of nursing and medical care are a separate issue from my feelings about how I like my gummies. My complaint with the gummies has to do with the way in which they feel like TE's (a description we can all relate to...) -- not to the touch, but on the "inside". Hard, unyielding. And the way they feel "stuck" to my insides -- their adherant quality. Actually, my PS did a good job -- in terms of how they look. How they feel is certainly not his fault. Despite doing a competent job, I still believe -- as a medical professional -- that my care at MSKCC was poor. Perhaps I know "too much" from an insider point of view or my standards are too high. The other problems that you refer to that I have been having with LE in my hand (not truncal) are completely beside the point, here. Bad luck probably, or bad genes, or idiosyncratic response to the implant or possibly bad surgical technique (as some now surmise).
Anyhow, it's a wonderful thing here, that women can get ALL of the versions of "the real story", because there are many... and we can help each other along as we make our choices.
-
I just googled to try and get some info about the study restrictions. I was on one Dr website and his wording makes me think that the restriction is put in place by the Dr and not by Allergan. This is a quote from one doctor's website Dr. Teitelbaum will offer this only to patients who live in the Southern California Area. Contact Inamed directly if you live elsewhere and need the name of a participating surgeon.
I would think that if the restriction was from Allergan, it would be worded differently. In Ontario, the gummies are approved but we are undergoing an Alloderm study. I'm part of the study (even though I was not chosen to actually get the Alloderm). I don't recall the agreement I signed mentioning anything about distance otherwise I too would probably not be able to participate. I do recall signing something saying that I would be available for the follow ups and that I would agree to fill out questionaires.Sharon, this is just my opinion and of course feel free to ignore it. I don't want it to come across as insensitive. That said . . . if the DCIS they have found during your revision is not commonly found post mastectomy, I'm wondering about the need for radiation. I know it's a gamble as to whether there is more in there but personally, I would want a lot more facts before deciding on my next move. I'd want to know if the previous DCIS was in the same area or is this in a completely different area? What was the post mastectomy pathology reports (ADH etc). I'd also want to know if an MRI or BSGI would provide information as to whether any more DCIS is left. I'm sort of looking at it like a lumpectomy that didn't get clear margins so you had a mastectomy. If they had completely removed all the ducts during the mastectomy, then the DCIS would have been gone. Or did they find more DCIS when you had the mastectomy that wasn't previously found prior to surgery. And if you have DCIS and have a mastectomy, in what cases is it necessary to have radiation. Obviously, it's a lot easier to be full of wisdom when it's not my own body. But as cautious as I am, I would just want a lot more info before doing anything. I'm so sorry you are having to go through this. Cancer just doesn't seem to fight fair.
I have my first post op appt with my PS tomorrow and have plugged a list of questions into my blackberry. I wonder if PS dread this first visit? They don't know if they are walking into the room to be faced with a unhappy or happy patient.
-
Jerusha, I agree that sharing of stories is an extremely important part of coming here. I liken it to reading reviews on restaurants. If there is one review and the restaurant is given a 10 out of 10, I figure it's likely the owner who has written the review. However, if there are 30 reviews, and it is given an 9 out of 10, then that's the restaurant I will go to; not the 10 out of 10 with one review. And these threads give a compilation of a wide variety of people and I think that's important. In my case, part of my research included reading about gummies from people who are my size since I imagine women with larger breasts might have a different opinion.
That said, I think some of the tightness or "inside" feelings are to do with the surgeon. I can tell you from personal experience, my first TE done by a different surgeon was THE MOST PAINFUL experience. It hurt all the time. Breathing was painful and each fill was excruitiating. I actually passed out from the pain. Fast forward, I found a new PS, she removed my TE and put in two new expanders. ZERO pain. Zippo. The fills were painless. I basically felt nothing. So I'm the same person, with TE and had two completely opposite experiences.
I think we all need to take everything with a grain of salt and accept that each of our experiences are going to be different; for whatever reason. Whenever I see a new doc, I always check them out of ratemd.com. Many months ago I had to see a urologist. His ratings were horrible but I kept thinking . . . this Dr. has been referred to me by my surgeon whom I trust. He works at the top cancer centre. So I decided to go ahead with the appointment. OMG . . . I loved him. He was the exact opposite of what was posted. I actually verified his first and middle name with his receptionist because I thought perhaps this was the son or some other relative. He was probably the best Dr. I have ever gone to . . . patient, knowledgeable, personable and spent a ton of time with me. My experience was superior but that doesn't mean the other patients were wrong. It was just their opinion based on their own experience.
-
Thank you all for a helpful discussion. One last question for the night--are the "gummies" from Mentor (the CPG?) similar or equal to the Inamed 410s? Thank you all again for sharing. I should have probably started looking for a PS who uses the 410 a long time ago. I didn't even know they existed until last week!
-
I've heard there are some differences. I think the Allergan is considered a true cohesive gel. But honestly, there are many other woman much more knowledgeable in this than I am and I'm sure they will put in their two cents very soon.
I've been skimming through most of the posts and trying to finish a project off at the same time that's due this week. Am I understanding it that you are considering getting a different implant and then when you move back to the orginal area,you will exchange them out for gummies? I can't say for sure about this type of surgery but I do know that having prior surgery in the same area creates risks caused by scar tissue etc. Something to think about before making a decision.
-
Gemini -- they are supposed to be a bit softer, a bit more squishy -- but not like a regular silicone round -- still more like the cohesive 410. Doctors, I believe can only be in one study or the other, so cannot dispense both. I am not sure if the Mentor CPG docs are even harder to find; it seems so. Maybe it is regional, though.
-
Mantra -- I think you are so right about the tightness and the "inside feelings". There are so many variables, and what I find intolerable, someone else might not mind at all. But when you control at least one variable by comparing YOU to YOU... same TE, same you, different surgeon...it is very informative. Too bad surgeon and outcome are never actually studied to understand what techniques lead to what outcomes. Wouldn't happen in a gazillion years!! But that is what we do here by sharing our anecdotal/individual experience.
-
Jerusha -- of course you are right to share your bad experience. I just wanted to restate my good one
Gummies have been in use for 10 years in Canada and Europe and it is not true that half the women who get them don't like them, though it certainly IS true that some don't like them. Clearly they are NOT working for you and I totally appreciate that. Without a doubt you should exchange yours for either regular silicone or saline OR consider autologous reconstruction. Personally I think autologous is more desirable, because it's your own tissue, but there are issues with that as well having to do with the loss of the use of the muscle that is moved, for one thing, and the additional scars and longer healing time, for another. For what it's worth, I do not think gummies are right for everyone. I have, in fact, suggested to others right here in this thread that they might be happier with the regular silicone. I think there is no perfect implant; whether you choose round or gummy silicone, each has pluses and minuses; saline, too, has pluses and minuses. In fact, there is no perfect reconstruction. But some are going to be better than others for individuals and as Mantra noted, you have to use your best judgment when selecting doctors and procedures and it is really hard to know what to do sometimes.
Re: Mentor CPGs... it is also my understanding that they are softer than the Allergan 410 but still cohesive (still can be cut in half and do not leak but form two halves). I think Musiclovermom has them if you want to PM her and ask her about them. Actually, I think there is someone here in this thread who has them as well (scroll back -- can't recall the name atm).
-
Sharon-I'm sorry your having to deal with this DCIS issue. I know your in good hands and you will come to the right decision on how to treat it. I did see your new pics and you look fabulous. Hang in there, it's all going to be alright. big hugs.
Lilah- so well said! You helped me a lot in deciding which way I should go. My final decision in choosing rounds over gummies had to do with what I felt was most important to me. I think though that if I choose the gummies I would have been happy too. I think either would have been fine, but they both still would have pro's and cons. Sometimes it's just so hard to know what to do and even though your reading about everyone else's experience you have no way of knowing what your outcome or feelings about it will be.
Jerusha- I just wanted to say I have the silicone rounds and when I first got them they seemed so soft to me, but now I notice they seem very firm, don't really move (although I can push them together in a bra if I wanted) and are very tight in the pocket, So maybe firmness is just the nature of implants? I hear saline is much firmer than the silcone and ripples more too.
-
Sweetie -- you should talk with your PS about the increased firmness. Did he/she tell you to massage your implants? I have read here in numerous threads that women who have smooth rounds need to massage (but I would confirm this with your PS and not go by what I am saying alone). I actually like to massage my gummy occasionally even though I've read here that you shouldn't with gummies lol... I should ask my PS about that myself! I do find that my implant feels softer lately but I think that's to do with time... and would have felt softer anyway. I have also recently read a comment from Whippetmom, who has smooth rounds for over a year now, who says she notices her implants have gotten softer.
-
Lilah-he said no massaging at the 2 week follow up, but I see him in two weeks and see what he says then. Someone else said some PS's don't want massaging if they used alloderm. I think they are soft,but I think it's just that they are so numb, especially the left so they feel weird to me. In a way they look so similar to the TE and don't move just like the TE didn't.
-
Ah well do what your PS says Sweetie he knows best!
I am surprised to hear they don't move; I thought it was only the gummies that don't move. Still, I think in time all will soften up.
-
Hi ladies--Spoke to Dr. Pusic's office at Sloan (the recommended PS) regarding the 410 study guidelines. Jessica was really helpful
Her office does indeed treat patients as much as 5 hours away, but only if they area also receiving other care at Sloan (oncology, etc.). So that's how they can get around it in the Allegan study. The research assistant also confirmed the 90 minute away rule (not 90 miles) as part of the study.
Elizza--which implants did you go with? I've been reading these great posts and am now getting a bit confused.
Lilah--I told my DC doc I could stay in town for weeks after the exchange for follow up visits. But his nurse squashed that idea citing the study guidelines (the distance rule).
PS in DC also said that I could go from a round to a gummy later--but he prefers I put in a shaped saline rather than a round (afraid it would end up under my armpit).
So I have to confirm with my StL doc in 2 days whether I'm having the surgery on my scheduled date of Dec 30 (with a shaped saline or round silicone) or just waiting it out until things are more settled in my life and waiting for a 410.
I'm inclined to move forward and get it done this year and doing an exchange for a 410 later...Thanks to all of you for listening!
-
Had my first post op visit today. They removed the steri strips. .. . I didn't realize that there weren't any stitches to be removed . . . a pleasant surprise. The pathology report was negative. I wasn't aware that they send away the tissue expanders, capsule as well as the scar to pathology. I guess it makes sense but I thought it would just be the scar.
I was told not to massage but when I'm three weeks post op I am to massage the scars with cream, twice a day for 10 minutes each time. The incision looks great to me but I will do as told. I honestly can't remember if she said to massage the incisions in a straight or circular motion. I do remember the strength she showed me to use, but as to the direction to massage, I'm clueless.
She also said I could start wearing a light bra that doesn't push, pull or squeeze. I spent FOREVER trying to find a 32 C or D without wires. I finally gave up and bought the only wireless, light bra they had. They only had one . . . I mean literally one!! . . .and it's PINK . . . YUCK. So it was a pink 34 C or nothing.
We also discussed why some surgeons say that it's okay to wear bras with a wire and some do not. She said it will be at least 3 months before she will make the decision about whether I can't or can. She explained that it's guided by each individual patient and what feeling they have in the area where the underwire would sit and gave me a detailed explanation that made complete sense.
She said nipples are a minimum of 3 months away. I'll get them done in April when I return to Canada. Tattoos will be 3 months following nipples.
The one thing that was said that bothered me is that I was told I still have swelling in the upper area. I just kept thinking . . . oh, no, there goes the cleavage!
So of course, this knocked me back a step emotionally.
Next appointment is in a month. I really need to find some bras. I didn't realize that this was going to be a problem. I was always a B cup before and always wore wired and finding a bra was extremely easy.
I've decided that the gummies (from the outside) feel like a very padded bra. I think if a company could make an implant that had a much more natural feel, they'd have a winner on their hands. Although, I guess it's the muscle that make it feel like . . . but then wouldn't all implants have the same firm feeling? Does the muscle cover the entire implant? In my case, the cleavage area feels much softer than the rest of it and I'm wondering if the muscle doesn't cover this area.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team