Is your supplement on this list?
This list from FDA/Dana-Farber shows "125 Fake Cancer Cures Consumers Should Avoid," (their wording, not mine) and a lot of them are discussed in this forum on a regular basis.
Edited to give correct article title to the link.
Comments
-
Thenewme, thank you for the post however, it would be a tragedy for new visitors to this forum to read it, become alarmed and dismiss many of the products listed as snake oil when that is not the case. Companies are chosen at random and asked to remove references to curing cancer like the ones listed below and in most cases are not forced to stop selling the products. Compliance letters are sent to conventional drug companies as well. It would be interesting to read the responses that were sent to the FDA.
The list for Fake Cancer Cures was updated to 187: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/EnforcementActivitiesbyFDA/ucm171057.htm
* "Treats all forms of cancer"
* "Causes cancer cells to commit suicide!"
* "80% more effective than the world's number one cancer drug"
* "Skin cancers disappear"
* "Target cancer cells while leaving healthy cells alone"
* "Shrinks malignant tumors"
* "Avoid painful surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or other conventional treatments"The company I purchase Curcumin from is listed but I never read any claims to curing cancer however, I did read the information below which is why I choose them.
We use patented ingredients like Curcumin C3 Comlex®, Forslean®, Gugulipid® and Boswellin which are also used by MD Anderson cancer center, UCLA and other premiere institutes in research and clinical trials.
Researchers at MD.Anderson, UCLA and other premiere institutes, say that Curcumin, a pungent yellow spice found in turmeric, blocks a key biological pathway. It shuts down nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB), a powerful master switch known to regulate expression of more than 300 genes that promote an abnormal inflammatory response that leads to a variety of disorders.. Curcumin is the most powerful antioxidant and antiinflamatory product availble naturally.
I use a host of the products listed but not the companies so knowing where your concern lies would be helpful.
-
thenewme: I have noticed that curcumin is on the list of supplements to avoid. I don't quite understand which way this spice might be dangerous. Or are they referring to THIS particular brand of curcumin pills?
EDITED TO ADD: Never mind, I got it. Efflorescing answered my question above.
-
Hi Efflorescing, thanks for posting the updated link! I think it's a tragedy to allow misinformation to go unchallenged. I disagree that the companies are singled out at random. I think they are added to the list when they are found to be making unproven claims and using false advertising.
My concern is that consumers need accurate, evidence-based facts, not overblown claims and misinformation.
Using your example of just one of the curcumin companies on the list, this letter from the FDA clearly shows that this particular company uses false advertising, and to my mind it's inexcusable and dangerous:
*********************Quote***********Ageless Cure, LLC 20-May-08
Department of Health and Human Services' logoDepartment of Health and Human ServicesPublic Health Service
Food and Drug AdministrationDallas District
4040 North Central Expressway
Dallas, Texas 75204-3128May 20, 2008
Ref: 2008-DAL-WL-11
WARNING LETTER
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTEDAgeless Cures LLC
Atman Homes LLC
1732b Michigan St
Houston, TX 77066Ageless Cures LLC
Atman Homes LLC
6418 Ferris Dr
Houston, TX 77081Ageless Cures LLC
Atman Homes LLC
PO Box 66485
Houston, TX 77266Dear Sir or Madam:
This is to advise you that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed your website at the Internet address www.agelesscures.com and has determined that the products "Curcumin C3 Complex," "Super Curcumin C3 Complex® w/ Bioprerine" and "Super Curcumin C3 Complex® Eco Pack" are promoted for conditions that cause the products to be drugs under section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(B)]. The therapeutic claims on your website establish that the products are drugs because they are intended for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. The marketing of these products with these claims violates the Act.
Examples of some of the claims observed on your website include:
• "Curcumin is the major component of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) and extensive scientific research on Curcumin has demonstrated its potent . . . cancer curing properties."
• "Scientists at M.D. Anderson wrote in January 2003: "Extensive research over the last 50 years has indicated Curcumin can both prevent and treat cancer. The anticancer potential of curcumin stems from its ability to suppress proliferation of a wide variety of tumor cells. Curcumin can suppress tumor initiation, promotion and metastasis."
"Curcumin. interferes with melanoma cells. Tests show that curcumin made melanoma skin cancer cells more likely to self-destruct in a process known as apoptosis."
• "[C]urcumin helped stop the spread of breast cancer tumor cells to the lungs of mice."
• "The curcumin suppressed two proteins that tumor cells use to keep themselves immortal."
• "Researchers at MD Anderson, UCLA and other premiere institutes, say that Curcumin . . . blocks a key biological pathway needed for development of melanoma and other cancers."
• "Curcumin also causes cancer cell apoptosis (programmed cell death)."
• "The National Cancer Institute is currently developing curcumin as a drug for the treatment of cancer."
• "Curcumin has been shown to prevent a large of number of cancers in animal studies."
• "Laboratory data indicate that curcumin can inhibit tumor initiation, promotion, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis."
• "Inhibition of proliferation of tumor cells, induction of apoptosis (a mode of cell death), inhibition of transformation of cells from normal to tumor, inhibition of invasion and metastasis and suppression of inflammation have been linked with the anticancer activity of curcumin."
• "How should curcumin be taken?
If you have cancer, you could try the following regimen . . . . By the end of eight weeks, a significant improvement is expected in most patients. If you do not have cancer, 1-2 gins per day is sufficient."• "Curcumin USES . . . . .
1. Antinflammatory/Anticancer
• Antitumor/Anticancer/Antimutagenic"
Further, the "Curcumin USES" and "Published Articles" pages of your website cite a number of articles about human and animal studies of your curcumin products or their curcumin ingredient. These articles concern the use of the products or their curcumin ingredient for treatment or prevention of cancer and other diseases. Each citation contains a link to the full text of the article. When scientific publications are used commercially by the seller of a product to promote the product to consumers, such publications may become evidence of the product's intended use. For example, under 21 CFR 101.93 (g)(2)(iv)(C), a citation of a publication or reference in the labeling of a product is considered a claim about disease treatment or prevention if the citation refers to a disease use, and if in the context of the labeling as a whole, the citation implies treatment or prevention of a disease.
The following are examples of reference citations used to market Ageless Cure products for disease treatment and prevention on your website:
• "The inhibitory effect of curcumin on the growth of human colon cancer cells (HT29, WiDr) in vitro Kim, KH, Park HY, Nam JH, Park JE, Kim JY, Park MI, Chung KO, Park KY, Koo JY. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2005 Apr; 45(4): 277-84."
• "Curcumin could block colorectal cancer hormone Nutraingredients.com - Montpellier, France 20/09/2006"
• "Curcumin found to fight tumors Daily News - Galveston County - TX, USA"
• "Turmeric may help against colon cancer United Press International - USA 20 (UPI)"
• "Curcumin fights colorectal cancer Food Consumer - Lisle,IL,USA By Ben Wasserman. 24 Sept."
• "Curcumin -New Weapon Against Colorectal Cancer Medlndia - India"
Your products are not generally recognized as safe and effective for the above referenced uses and therefore, the products are "new drugs" under section 201(p) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(p)]. New drugs may not be legally marketed in the U.S. without prior approval from FDA as described in section 505(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 355(a)]. FDA approves a new drug on the basis of scientific data submitted by a drug sponsor to demonstrate that the drug is safe and effective. Your products "Curcumin C3 Complex," "Super Curcumin C3 Complex® w/ Bioprerine" and "Super Curcumin C3 Complex® Eco Pack" are also misbranded within the meaning of section 502(f)(1) of the Act, in that labeling for these drugs fail to bear adequate directions for use [21 U.S.C. § 352(f)(1)].
The above violations are not meant to be an all-inclusive list of deficiencies in your products and their labeling. The unlawful disease treatment and prevention claims on your website were too numerous to list in this letter. It is your responsibility to ensure that products marketed by your firm comply with the Act and its implementing regulations. We advise you to review your website, product labels, and other labeling and promotional materials for your products to ensure that the claims you make for your products do not cause them to violate the Act.
You should take prompt action to correct the violations described above and prevent their future recurrence. Failure to do so may result in enforcement action without further notice. The Act authorizes seizure of illegal products and injunctions against manufacturers and distributors of those products [21 U.S.C. §§ 332 and 334].
Please notify this office, in writing, within fifteen (15) working days of the receipt of this letter, as to the specific steps you have taken to correct the violations noted above and to assure that similar violations do not occur. Include any documentation necessary to show that correction has been achieved. If corrective actions cannot be completed within fifteen working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which the corrections will be completed.
Your response should be directed to James R. Lahar, Compliance Officer at the above address.
Sincerely,
/S/
Reynado R. Rodriguez, Jr.
Director
Dallas DistrictRRR:jrl
-
My husband worked for the FDA as legal counsel. The FDA was always being sued and losing because they put out so much inaccurate information on those lists and other materials.
Around the FDA office they called these lists "Church Lady Info" after the character on Saturday Night Live who was always warning Satan was somewhere.
Nevertheless the lists keep being recycled. In our family, as soon as we see something with the FDA's name attached to it, we know where it came from and just say, "Church Lady!"
-
LOL re: the Church Lady!
Which part of the information is inaccurate?
-
Which part of your information can you back up?
The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim--you and the FDA.
-
Yazmin ~ The claims some of these companies have made re. what their products (like curcumin or lycopene) do are not FDA approved. I don't believe the FDA censures, nor does JH's list in any way reflect negatively on a specific nutrient -- although in some cases, those brands listed may not be quality products, especially if the manufacturers resort to such hype to sell them. (By the way, I've never heard of any of them except Neutraceuticals, a reputable manufacturer that makes KAL, Solaray, and some other excellent brands.)
If anyone's interested, here's some info' out of UCLA re. how to read supplement labels. You can also follow the links in this website to see some of the specific brands and products (including curcumin) they approve and make available based on one's individual situation and the recommendations of his/her nutritionist and physicians.
http://www.simmsmanncenter.ucla.edu/reflections/section/nutrition.asp
Thanks for sharing that list, thenewme. Unfortunately, there are people who, out of ignorance and desperation, believe inflated or false claims re. a wide range of products, from fat burners to exercise equipment to cancer cures. I think it's great if we can together look at why a supplement ends up on a helpful list like the one you posted, so that we don't throw out the baby with the bath water. Deanna
-
thenewme, you wrote (in part): I disagree that the companies are singled out at random. I think they are added to the list when they are found to be making unproven claims and using false advertising.
thenewme, do you use any of the supplements listed or does your treatment consist of conventional therapy? I ask because no matter how "well meaning" your message is, the intent of the messenger is of equal importance.
The companies listed were not shut down by the FDA once they complied by removing the so-called objectionable claims. In the case of Ageless Cures, they are still selling Curcumin and other supplements. Why didn't the FDA shut them down if their intention was to protect the public?
Can you post the response by Ageless Cures?
They are the only company that I am aware of that includes this information in each of their products:
QUALITY Guarantee - COA
Theoretical Level 1000mg (95% curcuminoids) 950mg CurcuminAgeless Cures strongly feels that our customers are entitled to know the quality of products being purchased from us. We buy the most expensive organic Curcumin, manufacture in a FDA and GMP certified facility inthe USA, maintain stringent quality standards and market directly to keep prices low.
Our Unprecedented Quality Guarantee is backed by "COA-Certificate of Analysis" with every order (See results below).
Ageless Cures maintains stringent quality control on all its products manufactured and sold from raw material procurement to manufacturing process. Approximately 4-6 batches of each product are made each year keeping the product fresh.
Product samples from every batch are sent to Internationally recognized Independent labs like Eurofins Scientific, USA and results published. Current Shipment Lot Highlighted
The test results show that the Active Curcumin levels (curcuminoids) meet or exceed the label specifications...Unprecedented In The Industry.
Theoretical Level 1100mg (95% curcuminoids) 1045mg Curcumin
Theoretical Level 1000mg (95% curcuminoids) 950mg Curcumin
Theroetical Level 500mg (95% curcuminoids) 475mg Curcumin
HPCL ( High performance Liquid Chromatography) is used to test the products for Active Curcumin. All batches tested by Eurofins Scientific Laboratory, CA.
-
Ok....need HELP....I am taking CURCUMIN.......IS IT OK???? I read a study on it from MD Anderson........ I was given the story from my natural food and vitamin store. UUUGGGHHHH why is all of this so confusing....LOL......
I do VERY well with yes take it or NO dont....LOL.....LOVE U LADIES
-
Angelsabove - In all the reading I've done on curcumin, the only caveat I've found is that if you have gall bladder disease, you shouldn't take it because it promotes the production of bile. However, I think I also read (can't be absolutely sure!) that the amount should not be 40 mg or over. Check out websites that do not sell curcumin supplements, and you'll usually get info which is not biased. Look for websites which are .org or .edu
Hope this helps.
-
Have you asked your doctor(s)? I'm taking mine, as recommended by my PCP, who is board certified in internal medicine, and will continue to unless new research comes out showing different information. But taking advice on something as precious as our health from a store clerk -- especially when we've had bc -- probably isn't a good idea. Is there a medical professional who is knowledgeable about your particular bc who could help you decide? Deanna
-
Mollyann, at least we agree on one thing! You said "The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim." That's my point, exactly! In this case, the burden of proof lies with the supplement manufacturers who make claims about what their products can do. As I read it, that's exactly the point of the FDA, as well. I'm not sure which "claims" you think I'm making.
Hi DLB823 -as always, I really appreciate your rational openness. I have the UCLA Integrative Medicine link as one of my favorite "trusted" medical information links - thanks for sharing! I wish I was closer so I could go there, as I really believe they advocate the best of both worlds and are using scientific facts/evidence and open-mindedness. I absolutely agree with you that the either/or mentality is destructive and I too feel that integrative medicine has infinitely more potential than either conventional or alternative.
Efflorescing, I'm afraid you may have missed the whole point here; it's about companies making false claims about their products with regard to treating specific diseases or conditions. In the case of Ageless Cures, as one example, it looks to me like they have not complied with the FDA - they still have at least some of the false claims on their website. As to why the FDA has not shut them down, I really don't know. My guess is that they may be investigating, or negotiating, or whatever. Maybe the FDA doesn't have the resources to go after every instance of what appears to be a huge problem. It's all the more reason we need to be careful and skeptical about our choices.
I don't know if Ageless Cures (or any of the others on the list) have responded, or where to find that information, but the fact remains that they had (or have) information on their website that the FDA has found to be noncompliant with current guidelines and/or patently untrue. I'm not sure what response they could really give, other than correcting their websites.
I do take several of the supplements on the list, but not from those specific manufacturers. But this isn't about ME, and it isn't really even about curcumin's benefits. It's about being honest about what it can and can't do. It's about facts and evidence.
I am taking curcumin because I've seen evidence that it may be beneficial, and I've discussed it with my health providers. I get my information from reputable sources, so I feel that I have accurate information and am well informed about the pros and cons of curcumin in particular. Here are some of the specific sites I believe to be reputable. As always, I'd love to learn of more reputable sites to add to my list, so please share.
Sloan-Kettering: http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/html/69401.cfm
Dana Farber: http://www.dana-farber.org/pat/support/zakim/lenny-zakim-lecture-and-fair-show-promise-of-integrative-therapies.html
US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=curcumin+cancer
Mayo Clinic: http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/curcumin/AN01741
-
Hi Angelsabove,
As you'll see from the sites I referenced above, curcumin has potential benefit, but they all agree that further studies need to be done. One potential issue with curcumin is that it may interfere with some conventional medicines, so please work with your doctors and let them know everything that you're taking, so together you can maximize the effectiveness of your treatment. As with everything, there is no one-size-fits-all answer. So much depends on your individual medical circumstances, point in treatment, reasons for taking it, etc.
-
Thanks for initiating this discussion thenewme.
I'd love to learn of more reputable sites to add to my list, so please share.
I like the Linus Pauling Institute webpage for information about micronutrients, mainly because of the ease of clicking through to PubMed from the included footnoted references.
http://lpi.oregonstate.edu/infocenter/phytochemicals/curcumin/
-
hello
I was taking curcumin for some time and then i read that it interferes with tomaxifin. So now, we know its good for us, but we cant take it and it reduces tomoxifin effects. Has anyones else determined that
-
Hi Kathy044, I'm not familiar with the Linus Pauling Institute - I'll have a look! Thanks for sharing! I definitely am a fan of direct links for footnote references.
-
Newme-What is your purpose here? You continue to change your ID and post your anti alternatives crap in the hopes that you can start another controversy. I do not even read past the headlines of your drivel anymore because it is obvious where it is always headed. Your motives are just shameful, however much you pretend to disguise them and profess that you really care to help others. You obviously have a vendetta against those of us who are happy and healthy and using all kinds of alternatives. Are you just envious or are you downright vindictive? Oh, and I am sure you are salivating that my response is just the opportunity you were waiting for to make one of your sarcastic little remarks back, but I am blocking you so I could care less what more you have to say.
-
thenewme, I did not miss the point. You began the thread by saying: 'This list from FDA/Dana-Farber shows a lot of supplements to avoid, and a lot of them are discussed in this forum on a regular basis'
You said nothing about avoiding companies that make false or inflated claims. You wrote that the supplements should be avoided. Was that just a poor choice of words and your intention was to warn against the companies rather than the supplements?
thenewme wrote: But this isn't about ME, and it isn't really even about curcumin's benefits. It's about being honest about what it can and can't do. It's about facts and evidence.
Exactly! Honesty is crucial so of course this is about you and everyone who posts on this forum. It's also about taking responsibility for what you post and clarifying your intention for posting information when the information is contrary to the spirit and purpose of the forum. If it was just a poor choice of words fortunately it can be corrected and you will make the corrections quickly less someone gets the wrong impression.
thenewme wrote: Maybe the FDA doesn't have the resources to go after every instance of what appears to be a huge problem.
How difficult is it to review the list they assembled and shoot off another letter? The FDA gives the companies 15 days to make corrections and revisions and to submit a response documenting their compliance. If they are unable to enforce their own regulations after almost 2 years I am mystified as to how they can help to protect consumers.
Regarding Ageless Cures, I did not read their prior statements so I can't speak on that but currently they reference MD Anderson as a source just as you do. This is listed on their website:
Due to FDA Regulations links to hundreds of published articles on Curcumin, Boswellin and Gugulipid were removed from this website, however they may be accessed online. Although we do not endorse them, but it gives valuable information about one of natures most powerful products and when taken in its purest form provides wide ranging health benefits.
IMHO, if the companies we purchase our supplements from are unable to provide data or links to evidence based research to educate us about the benefits of the products they sell, we are in a world of trouble. I have no stake in Ageless Cures nor any other company, I can purchase supplements anywhere. My concern, as stated previously, is that people new to this forum will open this thread, read "This list from FDA/Dana-Farber shows a lot of supplements to avoid, and a lot of them are discussed in this forum on a regular basis" and dismiss supplements altogether. I know you would not want that.
BTW where do you purchase your Curcumin and other supplements and how much do you take of each?
-
I thought the FDA had no recourse over companies that make supplements, because supplements are not standardized nor approved by the FDA. So, how could the FDA "shut them down" for false claims? With supplements, it's buyer beware--we have to do our own research on reputable companies and hope their products are standardized to the level that the FDA requires. Many companies do this on their own, like Pharmanex.
Nutritional supplement makers are pretty much allowed to say whatever they want. Most have a little disclaimer on the bottle somewhere. But that doesn't mean they aren't good products or have no place in our lives...
Anne
-
AnneW, there is a branch of the FDA called "T'he Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition" that regulates food, cosmetics and supplements. You call them to report food based problems, ask questions or file complaints. The number is 888-723-3366
-
http://margaret.healthblogs.org/2008/02/24/update-on-the-consumer-lab-curcumin-report/
Update on the Consumer Lab curcumin report
A blog reader who uses the curcumin manufactured by Ageless Cures sent this company an e-mail expressing her concern about the recent Consumer Lab report (see my February 8 2008 post for details; there you can also read a message by an Ageless Cures representative: I would like to mention that I did NOT get in touch with Ageless Cures...but I must say this message made me feel like a VIP ). Anyway, my blog reader received an immediate reply with reassurances that Ageless Cures was looking closely into the matter and working with Consumer Lab to figure it all out.
A few days ago she received another message from Ageless Cures, including a certificate of analysis of a 500 mg batch. I just checked, and the same certificate can be downloaded from the Ageless Cures website, and also the certificate of analysis of the 1000 mg batch.
The curcumin lot analysed by Consumer Lab was a 500 mg batch that had been discontinued in June 2007. Ageless Cures informed my blog reader that it transferred the manufacture of its 500 mg capsules to an FDA certified facility in October 2007. That seems to take care of that problem.
I admit that I can't help wondering why Consumer Lab tested a discontinued batch of curcumin in the first place? That makes little or no sense at all. Hmmm. Moreover, it did not test the popular 1000 mg pill (odd, eh?), which is manufactured in an FDA, GMP (which means "Good Manufacturing Practices," not "Greater Manchester Police" ) and BBB (must be "Better Business Bureau") certified facility. More hmmms.
Well, anyway, here follows the message my blog reader received from Ageless Cures (she authorized me to publish it; I have edited out some parts of it, such as personal references):
"Attached is the Certificate of Analysis of Curcumin 500mg and Super Curcumin 1000mg products performed by Internationally recognized Testing Labs Eurofins Scientific. Every batch manufactured by Ageless Cures is being tested and results posted on www.agelesscures.com. A copy of the COA is being enclosed with every order effective FEB 10th, 2008.
The test results show that the Active Curcumin levels (curcuminoids) meet or exceed the label specifications within tolerance. This same batch products manufactured in NOV-DEC 2007 are being shipped to customers. The same test methods purportedly used by Consumer Lab, HPCL (High performance Liquid Chromatography) is used to test the products for Active curcuminoids.
Certificate of Analysis Summary
Curcumin C3 Complex 500mg - 90 Capsules. Lot# 151011. Exp Date:12/2011. TEST RESULT: 512 mg of Active Curcumin (curcuminoids)
Super Curcumin C3 Complex w/Bioperine 1000mg. Lot# 101044. Exp Date:1/2011. TEST RESULT: 975mg of Active Curcumin (curcuminoids) + Bioperine.
Ageless Cures strongly feels that our customers are entitled to know the quality of products being purchased from us. We buy the most expensive organic Curcumin, manufacture in a FDA, GMP and BBB certified facility, maintain stringent quality standards and market directly to keep prices low.
The Consumer Lab report is a small blip which pertained to a specific small batch which we ceased to market long back and have also changed manufacturing to an FDA certified facility. We are also looking into the testing methods used by Consumer Labs and have been working with them to present all our products for voluntary testing."
From the very beginning, I always found it odd that Consumer Lab, a For Profit Organization (...), didn't test the Doctor's Best curcumin (very popular among us curcumin-takers; I have taken it, too) or the more popular NSI curcumin brand. It instead tested some obscure (to me, at least!) curcumin brands.
Odd, yes.
-
Efflorescing, The issue about the curcumin supplements is not if the supplements themselves are pure and how much curcumin is in them. The issue is in the false statements that they are being presented to successfully treat cancer. That can only be determined through further research. We can take curcumin, but realize it is a shot in the dark to determine if it really is effective. You can only hope until research is out.
Vivre, I think your post was slightly rude. There is not any shame in trying to avoid companies that have false claims of cancer cures. It is a responsible thing to do to look at research and government information.
Again, if we say supplements might make a difference and make me feel good that is great. I take supplements that have no proven cancer fighting benefit.
However, if we are going to say that such and such a supplement is successfully used to treat cancer, research data is imperative.
-
It seems to me that one of the best ways of avoiding the whole controversy of whether a particular supplement works against cancer or not (if it is not yet firmly established by research), is to consume as much of it in food form as possible, if possible: it is undeniable that many foods have a cancer-fighting potential that may not always be duplicated efficiently in pills.
-
Aye, Yazmin.
It is so difficult to sort through the caca. Between the nanny-state FDA, Codex Alimentarius, snake oil sales, and big-pharma protecting it's territory I doubt even Sherlock Holmes could figure it all out.
The way I understand it, the rule is if you make a claim that your supplement is a "cure" for anything, then it is considered a drug and therefore is subject to the testing and approval process of a drug. (Some fear this law, as written, would also apply to food that is found to cure something - ex. oranges and scurvy. I'm not sure if there are examples of FDA letters regarding food, though).
It scares me that supplements do not have to be proven safe or effective - they just can't claim to cure anything. I am cynical as they come. Anyone who wants to take my money is equally suspect - conventional or alternative. That's one reason why when I read compelling evidence about a supplement, I look to find the food or herbal source of it, and use that instead.
I know I may not get the benefit of high concentrations that are found in pill form. On the other hand, I think that is countered by the fact that I'm not likely to take too much, or create unanticipated imbalances, or have absorption problems that occur when vits are given in isolation.
It is also irritates me to no end the way supplements are being broken down into ever smaller components -
You dont just get a multiple vit - you get E - then you don't just get E - you have to know if you want alpha, beta, gamma, or delta... and so it goes for each vitamin, mineral etc.
It seems, as they continue to reduce these elements down, imbalances are will become ever more certain to occur.
And that doesn't even take into consideration the substances we haven't discovered yet, and what role each of those play...
Raising livestock, I've learned that giving supplemental vits and minerals can be not only tricky, but sometimes deadly. Nature is so very complex, and what our chemists don't know far outweighs what they do know.
Animal feed manufacturers are still adding certain minerals even though we've learned that the mineral is not absorbed unless it first goes into the soil, gets taken up by plant roots, where it is chemically altered inside the plant, and then eaten by the animal. Only in that form can their bodily metabolize it properly.
By all means, take supplements if you believe in them. I fully support your right to have access to the science and the products. But please consider planting a few veggies for yourself, as well. It's not that hard to have a very small patch with supercharged, high brix soil. The food will be nutrition packed unlike anything you can buy. And you keep you $$$ under your mattress, where it belongs! LOL.
-
runswithscissors:
I agree with everything you just stated above. Also: You and unlimited, and celia088 have probably made a pact to make me die-by-laughter, today:
It is so difficult to sort through the caca. You've got that one right.
Nature is so very complex, and what our chemists don't know far outweighs what they do know. This is "even more" true, if possible.
And then: That's one reason why when I read compelling evidence about a supplement, I look to find the food or herbal source of it, and use that instead. I am doing that, too. At the recent Society for Integrative Oncology conference in New York, which I attended, and where I got to meet Dr. Servan-Schreiber, one of the expert panels explained extensively why they recommend that people EAT turmeric, instead of trying to use the supplement form of it. Asian, American, and European experts on the panel concurred to describe the supplement form of Turmeric as "too strong".
I am looking at this issue this way: if we have observed that turmeric and holy basil have been keeping cancer levels down in societies where people consume them daily, what has worked for them is the food source of those substances (not any supplement).
I do take such supplements as tocotrienols [and runswithscissors, you are right here too: I hear the GAMMA tocotrienols are what works for breast cancer, not the ALPHA or BETA ones!!!!]; I also take olive leaf gelules, ubiquinol, Evening Primrose Oil for hot flashes (works so far), Quercetin for healthy histamine level (also works for me), Stamets mushroom blends (but soon switching to the powdered form of those).....because I have concluded that those substances are (at least) safe, even if I am not getting that much more protection from them
(but please correct me if I am wrong), and indeed, they help for little concerns other than cancer, as you can see.
Turmeric, garlic, Selenium, I make a point to consume large amounts of them in their food form. Mushrooms, too.
-
Vivre, it's probably best that you've blocked my posts. I'll never understand why some people are so threatened by facts. I'm not sure who you think I am, but I assure you I've never changed my ID here.
As to my purpose here, I'm a 40-year old with an adoring family and friends and LOTS to live for. I've been dealt a really crappy diagnosis, and I've exhausted all of my "conventional" treatment options. I'm triple negative, so there is no more treatment for me, and my risk of recurrence is quite high. I'm exploring options for complementary treatments that may help me fight the odds. Simple and straightforward.
For the record, I have NO problem with anyone's choices for treatment. I'm definitely NOT anti-alternative - but I am ANTI - NONSENSE. I am anti-chat room diagnosis and drug prescribing. I don't have time for quackery and snake oil. I need facts and rational discussion. I always welcome facts, information, and suggestions. Again, simple and straightforward.
I hate misinformation, and I feel compelled to speak out against it. It's health fraud:
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines health fraud as the deceptive promotion, advertising, distribution, or sale of a product represented as being effective to prevent, diagnose, treat, cure, or lessen an illness or condition, or provide another beneficial effect on health, but that has not been scientifically proven safe and effective for such purposes.
AnneW - nutritional supplements are considered drugs by the FDA if they claim to treat or cure disease. That's the crux of all this. Honest, verifiable, objective fact-based claims. Unfortunately, the enforcement piece sems to be limited to issuing "warning letters" and consumer warnings. Too bad they can't/won't do more.
Efflorescing - I'm not sure if you're trying to be obtuse or what, but most of your responses are what they call straw-man arguments. Again, it isn't about the purity of Ageless Cure products. It's about truth in advertising. You can go to their site right now and find tons of dishonest claims. THAT's what this is about. Simple. Straightforward.
I don't pretend to be an expert on FDA workings, nor do I think FDA is the infallible end-all and be-all of health issues. I do appreciate the service they provide, although I wish they had more authority, manpower, or whatever to enforce regulations better.
For now, if anyone is interested in reporting bogus cancer treatment/cure claims, you can do so at http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/curious/report.shtml
What's so hard about being honest about the benefits (real or perceived) and the limitations of a product? Why make exaggerated claims?
Yazmin, I agree that food in its natural state is always a great option!
RunsWithScissors (love the name, LOL!) - I completely agree with you, and you raise a great point about breaking everything down smaller and smaller.
-
thenewme: I understand your situation. I believe they are just now coming up with treatments that Triple Negatives can look into, right? (I am thinking about the PARPs). Besides, it is a fact that most Triple Negatives do not recur if you manage to go 5 years without a recurrence, while ER+, PR+ tumors keep on presenting a higher (albeit LOW) recurrence risk at the 20-year mark.
I don't know if that makes you feel better but we have to look at the brighter side of things, don't we?
-
newme, You have never once presented facts. You have never even defined "facts." You just state what the facts are located and expect us to take your word for it.
You keep steering people to conventional institutions like Sloan Kettering which may be qualified in chemo administration but are unqualified in the alternative medicine world.
Asking the FDA's or Dana Farber's opinion about a supplement is like asking the Pope about which is the best form of birth control.
-
Yes, I wish newme would stop "steering" us to mainstream chemo-pushing places.
I didn't come to this forum to get pushed to these places. Also, I wish you would stop spamming the FDA.
I have followed Beth's path and reread many old posts over the past month. Thank you, Natural Girls, all for the helpful alternative links!
-
"....I understand your situation. I believe they are just now coming up with treatments that Triple Negatives can look into, right? (I am thinking about the PARPs)....":
Having said that myself, I realize, of course, that there is no long-term data available for PARPs at this time, and that those of us potentially interested should watch out for the same kind of serious issues we have seen in Tamoxifen, AIs, and other conventional drugs.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team