radiation or more surgery???

Options
goldee4
goldee4 Member Posts: 3
radiation or more surgery???

Comments

  • goldee4
    goldee4 Member Posts: 3
    edited October 2010
    I am very confused.  I was diagnosed with DCIS in two places (only tested 2 places).  I had a lumpectomy with 5.5 x 4 x 2.8 cm area removed.  I also had a lymph dissection at the same time, which luckily was benign.  DCIS was present throughout the entire specimen tested (14 places) and my margins were not clear.  So two weeks later I had a re-excision.  My original BS swears that my margins are clear, but the 2nd opinion BS I saw feels they are not.  It is still questionable.  My first BS originally recommended radiation and tamoxafin.  I have a blood disorder and I cannot take tamoxafin.  I didn't get a 2nd opinion until after my 2nd surgery.  The 2nd BS said right away I need a mastectomy, without question.  I think the 2nd BS would have done a mastectomy from the start because my DCIS was so spread out.  My ob/gym agreed.  My first BS keeps reminding me that with radiation I would have about a 6% chance of DCIS (not invasive) cancer coming back.  Since DCIS is so slow moving, they would catch it in time and do a mastectomy then.  Why do a major operation for a precancerous disease when I only have a 6% chance of this precancerous disease coming back?  I still have a 94% chance that DCIS will never come back.  It seems like everything I read leads me to believe I need a mastectomy.  I am so confused!
  • Kitchenwitch
    Kitchenwitch Member Posts: 374
    edited October 2010

    Hi - I don't have much in the way of advice or information but I don't like to see your post sitting here without responses. I have a similar situation. Two spots of DCIS, lumpectomy and re-excision and still not a good margin. I am having another excision in about a week and a half. I also have a blood issue that will likely mean I can't take Tamoxifen.

     A pathologist read my slides and says he feels the DCIS is so widespread a mastectomy is unavoidable. Two breast surgeons have already said they don't agree. It's frustrating because I think the imaging is so shaky - I had an MRI that showed nothing. Recent mammograms are "unimpressive" according to my surgeon.

    Part of me thinks that if there is a recurrence in a few years maybe the treatments will be better? And another part of me is also very afraid that the recurrence will be worse, more aggressive and invasive... so I'm on the fence.

    I'm going to have another excision, and my surgeon seems willing to do one or two more beyond that for margins. Like you I would like to avoid mastectomy.

    One thing that bothers me is how little consistency there is. You seem to have been tested for HER2 - my first surgeon told me they don't test for that. So that's disappointing. In Philadelphia there is a doctor who feels that the presence of HER2 is predictive of a more aggressive cancer returning at some point. I am thinking of sending him my slides for testing. Maybe you can take some comfort in the fact that your DCIS is negative.  

    Bottom line is, I'm going to try really hard to get good margins and do radiation. At some point I may just have to have a mastectomy but I'm not going without a bit of a fight.

    Are you confident in your surgeon? Do you need a third opinion? My surgeon is the 5th one I've visited. I feel good about him and my upcoming excision.

    Best wishes. 

  • redsox
    redsox Member Posts: 523
    edited October 2010

    If DCIS recurs, it will be DCIS in about half of the patients and it will be invasive cancer in the other half. 

    I agree with Kitchenwitch that it really  depends on your confidence in each of the two surgeons you have seen.  Have you had a consult with a radiation oncologist?  That might help by providing another viewpoint. 

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited October 2010

    goldee4 I can only tell you what I would do in your case but I don't have a medical degree and I'm no specialist in breast cancer. Personally I think your 2nd surgeon might make sense due to the  fact it was in more than one area and especially since hormone therapy isn't an option for you. BUT I would recommend getting a 3rd opinion. I tend to want to go more aggressive. I really don't know the issues with DCIS.

    Just remember that both these surgeons might be right. Cancer is so unpredictable. Many times treatment is their best guess based on past statistics. It might come down to how aggressive you want to be.

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited October 2010

    goldee, one thing you have going for you is that your DCIS is grade 1.  That's good and would suggest that a recurrence is less likely.  But on the other hand your area of DCIS is large and very widespread and your margins are suspect.  Those two factors would suggest that a recurrence is very likely.  Combining both points, and based on the recurrence information that I've found, it appears that your recurrence risk probably is in the range of 10% to 20%, depending on just how close your margins are (i.e. whether you actually have positive margins or just close margins).

    http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/cgi/content/full/3/2/94/T2

    http://www.breastdiseases.com/dcispath.htm

    This leads me to believe that the 6% recurrence risk that your first BS mentioned to you is overly optimistic.  I also question his saying that the recurrence would be DCIS - there is simply no way to know this.  As redsox points out, 50% of recurrences after an initial diagnosis of DCIS are not found until the cancer has become invasive.  So if you have a recurrence, there is no way to know if it will be DCIS or invasive cancer - your BS is simply wrong about that point.

    Given that your first BS seems to be saying some things that are not consistent with what I (and many of us here) have learned about DCIS, frankly if it was me, I would question anything he says.  I do appreciate however that you don't want to have a mastectomy if it's not really necessary.  Do you have an opportunity to get a 3rd opinion?  I think the question of whether the margins are clear or not is really critical to your decision.  Knowing the true status of the margins is the only way to accurately estimate what your recurrence risk really is.  So if you can get another set of eyes on your slides, that could be very helpful and that's what I recommend.

  • speech529
    speech529 Member Posts: 337
    edited October 2010

    Hi Goldee

    I am so sorry you are going through this and then having such conflicting information.  I think this is the nature of DCIS--it is treated differently depending on where you are in the country.  There are some women who have sent their pathology reports to specialists to get another opinion.

    It's important to remember that Breast Cancer is a multi-focal disease.  I know that DCIS is not life-threatening, but it could become that way.  My doctors told me that mastectomy vs lumpectomy + radiation have about the same outcome for recurrence.  

    I chose a unilateral mastectomy after having a lumpectomy with large excision and poor margins.  I have a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer along with many other cancers.  My breast was very small (less than a A cup) and they took a very large excision the first time.  My DCIS was grade 3 and I had not had a mammo in 3 years when it was diagnosed.  I was concerned about the ratio of DCIS to my breast tissue--so I opted for the mx.  It is not an easy decision but I am at peace with what I decided to do.

    I had consultations with radiation oncology and plastic surgery well prior to making any decisions so that I had enough information to make my decision.  I also consulted an outside oncologist about my pathology.

    I think getting another opinion my be helpful for you.   It's important to have peace about your decision and with DCIS you do have some time to do that.  Peace to you!

  • linfer7358
    linfer7358 Member Posts: 34
    edited October 2010

    Hi speech529

    Your diagnosis is just like mine..How long have you had your lumpectomy before you decided to have the mx..Did you have radiations before the mx..I am scheduled to have lumpectomy this 14th of Oct..and i really wanna know what should i do if they will not be able to get a good  margin..The next step maybe is to have the mastectomy..It's very hard to decide at this point but i need to do some decission..I am having so much pain in my breast since they started to have lot of test and mamo from me i hope this is not because of the cancer it scares me to death..Every little pain terrified me..Please post how you're going with your treatment..Wish you well..

    It is so encouraging to know that i am not alone in this journey..People here are so supportive and helping each other get through..God bless to all!..

  • speech529
    speech529 Member Posts: 337
    edited October 2010

    linfer   I first had a stereotactic biopsy on March 25 to determine what my lesion was.  I had burning pain from that.  I found out on March 27 that I had DCIS. During the time between the diagnosis and the lumpectomy, I met with a radiation oncologist and a plastic surgeon.  This was to discuss treatment options, side effects, etc.  I knew that I would have to decide between lumpectomy + rads or mastectomy.

    Then I had a lumpectomy on June 2.  My margins were not "clear" so I had to have more surgery.  I did not have too much pain after the lumpectomy.  My BS injected a local anesthetic after surgery which really helped to block pain from starting.  I had another major surgery the same day (total vaginal hysterectomy with removal of ovaries) to treat problems that I found out about around the same time as the DCIS.  I had no problems recovering from that surgery, either.

    Due to a number of factors that were specific to me I decided to have the mx, which I had on June 28.  The decision you make should be your decision that you make with your doctors after getting informed. 

    As far as time frame from diagnosis to treatment, I had several months to think about what I wanted to do.  I met with the radiation onco and PS right after my diagnosis to get information.  I had that information for two months prior to my lumpectomy.  I think that it is important to have all the information you need prior to even starting your treatment so that when lumpectomy results come in, you know what  you will do depending on the results.

    Have you met with a radiation oncologist to find out what type of radiation you will have and all the SEs?  Have you met with a reconstructive surgeon to find out what your options would be?  

     This is a difficult time--getting all your questions answered is so important to your peace of mind.  Peace to you! 

  • goldee4
    goldee4 Member Posts: 3
    edited October 2010

    Thank you all for this information.  I guess knowledge is power, so is support!  I have another BS appointment this week, plus a PS (and want to see another) and another oncologist.  I had met with a radiation oncologist, actually got my treatment lined up and even had the appointment where they set me up and "marked" me.  So I now have three blue dots on my body, maybe for no reason.  I didn't ask the radiation oncologist about my decision because at that time, I felt my decision was made.  This all changed at my 2nd opinion BS.  I do wish I had sought out more opinions at the beginning.  I trust my original BS and my sister in law, who is a physician, had BC last year and used this BS.  So I didn't think to go elsewhere.  I trusted her.  I still do, she is just much more of a conservationist.  Maybe female BS are more inclined to save the breasts, I don't know.  The second surgeon, male, was adamant about a mx, now I am going to see two more.  I hate thinking about this all the time, I can't concentrate on much else.  I am hoping once my official decision is made, I won't be so overwhelmed.  And going to so many doctors is a full time job.  It is exhausting.  When I talk to people, all points lead to mx.  What are people's thoughts about unilateral vs. bilateral?

  • StellaG
    StellaG Member Posts: 24
    edited October 2010

    Hi Goldee. I am in UK and my diagnosis was very similar to yours, pure DCIS in a very small boobie. We don't have the luxury of a second opinion here but the advice and care we get is second to none. I had lumpectomy but did not get enough clearance on 2 margins. Rather than have him digging about in there again, I asked my BS for Mx and he agreed, had it done on 20 Sept, immediate Stattice (I think you call it Alloderm) reconstruction with TE initially as they need to stretch it a bit!! In the pathology following the Mx they found almost as much pure DCIS again as I was originally diagnosed with. I thought they would find some by the very nature of DCIS but given how much they found, I feel that I made absolutely the right decision to have the Mx and do not regret it a bit. I will have my exchange surgery and other breast enhancement done in a few weeks and then it is all done, That is the best result for me. No more worrying and get my life back on track. Hope this helps, xxxxx

  • lago
    lago Member Posts: 17,186
    edited October 2010

    BTW I don't think female BS are more inclined to conserve breasts than male BS. I think men actually like breasts more than women do ;-)

    Seriously I feel BS male or female are all about treating the patient. They do not want to see their patients get recurrences. At the same time a good surgeon doesn't want to remove healthy tissue. When I initially wanted to do a BMX my surgeon, although would support what ever I wanted to do, told me there was no need to remove healthy tissue. He wanted to wait till I had the MRI to see if it was necessary. Once those results came in he then highly recommended the BMX.

  • speech529
    speech529 Member Posts: 337
    edited October 2010

    Goldee  It is all-consuming when you are at the initial stages of getting information and trying to make the right choice.  For me, knowledge is power.  I think a surgeon's point of view may come from where they were trained and their long-term experience. 

    What kept echoing in my mind was my dad's (a retired surgeon) comment--cancer is a multifocal disease and must be treated as such.  Mx and excision + rads are equally effective in preventing recurrence and that's the bottom line.  

    My BS' advice was to start small with lumpectomy.  She assured me that we can keep going forward with excision, but we cannot go back once the breast is gone.  That was very helpful to me.  I knew I would keep my options available starting out with a lumpectomy.  Once I had the pathology report from the initial lumpectomy, the mx decision was very easy for me to make.  It was crystal clear what I wanted to do and I am at peace about it all now.  I was fully aware of all my options prior to the initial lumpectomy.  

    Every person is different as was illuminated in the experience of your sister-in-law and the BS...she was very comfortable with her decision, however, that does not mean you will be.  And that's okay.

    I hope you will get the answers soon so that you can be at peace with your decision.

Categories