Path Reports

Options
goldenlotus
goldenlotus Member Posts: 45

How long did it take to get back your official dx from breast biopsy?  Even though the radiologist told me it could take up to a week, I was hoping to have heard something by now (48hrs!)

Comments

  • lvtwoqlt
    lvtwoqlt Member Posts: 6,162
    edited January 2010

    It depends on the clinic/hospital about when you will get the results. Also, if the pathology department is backed up it may take an extra day or two.

    Sheila

  • goldenlotus
    goldenlotus Member Posts: 45
    edited January 2010

    unbelievable!!!!! drs office just called to tell me path is back, but dr. is out until wednesday  i asked for another dr to read report but they said has to be primary to sign off on it.  they are going to send her a msg. to call me over weekend.  shall i go to lab to pick up report w/out waiting to talk to dr.???????

  • VinRobMom
    VinRobMom Member Posts: 101
    edited January 2010

    can you have them fax it to you?  Yes if you are able to, go pick it up (but only if you can handle what you see, without your doc being there to explain).

  • gfbaker
    gfbaker Member Posts: 173
    edited January 2010

    Goldenlotus, I know it is scary and you want to have the results asap, but I wouldn't want to have them without a medical doctor to help understand what they say. They can be very tricky to understand and it is overwhelming. I called the facility and talked to one of the radiologists. I probably should have waited for my gyno who sent me there to call me instead. I know it sucks beyond all measure, but I would push to see if your doc can call you. My biggest wishes that it is benign!

  • IronJawedBCAngel
    IronJawedBCAngel Member Posts: 470
    edited January 2010

    If you can get to the lab in time, you should be able to sign for them and get them, they belong to you.  Because of HIPA laws, it is unlikely they would fax them to you, but you can ask.  I know our lab has you sign a release to get them without your doctor signing off.

    I would go get them, but I am the type of personality not to panic.  Some ladies do prefer having a doctor go over the report with them, but I would hate being made to wait that length of time. I will be thinking benign thoughts for you.

  • goldenlotus
    goldenlotus Member Posts: 45
    edited January 2010

    so, I picked them up - this is what they say:

    Focal atypical ductal hyperplasia and flat ductal epithelia atypica with associated calcs.

    focal extravasated mucin with associated calcs.

    benign breast tissue with pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia, columnar cell changes, fybrocystic changes and calcs.

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited January 2010

    Congratulations.  Your biopsy does not show breast cancer. 

    What it shows is a variety of conditions, the most serious of which is ADH (atypical ductal hyperplasia), a high risk condition.  Usually when someone gets a diagnosis of ADH from a needle biopsy, it is recommended that an excisional biopsy be done to remove the entire suspicious area.  This isn't because the ADH itself is a concern (the ADH can safely remain in your breast) but is because ADH sometimes is found together with DCIS, and most doctors want to be sure that there is no DCIS anywhere else in among the suspicious calcifications.  In 80% of cases, the excisional biopsy finds nothing more serious that ADH.

    Assuming that ADH remains your final diagnosis, this is a high risk condition that increases your risk of BC to approximately 16% - 30%.  Whether you are on the high side or the low side of those numbers depends on your own personal & family health history,other risk factors you may have (or not have).  With ADH, usually the recommendation is continued screening, often as part of a "high risk" program.  This could mean more frequent mammograms, or possibly the addition of MRIs.  Sometimes Tamoxifen is recommended but usually this is only the case for those who have ADH along with another high risk factor; Tamoxifen is not usually recommended for those who have ADH alone.  This is because as risk factors go, while those with ADH are considered "high risk", ADH alone puts someone on the low end of the "high risk" scale, with annual BC risk often still below 0.5% per year.

  • goldenlotus
    goldenlotus Member Posts: 45
    edited January 2010

    thanks Beesie! You are such a fountain of knowledge, I'm very impressed!

    My GP just called - she said that she is setting me up with a BS.  She said that based on the sytereotactic radiology report, they are making it a priority and I should be in to see somebody next week.  Apparently, the report, of which I do NOT have a copy, noted some area of concern that they were not able to get to with the stereo-biopsy (I wish I didn't know about that!)  so, the good news is that the pathology they were able to report on is "good", and the not so good news is......there's something else?!

Categories