Has anyone started a forum for Chemo in Dec 2008?

19192949697118

Comments

  • Firni
    Firni Member Posts: 1,519
    edited February 2010

    Hi Caroline.  I don't have much snow here.  We had flurries for a day and got about an inch.  We have had snows like you are experiencing and there certainly is a challenging beauty about tons of snow.

  • havehope
    havehope Member Posts: 503
    edited February 2010

    This one is for Caroline, but not only. Enjoy!

    Wine May Fight Cancer, But How?

    New approach to wine chemistry reveals new cancer- and obesity-preventing propertiesStuart Fox

    Posted: February 17, 2010

    Numerous medical studies have produced evidence that wine may help prevent cancer, but now, some scientists are presenting a new

    theory on the science behind its cancer-fighting properties. Their research may help develop new therapies.

    The evidence that wine can help fight some cancers has been growing for several years. (At the same time, some studies have shown

    alcohol, especially in excess, increases the risk of some cancers.) But researchers have struggled to understand why. Many theories

    speculated that antioxidants in wines, including compounds like resveratrol, have something to do with it. Antioxidants may reduce the

    stress of chemical processes in the body. But scientists have struggled to find evidence that the compounds in wine play such a role.

    William Li, president and medical director at the Angiogenesis Foundation, disagrees with the antioxidant theory. In his recent presentation

    at the TED Conference, an innovation summit, he argued that research shows that some compounds in wine-including resveratrol-

    function as antiangiogenic inhibitors, and those are the real cancer fighters.

    Antiangiogenic inhibitors are substances that prevent the growth of new blood vessels. Because growing tumors need new blood vessels in

    order to survive and spread, antiangiogenic inhibitors can suppress tumor growth. (Blood vessels are not usually built elsewhere in an adult

    body unless tissue repair is actively in process.)

    Antiangiogenics have proven so effective at fighting cancer that they make up many of the cancer medications already on the market.

    Identifying antiangiogenics inhibitors as the main source of wine's health effects widens the range of wines that contribute to cancer

    reduction. What's more, scientists are currently looking at antiangiogenic inhibitors as a treatment for chronic obesity, because they can

    suppress blood vessel growth in fatty tissue.

    "There are very few studies that show an antioxidant approach in diet creates better health," said Li. "An angiogenesis approach has already

    been embraced by the medical community as improving disease outcomes, including cancer."

    In his research, Li discovered that compounds like resveratrol prevented the development of cancer-feeding blood vessels by as much as

    60 percent. And since unhealthy fat growth requires the same kind of blood vessel development as tumors, a diet rich in antiangiogenic

    compounds fights flab just as effectively as it fights cancer.

    Other experiments Li performed on teas showed that foods previously identified as high in antioxidants were not necessarily high in

    antiangiogenics. While the antioxidant approach identified red wine as the healthier drink, Li believes that an antiangiogenic approach could

    discover similar health benefits in white wine as well.

    "The anti-cancer power of many foods is mistakenly attributed to antioxidants," said Richard Beliveau, director of molecular medicine at the

    University of Quebec and author of Food to Fight Cancer. "Antiangeogentic activity is much more important than antioxidant activity in

    preventing cancer."

    The argument continues to divide researchers, however. While Jack Losso, professor of food science at Louisiana State University, doesn't

    dispute Beliveau's assertion, he does not advocate fully ignoring antioxidants in favor of antiangiogenics.

    "Cancer is like a basketball team-you can't beat it with one player," said Losso. "I say resveratrol is like Michael Jordan. In Chicago, he had

    a good coach and good teammates, and they had a parade every year. He goes to Washington, and they never win. You need antioxidants

    and antiangiogenics."

    Li said he plans to continue to investigate the antiangiogenic properties of wine. Over the next two years, Li hopes to assemble a

    comparative grape and wine registry that identifies all of the antiangiogenic compounds in wine, their potencies, and their relative

    abundance in different types of wines and grapes. "By examining the potential of antiangeogenics in food, we will find answers to cancer all

    around us," he said. "In our groceries, in our food, and in our glasses."

    And yes, I do drink wine so the posting is biased. Laughing

  • swest
    swest Member Posts: 680
    edited February 2010
    Thank you Havehope!  Laughing  I needed an excuse!
  • EleanorJ
    EleanorJ Member Posts: 752
    edited February 2010

    Thanks Havehope, just what I wanted to hear :) Even though I wasn't about to cut the wine, I did feel like I should because of the breast cancer, now I don't feel bad about it at all :)

  • Mandy1313
    Mandy1313 Member Posts: 1,692
    edited February 2010

    Heavenhope: thanks for the post.

    I feel that there are some quality of life issues that have to be addressed. I like a glass of wine with a nice meal and not having it makes me feel deprived. So your article was very encouraging.  

    Caroline: I could not get the link with the photos to work. But your avatar with your family is very cute.

    Hugs to all of you.

    Mandy

  • bobcat
    bobcat Member Posts: 681
    edited February 2010

    Havehope - thanks for the wine post.  I still enjoy my glass of wine.  Mandy!! How are you?

  • colleen1960
    colleen1960 Member Posts: 226
    edited February 2010

    Hello All - Just catching up on all the posts.  Just wanted to pop in and say hello.  I cant' believe it has been one year since finishing chemo.  Feeling pretty good.  Still get tired very easily.  Like many of you I liked to have a few beers when out socializing or some wine.  I really can't drink anymore.  When I try I get very red and I feel like my body is on fire.  I have not given up though.  I try occasionally just to see.  Sometimes I can have a glass of wine or a beer and nothing happens, and other times I can't finish the wine or beer.  Crazy, has anyone else had this happen?  I am glad to see everyone is doing well.

    Take care,

    Colleen

  • Firni
    Firni Member Posts: 1,519
    edited February 2010

    Hi Colleen.  I don't have any problems having a couple beers or a few glasses of wine.  However, I feel like I live in a state of constant Tamoxifen induced redness and on fire skin.  My staff has given me paper fans, little battery fans and just fan me with pads of paper.  It's just really embarrassing when a cute doctor comes in and I have a sever hot flash.  Only a little more than 4 years left of that.  

  • EleanorJ
    EleanorJ Member Posts: 752
    edited February 2010

    Mandy, I've been having problems with facebook right and that's how I usually share photos. Oh well..

    Well Divas, it's been a rough week. I don't know if you all remember but back in the fall, my MIL's friend was diagnosed with small cell lung cancer. She did chemo & radiation at the same time, cancer spread while she was in treatment. They tried another chemo, still didn't work. She was hospitalized last week, they stopped all treatment, she died on Wednesday. We're all in shock, she went so fast, 6 months, especially since the doctors were all telling her that they were going to cure her. I will always be so thankful for her, because she is the one person that help pulling my MIL through my cancer so for her to be diagnosed 3 months after my ordeal was over, it's been rough on my MIL, and now, she just lost a very dear friend. Funeral is on Monday, won't be a fun day. Her hubby is a wreck, still very so in love with his wife after 25 years, and the 3 kids are a wreck as well. Such a sad situation :(

  • bobcat
    bobcat Member Posts: 681
    edited February 2010

    Prayers to you Caroline, your MIL and all your family and friends. 

  • Mandy1313
    Mandy1313 Member Posts: 1,692
    edited February 2010

    Caroline: So sorry to hear of your MIL's loss. Sending a big hug.

    Mandy

  • Texas357
    Texas357 Member Posts: 1,552
    edited February 2010

    Caroline, I'm very sorry for your loss. I know you must be feeling this very heavily.

    Colleen, no problems drinking here. Just wish I could go back to my one nightly glass of wine but all the stats have me frightened to do so. I stick to 2 per week and believe me when I say I cherish them! 

  • Firni
    Firni Member Posts: 1,519
    edited February 2010

    Caroline,  I'm so very sorry.  Lung cancer is a terrible thing.  Prayers to you and your family and the family of your MIL's friend.

  • EleanorJ
    EleanorJ Member Posts: 752
    edited March 2010

    Thanks everyone, the funeral was today, it's been a long & rough day, but we made it through. The worst has yet to come for her hubby & kids when all the comotion is over and all family leaves. She was a well loved and appreciated lady, I've never seen such a packed funeral before! She will be greatly missed :(

  • colleen1960
    colleen1960 Member Posts: 226
    edited March 2010

    Caroline:  Sorry sorry for your loss.  My prayers go out to you and your friends family.

  • havehope
    havehope Member Posts: 503
    edited March 2010

    Caroline, sorry for your loss.

  • havehope
    havehope Member Posts: 503
    edited March 2010

    Drug  Recall - Very Serious ***

    Send to friends & family  

     CONFIRMED  BY: SNOPES.COM <http://snopes.com/>     Type in the word PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE in the search box

    All  drugs containing PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE are being recalled.

        

    STOP  TAKING anything

    containing this ingredient. It has been linked to  increased hemorrhagic

    stroke (bleeding in  brain)

    among women  ages 18-49 in the three days after starting use of medication

    The FDA  recommended that everyone (even  children) seek  alternative medicine.

    The  following medications contain  Phenylpropanolamine:

    Acutrim Diet  Gum Appetite Suppressant

    Acutrim Plus  Dietary Supplements

    Acutrim eMaximum Strength Appetite Control

    Alka-Seltzer  Plus Children's Cold Medicine Effervescent

    Alka-Seltzer  Plus Cold medicine (cherry or orange)

    Alka-Seltzer  Plus Cold Medicine Original

    Alka-Seltzer  Plus Cold & Cough Medicine Effervescent

    Alka-Seltzer  Plus Cold & Flu Medicine

    Alka-Seltzer  Plus Cold & Sinus Effervescent

    Alka-Seltzer  Plus Night-Time Cold Medicine

    BC Allergy  Sinus Cold Powder

    BC  Sinus Cold Powder

    Comtrex Flu  Therapy & Fever Relief

    Day &  Night Contac 12-Hour Cold Capsules

    Contac 12  Hour Caplets

    Coricidin D  Cold, Flu & Sinus

    Dexatrim  Caffeine Free

    Dexatrim  Extended Duration

    Dexatrim  Gelcaps

    Dexatrim  Vitamin C/Caffeine Free

    Dimetapp Cold  & Allergy Chewable Tablets

    Dimetapp Cold  & Cough Liqui-Gels

    Dimetapp DM  Cold & Cough Elixir

    Dimetapp  Elixir

    Dimetapp 4  Hour Liquid Gels

    Dimetapp 4  Hour Tablets

    Dimetapp 12  Hour Extendtabs Tablets

    Naldecon DX  Pediatric Drops

    Permathene  Mega-16

    Robitussin  CF

    Tavist-D 12  Hour Relief of Sinus & Nasal Congestion

    Triaminic DM  Cough Relief

    Triaminic  Expectorant Chest & Head

    Triaminic  Syrup Cold & Allergy

    Triaminic  Triaminicol Cold & Cough

    I just found  out and called the 800# on the container for  Triaminic  and they  informed me that they are

    voluntarily recalling the following  medicines because of a certain

    ingredient that is causing strokes and  seizures in children

    Orange3D Cold  &Allergy Cherry (Pink)

    3D Cold

     &Cough Berry

                        

    3D Cough  Relief Yellow 3D Expectorant

    They are  asking you to call them at 800-548-3708 with the lot number on

    the box  so they can send you postage for you  to send it  back to them, and they will also issue you

    a refund. If you know of  anyone else with small children,

    PLEASE PASS  THIS ON.. THIS IS SERIOUS STUFF!

    DO PASS ALONG  TO ALL ON YOUR MAILING LIST so people are informed. They

    can then pass  it along to their families.

    To confirm  these findings please take time to check the  following:

    http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/ppa/_ <http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/ppa/_>  

    PLEASE  PASS THIS ON TO YOUR CHILDREN IN CASE THEY GIVE

    IT TO THEIR CHILDREN  OR TO FRIENDS WHO HAVE CHILDREN AND

     GRANDCHILDREN

  • Texas357
    Texas357 Member Posts: 1,552
    edited March 2010

    I have a follow-up appt with my medical oncologist today. Anyone else still going every 3 months? He has me go for a blood test right before including CBC and tumor markers.

    My breast surgeon wanted to see me every 6 months. My radiation oncologist wanted to see me every 3 months. I can't see the value of having 3 doctors do a manual check of my lymph nodes and skin and send me on my way. I take time off work for each of these visits and it just seems excessive.

    So I've decided to just see my medical oncologist unless I have a specific reason to see one of the others.

  • Mandy1313
    Mandy1313 Member Posts: 1,692
    edited March 2010

    Hi Texas!

    Originally my breast surgeon wanted me to see her every six months and to see one of my other doctors every six months so that I would be checked every 3 months.  My next visit was with the rads onc and he said that he thought every six months with a doctor was enough. I felt I needed to get out of the hospital and on with my life so I am working with the rads onc on follow up.     I have blood drawn on my visits to my internist (Yep, I am always seeing a doctor) and those are available to all of my other doctors throught the computer system of the hospital. But I've never had a tumor marker done.

    Hope everyone is doing well. 

    Mandy

  • Texas357
    Texas357 Member Posts: 1,552
    edited March 2010
  • swest
    swest Member Posts: 680
    edited March 2010

    Texas-I don't understand why you need to see the BS since you had the MX.  I only see my medical oncologist every 3 months.  He said we'd move to every 6 months in May. Yipee!!!!

    I miss you guys!

  • EleanorJ
    EleanorJ Member Posts: 752
    edited March 2010

    I had a 1 month follow-up with my rad onc. Med. onc, I see every 6 months, and BS wants me in every year. She saw me 6 month past surgery, than I had my mammo on the one year mark. She didn't ask for the mammo every 6 month so I'm not complaining. Hey, the less they want to see me, the happier I am! Of course, I could ask to see them more, but I'm not worried and it actually caused me anxiety last time I was in, so as long as I'm feeling great with no worries, I'm happy not going to the doctor :) I guess every doctors is different.

  • havehope
    havehope Member Posts: 503
    edited March 2010

    I am also on a 6 mo - every 3 mo schedule btw onc and surgeon. My next app is March 20. My onc always runs tumor markers as well as vit D, immuno test and others. But no other tests so far. I read that there are 2 spikes in recurrences one at 18 months and one at 60 mo from surgery. April will be my 18 months.

  • Firni
    Firni Member Posts: 1,519
    edited March 2010

    I'm supposed to see my med onc every 6 months.  Next appt in June.  I don't believe I'll go.  All he does is ask me how I'm doing, feels under my arms and feels my new fake boobs and says ok.  See you in 6 months.  No scans, no blood work, no tumor marker tests.  I don't see the point in going.  Just more money out of my pocket.  I'll see my gyn in June and she will do a lymph and breast manual exams.  Plus the other fun stuff.  I think I'll get my file from my current onc and see someone else if I ever have to. 

  • Texas357
    Texas357 Member Posts: 1,552
    edited March 2010

    While I want to be monitored, I agree that the anxiety of these visits has to be taken into account too. My BS wanted mammograms just to check the remaining skin. My medical oncologist said they aren't needed. I'd just as soon not have any extra radiation.

    Havehope: Is that 18 and 60 months post diagnosis? Post surgery? Post chemo?

  • havehope
    havehope Member Posts: 503
    edited March 2010

    Texas, is post surgery.

  • havehope
    havehope Member Posts: 503
    edited March 2010
    The Mathematics Of Cancer
    Robert Langreth, 03.15.10, 6:00 PM ET  Larry Norton sees some of the toughest cases as deputy physician-in-chief for breast cancer at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. He has access to the most advanced imaging machines, the best surgeons and numerous new tumor-fighting drugs. But often the fancy technology helps only temporarily. Sometimes a big tumor will shrink dramatically during chemotherapy. Then all of a sudden it comes back in seven or eight locations simultaneously.Norton thinks adding more mathematics to the crude science of cancer therapy will help. He says that oncologists need to spend much more time devising and analyzing equations that describe how fast tumors grow, how quickly cancer cells develop resistance to therapy and how often they spread to other organs. By taking such a quantitative approach, researchers may be able to create drug combinations that are far more effective than the ones now in use. "I have a suspicion that we are using almost all the cancer drugs in the wrong way," he says. "For all I know, we may be able to cure cancer with existing agents."His strategy is unusual among cancer researchers, who have tended to focus on identifying cancer-causing genes rather than writing differential equations to describe the rate of tumor spread. Yet adding a dose of numbers has already led to important changes in breast cancer treatment. The math of tumor growth led to the discovery that just changing the frequency of chemo treatments can boost their effect significantly.In the future Norton's theorizing may lead to new classes of drugs. Researchers have always assumed tumors grow from the inside out. His latest theory, developed in collaboration with Sloan-Kettering biologist Joan Massagué, asserts that tumors grow more like big clusters of weeds. They are constantly shedding cells into the circulatory system. Some of the cells form new tumors in distant places. But other wayward cells come back to reseed the original tumor, making it grow faster. It's like hardened terrorists returning to their home villages after being radicalized abroad and recruiting even more terrorists, says Massagué, who in December showed that the self-seeding process happens in laboratory mice. If this model works in humans, it will open up new avenues for treatment. It suggests that to cure cancer, doctors need to come up with drugs that stop the seeding process. These drugs may be different from the current crop of drugs, which are designed to kill fast-dividing cells.Among other mysteries, self-seeding may explain why tumors sometimes regrow in the same location after being surgically removed: not necessarily because surgeons failed to remove part of the original tumor but because some itinerant cancer cells returned later to their original home to start a new tumor in the same place.Norton, 62, got a degree in psychology from the University of Rochester, then an M.D. from Columbia University. For a while during college he thought he would make a career as a saxophonist and percussionist. The remnant of that dream is a vibraphone in his office in Memorial's new 16-story breast cancer center.Ever since he was a fellow at the National Cancer Institute in the 1970s he has been trying to come up with mathematical laws that describe tumor growth. He treated a lymphoma patient whose tumor shrank rapidly during chemotherapy. A year later the cancer returned worse than ever. The speed with which the tumor grew back didn't jibe with the prevailing notion that most tumors grew in a simple exponential fashion.Working with NCI statistician Richard Simon, Norton came up with a new model of tumor growth based on the work of the 19th-century mathematician Benjamin Gompertz. The concept (which other researchers proposed in the 1960s) holds that tumor growth generally follows an S-shape curve. Microscopic tumors below a certain threshold barely grow at all. Small tumors grow exponentially, but the rate of growth slows dramatically as tumors get bigger, until it reaches a plateau. A corollary of this: The faster you shrink a tumor with chemo, the quicker it will grow back if you haven't killed it all.Based on these rates of growth, Norton argued that giving the same total dose of chemotherapy over a shorter period of time would boost the cure rate by limiting the time tumors could regrow between treatments. The concept got a skeptical reaction initially. "People said it was a total waste of time," he recalls. It took decades before Norton was able to prove his theory. But in 2002 a giant government trial showed that giving chemotherapy every two weeks instead of every three lowered the risk of breast cancer recurrence by 26% over three years, even though the two groups got the same cumulative dose.

    Today Norton's "dose-dense" regimen is common practice for certain breast cancer patients at high risk of relapse after surgery. Timing adjustments are also showing promise in other tumor types. Last October a Japanese trial found that ovarian cancer patients lived longer if they received smaller doses of chemotherapy weekly rather than getting larger doses every three weeks, according to results published in The Lancet."Larry has been one of the real thinkers in this area," says Yale University professor and former NCI head Vincent DeVita. But designing better treatment schedules doesn't get as much credit as the glamorous business of inventing drugs.Norton's latest theory about how tumors grow is derived from Massagué's pioneering research. It is consistent with Gompertz's growth curves and ties together two essential features of cancer that researchers had long considered separate--cell growth and metastasis.Their collaboration started five years ago, when Massagué called Norton and shared a startling finding that was emerging from his laboratory. Massagué was studying how tumors spread from an organ such as the breast to the lungs, brain and other faraway places. He took human breast tumor cells, implanted them in mice and waited for metastases to occur. He analyzed cells that had metastasized to see what genes were overactive. None of the genes implicated in the spread of cancer to distant organs had to do with excessive cell division, it turned out. Instead, they all related to the ability to infiltrate and adapt to new environments.The finding seemed to contradict doctors' impression that the fastest-growing tumors are also the most likely to spread. Pondering how to reconcile the two ideas, Norton and Massagué theorized that tumor cells released into the bloodstream sometimes are attracted back to the original tumor and help it expand.Self-seeding may explain why large tumors tend to grow (in percentage terms) more slowly than small tumors: It could be that growth is a function of surface area rather than volume. Tumors that are efficient seeders may kill people by promoting the seeding process, not because they have a higher exponential growth rate.It took Massagué four years of work to prove that self-seeding occurs in laboratory mice. Now comes the tricky part: coming up with drugs that block tumor seeding. Massagué and Norton have identified four genes involved in seeding and are testing for drugs to block them. Convincing drug companies to go along could be difficult; it's easier to see whether a drug shrinks tumors than to see whether it stops evil cells from spreading. But Norton believes that doing this hard work may be the key to a cure.
  • Texas357
    Texas357 Member Posts: 1,552
    edited March 2010

    Thanks HaveHope!

  • bobcat
    bobcat Member Posts: 681
    edited March 2010

    Havehope - fascinating article.  Thanks.

  • Mandy1313
    Mandy1313 Member Posts: 1,692
    edited March 2010

    Havehope:  thanks for posting the article. It gives me alot to think about. 

Categories