Weekly Herceptin-alone instead of every 3 wks (after chemo/H)

Options
2»

Comments

  • weety
    weety Member Posts: 1,163
    edited April 2010

    lovemygarden, My blood pressure, which is usually low, was also higher during chemo.  I had TCH.  It was usually a good 10-20 pts higher, sometimes more.  Now that I'm on hercepitn alone, it seems to have gone back down for the most part, but it is still is inconsistent.  Sometimes it's back up to 130 over 85 when the week before it might have been back in the normal range of 100 over 60.  I still wonder if it is the herceptin messing with the heart.  Today it was 93 over 63.  But my pulse was 105!!!  I wish I knew why.

  • lovemygarden
    lovemygarden Member Posts: 342
    edited August 2010

    Well, after 7 weeks of high pre-chemo blood pressure I finally bought a monitor to use at home, and guess what my readings have been for the past two days? 112/73, 119/74, 118/77, 106/69, 116/77, 102/62, and 105/64. Pulse ranging from 71 to 79. All typical of what it's been all my life! Yet my pre-chemo BPs range from a low of 133 to the upper 160s.... guess I get either far more "unconsciously" stressed than I am aware of, or on those mornings my body silently rebels against the weird stuff it's about to receive?!

     I'm very curious to see what my BP will be this week, since I now know that the chemo itself is not affecting it in any way!

  • weety
    weety Member Posts: 1,163
    edited May 2010

    Now that's interesting!  Let us know what happens this week at chemo.  Weird.

  • JeninMichigan
    JeninMichigan Member Posts: 2,974
    edited May 2010

    I have been on Herceptin only every three week starting in August 2008 upon completion of chemo.   I will be on it probably forever due to my stage.    I don't have any issue with the every three weeks.  A little fatigue for about 24 hours afterward and the usual drippy nose but nothing more than that.  My fingers have never been good and so they are just a little bit worse than they used to be.    Also, my infusion is only 30 minutes every three weeks and no benedryl.    My muga is at 59 right now.   It started at 60, then 62, now 59.  My oncologist is not worried about it she said it is normal to flucuate a few points.

    Jennifer

  • lovemygarden
    lovemygarden Member Posts: 342
    edited August 2010

    weety, it has been an interesting week! I took my BP three or four times a day from last Thursday morning through this morning (Weds). They ranged from a low of 102/62 to a "high" of 118/75 ... all perfectly normally typical for me. This morning at 9 am it was 107/76; but when I took it just before getting ready to drive to chemo at 11 am, it was 130/89! WTF?!?... as my 20something son would say! Surprised  Wow, talk about proof that our emotions can seriously mess with our body even when we have no "noticeable" clue that it's happening!!!

    So I sat down, did some deep breathing, gave myself a good talking-to, took the paper with all the BP readings to chemo with me, showed it to the nurse ("See, I really wasn't fibbing about how low my BP is other than when I'm here!"), we had a good laugh about it, she took my BP for today, and it was 123/80. Laughing  I gave a fist-pumping "Yesss!" and sauntered into the other room for my treatment. Cool

     Should have bought the darn BP monitor 4 weeks ago, obviously!

    (btw, the exact same Omron digital deluxe monitor that Target is selling for $82 can be bought online elsewhere for $56, no sales tax, free shipping.. in case anyone else is thinking of getting one)

  • weety
    weety Member Posts: 1,163
    edited May 2010

    Gee whiz, it sounds like our mind really does have control of our body!!!

    I had the head chemo nurse for my herceptin treatment today, so I asked AGAIN about the difference in dosages when I was on weekly treatments and now on tri-weekly treatments.  She said that the standard dosage is 2mg/kg for weekly and 6mg/kg for the tri-weekly, just like was mentioned by others in this thread.  So I asked her about my particular case (I got 90mg weekly and now I get 300mg so it doesn't add up) and she said that they just round it up.  She also said it goes by what weight you started on and usually they don't change it as your weight fluctuates (why, I don't know) sooooo . . . since I started the weekly chemo/herceptin treatments at 100 pounds (45kg) I got 90mg/week.  I went up to 107 by the end of chemo and changed to the tri-weekly doses at 107 pounds(48.5 kg) so now I get 300mg/week (should be 291 but I guess its rounded up) even though I lost all the chemo weight and am back down to 100 pounds. 

    It doesn't all make much sense to me, but I guess I should be happy that at least I got a decent explanation this time.  She's the first one that even attempted to try to explain it.

  • stlcardsfan
    stlcardsfan Member Posts: 466
    edited May 2010

    I just came across this today and the blood pressure monitoring caught my eye.

    I too have been in the normal 120/80, with pulse around the upper 70's - low 80's.

    The past three readings before Chemo were terrible  155/90,  160/90, etc. I take it at home - with the Omron monitor and it is normal. For some reason my reading go up on Chemo days. In fact, after my final chemo on 4/28, is when it was the worst. 160 over something. The cardio nurse called me a few days later and wanted to put me on blood pressure medicine because of the high readings. I told her it was normal at home, and really didn't think I should be on medicine to lower it. I thought I was the only one that this was happening too, but am glad to see I am not alone.

    I start my Herceptin only on 5/19, going every 3 weeks, and just completed the TCH on 4/28. For the very first Herceptin, it was 1 1/2 hours, then after that they switched to 1 hour. I was told Hereceptin only would also be 1 hour.  

  • butchboxer
    butchboxer Member Posts: 6
    edited May 2010

    I originally was on every 3 wks treatment.  After my cancer came back, my new oncologist had me on once a week, which I did not understand, but he insisted.  Later I was told by an oncologist at UCLA that it doesn't make a difference to have it once a week or every 3 wks, only the dose was different.  I was really mad because I had to pay a copay everytime I went in.  After that I told my oncologist that I would not do it once a week and he changed it.  I don't know if not being able to take benedryl makes a difference.  I eventually changed oncologists for that and other reasons.

    I've been on Tykerb since Aug. 2009 and just began Herceptin again (3 wk cycles).  Currently in remission.  Next PET in a week or two.  If it's clear it will be my 2nd clear in a row.  Before that, I had something going on for the last 3 years.

  • lovemygarden
    lovemygarden Member Posts: 342
    edited August 2010

    Well, I went into my onc appointment today armed with my big sales pitch for why I want the weekly Herceptin-only.... and didn't even need to use it, because she started off by asking me "What do you want to do for your Herceptin-only treatments?" (she knows I am big on doing mucho research on everything, so apparantly she correctly assumed that I already knew about all the available options! Cool ) I said that although most people do get the every-3-weeks regimen, I really want to continue with the weekly. She said "Absolutely, after all that is the classic protocol, exactly how it was developed and tested" ... noted it down on my chart, and that was that. No sales pitch needed! 

    I love it when a doctor truly respects a patient's opinions and input. It's just too bad there aren't more of them! I've only met five in all my 60 years; two were dermatologists and the other three are my breast surgeon, the anesthesiologist for my BMX, and my oncologist. All the others were varying levels of arrogant, impatient, patronizing, you name it!

  • mthomp2020
    mthomp2020 Member Posts: 1,959
    edited May 2010

    Well, if you ever saw the breakdown of the charges for a single treatment, you'd see that weekly makes them a lot more money!  I did every 3 weeks from the start, and never had any problems with Herceptin.  I now do it every 2 weeks because that's how often I have Navelbine, so it saves me from coming in just for the Herceptin.  However, they still take 1 1/2 hourse to infuse it.  However, they recently changed their computer system, and it listed the infusion to be done over 1 hour.  They still did 1 1/2 hours.  Plus the computer added Tylenol and Benedryl as pre-meds, which I've never don with Herceptin, so I told them I didn't want them, didn't need them.  Bet they charge for them, though. 

    Sometimes it seems to be about milking some extra charges much like a hospital does.  By taking 1 1/2 hours for my infusion, they can charge more for the extra 1/2 hour.  They charge by the hour for infusions after the initial hour. 

    Oh, by the way, my BP is always higher when I go in.  They always check vitals before I see the onc and have my infusion.  They check again during the infusion, and it's always lower.  White coat syndrom!

  • lovemygarden
    lovemygarden Member Posts: 342
    edited August 2010

    Oh trust me, I know exactly what they charge for everything... because I have no insurance and thus every cent of my cancer expenses comes out of my own pocket. Cry

    That said... my oncologist (like all my other doctors) has worked with me as far as reducing costs, anywhere from 30% to 45% less than they bill an insurance company for the same thing(s).  And so the only meds and services I pay for are those I actually receive. My infusion time fee is not rounded up to full hours.

    I do understand about the 3-week vs weekly for those who have copays, but it would cost me the same to come in for 30 mins weekly as for 90 mins every 3 weeks... and I feel safer in many ways with getting weekly treatments. Can't put a price on that! Laughing

  • butchboxer
    butchboxer Member Posts: 6
    edited May 2010

    The doctor cannot charge for meds they aren't giving to you.  If they are, then I would call them on it.  Also, for things like benedryl, the doctor isn't making very little, if any money off of that.  They're probably getting their costs back by the time the insurance discounts, etc.  

    Some premeds are necessary.  I've had reaction to Herceptin requiring me to have the benedryl.   It is good to know what your getting, why, and if its really necessary.  It's nice to know we can say yes or no to a regiment.  Doing our homework ahead of time and asking lots of questions and getting solid answers from our doctors so we understand why they want to do something is KEY.

    Also, just because something is "standard protocol" doesn't mean it's the only way, or even the best way for every case.  Again, homework, education.

  • Susan-r
    Susan-r Member Posts: 1
    edited May 2010

    Hi Everybody:

     Just found this site and amazed at the amount of response. I am a recurrent Her-2neu+ at 52 yrs. old now (first time 5 years ago) Unusual in that I had a malignant cyst not solid tumor. Recently had a milk duct surgery (they thought that was the problem) and here we go again- malignant cyst same exact location. Had a bi-lateral, no reconstruction- fine with all that.

    Considered a "miracle patient" as PET shows no spread on a recurrent Her-2+ that apparently was there for a bit. Specialist angered that surgeon did not remove lymph nodes on that side- sentinal out orginially and recent ultrasound shows no suspicions but she wants me to have them removed to be on the safe side. 

    My oncologist and the breast oncologist specialist at a local renowned cancer center think I should do TCH every three weeks but Herceptin every week all along - assume dose for H is the lower throughout. Had first last week - they separated the TC each and the next day the Herceptin, with a Neulasta shot the next day.  I had gotten Neulasta preventatively five yrs. ago as I am a full time working Realtor and that was during our real estate boom. It was AC then and they gave me so much Emend I only dealt with constipation which is doable.

    Not this time!  Assuming Neulasta on the pounding head (expected) but muscle contraction across entire mastectomy site-like a vise grip - okay now but awful for several days. But the diarrhea -I have lost 7 lbs. since Fri.  Everything started Friday mostly evening- some vomiting but I have taken Immodium and had to stop eating. I tried a small piece of white bread Sunday evening and started it all over again. Went last night in the middle of the night with nothing but G2 for the day!.  I am planning to try some chicken broth now-hate to eat.

    Has anybody had this response and is it to the Herceptin?  I can not have Herceptin every week and do this as I am essentially housebound. Surely there is something to override? I am self supporting and can only work from home for so long....  I may have to forego the TC part - anyone out there opt for Herceptin only?

    Thanks for any response.

  • weety
    weety Member Posts: 1,163
    edited May 2010

    I want to make sure I understand your situation--I'm a little confused about how you got to where you are.  I think from your post it sounds like you did AC but no herceptin and this time you are doing TCH (with the herceptin).  Do they think the recurrence is a new cyst/tumor or the same one (which apparently means they missed some cells)  Did you have mastectomy then or with this new diagnosis? Did you have clear margins originally?  Radiation?  I'm not sure why the specialist was angry they didn't remove your lymph nodes the first time--did they not check your  sentinal lymph node the first time?

    From reading your post (although I do hope you can clarify in case I'm reading it wrong) I would not recommend stopping the TC part or the herceptin.  Your cancer seems to be pretty resilient if it decided to come back in the same place after doing AC chemo!  I didn't have diarrhea problems, but I know a lot of women did.  Go back to the forums and under the HER2+ forum is a thread entitled "taxotere, carboplatin and herceptin."  It is very long and very informative with lots and lots of entries and information.  I'm sure you will be able to find some advice for the bowel issues.  As for doing herceptin by itself, I'm not sure if they look at it differently when its a recurrence vs a first diagnosis, but I know the studies and research have shown that it is much more effective when it is done with a chemo regimen.

    I hope some other ladies can help you too, but I think you will get many more responses if you post on the thread I mentioned above--it's much more active than this one.  (This one is more for deciding whether to do the herceptin treatments weekly or every 3 weeks and the pros and cons of each.)

Categories