Has anyone started a forum for Chemo in Dec 2008?
Comments
-
Hi Caroline. I don't have much snow here. We had flurries for a day and got about an inch. We have had snows like you are experiencing and there certainly is a challenging beauty about tons of snow.
-
This one is for Caroline, but not only. Enjoy!
Wine May Fight Cancer, But How?
New approach to wine chemistry reveals new cancer- and obesity-preventing propertiesStuart FoxPosted: February 17, 2010
Numerous medical studies have produced evidence that wine may help prevent cancer, but now, some scientists are presenting a new
theory on the science behind its cancer-fighting properties. Their research may help develop new therapies.
The evidence that wine can help fight some cancers has been growing for several years. (At the same time, some studies have shown
alcohol, especially in excess, increases the risk of some cancers.) But researchers have struggled to understand why. Many theories
speculated that antioxidants in wines, including compounds like resveratrol, have something to do with it. Antioxidants may reduce the
stress of chemical processes in the body. But scientists have struggled to find evidence that the compounds in wine play such a role.
William Li, president and medical director at the Angiogenesis Foundation, disagrees with the antioxidant theory. In his recent presentation
at the TED Conference, an innovation summit, he argued that research shows that some compounds in wine-including resveratrol-
function as antiangiogenic inhibitors, and those are the real cancer fighters.
Antiangiogenic inhibitors are substances that prevent the growth of new blood vessels. Because growing tumors need new blood vessels in
order to survive and spread, antiangiogenic inhibitors can suppress tumor growth. (Blood vessels are not usually built elsewhere in an adult
body unless tissue repair is actively in process.)
Antiangiogenics have proven so effective at fighting cancer that they make up many of the cancer medications already on the market.
Identifying antiangiogenics inhibitors as the main source of wine's health effects widens the range of wines that contribute to cancer
reduction. What's more, scientists are currently looking at antiangiogenic inhibitors as a treatment for chronic obesity, because they can
suppress blood vessel growth in fatty tissue.
"There are very few studies that show an antioxidant approach in diet creates better health," said Li. "An angiogenesis approach has already
been embraced by the medical community as improving disease outcomes, including cancer."
In his research, Li discovered that compounds like resveratrol prevented the development of cancer-feeding blood vessels by as much as
60 percent. And since unhealthy fat growth requires the same kind of blood vessel development as tumors, a diet rich in antiangiogenic
compounds fights flab just as effectively as it fights cancer.
Other experiments Li performed on teas showed that foods previously identified as high in antioxidants were not necessarily high in
antiangiogenics. While the antioxidant approach identified red wine as the healthier drink, Li believes that an antiangiogenic approach could
discover similar health benefits in white wine as well.
"The anti-cancer power of many foods is mistakenly attributed to antioxidants," said Richard Beliveau, director of molecular medicine at the
University of Quebec and author of Food to Fight Cancer. "Antiangeogentic activity is much more important than antioxidant activity in
preventing cancer."
The argument continues to divide researchers, however. While Jack Losso, professor of food science at Louisiana State University, doesn't
dispute Beliveau's assertion, he does not advocate fully ignoring antioxidants in favor of antiangiogenics.
"Cancer is like a basketball team-you can't beat it with one player," said Losso. "I say resveratrol is like Michael Jordan. In Chicago, he had
a good coach and good teammates, and they had a parade every year. He goes to Washington, and they never win. You need antioxidants
and antiangiogenics."
Li said he plans to continue to investigate the antiangiogenic properties of wine. Over the next two years, Li hopes to assemble a
comparative grape and wine registry that identifies all of the antiangiogenic compounds in wine, their potencies, and their relative
abundance in different types of wines and grapes. "By examining the potential of antiangeogenics in food, we will find answers to cancer all
around us," he said. "In our groceries, in our food, and in our glasses."
And yes, I do drink wine so the posting is biased.

-
Thank you Havehope!
I needed an excuse! -
Thanks Havehope, just what I wanted to hear
Even though I wasn't about to cut the wine, I did feel like I should because of the breast cancer, now I don't feel bad about it at all 
-
Heavenhope: thanks for the post.
I feel that there are some quality of life issues that have to be addressed. I like a glass of wine with a nice meal and not having it makes me feel deprived. So your article was very encouraging.
Caroline: I could not get the link with the photos to work. But your avatar with your family is very cute.
Hugs to all of you.
Mandy
-
Havehope - thanks for the wine post. I still enjoy my glass of wine. Mandy!! How are you?
-
Hello All - Just catching up on all the posts. Just wanted to pop in and say hello. I cant' believe it has been one year since finishing chemo. Feeling pretty good. Still get tired very easily. Like many of you I liked to have a few beers when out socializing or some wine. I really can't drink anymore. When I try I get very red and I feel like my body is on fire. I have not given up though. I try occasionally just to see. Sometimes I can have a glass of wine or a beer and nothing happens, and other times I can't finish the wine or beer. Crazy, has anyone else had this happen? I am glad to see everyone is doing well.
Take care,
Colleen
-
Hi Colleen. I don't have any problems having a couple beers or a few glasses of wine. However, I feel like I live in a state of constant Tamoxifen induced redness and on fire skin. My staff has given me paper fans, little battery fans and just fan me with pads of paper. It's just really embarrassing when a cute doctor comes in and I have a sever hot flash. Only a little more than 4 years left of that.
-
Mandy, I've been having problems with facebook right and that's how I usually share photos. Oh well..
Well Divas, it's been a rough week. I don't know if you all remember but back in the fall, my MIL's friend was diagnosed with small cell lung cancer. She did chemo & radiation at the same time, cancer spread while she was in treatment. They tried another chemo, still didn't work. She was hospitalized last week, they stopped all treatment, she died on Wednesday. We're all in shock, she went so fast, 6 months, especially since the doctors were all telling her that they were going to cure her. I will always be so thankful for her, because she is the one person that help pulling my MIL through my cancer so for her to be diagnosed 3 months after my ordeal was over, it's been rough on my MIL, and now, she just lost a very dear friend. Funeral is on Monday, won't be a fun day. Her hubby is a wreck, still very so in love with his wife after 25 years, and the 3 kids are a wreck as well. Such a sad situation

-
Prayers to you Caroline, your MIL and all your family and friends.
-
Caroline: So sorry to hear of your MIL's loss. Sending a big hug.
Mandy
-
Caroline, I'm very sorry for your loss. I know you must be feeling this very heavily.
Colleen, no problems drinking here. Just wish I could go back to my one nightly glass of wine but all the stats have me frightened to do so. I stick to 2 per week and believe me when I say I cherish them!
-
Caroline, I'm so very sorry. Lung cancer is a terrible thing. Prayers to you and your family and the family of your MIL's friend.
-
Thanks everyone, the funeral was today, it's been a long & rough day, but we made it through. The worst has yet to come for her hubby & kids when all the comotion is over and all family leaves. She was a well loved and appreciated lady, I've never seen such a packed funeral before! She will be greatly missed

-
Caroline: Sorry sorry for your loss. My prayers go out to you and your friends family.
-
Caroline, sorry for your loss.
-
Drug Recall - Very Serious ***
Send to friends & family
CONFIRMED BY: SNOPES.COM <http://snopes.com/> Type in the word PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE in the search box
All drugs containing PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE are being recalled.
STOP TAKING anything
containing this ingredient. It has been linked to increased hemorrhagic
stroke (bleeding in brain)
among women ages 18-49 in the three days after starting use of medication
The FDA recommended that everyone (even children) seek alternative medicine.
The following medications contain Phenylpropanolamine:
Acutrim Diet Gum Appetite Suppressant
Acutrim Plus Dietary Supplements
Acutrim eMaximum Strength Appetite Control
Alka-Seltzer Plus Children's Cold Medicine Effervescent
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold medicine (cherry or orange)
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold Medicine Original
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold & Cough Medicine Effervescent
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold & Flu Medicine
Alka-Seltzer Plus Cold & Sinus Effervescent
Alka-Seltzer Plus Night-Time Cold Medicine
BC Allergy Sinus Cold Powder
BC Sinus Cold Powder
Comtrex Flu Therapy & Fever Relief
Day & Night Contac 12-Hour Cold Capsules
Contac 12 Hour Caplets
Coricidin D Cold, Flu & Sinus
Dexatrim Caffeine Free
Dexatrim Extended Duration
Dexatrim Gelcaps
Dexatrim Vitamin C/Caffeine Free
Dimetapp Cold & Allergy Chewable Tablets
Dimetapp Cold & Cough Liqui-Gels
Dimetapp DM Cold & Cough Elixir
Dimetapp Elixir
Dimetapp 4 Hour Liquid Gels
Dimetapp 4 Hour Tablets
Dimetapp 12 Hour Extendtabs Tablets
Naldecon DX Pediatric Drops
Permathene Mega-16
Robitussin CF
Tavist-D 12 Hour Relief of Sinus & Nasal Congestion
Triaminic DM Cough Relief
Triaminic Expectorant Chest & Head
Triaminic Syrup Cold & Allergy
Triaminic Triaminicol Cold & Cough
I just found out and called the 800# on the container for Triaminic and they informed me that they are
voluntarily recalling the following medicines because of a certain
ingredient that is causing strokes and seizures in children
Orange3D Cold &Allergy Cherry (Pink)
3D Cold
&Cough Berry
3D Cough Relief Yellow 3D Expectorant
They are asking you to call them at 800-548-3708 with the lot number on
the box so they can send you postage for you to send it back to them, and they will also issue you
a refund. If you know of anyone else with small children,
PLEASE PASS THIS ON.. THIS IS SERIOUS STUFF!
DO PASS ALONG TO ALL ON YOUR MAILING LIST so people are informed. They
can then pass it along to their families.
To confirm these findings please take time to check the following:
http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/ppa/_ <http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/ppa/_>
PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO YOUR CHILDREN IN CASE THEY GIVE
IT TO THEIR CHILDREN OR TO FRIENDS WHO HAVE CHILDREN AND
GRANDCHILDREN
-
I have a follow-up appt with my medical oncologist today. Anyone else still going every 3 months? He has me go for a blood test right before including CBC and tumor markers.
My breast surgeon wanted to see me every 6 months. My radiation oncologist wanted to see me every 3 months. I can't see the value of having 3 doctors do a manual check of my lymph nodes and skin and send me on my way. I take time off work for each of these visits and it just seems excessive.
So I've decided to just see my medical oncologist unless I have a specific reason to see one of the others.
-
Hi Texas!
Originally my breast surgeon wanted me to see her every six months and to see one of my other doctors every six months so that I would be checked every 3 months. My next visit was with the rads onc and he said that he thought every six months with a doctor was enough. I felt I needed to get out of the hospital and on with my life so I am working with the rads onc on follow up. I have blood drawn on my visits to my internist (Yep, I am always seeing a doctor) and those are available to all of my other doctors throught the computer system of the hospital. But I've never had a tumor marker done.
Hope everyone is doing well.
Mandy
-
Thanks Mandy!
-
Texas-I don't understand why you need to see the BS since you had the MX. I only see my medical oncologist every 3 months. He said we'd move to every 6 months in May. Yipee!!!!
I miss you guys!
-
I had a 1 month follow-up with my rad onc. Med. onc, I see every 6 months, and BS wants me in every year. She saw me 6 month past surgery, than I had my mammo on the one year mark. She didn't ask for the mammo every 6 month so I'm not complaining. Hey, the less they want to see me, the happier I am! Of course, I could ask to see them more, but I'm not worried and it actually caused me anxiety last time I was in, so as long as I'm feeling great with no worries, I'm happy not going to the doctor
I guess every doctors is different. -
I am also on a 6 mo - every 3 mo schedule btw onc and surgeon. My next app is March 20. My onc always runs tumor markers as well as vit D, immuno test and others. But no other tests so far. I read that there are 2 spikes in recurrences one at 18 months and one at 60 mo from surgery. April will be my 18 months.
-
I'm supposed to see my med onc every 6 months. Next appt in June. I don't believe I'll go. All he does is ask me how I'm doing, feels under my arms and feels my new fake boobs and says ok. See you in 6 months. No scans, no blood work, no tumor marker tests. I don't see the point in going. Just more money out of my pocket. I'll see my gyn in June and she will do a lymph and breast manual exams. Plus the other fun stuff. I think I'll get my file from my current onc and see someone else if I ever have to.
-
While I want to be monitored, I agree that the anxiety of these visits has to be taken into account too. My BS wanted mammograms just to check the remaining skin. My medical oncologist said they aren't needed. I'd just as soon not have any extra radiation.
Havehope: Is that 18 and 60 months post diagnosis? Post surgery? Post chemo?
-
Texas, is post surgery.
-
The Mathematics Of Cancer
Robert Langreth, 03.15.10, 6:00 PM ET Larry Norton sees some of the toughest cases as deputy physician-in-chief for breast cancer at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. He has access to the most advanced imaging machines, the best surgeons and numerous new tumor-fighting drugs. But often the fancy technology helps only temporarily. Sometimes a big tumor will shrink dramatically during chemotherapy. Then all of a sudden it comes back in seven or eight locations simultaneously.Norton thinks adding more mathematics to the crude science of cancer therapy will help. He says that oncologists need to spend much more time devising and analyzing equations that describe how fast tumors grow, how quickly cancer cells develop resistance to therapy and how often they spread to other organs. By taking such a quantitative approach, researchers may be able to create drug combinations that are far more effective than the ones now in use. "I have a suspicion that we are using almost all the cancer drugs in the wrong way," he says. "For all I know, we may be able to cure cancer with existing agents."His strategy is unusual among cancer researchers, who have tended to focus on identifying cancer-causing genes rather than writing differential equations to describe the rate of tumor spread. Yet adding a dose of numbers has already led to important changes in breast cancer treatment. The math of tumor growth led to the discovery that just changing the frequency of chemo treatments can boost their effect significantly.In the future Norton's theorizing may lead to new classes of drugs. Researchers have always assumed tumors grow from the inside out. His latest theory, developed in collaboration with Sloan-Kettering biologist Joan Massagué, asserts that tumors grow more like big clusters of weeds. They are constantly shedding cells into the circulatory system. Some of the cells form new tumors in distant places. But other wayward cells come back to reseed the original tumor, making it grow faster. It's like hardened terrorists returning to their home villages after being radicalized abroad and recruiting even more terrorists, says Massagué, who in December showed that the self-seeding process happens in laboratory mice. If this model works in humans, it will open up new avenues for treatment. It suggests that to cure cancer, doctors need to come up with drugs that stop the seeding process. These drugs may be different from the current crop of drugs, which are designed to kill fast-dividing cells.Among other mysteries, self-seeding may explain why tumors sometimes regrow in the same location after being surgically removed: not necessarily because surgeons failed to remove part of the original tumor but because some itinerant cancer cells returned later to their original home to start a new tumor in the same place.Norton, 62, got a degree in psychology from the University of Rochester, then an M.D. from Columbia University. For a while during college he thought he would make a career as a saxophonist and percussionist. The remnant of that dream is a vibraphone in his office in Memorial's new 16-story breast cancer center.Ever since he was a fellow at the National Cancer Institute in the 1970s he has been trying to come up with mathematical laws that describe tumor growth. He treated a lymphoma patient whose tumor shrank rapidly during chemotherapy. A year later the cancer returned worse than ever. The speed with which the tumor grew back didn't jibe with the prevailing notion that most tumors grew in a simple exponential fashion.Working with NCI statistician Richard Simon, Norton came up with a new model of tumor growth based on the work of the 19th-century mathematician Benjamin Gompertz. The concept (which other researchers proposed in the 1960s) holds that tumor growth generally follows an S-shape curve. Microscopic tumors below a certain threshold barely grow at all. Small tumors grow exponentially, but the rate of growth slows dramatically as tumors get bigger, until it reaches a plateau. A corollary of this: The faster you shrink a tumor with chemo, the quicker it will grow back if you haven't killed it all.Based on these rates of growth, Norton argued that giving the same total dose of chemotherapy over a shorter period of time would boost the cure rate by limiting the time tumors could regrow between treatments. The concept got a skeptical reaction initially. "People said it was a total waste of time," he recalls. It took decades before Norton was able to prove his theory. But in 2002 a giant government trial showed that giving chemotherapy every two weeks instead of every three lowered the risk of breast cancer recurrence by 26% over three years, even though the two groups got the same cumulative dose.
Today Norton's "dose-dense" regimen is common practice for certain breast cancer patients at high risk of relapse after surgery. Timing adjustments are also showing promise in other tumor types. Last October a Japanese trial found that ovarian cancer patients lived longer if they received smaller doses of chemotherapy weekly rather than getting larger doses every three weeks, according to results published in The Lancet."Larry has been one of the real thinkers in this area," says Yale University professor and former NCI head Vincent DeVita. But designing better treatment schedules doesn't get as much credit as the glamorous business of inventing drugs.Norton's latest theory about how tumors grow is derived from Massagué's pioneering research. It is consistent with Gompertz's growth curves and ties together two essential features of cancer that researchers had long considered separate--cell growth and metastasis.Their collaboration started five years ago, when Massagué called Norton and shared a startling finding that was emerging from his laboratory. Massagué was studying how tumors spread from an organ such as the breast to the lungs, brain and other faraway places. He took human breast tumor cells, implanted them in mice and waited for metastases to occur. He analyzed cells that had metastasized to see what genes were overactive. None of the genes implicated in the spread of cancer to distant organs had to do with excessive cell division, it turned out. Instead, they all related to the ability to infiltrate and adapt to new environments.The finding seemed to contradict doctors' impression that the fastest-growing tumors are also the most likely to spread. Pondering how to reconcile the two ideas, Norton and Massagué theorized that tumor cells released into the bloodstream sometimes are attracted back to the original tumor and help it expand.Self-seeding may explain why large tumors tend to grow (in percentage terms) more slowly than small tumors: It could be that growth is a function of surface area rather than volume. Tumors that are efficient seeders may kill people by promoting the seeding process, not because they have a higher exponential growth rate.It took Massagué four years of work to prove that self-seeding occurs in laboratory mice. Now comes the tricky part: coming up with drugs that block tumor seeding. Massagué and Norton have identified four genes involved in seeding and are testing for drugs to block them. Convincing drug companies to go along could be difficult; it's easier to see whether a drug shrinks tumors than to see whether it stops evil cells from spreading. But Norton believes that doing this hard work may be the key to a cure.
-
Thanks HaveHope!
-
Havehope - fascinating article. Thanks.
-
Havehope: thanks for posting the article. It gives me alot to think about.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team