Curing Cancer with Diet

Options
2

Comments

  • somanywomen
    somanywomen Member Posts: 872
    edited March 2010

    Marienne, wow, you have a doctor that has knowlege of nutrition....That is the exception and I for one am envious...I feel that since we can have at least that control (diet) fighting this bc to give it our best shot!!...I have been on arimidex since Jan 14....I do notice a few more hairs in my brush, but no ohter se's to date..My onco score was close to yours and only a 1-2% change so I chose diet change to make that up.......good luck

  • dlb823
    dlb823 Member Posts: 9,430
    edited March 2010

    jerseyjean ~ I was in a similar situation (post menopause), tried Femara, but could not tolerate it.  (I had an episode of passing out caused by the the severe nausea it gave me.)  After much research, I've opted to use the natural aromatese inhibitor, I3C, for now, along with a full range of other cutting edge supplements, and a diet based on the principals from books like those noted above.  The last time my estrogen was tested, it was in the same neglible range as women on an A/I (<10).  I will continue to monitor my estrogen and other hormone levels, but for now, I feel my decision not to take an A/I was the right one for me.  If I was in your situation, I would start by getting one of your doctors (maybe your primary doc) to order a blood test to see how much estrogen you're actually producing.  That should help you figure out what you need to do re. blocking or modulating it.    Deanna

  • Luna5
    Luna5 Member Posts: 738
    edited March 2010

    Deanna...so glad I read your post...this is the first I have heard of a target number for estrogen.  I haven't ever heard of anyone prescribing AIs actually checking to see if they are working.  I need to re-look at my last bloodwork report but I think my estrone and estradiol are still in the 20s.  What is the optimum goal?  You mentioned <10.  Is this for estradiol, estrone or both? 

  • Marie45
    Marie45 Member Posts: 31
    edited March 2010

    The topic caught my eye and I read the question but haven't read any of the answers. I have not read the book.  I believe a good diet is good for you whether you have cancer or not.

    I just want to say that an aquaintence of mine has lung cancer.  He was on chemo but didn't like it (who likes chemo??) and about a year ago did a lot of research on diet and how it can 'cure' cancer. 

    He chose to go off chemo a year ago and went on the diet.  He said he felt terrific.  Earlythis week, he wasn't feeling well so he went to a doctor.  Tests revealed he has days to live.  Looks like tonight he will go. 

    We all have to do what we feel is right for ourselves.  If it were me, I'd throw away the book and eat a balanced diet and continue with the treatment - as directed by my Medical Oncologist and agreed to by me.

  • Bless
    Bless Member Posts: 141
    edited March 2010

    daisy6,

    You are so blessed to have such a knowledgeable dietitian near you.  I can't find any dietician's in my area, much less a good one, or holy cow one that actually specializes in breast cancer!  I'm jealous!

  • hrf
    hrf Member Posts: 3,225
    edited March 2010

    I've been taking Arimidex and am managing the se's effectively. I take glucosimand/chondroitin and hyaluronic for the joints ... also cherry juice does help. I do take vagifem to deal with vaginal issues. It's all ok.

  • dlb823
    dlb823 Member Posts: 9,430
    edited March 2010

    Luna ~ I don't have a specific answer to your question, but I don't think our oncs do either.  All I can tell you is, when I've had my blood work done, the report gives a normal (untreated) reference range.  For postmenopausal women it's 130 mg. or less for total estrogens (mine was 107) and for Estriadiol it was ND-37 (mine was <10).  This was about a year after I stopped HRT and 3 months after I started I3C.   

    For anyone who is premenopausal, here are the normal (untreated) ranges given for that:

    Total estrogens:  Early Follicular Phase 70-400 pg/ML, Late Follicular Phase 100-900 pg/ML and Luteal Phase 70-700 pg/ML.  For estradiol, there's a much wider range based on cycle days -- anywhere from 11-69 to 146-526. 

    I have heard anectodotally that the objective of the A/I's is to get our estrogen as close to 0 as possible, but that scares me re. depriving all of our organs, like our heart, of it.  Also, in my case, I had been on HRT and was 100% ER+.  So, I feel that removing the HRT (which I firmly believe was a factor in causing my bc) was huge for me.  But women who are premenopausal and ER+ have an entirely different challenge.

    Hope this helps some.  I have an appointment with the integrative specialist @ UCLA later this month, and the whole question of I3C/Dim/Myomin is on my list of questions for her.   

    Marie, I'm very sorry about your friend.  Unfortunately, a lot of people who choose diet over chemo do so out of fear, when chemo may have made a difference.  On the other hand, many times cancer is going to trump anything we do -- conventional or alternative.   But that doesn't mean that some healthy diet modifications may not be beneficial for people living with cancer or the fear of a recurrence.  For example, while low-fat dairy products are considered a healthy part of a normal diet, several renown integrative specialists caution us about the amount of hidden hormones they contain -- especially if we have a hormone-sensitive cancer.  The very fact that many of us who developed bc had always eaten very healthy diets suggests to me that there may be things we may want to do (or at least know about) to fine tune our diets in view of our bc dx.   JMHO...   Deanna

    I

  • Luna5
    Luna5 Member Posts: 738
    edited March 2010

    Deanna      Thanks for the info on estrogens.  I will take another look at my last bloodwork.

    Can't wait to hear what your doc says about I3C/DIM/Myomin....I have been taking DIM but am still not sure which one (or combination?) is right for post menopausal.  

  • TNgolfer
    TNgolfer Member Posts: 253
    edited March 2010

    Luna5,

    What is DIM?

  • vivre
    vivre Member Posts: 2,167
    edited March 2010

    Marie45-My dear friend's father also had lung cancer. He did everything his doctors told him, which included no advice on diet and lots of chemo. He last a few weeks. Lung cancer is particularly deadly. At least your  friend had a year of feeling good, instead of a few weeks of feeling like crap.

    I heard a doctor talk this week about naturally lowering estrogen. She said that the excess weight we put on in our midriff is like growing an extra estrogen producing organ. Fat in the midriff chemically converts cells to estrogen and stores it. So the main reason diet matters is it helps us to lose that midriff weight. I know that once I ate less estrogenic foods, I was able to get rid of all that midriff weight that I had been fighting for years. I also lost a lot of excess breast tissue, which is another store for estrogen. My blood and urine tests are proof that my estrogen levels are now very low. I also take myomin, which acts just as I3C/DIM to lower estrogen receptor ratios, which is exactly what tamox does. There are so many estrogens in foods. These estrogens will go through us if we do not have a lot of fat in our bodies to store them. We do need to watch what we eat, and use estrogenic foods sparingly, but it is so hard to do because there is estrogen everywhere. So I would not worry too much about things like grapefruit that are low glycemic and thus will help us keep our fat levels down.I think we can consume things like that sparingly. The trick is to eats lots of variety and in small quantities. And our best protection, better than any drug out there is to lose weight and exercise everyday. Studies show that this reduces our risk of bc by 50%. Isn't that the same as the drugs do? And for many, those drugs cause weight gain. That seems counterproductive to me, and the main reason I decided to get control of my eating habits and get healthy. Plus the only side effects are looking and feeling better!

  • TNgolfer
    TNgolfer Member Posts: 253
    edited March 2010

    vivre,

    Just as fyi.....In all my research I have uncovered two things about grapefruit: 

    1) all citrus (except grapefruit) are natural aromatase inhibitors

    2) grapefruit also interferes with high blood pressure medications

  • marichai22
    marichai22 Member Posts: 31
    edited April 2010

    Has anyone ever cured their cancer with Diet, Herbs, Juices or Vitamins alone or are those things in addition to surgery, chemo, and radiation?

  • TNgolfer
    TNgolfer Member Posts: 253
    edited April 2010

    Interesting question.  My guess is you won't find the answers in your doctor's office and there won't be any statistics from insurance companies either.  You will find stories on the internet and in a lot of books out there.  But if you refuse chemo, or any other treatment, I don't think you are "followed" statistically by anyone.  Lot of good accounts in one of the books I read.  I think it was the one about fighting cancer with nutrition.

    Marianne 

  • marichai22
    marichai22 Member Posts: 31
    edited April 2010

    TNgolfer,

    Thank you for your reply.  After reading the posts here it sounds like good diet and exercise accompanied with traditional treatment is the overall consensus.

  • TNgolfer
    TNgolfer Member Posts: 253
    edited April 2010

    There are also some other things out there that help, depending on your particular type of breast cancer.  There are some books devoted exclusively to nutrition and breast cancer and some books just deal with all cancers.  Also, if your bc was ER+ and your recommended therapy would be hormone treatment (aromatase inhibitors), there are some foods that are natural AI's.  I personally am skeptical about medications and how they actually work and worried about a lot of side effects.  The trick is to find out what quantity of natural foods and/or supplements would equal the traditional med's.  Some really interesting information out there.

    Marianne

  • Yazmin
    Yazmin Member Posts: 840
    edited April 2010

    Marianne:

    Could you, perhaps, go a little bit into some of the "things" out there that you feel can help? 

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited April 2010

    Large white common mushrooms and Grape Seed Extract (GSE) have been shown to be high in natural AI's.

    http://www.mushroom-uk.com/health_professionals/report.htm

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/5000582/Eating-mushrooms-daily-may-cut-breast-cancer-risk-by-two-thirds.html

    **********************
    http://www.cbcrp.org/research/feature/schen.php

    Featured Researcher-Shiuan Chen, Ph.D.

    Shiuan ChenDr. Chen is the Director of the Department of Surgical Research, Division of Surgery in the Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope.

    Developing Breast Cancer Prevention from Natural Products

    Dr. Chen has studied the chemopreventive properties of the aromatase inhbitors in grape seed and white button mushrooms. Aromatase is an enzyme responsible for making estrogen. Dr. Chen has found that the activity in extracts from grape seed and in white button mushrooms is capable of blocking tumor growth in animals. Based on these observations, he is developing a breast cancer chemopreventive drug. Read more about Dr. Chen's work >  http://www.cbcrp.org/research/PageInvestigator.asp?person_id=1657
    Ask an Expert

    If you'd like to ask Dr. Chen a question about his research, please email your question to shiuanchen@cabreastcancer.org any time between March 12 and April 30. New questions and answers will be posted regularly, so check back for updates.

    * Q. How much grape juice would you have to drink to prevent breast cancer?
    A. Based on animal studies, we estimate that 250 - 300 ml of grape juice per day could have a protective effect against breast cancer. The use of grape seed extract may avoid concerns about the sugar content in grape juice. We can only get precise dosage after human trial.

    The City of Hope has an active clinical trial to determine the dosages of grape seed extract that can suppress estrogen formation (i.e., aromatase suppression) in postmenopausal women.

    * Q. How many mushrooms would you have to eat to have an effect on aromatase activity?
    A. Based on animal studies, we need to eat 150 - 200 g of white button mushrooms everyday. The City of Hope plans to initiate clinical trials to determine the exact dosages of mushrooms for suppressing estrogen production in postmenopausal women.

    * Q. Do ALL mushrooms affect aromatase activity? Do some work better than others?
    A. As indicated in our paper published in the Journal of Nutrition in 2001, most types of mushrooms we tested can suppress aromatase activity. The good news is that the most common type of mushrooms, white button mushrooms, are equally effective as some unusual types of mushrooms. From our preclinical studies, the anti-aromatase effect of mushrooms remains even after they are cooked.

    * Q. Are the aromatase inhibitors that you find in grapes different from the ones you find in mushrooms? If they are different, which ones seem to be more effective?
    A. Yes, the anti-aromatase chemicals we isolated from grapes (i.e., procyanidin dimers) and from mushrooms (i.e., conjugated linoleic acid) are different. From our studies, the chemicals in grapes (grape seeds) seem to be more potent than those in mushrooms. In addition, the modes of action of these chemicals are not exactly identical.

    * Q. In what ways could the inhibitors that you've found in grapes be different than the ones currently used in the clinic?
    A. The inhibitors in grapes are clearly less potent than those currently used in the clinic. Therefore, they may be useful in prevention, with less side effects (that associated with the elimination of estrogen in our body). In addition, grape chemicals are found to suppress the expression of the protein aromatase, and also to inhibit aromatase activity. Based on such results, we would like to hypothesize that grape chemicals may also be useful against premenopausal breast cancer. The synthetic aromatase inhibitors are shown to be only effective for postmenopausal breast cancer.

     *****************************

    http://www.cancerdecisions.com/content/view/280/2/lang,english/

     Anticancer Power of Supermarket Mushrooms
    Sunday, 18 October 2009


    Most people have heard by now about the healing powers of exotic medicinal mushrooms, such as reishi, shiitake and maitake. But what about the white button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus), the kind that is so boringly abundant in American supermarkets? A study at City of Hope hospital suggests that it too may have anticancer effects if taken daily.


    "You don't need a strong effect to cause cancer prevention. Eating 100 grams or even less of mushrooms per day could have an effect on preventing new breast cancers," said Dr. Shiuan Chen, director of the Division of Tumor Cell Biology at the Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope in Duarte, California. Results of the ongoing study have appeared since 2006 in several leading scientific journals.


    Mushroom extracts turned out to be effective aromatase inhibitors. Aromatase is an enzyme that helps the body make estrogen, a hormone that feeds the growth of breast tumors. Of seven vegetables tested, mushrooms had the greatest effect. Other forms of mushrooms (such as portabello, crimini, and shiitake) also were aromatase inhibitors, so one could vary the type eaten to add a little variety to the regimen.


    The button mushroom extract reduced the proliferation of breast cancer cells in the laboratory. Giving the extract to mice with breast cancer also suppressed tumor growth. Based on their laboratory experiments, the scientists estimated that 100 grams of mushrooms (less than four ounces) taken per day would probably help prevent breast cancer growth.


    "Results from this and other laboratories support the hypothesis that white button mushrooms may be an important dietary constituent for reducing the incidence of hormone-dependent breast cancer in women," the authors wrote. "Prevention strategies involving mushrooms are readily available, affordable, and acceptable to the general public."


    Many women who have completed their initial therapy for estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer take synthetic drugs for years to inhibit aromatase production. It would be most interesting to see how ordinary mushrooms compare to drugs such as anastrazole (Arimidex) in their actual anticancer ability? Anastrazole has some potentially serious adverse effects, and so dietary substitutes would be most desirable. But do not be surprised if pharmaceutical companies do not rush to do such studies. In 2007, AstraZeneca reported $1.7 billion in sales on Arimidex. This translates into a cost of several hundred dollars per month for women taking the drug. Four ounces per day of mushrooms will set you back about $15 per month, or less if you buy in bulk. From a drug company's point of view, the economics do not favor such nutritional agents.


    Comparative studies of the sort I am proposing are rarely performed and when they occasionally occur are usually stacked against the less expensive approach. Oftentimes, the information we receive about cancer is inaccurate. In fact, the typical cancer patient is kept in the dark and fed a load of manure...just like the proverbial mushroom.

     --Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D.

    Edited to add a link

  • TNgolfer
    TNgolfer Member Posts: 253
    edited April 2010

    Yazmin,

    Beside Sheila's info there is an article you can find on the web at www.naturalnews.com/026514_cancer_brst_cancer_food.html or just google Natural Aromatase Inhibitors are Best Prevention of Breast Cancer ...

    this article dated June 2009, lists natural AI's and food's that contain them; e.g., apples (with the skin) cabbage, onions, garlic, celery, parsley, artichokes, basil, chamomile, all citrus (except grapefruit), olive oil, skin and seeds of red grapes, etc.

    Very interesting information.

    I have been on Arimidex for 30 days and no noticeable side effects, but I know I won't tolerate such serious SE's as I have seen reported here.  Quality of Life is important, too.

    Thanks for the link Sheila.

    Marianne

  • Yazmin
    Yazmin Member Posts: 840
    edited April 2010

    Thanks, Marianne.

  • luv_gardening
    luv_gardening Member Posts: 1,393
    edited April 2010

    Since being on Arimidex for the last few months I've had some stiffness in my hands and knees though I would normally get that in cold weather, but it happened in our Australian summer.  Now I've noticed a red round lump has come up on the last joint of one of my fingers that occasionally feels painful.  Checking 'Osteoarthritis' on Wikipedia I see it's probably a Heberden's node which means calcium deposits are forming there which will form a bony lump and permanently restrict movement.  Now I'm wondering what damage is being done to my knees that I can't see.

    Most of the natural food AI's have other healing properties such as anti-inflamatories and I wish someone would conduct a large, proper clinical study comparing them to drugs but I guess we need to see common sense from the decision makers sitting on research boards before that ever happens.  It may be that the anti inflamatories stop arthritic SE's and improve general health while still improving the survival rate instead of doing permanent damage.

    My DXA showed I have osteoporosis in my hip already and I'm not yet 60, so my onco wants to either change my meds to Tamoxifen or put me on bisphosphonates to build my bones.  I have another month to decide before I see her.  I'm not keen on either option.  I'd rather go back to mushrooms and Grape Seed Extract which were giving me hot sweats just as strong as the Arimidex is, continue using lots of cabbage, garlic, celery, parsley etc and use Vitamin K1 and K2 plus Stontium with lots of exercise for the osteoporosis.  I think my lovely onco wants me on bisphosphonates due to my higher odds of getting mets but I doubt the flimsy evidence from the Austrian study, and the SE's can be too high a price to pay.  She is really nice and I know she wants to keep me well but she hasn't studied the alternatives.

    Oh well, it's only our lives and wellbeing at stake.  At least we on this forum will look at all the options and use our common sense.

  • KT41
    KT41 Member Posts: 5
    edited July 2010

    i had chemo, hormone treatment and a lumpectomy and lymphs removed.  i stopped normal treatment after the hormone stuff and did not have the recommended mascetomy.  i am now treating my cancer using diet only and visit a chinese doctor who is helping me.  i feel great actually, and it hasnt come back (touch wood).

     my diet is: no red meat, no diary, no sugar.  only eat whole grains, vegetables, fruit, nuts, seeds, beans, lentils chickpeas, eggs (in moderation) and fish (in moderation). 

    i only drink water (non flouridated, mineral spring water is best), vegie juice, fruit juice, green tea; herbal teas and wheatgrass juice.

    i eat herbs regularly from my chinese doctor and do qi gong and acupuncture.

    since i saw him i felt good for hte first time in ages and i also felt hope again and belief that this can be beaten and there is help available out there.

    the book 'the china study' by dr campbell went a long way to satisfying me that correct diet  (no red meat, dairy or sugar) can cure cancer and that eating the wrong things can cause cancer to grow.

     also i eat seaweed as often as i can and take magnesium baths as i think getting enough magnesium is critical for your health.

  • gena
    gena Member Posts: 15
    edited July 2010

    I read the book "Anticancer" by Dr. David Servan-Schrieber." and then went to the nutritionist that helped Dr. Servan-Schrieber.  I take chemo, I take supplements recommended to me by my nutritionist, I eat healthy, I read the Bilble and meditate daily through prayer.  I also listen to a cd that deals with healing messages to guide your body through healing. I try to cover all areas of my body, physically and spiritually.  I did not do this the first time I had cancer and it returned 3 years later.  The doctor is now amazed every time I have scans and do blood tests. 

  • Luna5
    Luna5 Member Posts: 738
    edited July 2010

    Sheila....one of those things...I don't know if it is biophosphonates or something else can cause jaw necrosis  so google whatever you are considering

    Why don't you find out what your hormone levels are.  If you want to go off Arimidex, you could see if you estradiol goes up too high when you are off it.  I got my estradiol down from 32 to 15 using natural AIs like Chrysin, melatonin, organic apples, quercetin with bromelain, 375 mg grape seed extract (Masqueliers Tru OPCs) and a bunch of other things.  Just started Thorne mushroom extract also.

    All I know is the docs always seem to tell the women on these boards who are taking these drugs that their symptoms aren't caused by the drugs and then they want to give them more drugs for arthritis or something else that they didn't have before the Arimidex or Tamox.

    Best wishes to all the wonderful women who have gathered here to support and share info with each other.

  • mahouna
    mahouna Member Posts: 9
    edited July 2010

    I read the china study and am following it to a "T". I am also taking flax oil and cottage cheese each morning. I have lost 16 pounds in 5 weeks doing this and am convinced my diet and excessive radiation through two failed MRIS in one week contributed to my DCIS. I am naturally curious and didnt buy into the idea that cutting off my breasts was the only option, especially for DCIS. I think doctors scare the crap out of women and they rush into mastectomies and chemo and radiation. This book answer my question, question my oncologist didnt answer. Such as, "if we are winning the war on cancer then why are 1 out of 2 men getting cancer and 1 out of 3 women." I had a lumpectomy only which I had to travel 1300 miles to get a surgeon to do since no one in Florida would do what I asked.

    Interestingly enough three nurses whispered to me"they overtreat for DCIS". I am a vegan now, fell great and am convince I can stop the promotion phase of my cancer. I find many women are scared to death and do whatever the doctor says. I also will not take tamoxifen, it is an evil drug with horrible SE.

    I think $$$ rules our treatment options, not science.

  • MariannaLaFrance
    MariannaLaFrance Member Posts: 777
    edited July 2010

    Mahouna,

    Have to agree with you. I opted for the same treatment as you. I only had lumpectomy and rads for my DCIS. My DCIS was so small that it was actually removed when I had my biopsy. When the lumpectomy tissue sample came back, there was no cancer left in the 1.5 inches of flesh they took off my breast. DCIS measured at 2.4mm. Yes, you read that correctly 2.4mm. Small, eh?

    My husband suggested to the breast surgeon that maybe rads was overkill, and she told him it was a very strongly suggested thing for me to do. Hence, my decision. However, I often wonder if I damaged my lungs and heart because of the rads.

    I opted out of Tamox, despite doctors telling me that it was a good course to take. All my docs thought it was a good idea to take for prevention, but I really can't hack the thought of it.

    Now, if I had invasive cancer, I'd probably try something in the chemotherapy suite of drugs, but I feel very comfortable in my choice not to take the Big Pharma drugs.

  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited July 2010

    I don't think MRIs use radiation.  They use sound waves, or something like that.

  • kcshreve
    kcshreve Member Posts: 1,148
    edited July 2010

    MRI - M= Magnetic.  Images are from magnetic resonance.  No rads there.  However, they do use a dye, but I don't think it's ever been implicated in cancer development.

  • maxl
    maxl Member Posts: 8
    edited July 2010

    Thank-you for your encouraging words.

    I have been reading The china Study and Anti Cancer and trying to make good choices regarding my treatment.

    I will continue to pray and be prayed for and know that is the first defence for my bc.

  • maxl
    maxl Member Posts: 8
    edited July 2010

    I have been reading The China Study and Anti cancer and trying to make good life style choices.

    I am newly diagnosed and appreciate the help found on these pages.

    Abundant blessings!

  • somanywomen
    somanywomen Member Posts: 872
    edited July 2010

    Hope the below article isn't too long, but recently I have come across several articles of interest about the health benefits of plums and peaches....

    Peaches and Plums Have Anti-Breast Cancer Components
    Friday June 4, 2010
    Next time you reach for a ripe peach or a juicy plum, consider how powerfully healthy these fruits are.  Not just pretty and low in calories, peaches and plums are loaded with antioxidants, dietary fiber, and vitamins.  But it was their phenolic compounds that caught the attention of scientists at Texas AgriLife Research.  In their lab studies, when the phenols from peaches and plums got together with breast cancer cells, the malignant cells were killed.  Researchers were happy with those results, but even more pleased about the response from healthy cells.  "These extracts killed the cancer cells but not the normal cells,"  said Dr. Luis Cisneros-Zevallos, who worked on the study.
    Extracts were taken from the "Rich Lady" peach and the "Black Splendor" plum, chosen because of their particularly high phenolic content.  Chlorogenic and neochlorogenic phenols from these peaches and plums were found to kill breast cancer cells, without harming healthy cells nearby.  Even when scientists tested these fruit phenols on the most aggressive types of breast cancer cells, the cancer died and the healthy cells were unaffected.  That's a dream come true for breast cancer patients that may require chemotherapy - a systemic treatment that affects every cell in the body.
    More research is needed before cancer patients will be treated with phenols from these super fruits.  But the plant breeders and researchers at Texas AgriLife are very interested in continuing this line of exploration.   They hope that someday, they can grow peaches and plums that have very high content of cancer-killing compounds.

    The work documenting the health benefits of stone fruit has been supported by the Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center at Texas A&M University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the California Tree Fruit Agreement.

Categories