Zometa

Options
kimber3006
kimber3006 Member Posts: 586
«134567

Comments

  • kimber3006
    kimber3006 Member Posts: 586
    edited December 2009

    I thought I saw an article once somewhere about possible promising results for Zometa being used to improve cure rates before mets, rather than just treat bone mets, but I can't find it.  I have treatment tomorrow and would like to discuss with my onc.  Does anyone have a link to this info?  Is anyone on Zometa with chemo?

  • everyminute
    everyminute Member Posts: 1,805
    edited December 2009

    here is one article -

    A New Approach to Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer


    Dr. Clifford Hudis is Chief, Breast Cancer Medicine Service, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. View profile.

    1. In your view, which development that has occurred since September 2007 could have the most significant impact on oncology in the area of breast cancer?

    The development from this year that could have the biggest long-term impact on breast cancer is the observation that the bisphosphonates, widely used for treating and preventing osteoporosis, may have a role in adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

    2. What specific changes in oncology, specifically in the treatment of breast cancer, have you observed or do you foresee as a result of this development?

    If the results of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group-12 trial, initially presented at the 2008 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) by Dr. Michael Gnant, are confirmed by additional ongoing studies, the impact on breast cancer treatment could be profound. As was widely reported during the ASCO meeting, this randomized trial of approximately 1800 premenopausal women with stage I or II endocrine-responsive breast cancer found that the addition of zoledronic acid (Zometa) to endocrine therapy (tamoxifen or anastrozole) lowered the risk of relapse by 36% compared with endocrine therapy alone. This could mean that a large number of women who until now have been treated with direct anticancer drugs that prevent recurrence of early-stage breast cancer could, in addition, be treated with the bisphosphonates.

    The reason this is so important is that the bisphosphonate drugs are relatively safe, comparatively speaking, and they have known health benefits related to osteoporosis. Now, they appear to have a direct anti-breast cancer effect. They may have anticancer effects against other tumors as well. The use of bisphosphonates as adjuvant therapy would represent a new frontier in preventing recurrence of early-stage breast cancer. Considering that breast cancer is such a common disease and is reasonably well treated in many parts of the world, the addition of bisphosphonate therapy would be an important incremental step toward improving overall outcomes.

     
  • kimber3006
    kimber3006 Member Posts: 586
    edited December 2009

    That's it - thank you!

  • crusader1
    crusader1 Member Posts: 1,222
    edited December 2009

    Hi,

    I started my Zometa after I finished my chemo. I was node negative but had a high oncotype score, thus I had chemo.

    My bone density was not great so the onco felt that Zometa could not hurt and might prevent a recurrence in addition to improving my bones.

    I am not familiar if others have taken it with chemo. It is a short infusion. I had no side effects at all after it.

    Go for whatever might prevent a recurrnce. My insurance did pay totally for it.

    Hugs,

    Francine

  • kimber3006
    kimber3006 Member Posts: 586
    edited December 2009

    Okay, I finally found exactly what I was looking for at clinicaltrials.gov and elsewhere.  I guess I just needed the proper terms to do a more targeted search.  I've been reading so much the last several weeks and I still have so much to learn!  I do think I want the Zometa, though the SEs are a little scary (though not really in comparison with recurrence, right?).  I'm anxious for my onc's opinion (and to know if my insurance will cover it).

  • Pure
    Pure Member Posts: 1,796
    edited December 2009

    HI Kimber

    There is also a study that shows getting WITH chemo can help increase teh effectiveness of the chemo. The girls in the study hada 100% response to the chemo which increases long term survival.

    I am talking about this today with my oncologist as I am couldn't do it up to this point b-c of being prego but  I am hoping to do it with the taxol.

  • KerryMac
    KerryMac Member Posts: 3,529
    edited December 2009

    Kimber - my Onc didn't seem to think the SE's were a significant concern. She didn't promise any benefit (still unproven) but she didn't seem to think it would do me any harm. I'm sure your onc is aware of it, hopefully just by asking for it, he will give it to you.

  • Pure
    Pure Member Posts: 1,796
    edited December 2009

    yeah at the very least though it prevent ostroporisis (spel?) and my mom got that really bad after being on tamoxofin for 5 years.

  • Let-It-Be
    Let-It-Be Member Posts: 325
    edited December 2009

    A lot of Canadian oncs are not on board with zometa.  I would not have known about it as an option even, were it not for these boards.  At my first 3 month follow up, I brought up the subject and my onc poo pooed zometa.  At my recent 3 month follow up, I asked to revisit zometa, again, an unwelcome response.  She said it is only really prescribed for post menopausal women.  I said, "I know many American women, pre-meno, who are being offered this for prevention and I know for a fact a couple of Canadian women have received it."  I even asked her what she had learned of it from the recent conference.  It irked her that I could converse about "her world".  With that she said, okay I'll look into it.  Just like that.  In 5 days I received a call from drug access at my cancer centre and they gave me the din # to see if my insurance covers, which it does (Joy!).  So, now I have the  ball rolling.  Honestly, it's all thanks to the knowledge received here and from what others have done.

    Thanks Mary for posting the above article, it was one I was looking for as well.  I'll checkout the clinicaltrials.gov site too.  The side effects, jaw necrosis, does anyone know more about the odds of this occcuring?  Is it longterm s/e or immediate?  I have pretty good teeth, so I'm thinking this might occur if existing periodontal problems? 

    Glad to at least have this option underway!!

    Happy New Year Ladies,by the by, it's my son's 7th birthday on Thursday.  I was diagnosed on Jan. 7th last year.  My biopsy was on Dec. 15 and I waited all through the holidays and his birthday,  This year is SO MUCH BETTER!!  Wishing everyone HEALTH and HAPPINESS in 2010!

    Christine

  • KerryMac
    KerryMac Member Posts: 3,529
    edited December 2009

    Christine - I too would not have known about it if not for these boards. Great to hear you have got the ball rolling for yourself!

    It is funny, as when I first asked for it, my onc said "where did you hear about it" too, as if I was overstepping a line somehow. 

    As for SE's - my Onc doesn't seem to think they are of any concern at all. She thinks it is pretty safe. When I got my infusion, the nurse (employed by Norvatis) seemed more concerned with renal failure than the jaw thing - she just said no extractions. Norvatis requires bloodwork from me checking kidney function before each infusion. 

  • Pure
    Pure Member Posts: 1,796
    edited December 2009

    You know there has been 2 solid studies on Zometa-and a lot of time and money dedicated to it at ASCO educating doctors about it-I just don't get why certain docs are not on board with it-it's a step away from standard treatment. It makes me so mad.

  • everyminute
    everyminute Member Posts: 1,805
    edited December 2009

    There is an article in prevention magazine that I was reading at the gym this am about "dr.google"  They did a survey on colon cancer survivors and those that did research on their own had more agressive and targeted treatments than those that didnt.

    duh.

  • KerryMac
    KerryMac Member Posts: 3,529
    edited December 2009

    If not for all the amazing advice I have gotten here, I wouldn't have known about Zometa at all, nor would I have known about the option of having an ooph (my Onc did suggest monthly Lupron shots)

  • hrf
    hrf Member Posts: 3,225
    edited December 2009

    I also learned about the Zometa on these boards and my onc initially didn't want to pursue it. But I have had 1 infusion ... like KerryMac, done at home by a nurse sent by Zometa. My insurance won't cover it, the hospital won't administer it (which would then cover the cost) but Access Zometa is subsidizing 50%. I don't know why, in Ontario, Zometa is such an issue and not part of standard treatment considering the proven effect. But thanks to folks here, I was able to bring the issue up, ask good questions, and now am receiving the treatment. The onc told me about the potential se's .. my dentist (my brother) called her and he's ok with follow up. The onc has 2 patients with severe se's but both of them have been on Zometa for more than 3 years.

  • Let-It-Be
    Let-It-Be Member Posts: 325
    edited December 2009

    Hooray for the boards!

  • krcll
    krcll Member Posts: 343
    edited December 2009

    My oncologist says that it isn't yet proven that Zometa works and that the women in the Austrian trial didn't have chemo, so you can't infer too much from it.  Can any of you smart women out there tell me of other trials showing the effects of Zometa or have any rebuttal to his statement? I do trust my onc to be very up-to-date on all the trials- he is the head of the norwegian committee to set the breast cancer treatment standards for the country. But when I see so many women on these boards getting Zometa, I don't want to be left behind. I'm already getting every treatment in the book, I wouldn't even notice getting one more!

  • everyminute
    everyminute Member Posts: 1,805
    edited December 2009

    Can you show him this information from Chief of Breast Cancer Medicine at Sloan Kettering in NY - at the very least ask him whats the harm? 

    A New Approach to Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer


    Dr. Clifford Hudis is Chief, Breast Cancer Medicine Service, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. View profile.

    1. In your view, which development that has occurred since September 2007 could have the most significant impact on oncology in the area of breast cancer?

    The development from this year that could have the biggest long-term impact on breast cancer is the observation that the bisphosphonates, widely used for treating and preventing osteoporosis, may have a role in adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

    2. What specific changes in oncology, specifically in the treatment of breast cancer, have you observed or do you foresee as a result of this development?

    If the results of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group-12 trial, initially presented at the 2008 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) by Dr. Michael Gnant, are confirmed by additional ongoing studies, the impact on breast cancer treatment could be profound. As was widely reported during the ASCO meeting, this randomized trial of approximately 1800 premenopausal women with stage I or II endocrine-responsive breast cancer found that the addition of zoledronic acid (Zometa) to endocrine therapy (tamoxifen or anastrozole) lowered the risk of relapse by 36% compared with endocrine therapy alone. This could mean that a large number of women who until now have been treated with direct anticancer drugs that prevent recurrence of early-stage breast cancer could, in addition, be treated with the bisphosphonates.

    The reason this is so important is that the bisphosphonate drugs are relatively safe, comparatively speaking, and they have known health benefits related to osteoporosis. Now, they appear to have a direct anti-breast cancer effect. They may have anticancer effects against other tumors as well. The use of bisphosphonates as adjuvant therapy would represent a new frontier in preventing recurrence of early-stage breast cancer. Considering that breast cancer is such a common disease and is reasonably well treated in many parts of the world, the addition of bisphosphonate therapy would be an important incremental step toward improving overall outcomes.

  • Husband11
    Husband11 Member Posts: 2,264
    edited December 2009

    From the Austrian study, which involved more than 1000 women, none had osteonecrosis of the jaw when receiving 8mg every 6 months.  That would seem to put this serious side effect into the category of no more than 1 in 1000 for women at that dosage.  The current clinical trial though does give the drug at more frequent intervals for the first 6 months.  You need a clean bill of health from your dentist to get into the clinical trial, as there is an association between the problem and recent dental work involving the bone, like extractions and root canals.  It would probably be wise should a problem occur with your teeth during the treatment period, to explore less invasive alternatives to avoid disrupting the jaw bone.  Other serious side effects include kidney problems, and you need to have your creatinine clearance tested to get in the clinical trial, and probably during it, to ensure proper kidney function as it stresses the kidneys.  My wife Bev is in the clinical trial.  I am hopeful that positive results will be seen, esp in light of the new data (Women's Health Initiative) that other bisphosphonates given for osteoporosis treatment appear to have a preventative effect in breast cancer becoming invasive.  This adds to the evidence that bisphosphonates have some direct effect on the cancer cells themselves, regardless of whether in soft tissue or bone.

  • Let-It-Be
    Let-It-Be Member Posts: 325
    edited December 2009

    Thanks for this information Timothy!

  • hrf
    hrf Member Posts: 3,225
    edited December 2009

    I'm not in a clinical trial but was able to get it through Access Zometa. My onc wrote the prescription. While the results may be too soon to be 100% conclusive, there is enough good data there that has been replicated that convinced me to give it a try.

  • KerryMac
    KerryMac Member Posts: 3,529
    edited December 2009

    krcll - will you be going on an AI or having ovarian removal/shut down?? Either would put you at risk of bone loss, so you could come at him from that angle too. My Onc was skeptical at first, and used that exact same reasoning, but then changed her mind, and said at the very least it will do me no harm.

  • gramoflexus
    gramoflexus Member Posts: 52
    edited December 2009

    I  will be starting a clinical trail for Zometa along with chemo treatments . I noticed several of you have about the same stats as myself . I would like to be your friend as we take this journey together . Today is not a good day . Today is one of those scared shitless days . Most of the time Iam very positive . My sister in a law had BC in 1992 with 18 nodes involved and she is doing great today .

    Diagnoised 10 /09  er+ pr+ her-  3.4 cm stage IIIb  9nodes out of 20 involved

    Thanks Linda

  • Pure
    Pure Member Posts: 1,796
    edited December 2009

    Linda- Today was a scared shitless day for me too:) I am doing Zometa at the same time of chemo as well-my choice.....What treatment did your sister in law have? What is your treatment?

  • hrf
    hrf Member Posts: 3,225
    edited December 2009

    What day isn't a scared shitless day? I just try to put one foot in front of the other as each day goes on. Some days are better than others but for me, it doesn't go away.

  • kimber3006
    kimber3006 Member Posts: 586
    edited December 2009

    My onc (actually his PA, he's on vacation) said Zometa is definitely in my future.  She said Zometa after chemo has been "standard" with them for close to a year for anyone pre-menopausal and ER+.  She also said she hasn't heard of anyone having problems with insurance approving it (mine requires pre-authorization for it).  So YAY!

    Pure - I'm going to ask about starting it while still on chemo, but I don't know if that's an option for me since I'm HER2+ and will be getting the herceptin with my Taxol.  I have to have the herceptin and I don't want to risk anything interfering with it, but I'll check anyway.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2009

    I was given a Zometa infusion for the first time with my very first chemo treatment, then I got another one 2 weeks ago.

  • Pure
    Pure Member Posts: 1,796
    edited December 2009

    Hey Shana your the first one that told me they did it with Chemo.  Did he tell you why he was doing it then? Meaning did he mention the study where girls who did it with chemo has a 100% response to chemo.

  • krcll
    krcll Member Posts: 343
    edited December 2009

    KerryMac- I had my ovaries removed when I was 45 and will be going on AI after rads, so I would imagine I am at risk of osteoporosis (sp?). I will definitely give it a try with my onc. Thanks for the suggestion!

  • LindaLou53
    LindaLou53 Member Posts: 929
    edited December 2009

    I just bumped a couple of older threads on Zometa which have lots of helpful information for you ladies just starting out on it.  I finished 3 years on Zometa last July and will be taking it annually from now on until new research determines if there is still a benefit after more than 3 years.

  • helena67
    helena67 Member Posts: 357
    edited December 2009

    There are some new studies that came out recently that show that Zometa upfront in women on an aromatase inhbitor is better for preventing bone loss than delayed Zometa (which means not giving the drug until there is a decease in bone density). So, any of you on an aromatase inhibitor can make a good argument for Zometa that way. I will try and see if I can paste in a suitable abstract....

Categories