Hello, Goodby, Ovaries

Options
montana7p
montana7p Member Posts: 20
edited June 2014 in Stage III Breast Cancer

I have been lurking on this website for the past year and a half.  I am a year out from chemo and am now dealing with both fear of recurrence as well as the decision about ovarian suppression. I know there is a hormonal therapy thread, but I thought I'd post this here since it seems that the recommendation for supression is based on the aggressive nature and staging of my diagnosis. I am 40 years old and had been in chemopause for the past year, but my FSH levels have been declining for the past 3-6 months and at the end of April I had my first period. My skin looks good and I've been feeling like maybe I could shed the disgusting fat around my belly.  I actually desired to have sex for the first time in over a year which was fabulous. BUT...I had the dreaded ovary discussion with my oncologist today about suppression which he recommends. I am so sad about it.  I know I should do everything possible to prevent recurrance. Is this a clear-cut choice for me? Any words of wisdom from those having been in the same boat are appreciated.

Comments

  • coonie
    coonie Member Posts: 7,618
    edited May 2010

    I just had my ovaries removed the same day as my mastectomy. Seems to me like female parts cause problem, and I didn't want to get broke down any time soon......AGAIN!!

    Good Luck!!!

  • Bugs
    Bugs Member Posts: 1,719
    edited May 2010

    Oh Montana, I so get how you are feeling.  I got my period 5 months post chemo...and I figured something was going on since I felt so dang good, almost...sexy!  Amazing what estrogen does, eh?

    Clear cut choice?  Only you can say that. I chose to have an ooph.  It hasn't been so bad.  Not as bad as my fears made it.  But..yes.  It's a change.

    BTW, is there something I'm missing?  Your signature line says you are stage 3b?  Looks like it should be 3a?

    Good luck with your decision.  Sigh..sucks don't it?

  • SpunkyGirl
    SpunkyGirl Member Posts: 1,568
    edited May 2010

    Montana,

    I was just shy of 40 at diagnosis, and I have not done ovarian suppression or taking them out.  I don't know if I've made the right decision or not, and I do think about it often.  You can see that I'm well over 3.5 years out, and I'm doing well that I know of.  I do take my Tamoxifen religiously, but I'm still at almost 44 still getting the dreaded period.  I don't know what to say to you, except that the choice has to be well thought out.  One thing my Oncologist told me was that there was a study done of women on Tamoxifen that showed there was NOT a higher recurrence rate in those who still had their periods vs. those who didn't.  I've had friends who've recurred even though they've had their ovaries out.  I've also had friends who had oopherectomies who said it was a breeze and are doing well.  I've also had friends who had oopherectomies and wish they didn't because of the side effects (hot flashes, bone pain). 

    I did try to research as much as possible, and even though it seems the right thing to do to get an ooph if you are ER+, I couldn't find any substantial studies to support it.  If anyone out there knows of any, I'd love to read them. 

    This is a tough one!

  • montana7p
    montana7p Member Posts: 20
    edited May 2010

    Actually, I think my intra-mammary and node in my pec wall make me IIIc?  I had neoadjuvant chemo which shrivelled my nodes and they never got an acccurate count. But I'd love to be IIIa.

  • Pure
    Pure Member Posts: 1,796
    edited May 2010

    I was just thinking of you. When you posted I got scared something happen to you. You were one of the first women to write to me and offer support. I still read your email from time to time still. Glad to hear your doing ok!

    Do you do the shots? You could do those but I am doing the ovarys. I will do them on June 15th. The reason I am doing it is:

    1) I am an immediate metabolizer of tamoxfin so I want to be given an AIL. asap

    2) Five years of AILS shows better outcomes then 5 years to tamoxofin

    3) There is one study that shows ovary suppresion shows a 16% decrease in reoccuerence

    4) Some studies show that in younger women their homonal surges can overcome the shots suppresion

    5) I am scared sh_ _ less of the shot-apprently it is as big as a straw.

  • KerryMac
    KerryMac Member Posts: 3,529
    edited May 2010

    Jen - your last line made me laugh!! hahahah.

    I had mine removed. I didn't ask for studies, or % advantage or anything. I suggested it to my Onc, but she never tried to talk me out of it. (she had suggested the shot) It was a gut feeling for me. My cancer was 100% ER+, I just felt it was something I needed to do. I didn't want to have any regrets.

    I had the Surgery last July, it was fairly easy recovery. I have zero regrets. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2010

    KerryMac:  How exactly did they do the removal of ovaries.  Is is through a tiny incision in the abdomen?  Just curious.  I'm officially in menopause due to the chemo, so not sure I want to or need to remove ovaries. 

  • lvtwoqlt
    lvtwoqlt Member Posts: 6,162
    edited May 2010

    I was 46 at dx of DCIS, at 45 dx for the 2nd time with ADH and put on tamox. Didn't like the se's of the tamox and since I opted for bilat mx was taken off tamox. My surgeon did however say that after I went through natural menopause, he recommended removal of the ovaries because of history of ovarian cancer in my family. I forgot about the conversation with my surgeon until I saw the title of this thread. I guess I will have to bring it up with my gyn now since my hormone levels tested in the menopause range in November. I would love to go to my surgeon for this procedure but he has left the area for a bigger hospital. I did see a new GYN last week my family doctor referred me to for problem with a pap that the GYN said was probably caused by my reduced hormone levels.

    Sheila

  • clariceak
    clariceak Member Posts: 752
    edited May 2010

     montana7p - What does your family history for bc and ovarian cancer look like?  You're so young to have bc I always wonder if there might be a genetic component.  I was BRAC neg but due to family history it is recommended that have my ovaries removed.  It's an easy decision for me since I was going into perimenopause prior to dx.  I can see how it's much harder when you're so young.  I'm sure the other ladies can give you some advice and hope you can reach a decision that feels right for you.

    Hey Kerry - I assume you had lacroscopic.  I'm debating whether to go north to Anchorage for my surgery or to Seattle where my onc said it could be performed by robots.  Apparently an advantage, but I haven't done any research.  How was yours done?

  • lvtwoqlt
    lvtwoqlt Member Posts: 6,162
    edited May 2010

    clariceak, my family history is mother with bc at age 60, her sister ovarian at age 37. My mom did the brca test and was negative.

    Sheila

  • lvtwoqlt
    lvtwoqlt Member Posts: 6,162
    edited May 2010

    I am skeptical about someone whose first posts are all about a clothing company. I am not going to that site.

    Sheila the skeptical

  • montana7p
    montana7p Member Posts: 20
    edited May 2010

    Clariceak — I have no close relatives (a maternal great aunt who had BC post-menopausally is closest) and I was tested and don't carry the BRAC genes.  I had babies in my mid-thirties (33 and 36) which seem to be the biggest risk factors. It really hit me out of nowhere. Fast growing tumor and I didn't even consider BC at first because I'm young with no history and it wasn't a lump at first. 

  • KittyDog
    KittyDog Member Posts: 1,079
    edited May 2010

    I haven't gotten that far in my journey but the Dr. hinted at it yesterday.  He is leaning towards me having a hysterectomy.  I have no problems with doing it.  I haven't had a period in a year now.  I have been having hot flashes and missed months of periods for a few years now.  Hey that reminds me the one good side effect of chemo is I am now cold natured.  Wonder how long it will last living in the south.

    I hope you find comfort in the decision you make.

  • KerryMac
    KerryMac Member Posts: 3,529
    edited May 2010

    Clarice - mine was done laproscopically, a small incision through the belly button, they blew me up with gas and used a camera to locate the Ovaries,then two small incisions over my Ovaries, and they yanked them out my belly button again. I have heard that they can get robots to do it too - a girl in my Chemo group had it done that way. It wasn't offerned to me though. The way I did it was fine, if it is easier/closer for you to get it done that way.

  • kimber3006
    kimber3006 Member Posts: 586
    edited May 2010

    montana7p - I'm right there with you in hating the idea but knowing I need to do something (and also 39 at dx - just turned 40 a couple weeks ago).  My onc is recommending the shot to suppress ovaries with Tamoxifen when I finish rads in a few weeks.  I'm going that route for now.  At first I just wanted the ooph, but I've decided the shot does the same thing and leaves my options open.  It gives me more time to fully understand the consequences for me.  All of this stuff affects everyone so differently.

    KittyDog - I'm loving the lowered body temp in our SC heat as well!  If my body temp is going to return to normal, I hope it's not until October.....

  • my2kids
    my2kids Member Posts: 10
    edited August 2010

    my oncologist recommended removal and when they went in the cancer was there. think on it and make best decision for your health. also i was getting the shot every 4 weeks to stop  cycle but needle so big and painful that i couldnt do it the rest of my life (sorry chemo brain cant think of the name now) Diagnosis: 6/14/2008, LCIS, 6cm+, Grade 1, 24/24 nodes, mets, ER-, HER2-

  • chrishat
    chrishat Member Posts: 89
    edited August 2010

    i had an oopherectomy on june 15 (hi pure!) and it was super easy for me. the recovery was a piece of cake and 2 months later, i really don't feel different, except relieved..my cancer was 97% er and pr positive so it just made sense to me. my onc kept saying it was unecessary since chemo would shut them down, but i kept hearing about women who started menstruating after chemo,,,, where there are periods, there is estrogen......so i just wanted them OUT. plus, i wanted to take arimidex, and you have to be post menopausal. i have hot flashes but i'd be having them anyway on arimidex or tamoxifen. like kerrymac said, i have zero regrets.

  • kimber3006
    kimber3006 Member Posts: 586
    edited August 2010

    Hmmm, still trying to decide here.  I'm not having much trouble at all with the shots or Tamoxifen.....which of course just makes me wonder if they're working - lol!  I did want to add some info for those who might read this thread and fear those big needles that were mentioned a couple of times.  The shot is available subcutaneous now (at least with the drug I'm getting - Eligard - lots of different names for the same thing as Lupron).  So it was just a tiny little needle - got mine right next to my belly button.  Apparently they used to have to give it in a muscle - thus the big, painful needle - but no more.

  • Pure
    Pure Member Posts: 1,796
    edited August 2010

    Something instinctually tells me that having my ovaries out was EXACTLY what I needed to do. And to be really honest, I feel so even now emotionally. I sort of luag about it and say had I know this I would have skipped all those years of PMS and being a bitch and skipped straight to the ovaries coming out. I will say that I am only an immediate metabolizer or tamoxifi so it was very important I get on an AI as well.

Categories