Canadian Health Care

Options
13940414345

Comments

  • Enjoyful
    Enjoyful Member Posts: 3,591
    edited April 2010

    Hi Elizabeth!  Yes, it's a vaccine that hopefully trains your immune system to seek & destroy cells expressing the protein mammaglobin-A, which is over-expressed in 80% of breast cancers.  My latest & greatest tumor was tested for the protein, and it passed the test.  I have two more rounds of shots to go through, each four weeks apart.  It's a Phase I trial so the primary purpose is to test safety.  The secondary purpose is an immune response.  I hope both purposes are met!

  • konakat
    konakat Member Posts: 6,085
    edited April 2010

    That is so cool! WOW!!!!! 

  • Rico
    Rico Member Posts: 128
    edited April 2010

    Thanks, E., for explaining how they hope the vaccine will work. It makes perfect sense. And it's definitely the stuff that dreams are made of. Words cannot convey my gratitude for what you are doing. I certainly understand the wear and tear involved in traveling. Plus it hasn't been that long since you finished chemo so it's an enormous effort on your part.

    Ironic, isn't it, that the Canadian thread is open to everyone while the recently deceased American thread was open only to Americans. It apparently has been replaced by a thread for conservatives only. Free speech is a wonderful thing. LOL. 

  • Kyta
    Kyta Member Posts: 713
    edited April 2010

    Hello all.

    Enjoyful ~ I agree with the others, that we're all appreciative of people like you who enter clinical trials and this one sounds very exciting. Hope your arm is feeling better....and glad to hear there's "No symptoms of zombie-ism, super-human strength, or pyrokinesis yet" :-) . By the way, just curious, how far do you have to travel for this trial?

  • Enjoyful
    Enjoyful Member Posts: 3,591
    edited April 2010

    Mich - I travel from the mid-atlantic region to St. Louis, MO, a distance of about 850 miles one-way.  It's only a two hour plane trip, though, so it's not too bad if you can get a direct flight. 

    Rico - Crazy ironic, isn't it?  Maybe we should start a new thread in the Canadian forum - Canadians & Friends? 

  • Kyta
    Kyta Member Posts: 713
    edited April 2010

    Wow, that's quite a commute, and all at your own expense......my hat's off to you, and I hope you reap the rewards of this trial.

  • Enjoyful
    Enjoyful Member Posts: 3,591
    edited April 2010

    It's an act of desperation.  :-)   The trials in my area either involved chemo or some other agent that didn't make any sense to me. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2010

    Enjoyful, that's very encouraging, that vaccine stuff... Will look for your updates!

  • Enjoyful
    Enjoyful Member Posts: 3,591
    edited April 2010

    I will keep you all posted!

  • ananda8
    ananda8 Member Posts: 2,755
    edited April 2010

    When completely convinced of the truth of something that is incorrect people often withdraw into the familiar territory of their firmly held but incorrect beliefs.  There is even a name for this.  It's called cognitive dissonance.

  • Kathy044
    Kathy044 Member Posts: 433
    edited April 2010

    Lindsea, I've been enjoying your comments about the Canadian medical and drug systems and keep meaning to join in the discussion, but you say it so well. A very small point, not all provinces pay for Medical plans through taxation - in BC we pay a monthly medical insurance premium, (those with a low income can receive premium assistance) but almost everyone pays something.

    About drug formularies, I had to take Neupogen shots with my chemo. Did you know Neupogen is not on the list in British Columbia? I didn't. I was able to pay for the first two sets of shots through my extended health insurance until my annual prescription drug amount was maxed. I assumed then that the amount would bring down the deductable on the gov't "Fair Pharmacare plan and I would be covered there, but it didn't, because it isn't an approved drug.

    So I have no drug coverage for the rest of the year. I was not going to pay the full cost for the next two sessions, (over $1700 each), so I arranged to have my onc apply for a special authorization for the use of the shots and applied to the drug company "Victory Program" for help with the cost and they covered the amount of my deductable on the gov't plan. Whew.

  • Kathy044
    Kathy044 Member Posts: 433
    edited April 2010

    Lindsea, I've been enjoying your comments about the Canadian medical and drug systems and keep meaning to join in the discussion, but you say it so well. A very small point, not all provinces pay for Medical plans through taxation - in BC we pay a monthly medical insurance premium, (those with a low income can receive premium assistance) but almost everyone pays something.

    About drug formularies, I had to take Neupogen shots with my chemo. Did you know Neupogen is not on the list in British Columbia? I didn't. I was able to pay for the first two sets of shots through my extended health insurance until my annual prescription drug amount was maxed. I assumed then that the amount would bring down the deductable on the gov't "Fair Pharmacare plan and I would be covered there, but it didn't, because it isn't an approved drug.

    So I have no drug coverage for the rest of the year. I was not going to pay the full cost for the next two sessions, (over $1700 each), so I arranged to have my onc apply for a special authorization for the use of the shots and applied to the drug company "Victory Program" for help with the cost and they covered the amount of my deductable on the gov't plan. Whew.

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited April 2010

    Hi Kathy -- Great to hear from you!  I knew BC had a different way of handling the drug situation.  In fact a few years ago, the Ontario gov't brought in a new Health Premium tax to help pay for rising costs, I guess similar to your medical insurance premium.  But it turns out to be not enough (surprise, surprise!!).

    As for neupogen -- my supplemental insurance (no maximum) paid for it (12 shots @ $200 per tx) but if it hadn't, I would have been given a home care card which the pharmacy would have accepted.  Ontario also had a special Trillium Fund to help cover drug costs for those who have difficulty paying for expensive medicines.  And drugs administered in hospital are also covered by OHIP (Ont. Health Insurance Plan).

    I'm wondering how many Ontarians get neulasta instead of neupogen?  Neulasta would probably be administered in hospital (the day after tx) and perhaps that is why most of us are presribed neupogen which is administered at home.   Just wondering.....

    BTW, Kathy, have you completed your tx?  Will you be going on Tamoxifen or an AI?  Will either of those be covered?   Wishing you well.

    Linda

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2010

    Olga had Neulasta instead of Neupogen. That was a one-time shot (administered by our family physician) and cost the insurance company $2,200.

  • konakat
    konakat Member Posts: 6,085
    edited April 2010

    There are some of us slipping through the cracks with supplemental insurance, or those without.  I unfortunately went on gov't Disability without being employed (i.e., job with benefits) and the Ontario Drug Benefit Plan doesn't cover Tykerb.  I think it was just last year that a woman battled and won to get Xeloda covered.  Soooo, finding out that Tykerb isn't covered has given me patience to see if I can finally get on a clinical trial that will offer it (or TDM1).  The ON plan is slow to pick up drugs that are approved by the feds and provinces to use. 

  • Luah
    Luah Member Posts: 1,541
    edited April 2010

    Linda:  I did DD AC at Sunnybrook and my onc prescribed neulasta over neupogen - simpler: one shot instead of 7 or 8 or more.  The nurse showed me how to inject myself at home, which I did 3 times without a problem - though I was sure nervous! 

    The drug company's program picked up the half that our insurance didn't cover.

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited April 2010

    Luah, you ARE a brave one!  The visiting nurse gave me the first 2 or 3 shots of neupogen, then taught my DH how to do it.  He practiced on a few oranges (natch!!) and then practiced on me!!  He was truly wonderful throughout but when he gave me the final shot, he said "Thank goodness this is the last one".  I asked him if it was really hard for him and he replied that every time he gave me the shot, he was so afraid of hurting me.    Awwwww, made me cry!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2010

    Linda, I can relate to what your husband said! I give Olga daily shots of Lovenox for more than a month already and this will end only in a few months at best. Each shot is a story...

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited April 2010

    Is this a fairly new trend...getting neulasta or neupogen in Canada?  My onc just told me that it would be considered if I had issues.  

  • mke
    mke Member Posts: 584
    edited April 2010

    I had neulasta (paid for by our insurance) and injected by a visiting nurse at home.  I switched to neupogen in the hope that it would be a bit more gentle, my husband administered those.

    It is a bit misleading to think of Canada as a single payer system.  Health care is a provincial responsibility although the federal gov. has general guidelines and provides some of the funding.  There are differences in coverage, for example Quebec is making noises about user fees for doctor visits.  That worries me as most frequent users need to be frequent users.

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited April 2010

    PiP -- I think many oncs choose to automatically prescribe it as a preventative.  Cynically speaking (!), because it's given outside of hospital, it's better for the hospital's budget than it would be if the patient had to be admitted with fever and life-threatening infections etc. due to a dangerously low WBC.

    Yan - I salute you!  And so does my DH Smile.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2010

    PIP - I don't know if that's a trend. Olga had VERY low WBC at that time, so they gave her Neulasta.

    Linda - Wink

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited April 2010

    They never tested my blood until it was time for my next tx.  And it was never low enough then to warrant extra tx or to postpone chemo.  How do they know if you need it?  Do they test you between chemos now?

  • Marple
    Marple Member Posts: 19,143
    edited April 2010

    PIP, my understanding is and this was in 06 when I had chemo, if your bloodwork wasn't good before the next chemo they would retest you in a few days (can't remember how many days).  If your bloodwork was still not good after a week........you'd get a neulasta shot.  My bloodwork was done 2 days before each scheduled chemo.   

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited April 2010

    PiP -- I wasn't prescribed neupogen until after my second tx.  After the first tx, and just before second, my WBC count was borderline low, so after the second tx I was prescribed neupogen (x 10).  But when WBC count was taken just before third tx, it was still kind of low, so my onc upped it to x 12.  it definitely kept me from getting any infections -- as if the SEs from Taxotere aren't enough to handleTongue out

    Everybody's different!  But I am curious to know why some oncs prefer neulasta over neupogen???

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited April 2010

    That makes sense to me.  I was wondering if they just gave it to everyone now "just in case".  It doesn't sound like much has really changed then.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2010

    Yeah, they ordered the shot after the WBC on the day of chemo plummeted (didn't test between the tx's). She got the Neulasta next day.

    Sharon - now they do the bloodwork 1.5-2 hours before the chemo.

  • pickle
    pickle Member Posts: 1,409
    edited April 2010

    Here is a link to our health care system on the govenment's site. This outlines the federal and provincail guidelines and resposibilities.

     http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/pubs/system-regime/2005-hcs-sss/del-pres-eng.php

    Here is a link on the differnces between Canada and the U.S, and it covers why drugs in Canada are cheaper than the US

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_the_health_care_systems_in_Canada_and_the_United_States#Drugs

  • Luah
    Luah Member Posts: 1,541
    edited April 2010

    It's my understanding that neupogen or neulasta is required/prescribed for dose dense scheduling - and it's sometimes prescribed to women on a triweekly schedule when their WBC fails to recover.  In the U.S., it seems to be used quite widely (which is nice for the drug maker), but frankly, I don't think it makes sense to prescribe automatically - after all, it is another drug with some unpleasant side effects  and it's expensive. 

  • Alpal
    Alpal Member Posts: 1,785
    edited April 2010

    I think it is more widely used in the US. You know, who cares as long as insurance will pay? Hehe. I was on triweekly treatments and after the first treatment they had me come in the next week for blood work. As WBC was really low, I automatically got Neulasta 24 hours after all the rest of the treatments.

Categories