New Study Links Alchohol to BC Recurrance
I haven't seen the study...(does anyone have a link), but my parents heard about it on the news. They said that drinking 3 alchoholic drinks per week increased recurrence of breast cancer by 34% That's huge. I'm quitting wine..even my once a week glass. Not worth the risk.
It appears that they did not analyse Triple Negatives in the study, if I'm wrong someone show me where to read about it please. If that is the case, we triple negatives need to be careful, for all we know the impact of alchohol is much greater....like high fat diets. I don't have time to wait for a study tailored to triple negatives. The vast majority of our recurrances happen in the first 3.8 years. I'm at the two year point. I'm cutting out alchohol now.
Drinking alchohol may be good for heart desease but I think many women who have had a diagnosis of triple negative breast cancer are more worried about the cancer at least in the first 3-5 years.
Also there was some distinguishing with high risk groups, does anyone know what those groups were? We triple negatives are our own high risk group even if the study didn't analyse us.
Comments
-
http://www.reutershealth.com/archive/2009/12/10/eline/links/20091210elin018.html
This seems to be latest study...I'm also trying to cut out all the alcohol, which is hard this time of the year but there is more and more evidence of how dangerous it is for bc survivors so...
-
I have cut out all booze as well. For one thing the sugar is staight up cancer food
-
The study is pre AI's which lower the amount of estrogen in post-menopausal women. Since they feel alcohol increases the circulation of estrogen in the body, I wonder if it's a trade off when you take an AI? Now they'll have to do a study of women who are on AI's and drink.
-
I stopped the night before my surgery last December. Even through my 2 kids weddings this year! None.
-
I'm not Triple Negative but I saw the headline of this thread and thought that I would add some information that might be helpful. There may be a benefit to quitting alcohol, and there certainly is nothing wrong with doing that, for those who want to do quit. But many of us don't want to stop enjoying our wine (or other beverages) and as I read it, this study is not quite as definitive as the headlines make it seem and in my opinion, it's not a reason to over-react, particularly if you are not in the high risk groups (as determined by this study).
Here is a link to another thread with a discussion about this research study:
http://community.breastcancer.org/forum/86/topic/745233?page=1#post_1633831
And if the link doesn't work (as so often happens with links within BC.org; all other links seem to work fine!), here is a copy of what I just posted in that other thread, after spending a few hours on the internet researching and reading about this study:
***********************
I'm a wine drinker too; Jan, like you, it's my only guilty pleasure. The way I see it, breast cancer has had enough of an impact on my life so I'm not about to let it take away this pleasure. But of course any news about alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk always interests me.
I have been trying to find the full tables from this study so that I can dig through them to find out what the study really says. I have a research background and often find that there is more subtlety to the results when you go through the details vs. what is reported in the press or even in the authors' text. But so far, I haven't been able to find anything. I did find some tables from the original broader-based study that this study was drawn from but there was not much detail on alcohol consumption in those tables. So I suspect that the more detailed tables associated with this report will be available at some time in the future but probably haven't been released yet. I did notice in one report that I read that this study has not yet been peer-reviewed which means that this is all very preliminary.
In any case, I did find two better summaries of the study, which do provide a bit more information:
http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/SABCS/17444
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/713692
- Here are a few highlights, first from the medpage article:
Women whose alcohol consumption was defined as moderate-to-heavy (at least 6 g of alcohol a day, or at least three to four drinks per week) were at elevated risk of both breast cancer recurrence (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.82) and death from breast cancer (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.28) compared with those who drank no more than 0.5 g per day.
The increased risk of recurrence was highest for women who drank two or more glasses of wine a day, while there was no significant risk increase among those who consumed less than three drinks overall per week.
Postmenopausal breast cancer survivors were particularly at risk from moderate to heavy drinking (HR 1.51 versus 1.24 for premenopausal, P=0.03 for trend), as were overweight and obese women (HR 1.58 versus 1.09 for normal weight, P=0.03 for trend).
The researchers cautioned that further prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings.
...The new results could be consistent with counseling breast cancer patients that "one glass of wine may be okay, but keep it at that," Peppercorn said, though he cautioned against overinterpreting the observational data. (Note: Dr. Peppercorn was not involved with the study)
Peppercorn additionally warned about the barely significant overall hazard ratios and the limitations of self-reporting alcohol intake.
The study could not determine causality, and false associations due to confounding from other factors were possible, he noted.
- And second, from the medscape article:
Clinicians need to provide a "nuanced message" about alcohol consumption to women with early-stage breast cancer, said a presenter here at the 32nd Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
The message needs to be nuanced because, as a new study presented here showed, light consumption (fewer than 3 drinks per week) did not increase the risk for breast cancer recurrence in early-stage disease.
However, moderate to heavy consumption of alcoholic beverages (3 or 4 drinks per week, or more) was associated with a 1.3-fold increased risk for breast cancer recurrence and a 1.5-fold increase in breast cancer deaths, according to the study.
These results must be weighed against past research that shows that "moderate alcohol consumption" decreases the risk for cardiovascular disease, said epidemiologist Michelle D. Holmes, MD, DrPH, from Harvard University in Boston.
"Many women live a long time with early breast cancer, and alcohol consumption may decrease the risk of heart disease [during that time]," said Dr. Holmes, who acted as a discussant of the study on alcohol use and breast cancer disease recurrence.
Dr. Holmes also noted that the new study did not show that alcohol consumption was associated with a higher risk for death from all causes.
Among the group that drank 3 or 4 drinks per week, or more, the increased risk for recurrence was pronounced in postmenopausal (hazard ratio [HR], 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20 - 2.54) and overweight/obese (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.07 - 2.35) women.
Dr. Kwan said that, on the basis of these findings, "women previously diagnosed with breast cancer should consider limiting their consumption of alcohol to less than 3 drinks per week, especially women who are postmenopausal and overweight or obese."
Dr. Holmes agreed that obese women with breast cancer should be careful about drinking alcohol and that they might have "particularly bad" survival outcomes if they do.
So,it appears that:
- Low levels of alcohol consumption do not increase risk.
- Those most affected are post-menopausal and overweight or obese.
- While the death rate from breast cancer increased for those who consumed more alcohol, the death rate overall did not, suggesting perhaps that for those most at risk, the positive benefits from alcohol related to cardiovascular health cancelled out the increased breast cancer risk.
- The study was based on self-reporting, which can be suspect. And the hazard ratios (i.e. the difference in results between the groups) were low, again raising caution.
One aspect that interests me a lot, and which wasn't commented on in any of the articles that I've read about the study, is the question of whether or not increased folate intake reduces the breast cancer risk associated with alcohol consumption. Previous studies have shown that folate intake reduces or completely eliminates this risk; I noticed in one of the articles that I read that folate intake was one of the items tracked in this study but nothing was published about the possible effects (if any) of increased folate intake. So I'm very interested to see the detailed tables to investigate this further. Here is information on an earlier study which suggested that "An adequate dietary intake of folate might protect against the increased risk of breast cancer associated with alcohol consumption". http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/331/7520/807
***********************
-
I certainly have cut back but I don't go without completely. I am partying tonight!
-
I heard/read something (somewhere, damn chemo fog!) that this may not be accurate for those who have had bi-lat mx? Did anyone hear that as well?
I had also read about folate. I try to eat lots of green leafy veggies or broccoli before drinking. I'll bet my breath smells great. HAHAHA
-
Has anyone else noticed that "new" studies are comming out alot of times , but then six months or a year later, some of them will be honest and say.."Woops, we recently found that the data on our study was not as accurate as we originally thought"? I used to worry just about all of the time. Then I thought to myself "What causes the most health problems?...Stress and worry!" I worried enough when I was first diagnosed and for 2 years after. Now, I do what "I" feel is ok. If I want to have a beer or 3, once every couple of months, I will. I do not know when I am going to leave this earth, but I do know that I want to 'live' while I am here, and not be smothered by everything that "might possibly" cause a recurrance.
-
Beesie, thanks for taking the time to research and organize the findings.
- I had no idea about the folate, very interesting.
-
I hate that they consider over 3 drinks a week "moderate to heavy consumption" for a woman! That used to just get me warmed up....
I'd like to see what they consider heavy for a man. I wonder if alcohol increases the odds for prostrate cancer?
-
Barbe -
I guess you didn't see the news yesterday . . . evidently BEER is good for prostrate cancer. God knows Men have it easy!!
Laura
-
OMG!
Can't they at least say that chocolate is good for breast cancer?
-
The thing about being triple negative is we have no pill to take after chemo..nothing at all. Our only "treatment" available in the years following chemo is to make our bodies inhosbitable to cancer through diet, exercise, etc. Does anyone know if they seperated out the triple negatives in the study to see what the effect is on us? It is often very different. In the low fat studies, eating fat negatively effected triple negatives very disproportionately. There was a very dramatic impact and difference.
Also, for triple negatives, if we do recur at all it mainly happens in the first 3.8 years....so we don't really have time to wait for new and better studies. I'm at the 2 year point. What they learn 2 years from now can be too late for many of us Tripple negatives. So....I've been told by my oncologist and read this alot that if the theory doesn't hurt you (I know it won't hurt me to cut out alchohol, lower my fat intake, cut out sugar and do exercise), then go ahead and do it becuase it may help avoid recurrance. We have nothing else to help us. We Triple Negatives are waiting for targeted treatment like herceptin and tamoxifin (sp) but it doesn't yet exist...so we do what we can on our own.
-
I read the metscape discription of the study and it clearly did not seperate out the triple negatives. It was done of women who enrolled from 1997 (shoot I can't remember numbers but I think that was it) up to those who enrolled up to the year 2000. So, they probably don't know which were triple negatives. Combine that fact with the fact that triple negatives would likely be a minority in the study...and one that they didn't even analyse. So all my triple negative sisters, we don't get the benefit of knowing what happened to us in that study. Did a much larger chunk of triple negatives recurr who drank over 3 drinks a week?.....or was there a difference at just 2 drinks a week?
I love wine but we probably wont get an answer that addresses our needs or even considers us soon. Boy that pisses me off. We have to make decisions based on very little information...I'm not at risk of heart desease yet and many triple negatives are younger...so I'm cutting out alchohol. I'd rather feel good about my choice if a study comes out 3 years from now where they bother to analyse the impact on triple negatives and it turns out that alchohol increased recurrance. I'm really doubtful that a study will come out saying that drinking alchohol lowered recurrance for triple negatives. If a study comes out saying it made no difference, no harm done for me.
My triple negative sisters, they could easily do a study of us. They could enroll just triple negatives and ask us how much we've had to drink for the last 3 years or for the upcoming 3 years....Our studies could be much shorter and be meaningful because our recurrances happen so much faster than other breast cancers....I'm guessing that study isn't underway though. Really pisses me off.
-
azdiva, I read the comment that this study doesn't apply to women who've had bilaterals in the other thread on this topic but from what I've read about the study, this is not entirely true. The study defines "recurrence" as "local, regional, and distant disease, new contralateral breast cancers, and breast cancer death if no previous recurrence was recorded." Women who've had bilaterals still do have a very small risk of either a local recurrence or a new contralateral breast cancer. And certainly any woman who's had a bilateral for invasive cancer (this study only looked at those who had invasive cancer, not DCIS) still has a risk of regional and distant disease. So that would suggest that at least a portion of the risk does still apply to women who've had bilaterals.
PS73, you're welcome! With regard to folate, I take a multivitamin that includes folic acid and if I'm drinking more than just a glass of wine, I sometimes supplement with 1/2 a folic acid pill (to keep my daily intake below 1000mg). Most of the news about folate is good; it has a variety of benefits, health-wise, however a recent study suggests that too much folate might actually cause cancer, but it's mostly lung cancer (for which I'm low risk - never smoked in my life and grew up in a non-smoking household) and the increase is quite small. A general overview: http://dietary-supplements.info.nih.gov/factsheets/folate.asp An article about the recent study: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health/folic-acid-may-increase-cancer-risk-study-shows/article1367188/
Barbe, some believe that chocolate might be good for us. Chocolate is a flavonoid, and there is some evidence that flavonoids reduce breast cancer risk. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17158855 There is an inconsistency in this information, however, since red wine is also a flavonoid. While the study in the first article suggests that all flavonoids protect against BC risk, the following study seems to suggest that it is primarily leafy veg flavones that benefit us: http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v89/n7/full/6601271a.html Still, I'm taking the first study to the bank, and I'm continuing to consume chocolate and red wine. Who knows, it might turn out that these are the right flavonoids after all and maybe I'm significantly reducing my BC risk!
Meggy, I wanted to respond to some of the comments since my last post but I do apologize for taking the thread off track again from the Triple Negative discussion. Hopefully the discussion focuses back on Triple Negs from this point on. And if I ever do get hold of the detailed tables and there is anything specific about Triple Negatives, I'll come back and let you know.
-
What bothers me about this study is that these women were diagnosed in the 1997-2000 timeframe. I think this was prior to Tamoxifen being used on a routine basis and certainly prior to aromatase inhibitors. So I would suspect this data does not reflect the current population of women who would get post hormonal therapy.
I would really like to understand what the risk is for women who do receive aromatase inhibitors, as I would think these findings would be quite different. But so far, no one has picked up on this, at least not in what I have read.
Major bummer, as I think dinner without wine is uncivilized, although not drinking at all while on chemo as important to protect my liver function.
They could at least look at the Tamoxifen group (if enough subjects to have a statistically valid sample) and rerun the data. However, doubt that it would have the same media-grabbing attention.
-
Bessie, thank you. As triple negatives, we have to do what is best for us now based on imperfect information because there is nothing else for us to do after chemo.
-
Claire: Yeah I am confused too....from the document that Clinic gave me, it's mentioned that drinking appropriate amount of alcohol will help Tamoxifen metabolism
-
Beesie: You're the best! As soon as I saw that study I wanted to delve into it more, and found precious little. Very frustrating. I must admit I left it at that because being on day 5 post-AC, I was feeling rather fatigued. Thank you so much for digging up what you did.
Back to the trip neg angle, my understanding is that alcohol may be much less of a risk for us than for ER+ women, because our tumours don't feed on circulating estrogen which is how they think alcohol acts on the body.
-
Beesie, wow, that is scary. Both the Folate and the B12. Especially the B12 since many many women take this to counter the side effects of taxol neuropathy. I know I was supplementing over the RDI and ran it by my onc and nurses and they okayed it. Thanks for posting this article.
-
I hate these studies...there are so many other variable...a co-worker of mine is a 6 year out TN..never drank...I drink and I'm a TN...I know several women who have had breast cancer and did not drink..before, during and after..I know women that drank before, during, and after...my oncs have never told me to quit drinking...ever...
I have a group that I hang out with..we ALL drink...2 of us got breast cancer..we all drink about the same...
I just think that if every women that drank got breast cancer.every one we know would have breast cancer...and then how do they explain the women who dont drink that get breast cancer? Hmmm...I know that this is about recurrence..but whatever....
-
Beesie,
As always, you are tremendous in gathering data and presenting it in a easy to understand, concise manner. Thank you!
Now, if I recall correctly, not too long ago the studies were stating that we limit our alchohol intake to 5 drinks per week or less. Now they are saying three or less (or is it no more than 2)? I agree, these studies are ever changing, alarming and confusing.
Since my mastectomy, I haven't drunk much at all. Maybe once every two - three weeks. But when I did drink, I would have maybe err four beers; if it was a big get together, maybe a bit more. Before my diagnosis, I would drink much more: work all day, go run 5 miles, come home and drink 5 Molson Ice 3-4 times per week! I felt justified, as I had just run! Of course, now I wonder if this beer drinking contributed to my BC - although they say that the alcohol elevates the estrogen and we are triple neg. ?
Raye
-
22 year triple neg. survivor here. Must say I never gave up my 2 glasses of wine a day. One while preparing dinner and one with dinner, that makes 14 glasses a week. I'M STILL STANDING AND LOVE MY WINE. I'm 63 years old, Italian and feel great. We Italians love our wine, you know that Mediteranian diet that contributes to longevity. We can drive ourselves crazy if we listen to every study that's out there. Remember everything in moderation. My grandmother, born in Italy, lived to be 103 and tells us as little children they were forced to drink wine because it was good for the blood and years later that was another theory that was proven to be true. Guess I'm just waiting for the next study that will show wine to be good for women with breast cancer. Most important thing is live your life and be happy. How much better is that glass of wine at night if it is going to give you a little comfort, sure sounds better then stressing over more of those dam studies and statistics....
-
Here's a twist. I used to drink wine every night with dinner...and beyond. White wine spritzers after years of red (before red gave me reflux). Anyway, since I stopped last December I've been having tea with dinner. Now I find out my iron is VERY low. The only culprit I can see is that your body can't absorb the iron you eat if you have tea or coffe or milk with your meal! Go figure!
-
nonijones-
Thank you for your post. I don't drink all that much. Probably a couple of glasses a couple of times a week. But I tell you, although at 5 years out, my hair is all back, breast cancer took my hair, my hormones and therefore my sex life, decadent food because of low fat diet, not to mention peace of mind.....it really makes me mad to think I can't have a @#*! glass of wine!!!!!!!
Thanks, Shannon
-
I hear you Shannon, now sex hurts...my big strong man just seems like too much....looking back, I used to have 2 glasses of wine with every date....now I don't and I really don't enjoy intimacy. Chemo really messed that up. It just hurts. I have cut my wine drinking way back. Now only about 1 glass a week. Wish I could do without that but it seems hard. I can't even eat salt because it messes with my lymphedema. Man....what's left?
-
I truly want to do what I can to keep the cancer from coming back. That said, I have cut down on fat intake, exercise daily, increased certain vitamins and cut back on my wine intake. But I can't seem to cut it out all together. I have a very small glass, 1/4 cup about 4 nights a week. I have maybe one beer a week. Then I feel weak.
My onc. said to cut it out completely, but if I must, keep it at one a day or less. That I can do, but cut it out completel would be very hard for me. Like the previous post, Chemo, thru me into menopause and I've suffered from anxiety since my DX. My minds a wreck and my body looks like I've been in a Ninja sword fight. Until they study this a little more, I'm gonna have to continue to be weak and attempt to enjoy my singular Merlot at night. -
dark chocolate is good for breast cancer! but only one small piece a day after a meal and preferable organic and sweetended with fruit juice. me--i can't live without that and the occassional glass of organic red wine
-
My wife used to have hardly a drink per two months. The cancer came back within a year.
-
I have since learned that there weren't enough women on hormonal therapy among the sample for them to cut the data that way. So still don't think this study gives us an accurate read on that topic.
Have to admit I really miss having wine with dinner. I did make myself a decadent cake for my birthday this week. Just yummy.
Post treatment, I don't expect to live without the pleasures in life. This includes great food, wine, great sex, and my friends. I will have to watch my weight though, and space out the food treats. Also cut back on wine somewhat from what I was doing in the past. I live in one of the paradises for food and wine....and yes chocolate too.
So lots of cycling and skiing events in my future including the exercise I am doing throughout chemo. I am planning on being strong and fit enough this summer to do the 70 mile LiveStrong in June....not sure yet what else.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team